Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate and nonuniform CFD-based thermal behavior analysis of distribution transformers: voltage imbalance effect

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermal condition monitoring of distribution transformers (DTs) as the most important and expensive equipment of the power grid is undeniable, and by accurate investigation of its thermal status, its failure can be prevented because the insulation condition of the transformer is directly related to the hotspot temperature (HST). In this paper, accurate and nonuniform magnetic-thermal analysis of DT is proposed for precise HST prediction. In the magnetic analysis, the DT is modeled as a 2D axial symmetry, and the losses calculation of the windings has been fulfilled as a nonuniform. In the thermal analysis, the DT is modeled as 3D and nonuniform, and the conservator and core stacking, which has a considerable effect on the HST, is precisely modeled. By taking advantage of optical fiber sensors (OFSs) in the understudied 500 kVA DT, the accuracy of the proposed nonuniform 3D CFD-based modeling during the temperature rise test (TRT) is validated. The empirical evaluation results depict that the presented nonuniform CFD-based thermal analysis for HST prediction is very precise, and there is an appropriate vicinity to the experimental values. The error percentage of the proposed 3D CFD-based thermal analysis is 0.11% (0.1 °C) compared to the OFSs measurements, which demonstrates the precision and effectiveness of the presented modeling. Also, the verification of the results of nonuniform 3D CFD-based thermal analysis in top-oil temperature (TOT) and bottom-oil temperature (BOT) during the experimental TRT is fulfilled via thermography. According to the attained evaluated results, temperatures of 3D CFD-based thermal analysis and thermography in the noted two points are in good accordance with each other. In short, the error percentage is less than 0.65%, which indicates the correctness and proper performance of the proposed nonuniform 3D CFD-based modeling. Finally, the proposed nonuniform 3D model was subjected to voltage imbalance of 0.95, 1.05, 1.1, 1.15, and 1.2 of rated voltage. The results demonstrate the HST increases by − 0.4, 0.4, 0.9, 1.3, and 1.8 °C, respectively, over the original model without voltage imbalance, which represents that this issue should be considered in the design and operation of the DT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28.
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Area [\({\mathrm{m}}^{2}\)]

\({c}_{p}\) :

Specific heat capacity \([\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{ kg}\,\mathrm{ K})]\)

D :

Diameter [\(\mathrm{m}\)]

H :

Height [\(\mathrm{m}\)]

h :

Heat transfer coefficient [\(\mathrm{W}/ {(\mathrm{m}}^{2} \,\mathrm{K})\)]

HST:

Hotspot temperature [°C]

k :

Thermal conductivity \([\mathrm{W}/ (\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{ K})]\)

L :

Length [\(\mathrm{m}\)]

LCI:

Loading capacity increment (rated load + increment load) [kW]

m :

Mass [\(\mathrm{kg}\)]

Nu:

Nusselt number

P :

Losses [\(\mathrm{W}\)]

Pr :

Prandtl Number

Ra:

Rayleigh number

T :

Temperature [K], [°C]

Th:

Thickness [\(\mathrm{m}\)]

w :

Winding

W :

Width \(\mathrm{m}\)

\(\varnothing\) :

Volumetric concentrations percentage (%)

\(\alpha\) :

Thermal diffusivity \({[{{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}}^{ }]}\)

\(\beta\) :

Thermal expansion coefficient \([1/ \mathrm{K}]\)

ε :

Emissivity

\(\upsilon\) :

Kinematic viscosity \({[{{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}}^{ }]}\)

\(\rho\) :

Density \([\mathrm{kg }/{\mathrm{m}}^{3}]\)

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity \({[{\mathrm{Pa}\,\mathrm{s}}^{ }]}\)

σ :

Stefan–Boltzmann constant \([\mathrm{W}/ ({\mathrm{m}}^{2} \,{\mathrm{K}}^{4})]\)

a:

Ambient

Cons:

Conservator

cov:

Convection

Fin:

Corrugated wall

loading:

Windings + additional

no-load:

Core

o:

Oil

rad:

Radiation

s:

Surface

References

  1. IEC 60076–7 (2018) Power transformers: Part 7: Loading guide for mineral-oil-immersed power transformers

  2. IEEE C57.91 (2011) IEEE guide for loading mineral-oil-immersed transformers and step-voltage regulators

  3. Pradhan MK, Ramu TS (2004) Estimation of the hottest spot temperature (HST) in power transformers considering thermal inhomogeniety of the windings. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(4):1704–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taheri AA, Abdali A, Maboudi A, Mazlumi K (2021) Thermal behavior investigation of installation orientation and color effect on distribution transformers using E-TRM method and its effect on loading. Eng Sci Technol Int J 24(2):348–359

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taheri AA, Abdali A, Taghilou M, Haes Alhelou H, Mazlumi K (2021) Investigation of mineral oil-based nanofluids effect on oil temperature reduction and loading capacity increment of distribution transformers. Energy rep 7:4325–4334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taheri AA, Maboudi A, Khavasi E, Taghilou M (2022) Thermal analysis of disk-type transformer winding immersed in nanofluids using mixture and Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 44(5)

  7. Guimarães R, Delaiba AC, Rosentino AJP Jr, Saraiva E, de Oliveira JC (2015) Electromechanical stress in transformers caused by inrush and short circuit currents. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37(1):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das S, Paul S, Doloi B (2020) Feasibility assessment of some alternative dielectric mediums for sustainable electrical discharge machining: a review work. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 42(4)

  9. Djamali M, Tenbohlen S (2017) Hundred years of experience in the dynamic thermal modelling of power transformers. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(11):2731–2739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiravand V, Faiz J, Samimi MH, Mehrabi-Kermani M (2021) Prediction of transformer fault in cooling system using combining advanced thermal model and thermography. IET Gener Transm Distrib 15(13):1972–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taheri AA, Abdali A, Rabiee A (2019) A novel model for thermal behavior prediction of oil-immersed distribution transformers with consideration of solar radiation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 34(4):1634–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taheri AA, Abdali A, Rabiee A (2020) Indoor distribution transformers oil temperature prediction using new electro-thermal resistance model and normal cyclic overloading strategy: an experimental case study. IET Gener Transm Distrib 14(24):5792–5803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Radakovic ZR, Sorgic MS (2010) Basics of detailed thermal-hydraulic model for thermal design of oil power transformers. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25(2):790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coddé J, Van der Veken W, Baelmans M (2015) Assessment of a hydraulic network model for zig–zag cooled power transformer windings. Appl Therm Eng 80:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swift G, Molinski TS, Lehn W (2001) A fundamental approach to transformer thermal modeling. I. Theory and equivalent circuit. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 16(2):171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Susa D, Nordman H (2009) A simple model for calculating transformer hot-spot temperature. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24(3):1257–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Susa D, Lehtonen M, Nordman H (2005) Dynamic thermal modeling of distribution transformers. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(3):1919–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang WH, Wu QH, Richardson ZJ (2004) A simplified transformer thermal model based on thermal-electric analogy. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(3):1112–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Souza LM, Lemos AP, Caminhas WM, Boaventura WC (2012) Thermal modeling of power transformers using evolving fuzzy systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(5):980–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He Q, Si J, Tylavsky DJ (2000) Prediction of top-oil temperature for transformers using neural networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 15(4):1205–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen WG, Su XP, Chen X (2012) Combination of support vector regression with particle swarm optimization for hot-spot temperature prediction of oil-immersed power transformer. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 88(8):172–176

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aizpurua JI, McArthur SDJ, Stewart BG, Lambert B, Cross JG, Catterson VM (2019) Adaptive power transformer lifetime predictions through machine learning and uncertainty modeling in nuclear power plants. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(6):4726–4737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ge Q, Wang M, Jiang YH, Lu YZ, Yao G, Sun C (2021) Health management of dry-type transformer based on broad learning system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, pp 1–1

  24. Mohammed MS, Vural RA (2019) NSGA-II+FEM based loss optimization of three-phase transformer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(9):7417–7425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raeisian L, Niazmand H, Ebrahimnia-Bajestan E, Werle P (2019) Thermal management of a distribution transformer: an optimization study of the cooling system using CFD and response surface methodology. Int j electr power energy syst 104:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Deng Y et al (2019) A method for hot spot temperature prediction of a 10 kV oil-immersed transformer. IEEE Access 7:107380–107388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taghikhani JZ, Taghikhani MA, Gharehpetian GB (2022) “Comprehensive comparative analysis of Metal-Oxide nanoadditives impacts on Oil-Filled Finemet and Vitroperm alloy core transformers HST concerning nanofluid thermophysical properties accurate estimation. Energy Convers Manag 260:115594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdali A, Abedi A, Mazlumi K, Rabiee A, Guerrero JM (2022) “Precise thermo-fluid dynamics analysis of corrugated wall distribution transformer cooled with mineral oil-based nanofluids: Experimental verification. Appl Therm Eng 221:119660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdali A, Abedi A, Mazlumi K, Rabiee A, Guerrero JM (2023) Novel hotspot temperature prediction of oil-immersed distribution transformers: an experimental case study. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 70(7):7310–7322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdali A, Abedi A, Masoumkhani H, Mazlumi K, Rabiee A, Guerrero JM (2023) Magnetic-thermal analysis of distribution transformer: validation via optical fiber sensors and thermography. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 153(109346):109346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdali A, Masoumkhani H, Abedi A, Mazlumi K, Rabiee A, Guerrero JM (2023) Liquid-immersed distribution transformers’ thermal analysis with consideration of unbalanced load current effect. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., pp 1–1

  32. Kebriti R, Hossieni SMH (2022) “3D modeling of winding hot spot temperature in oil-immersed transformers. Electr Eng (Berl, Print) 104(5):3325–3338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arabul AY, KeskinArabul F, Senol I (2018) “Experimental thermal investigation of an ONAN distribution transformer by fiber optic sensors. Electric Power Syst Res 155:320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. G. A. de Aquino et al (2022) All-optical real-time monitoring of air/vacuum valves in water pipeline systems using fiber Bragg grating. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 44(1).

  35. Macarios TC, Barbosa JR (2015) “Infrared thermal imaging analysis of a 1-kW variable capacity compressor frequency inverter. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37(1):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cengel Y, Ghajar A (2019) Heat and mass transfer: fundamentals and applications, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bejan A (2013) Convection heat transfer, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Moreira TA, Colmanetti ARA, Tibiriçá CB (2019) “Heat transfer coefficient: a review of measurement techniques. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(6):264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Sankoor K, Al-Gayyim H, Al-Musaedi S, Asadi Z, Ganji DD (2021) Analytically investigating of heat transfer parameters with presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in Williamson-magnetic fluid by AGM and HPM methods. Case Stud Therm Eng 27(101236):101236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Attar MA, Roshani M, Hosseinzadeh K, Ganji DD (2022) Analytical solution of fractional differential equations by Akbari–Ganji’s method. Partial Differ Equ Appl Math 6(100450):100450

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA involved in conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, resources, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, and project administration. HM involved in software, investigation, and visualization. KM involved in validation, data curation, writing—review and editing, and supervision. AR involved in investigation, data curation, writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ali Abdali or Kazem Mazlumi.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Guilherme Ribeiro.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

In Table 13, the complete details and characteristics of the understudied 500 kVA DT are shown, including tank dimensions, conservator, core, corrugated walls, core, LV and HV windings, and LV and HV oil canals (OCs).

Table 13 Specifications of geometrical dimensions of studied DT

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdali, A., Maosumkhani, H., Mazlumi, K. et al. Accurate and nonuniform CFD-based thermal behavior analysis of distribution transformers: voltage imbalance effect. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 613 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04516-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04516-z

Keywords

Navigation