Abstract
The effect of suction and blowing on the local stability of the flat-plate boundary layer is presented using non-normal theory. The 3D governing stability equations are derived using standard procedure in the form of normal velocity and vorticity. The governing stability equations are discretized using the Chebyshev spectral collocation method. The discretized governing equations with grid stretching form an eigenvalue problem, and it is solved using the QZ algorithm with an appropriate boundary conditions. The transient energy growth is computed by the linear superposition of the non-orthogonal eigenvectors. The energy curve is obtained by singular value decomposition (SVD) of the matrix exponential. The receptivity analysis is also considered based on the input–output framework to quantify a fluid system’s response with external forcing frequencies. The optimal fluid system response corresponding to the optimal initial condition is computed for non-modal and receptivity analysis. The flow is modally stable for suction even at a higher Reynolds number \((\hbox {Re}_{\delta ^*})\), while a reverse trend is observed for blowing. In a case of suction, peak response in energy of the fluid system is detected at resonant frequency \(\omega = 0.14\) and 0.102 for \(\alpha = 0.15\), \(\beta = 1\) and \(\alpha = 0\), \(\beta = 1\), respectively. Similarly, for blowing, maximum flow response is detected at \(\omega = 0.1\) and 0.102 for \(\alpha = 0.15\), \(\beta = 1\) and \(\alpha = 0\), \(\beta = 1\). The temporal growth rate \(\omega _i\), energy growth, and resolvent norm are increased with increasing the Reynolds number or blowing intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hervey WD (1987) Boundary-layer control for drag reduction report. NASA Langley Res Center Aerosp 96(6):1839–1863
Schrauf G (2005) Status and perspectives of laminar flow. Aeronaut J 109(1102):639–644
Libby PA, Laufman L, Harrington RP (1952) An experimental investigation of the laminar boundary layer on a porous flat plate. J. Aeronaut Sci 2:127–135
Reynolds GA, Saric WS (1986) Experiments on the stability of the flat-plate boundary layer with suction. J AIAA 24:202–207
Saric W, Reed L (1986) Effect of suction and weak mass Injection on boundary-layer transition. J AIAA 3:383–389
Huang Z, Wu X (2016) The effect of local steady suction on the stability and transition of boundary layer on a flat-plate, J. AIAA, 1–12
Schmidt BE, Bitter NP, Hornung HG, Shepherd JE (2016) Injection into supersonic boundary layers. J AIAA 51(1):161–173
Bhoraniya R, Narayanan V (2021) Global stability analysis of the spatially developing boundary layer: Effect of wall suction and injection. In: Springer lecture notes in mechanical engineering, pp 509–517
Palanichamy P (2017) Heat and Mass transfer on flat plate with suction and injection. Global J Math Sci Theory Practical 9(3):367–386
Aydin O, Kaya A (2005) Laminar boundary layer flow over a horizontal permeable flat plate. App Math Comput 161:229–240
Sadri S, Babealahi M (2013) Analysis of a laminar boundary layer flow over a flat-plate with injection or suction. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 54(1):59–67
Wang S, Lei J, Zhen H, Lee C (2015) Numerical investigation of wall cooling and suction effects on supersonic boundary layer transition using large eddy simulation. Adv Mech Eng 7(2):493194
Schmid Peter J, Luca B (2014) Analysis of fluid systems: stability, receptivity, sensitivity: lecture notes from the FLOW-NORDITA summer school on advanced instability methods for complex flows. Appl Mech Rev 66(2):024803
Reddy SC, Henningson DS (1993) Energy growth in viscous channel flows. J Fluid Mech 252:209–238
Peter J (2007) Schmid, nonmodal satbility theory. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 39:129–162
Zuccher S, Luchini P, Bottaro A (2004) Algebraic growth in a Blasius boundary layer: optimal and robust control by mean suction in the non-linear region. J Fluid Mech 513:135–160
Fransson JH, Corbett P (2003) Optimal linear growth in the asymptotic suction boundary layer. Eur J Mech B Fluids 22(3):259–270
Byström MG, Levin O, Henningson DS (2007) Optimal disturbances in suction boundary layers. Eur J Fluid Mech B Fluids 26:330–343
Kurian T, Fransson Jens HM (2011) Transient growth in the asymptotic suction boundary layer. Exp Fluids 51:771–784
Butler KM, Farrell BF (1992) Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 4(8):1637–1650
Hanifi A, Schmid PJ, Henningson DS (1995) Transient growth in compressible boundary layer. Phys Fluids A 8(3):826–836
Hamada GYR, Wolf WR, Pitz DB, Alves LSB (2023) Stability and receptivity analysis of mixed convection in unsteady stratified horizontal boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 961(A10):1–18
Greenshields, Christopher OpenFOAM v10 User Guide, The OpenFOAM Foundation. https://doc.cfd.direct/openfoam/user-guide-v10, London, UK
Roache P (1994) A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng 116(3):405–413
Bhoraniya R, Narayanan V (2019) Global stability analysis of axisymmetric boundary layer: effect of axisymmetric forebody shapes. Pramana J Phys D 93(6):1–11
Sameen A, Govindarajan R (2007) The effect of wall heating on instability of channel flow. J Fluid Mech 577:417–442
Taira K, Brunton SL, Dawson STM, Rowley CW, Colonius T, McKeon BJ, Schmidt OT, Gordeyev S, Theofilis V, Ukeiley LS (2017) Modal analysis of fluid flows: an overview. J AIAA 55(12):4013–4041
Schmid PJ, Henningson DS (2001) Stability and transition in shear flows. Springer, New York
Nogueira PAS, Cavalieri AVG, Hanifi A, Henningson DS (2020) Resolvent analysis in unbounded flows: role of free-stream modes. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 34:163–176
Jovanovic MR, Bamieh B (2005) Component wise energy amplification in channel flows. J Fluid Mech 534:145–183
Hwang Y, Cossu C (2010) Linear non-normal energy amplification of harmonic and stochastic forming in the turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech 664:51–73
Orr WMF (1907) The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part II: a viscous liquid. Proc R Irish Acad Sect A Math Phys Sci 27:69–138
Kant R, Sharma V, Bhoraniya R, Narayanan V (2022) Receptivity and sensitivity analysis of Jeffery-Hamel flow. Sadhana Indian Acad Sci 123(4):2333–2335
Drazin PG, Reid WH (1981) Hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sundaram P, Suman V, Sengupta A, Sengupta T (2020) Effects of free stream excitation on the boundary layer over a semi-infinite flat plate. Phys Fluids 32(094110):1–19
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) Government of India for providing financial support for the research (CRC/2020/005698). We also acknowledge that we modified the existing source code of Luca Brandt [28] as per our problem and used it for stability and receptivity analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Appendix A: Spatial grid convergence analysis
The spatial grid convergence study is a numerical technique used to check the precision and accuracy of the CFD simulation with regard to the grid resolution. In other words, it is a technique used to determine whether the simulation result is trustworthy and independent of the grid size or not. The fundamental principle of the spatial grid convergence analysis is to run the same simulation at several grid resolutions and compare the outcomes. The grid is refined until the changes in the output parameters (i.e. velocity and pressure) become negligible, indicating that the solution has converged. Thus, the grid resolution \(2001\times {251}\) is enough for all base flow configurations with relative errors of less than \(0.1\%\) (see Tables 1, 3, and 4).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thummar, M., Bhoraniya, R., Kant, R. et al. Stability and receptivity analysis of flat-plate boundary layer with suction and blowing. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 415 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04328-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04328-1