Abstract
Speed flame propagation in Otto cycle engines is one of the principal characteristics of fuel and is fundamental in defining the ignition advance. The greater the propagation speed the less the negative work required to compress the mixture before the piston reaches the top dead center and the higher the cycle’s efficiency. This paper presents experimental results of time measurements of the fuel’s ignition and the maximum pressure rating in the combustion chamber of a Cooperative Fuel Research engine specially instrumented. The combustion duration measurements of oxygenated and non-oxygenated fuels were taken as a function of the compression ratio (8:1, 10:1 and 12:1) and lambda (λ). The speed flame propagation in the combustion chamber is significantly changed with the change of the lambda different compression ratios. The VNG has a maximum in the speed flame propagation in the stoichiometric region (λ = 1.0) in all compression rates in this study. Similar behavior occurs with ethanol and gasohol, but only in compression ratio 12:1. Ethanol and gasohol have the higher rate of flame propagation for all compression ratios measured as compared to the non-oxygenated (isooctane) and oxygenated fuels (MTBE and TAEE).
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
In conventional spark-ignition engines, the fuel and air pass through intake manifold into the cylinder’s, where they are mixed with the residual gas and then compressed. Under normal operating conditions, combustion is triggered by an electric discharge during compression. The flame front propagates through the air–fuel mixture until it reaches the walls of the combustion chamber, where it is extinguished. At the onset of combustion caused by the spark from the spark-plug, the speed flame propagation is small and is accompanied by a slight increase in pressure (delay time) due to combustion. The flame front increases progressively and propagates through the combustion chamber until the pressure inside the cylinder reaches its maximum after the top dead center (TDC).
The combustion process is divided into four distinct phases: ignition, development, propagation and end of flame. The maximum combustion pressure must occur at a point (15° after TDC) that provides the maximum power or maximum torque. Combustion starts immediately after spark ignition, but, because the initial stages are quite slow, the ignition delay period is used to describe the first stage. Second Ishii et al. [1] it is difficult precisely determine the end of combustion because of burning late phenomenon [2]. For these reasons, ignition delay and end of combustion are usually defined arbitrarily. Ignition delay can, for example, be considered the time period in which the ratio of burned gas reaches a value of 5 [3] or 10 % [4]; [5] and end of combustion as the time period in which this ratio reaches the value of 85 [4, 6] or 90 % [3]. If the onset of combustion advances progressively before the TDC, the negative work of compression increases. If ignition is delayed, the pressure peak occurs later and its value is reduced. The appropriate time for the onset of the combustion process depends on the speed flame propagation and on the geometric configuration of the combustion chamber. These depend on the engine design, the operating conditions and the properties of the fuel–air mixture [7–9, 4].
Complete combustion is described as that in which the flame front moves through the combustion chamber until the air–fuel mixture is completely consumed and transformed into carbon dioxide and water. During the combustion process, carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxide are present due to kinetic effects. Factors such as the fuel’s composition, air–fuel ratio, geometric details, temperature, pressure, compression ratio and deposits in the chamber determine the physical and chemical characteristics of the combustion process [10–13]. The reactions that occur during the combustion process are determined by serial and parallel mechanisms whose stages initiate in response to the formation of radicals and reactions due to equilibrium displacement. In many cases, due to the high release of energy and the resulting increase in temperature, the speed of the reaction increases exponentially, leading to possible detonation or knocking [4]. Knocking depends on the temperature, the system’s pressure, and the fuel’s physicochemical characteristics [9]. At very low pressures, the system is outside the knock region and the mixture reacts mildly [4, 14–16].
In engines with optimal design, the turbulence inside the combustion chamber is proportional to the engine’s revolution and increases the speed flame propagation [4, 17]. High revolution requires a great advance in the ignition, because the spark time for a given mass of fuel and air inside the cylinder is set to give the maximum brake torque for an operating condition [4]. The engine’s geometric parameters affect the turbulence and surface area of the flame front. Aerodynamic details of the intake system contribute to the creation of an oriented gas flow, changing the flame’s surface area and path. The shape of the combustion chamber also affects other criteria such as volumetric efficiency, knocking trend and pollutant emissions. Combustion speed measurements in a laminar system using pure hydrocarbons indicated that, for the same air–fuel ratio, the speed flame varies as a function of the fuel’s chemical structure [9, 18, 19].
Due to the constant increase in crude oil-derived liquid fuel prices and the growing restrictions with respect to environmental contamination, interest has focused increasingly on alternative fuels [20–27]. These fuels can be classified as synthetic gasoline, gasoline with oxygenated compound additives such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tert-amyl-ethyl-ether (TAEE) [28, 29]. Studies of the speed flame propagation of new oxygenated fuels such as TAEE are important to determine the best ignition advance to reach the maximum brake torque. This paper analyzes the variation in burning speed of a Brazilian commercial gasoline (gasohol), isooctane, MTBE, TAEE, ethanol and vehicular natural gas (VNG) at different compression ratios and air–fuel ratios. Compression ratios used in this study were 8:1, 10:1, and 12:1 for the liquid fuels and 14:1 for VNG. The air–fuel ratios used for each compression ratio were 0.8 and 0.9 (rich mixture), 1.0 (stoichiometric), and 1.1 and 1.2 (lean conditions).
2 Materials and methods
Six different fuels were used in this study: a Brazilian commercial gasoline (gasohol), isooctane 99 %, MTBE 99 %, TAEE 99 %, ethanol 99.3 % and VNG. The VNG contained 89 % methane, 7 % ethane and 2 % propane. Table 1 lists the physicochemical characteristics of the liquid fuels used here.
According to table, ethanol shows a higher antiknock index (AKI) than the ramified ethers (TAEE and MTBE) and isooctane. The antiknocking strength is an extremely important property of fuel for Otto cycle engines, since it should not auto ignition by compression, but by sparking. Combustibles having a high octane index produce a milder and more effective combustion. The octane number is simply a numerical description of its resistance to auto ignition without entering into a knocking process (spontaneous burning of the mixture). The average of the Motor Octane Number (MON) (ASTM D 2700-97) [30] and Research Octane Number (RON) (ASTM D 2699-97) [31] is known as the Antiknock, AKI = [(MON + RON)/2].
Volatility can be understood as the ease with which fuel evaporates. This property is extremely important since the combustion process takes in a gaseous environment, i.e., inside the engine, where the fuel must first vaporize so that combustion can occur. The volatility is determined based on the properties of Reid vapor pressure and distillation curve.
Fuels with high vapor pressure present high rate emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, there is a minimum required for starting at low temperatures. Fuels with low vapor pressures and high enthalpy of vaporization have trouble in completing vaporization in the intake manifold, making the combustion process and reducing engine performance. The higher the enthalpy of vaporization the smaller is the resulting temperature in the intake manifold, increasing the volumetric efficiency of the plunger. There is currently a strong trend in reducing the volatility of parameters, among these the vapor pressure in gasoline [32–35]. The behavior of the vehicle with respect to the volatility of gasoline at low temperatures can cause incomplete fuel vaporization and in an uncontrolled air/fuel ratio. Considerable progress has occurred in this area, such as replacing the carburetor injection system multipoint [9]. The volatility parameters that have an effect on performance at low temperature have been determined by testing vehicles at high speeds. At high temperatures, the most common phenomena affecting fuel systems in vehicles are mainly steam “lock” and percolation. Vapor “lock” is the occurrence of a stock vaporized fuel from the fuel tank and the carburetor or fuel injection system. Percolation is the result of an uncontrolled vaporization of fuel, which can happen when the vehicle stops after a long period at high operating temperatures. The enthalpy of vaporization has a strong influence on engine power because the higher the value, the greater the amount of heat removed from the intake manifold and thereby lower the temperature of the mixture allowed. This lowering of the temperature in the combustion chamber increases the density of the air/fuel mixture and with it, the mass of fuel to be oxidized is increased, favoring an increase of engine power. In general, the vapor pressure of a volatile liquid is the pressure exerted by the vapors of the same confined space (the force per unit area exerted on the liquid surface). For pure hydrocarbon, steam pressure depends on the temperature and enthalpy of vaporization. For gasoline, which are mixtures of hydrocarbons, depends on the relative concentrations and the interaction of the constituents of the mixture [35].
Figure 1 shows the profile gasohol. The distillation curve gives an idea of the volatility of gasoline throughout the range of distillation. The distillation curve can, in simple terms, be represented by three points: T10, T50 and T90, which represent the temperatures at which 10, 50 and 90 % vaporization of de gasoline’s initial volume occurs (ASTM D-86) [36–37]. These temperatures characterize the volatility of the fuel’s light, medium and heavy fractions. These fractions, in turn, affect the engine’s different operating regimes. It should also be remembered that the control of one or more properties of gasoline results in proper combustion in car engines, and emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbons (HCs) may be reduced. The ideal fuel for reducing contaminants must have a Reid vapor pressure not greater than 51.68 kPa, essentially zero olefins in its composition and temperature for the 50 % distillation point (ASTM D-86) [36] greater than 82 °C but <96.1 °C. The profile abnormal distillation gasohol is due to azeotrope formed by ethanol and hydrocarbons, wherein the composition volumetric gasohol consisted of 13 % normal paraffins, 23 % isoparaffins, 13 % naphthenes, 11 % olefins, 9 % aromatics and ethanol 25 %.
When considering the flow of the fuel through a carburetor jet, the coefficient of discharge for normal hydrocarbon fuels is virtually constant above a critical value of the Reynolds number. Under these conditions, the mass flow is a function of the density of the fuel so that increases mass flow and lowers the air–fuel ratio of the mixture. This is partly offset by the lower level in the float chamber that occurs with heavier fuels. There is such compensating factor with injection vehicles where the mass of fuel injected will depend directly on the density of the fuel. Variations in density between commercial fuels will therefore influence the air/fuel ratio unless there is an engine management system to hold it at the optimum level. Most gasolines have a density between about 0.72 and 0.78. The density will depend on the types of components used in blending the gasoline, aromatics compounds have the highest density, with the olefins being intermediate and the paraffins having the lowest density, when compounds having the same number of carbon atoms are compared. Of the pure compounds used in this study, ethanol has the highest density value. The tests to measure the speed flame propagation were performed with a CFR engine (a Cooperative Fuel Research engine (year 1951) manufactured by the Waukesha Engine Division) modified with an Otto cycle cylinder head being specially instrumented with sensors and temperature indicators, D-1 Knock sensor, Lambda probe, acquisition board, as shown in Fig. 2 a schematic diagram of the system with the instrumentation used in the tests. The VNG was stored in a high-pressure cylinder equipped with a pressure control valve and the dosing was done with a mixer mounted on the intake manifold of the CFR engine. The engine’s original system, which was used for the other fuels, consisted of a triple barrel carburetor with adjustable height for adjustment of the air–fuel ratio.
The speed flame was obtained using a D-1 knock sensor (a standard component of the CFR engine). The D-1 sensor has a stainless steel diaphragm, which induces a voltage in the sensor through the action of pressure. The induced voltage signal is proportional to the pressure rate in the combustion chamber. In this work, speed flame propagation was defined as the angle between the spark ignition and the maximum pressure rate inside the combustion chamber divided by time. According Ishii et al. [1], the angle considered in flame propagation includes the ignition delay [4] and the maximum pressure rate. The ignition advance was set at 10° to compare the speed flame propagation of the fuels under study. The ignition was determined from the signal voltage of the electronic ignition control system. The piston’s position was determined by a 600 mm diameter toothed wheel with 304 straight teeth and one slanted in the position relative to the top dead center with the aid of an inductive sensor.
The parameter (λ) lambda expresses a relationship between the mass of air and fuel admitted to in a given instant by the engine, compared to the masses of air and fuel chemically balanced. It is called “rich mixture” (λ < 1) when there is a lack of oxygen for the complete oxidation of all the reagent available in the combustion chamber and is called “lean” (λ > 1) when there is excess oxygen to the oxidation of all the available reagent into the combustion chamber. The air–fuel ratio was adjusted using a Bosch model LSU4 broadband lambda probe with a MoTec PLM converter. The recorded pressure rate, position and ignition sensor signals were obtained using a CIO EXP GP and CIO DAS 16/330 data acquisition system at a sampling rate of 55 kHz.
The burning time in the combustion chamber was defined as the interval between ignition and the maximum pressure variation inside the combustion chamber. The dimension of combustion duration was expressed as s−1, and the tests were performed at a fixed revolution of 600 rpm (10 Hz). The “burn time” value of each fuel under the different conditions analyzed here is the mean value of 45 consecutive cycles after complete stabilization of the operational conditions. After all the operational conditions in the tests were stabilized, a comparison was made of the results. Figure 3 depicts the characteristic profiles of the pressure rate, position and ignition sensors signals recorded for the engine test, using gasohol as fuel and a compression ratio of 8:1.
3 Results and discussion
The combustion speed flame is an important factor to adjust the best ignition advance. The cylinder’s dimension and the compression ratio can also be adjusted to achieve maximum torque as a function of revolution and air–fuel ratio.
The results presented in Table 1 indicate that the oxygenated compounds showed the highest densities and antiknock index. The oxygenated compound TAEE presented the lowest vapor pressure.
Figure 4 shows the results of the speed flame propagation of fuels used in this study in function of the lambda in different compression ratios (8:1, 10:1 and 12:1).
It is observed that the speed flame propagation in the combustion chamber is significantly changed with the change of the lambda to different compression rates. The VNG has a maximum in speed flame propagation in the region stoichiometric (λ = 1.0) in all compression rates in this study. Similar behavior occurs with ethanol and gasohol, but only in compression ratio 12:1.
Evaluating rich region (λ = 0.8 and 0.9) shows that the fuel reached the lowest flame propagation rate is VNG, while the lean region (λ = 1.1 and 1.2) the TAEE begins to show a slower flame propagation in all compression ratios studied. MTBE presents a behavior similar to TAEE to the lean region can be explained of the oxygenated fuel TAEE, whose molecular structure is similar to that of MTBE but with a higher molecular weight.
Ethanol and gasohol have the higher flame propagation rate for all compression ratios measured as compared to the non-oxygenated (Isooctane) and oxygenated fuels (MTBE and TAEE). Ethanol has a vapor pressure of about 16 kPa, according to Table 1, however, when mixed with gasoline, form azeotropes with the hydrocarbons of minimum, which have a boiling point lower than that of two separate components. This effect results in an increase of the vapor pressure of the mixture.
Gasohol is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and ethanol and it is impossible to attribute the increase or decrease to any specific compound. However, it is known that linear chain compounds and olefins have a higher combustion speed than branched and saturated compounds. However, oxygenated compounds such as MTBE and TAEE presented lower speed flame propagation than gasoline, although ethanol showed values close to that of Brazilian commercial fuel, whose composition contains about 25 % v/v of ethanol.
Higher burning speed requires smaller advancements. Fuels with low flame speed need a higher ignition advance to maximize the torque. For VNG and gasohol, when used compression ratio 12, the highest combustion speed occurs in the stoichiometric mixture condition, while the burning speed of oxygenated fuels is higher when the mixture is rich (λ = 0.8–0.9) and diminishes when the mixture is lean (λ = 1.1–1.2), showing the profile for all compression ratio used in this study. For air–fuel ratios above the stoichiometric ratio (lean mixture), the combustion process becomes unstable, leading to failures in the combustion cycle.
It should be noted that, as the compression ratio increases, so does the speed flame propagation, due to the higher diffusion of mass and energy when density is high [38–39].
Note that among the rich mixtures (λ = 0.8), fuels such as ethers (MTBE and TAEE), gasohol and isooctane present similar speed flame propagation. Among the oxygenated compounds, ethanol presents the highest speed flame propagation and among the hydrocarbons, VNG shows the lowest flame speed with rich mixtures, which increases with lean mixtures. Methane has high activation energy in the oxidation process, which may explain the lower speed flame propagation observed at air–fuel ratios below the stoichiometric condition when the combustion temperature is low. The best ignition advance for VNG should be higher than that of gasohol and oxygenated fuels to achieve maximum torque. Ethanol has higher speed flame propagation, while the high flame speed of gasohol can be attributed of the ethanol in its formulation. As mentioned by Lawes et al. [40], the speed flame propagation of ethanol can be explained by the formation of intermediate species such as acetaldehyde and formaldehyde, whose high reactivity favors the oxidation process [41–42].
The speed flame propagation of all the fuels analyzed, except for VNG, here increases when the air–fuel ratio is rich and close to the stoichiometric ratio. This behavior can be explained by the fact that the combustion temperature increases when it approaches the stoichiometric ratio. When the air–fuel ratio is above the stoichiometric ratio (lean mixture), the speed flame propagation diminishes in response to the decrease in combustion temperature caused by excess air.
4 Conclusions
The proper determination of the compression ratio and ignition advance for the optimal performance of engines is directly related with the type of fuel employed. Fuels with branched-chain and ether compounds show low speed flame propagation. The speed flame propagation of ethanol is higher than that of branched-chain and ether compounds. The use of compression ratio 12:1 increases the combustion speed of isooctane, VNG, TAEE, ethanol and gasohol as compared with compression ratios 8:1 and 10:1. The higher the compression ratio the greater is the speed flame propagation. To achieve high thermodynamic and mechanical performance, internal combustion engines with spark ignition should operate with high compression rates, and to minimize the negative work of compression, the ignition advance should be reduced to obtain the maximum brake torque. The combustion speed diminishes at air–fuel ratios above the stoichiometric ratio. The VNG has a maximum in the speed flame propagation in the stoichiometric region (λ = 1.0) in all compression rates in this study. Similar behavior occurs with ethanol and gasohol, but only in compression ratio 12:1. Ethanol and gasohol have the higher rate of flame propagation for all compression ratios measured as compared to the non-oxygenated fuels (isooctane) and oxygenated (MTBE, and TAEE)fuels with high octane ratings can be used in engines with high compression ratios.
Abbreviations
- AKI:
-
Antiknock Index ([(MON + RON)/2])
- Hz:
-
Hertz frequency unit is derived from the International System (IS) for frequency, which is expressed in terms of cycles per second
- Kpa:
-
103 Pa (Pascal) unidade padrão Multiple of the standard unit of pressure and tension of the International System (IS)
- λ :
-
lambda expresses a relationship between the mass of air and fuel admitted to in a given instant by the engine, compared to the masses of air and fuel chemically balanced
References
Ishii K, Sasaki T, Urata Y,Yoshida K, Ohno T (1997) “Investigation of Cyclic Variation of IMEP Under Lean Burn Operation in Spark-Ignition Engine”, SAE Tech Paper 972830
Zervas E (2005) Comparative study of some experimental methods to characterize the combustion process in a SI engine. Energy 30:1803–1816
Varaprasada R, Nehru KVK, Ganesan V (1993) Evaluation of S. I. Engine Combustion Parameters: a New Approach. Combust Sci Tech 89:47–55
Heywood JB (1988) Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, USA
Grupta M, Bell SR, Tilmlman STJ (1996) An investigation of lean combustion in a natural gas-fueled spark ignited engine. Energy Res Technol 118:145–168
Bell SR, Grupta M (1996) Extension of the lean operating limit for natural gas fueling of a SI engine using hydrogen blending. Combust Sci Technol 123:23–48
Chollet HM (1996) O Motor e seus acessórios. Hemus Editora Ltda, São Paulo
Giacosa D (1986) Motores Endotérmicos. Editora Científico-Médico, Barcelona
Guibet J, Faure-Birchem E (1999) Fuels and Engines. Editions Technip, Paris
Ceviz MA, Kaymaz I (2005) Temperature and air–fuel ratio dependent specific heat ratio functions for lean burned and unburned mixture. Energy Convers Manage 46:2387–2404
Moses E, Yarin AL, Bar-Yoseph P (1995) On knocking prediction in spark ignition engines. Combust Flame 101:239–261
Sayin C, Kilicaslan I, Canakci M, Ozsezen N (2005) An experimental study of the effect of octane number higher than engine requirement on the engine performance and emissions. Appl Therm Eng 25:1315–1324
Zervas E, Montagne X, Lahaye J (2004) Influence of fuel and air/fuel equivalence ratio on the emission of hydrocarbons from a SI engine. 1. Experimental findings. Fuel 83:2301–2311
Farrel JT, Johnston RJ, Androulakis P (2004) “Molecular structure effects on laminar burning velocities at elevated temperature and pressure”, SAE Paper 2004-01-2936
Selamet EE, Selamet A, Novak JM (2004) Predicting chemical species in spark-ignition engines. Energy 29:449–465
Wendeker M, Czarnigowski J, Litak G, Szabelski K (2003) Chaotic combustion in spark ignition engines. Chaos Solitons Fractals 18:803–806
Lee KH, Lee CS (2002) Analysis of combustion and flame propagation characteristics of LPG and gasoline fuels by Laser Deflection Method. KSME Intern J 16:935–941
Hurn RW, Marshall WF, Allsup JR (1991) SAE PT-91/38, ISBN 1–56091-141-7, 1991
Owen K, Coley T (1995) Automotive Fuels Reference Book, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc, 2ª Edition, USA
MacLean HL, Lave LB (2003) Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 29:1–69
Menezes EW, Silva R, Cataluña R, Ortega RJC (2006) Effect of ethers and ether/ethanol additives on the physicochemicalproperties of diesel fuel and on engine tests. Fuel 85:815–822
Pascoli SD, Femia A, Luzzati T (2001) Natural gas cars and the environment. A (relatively) ‘Clean’ and cheap fuel looking for users. Ecol Econ 38:179–189
Poulopoulos SG, Sâmaras DP, Philippopoulos CJ (2001) Regulated and unregulated emissions from an internal combustion engine operating on ethanol-containing fuels. Atm Environ 35:4399–4406
Poulopoulos SG, Philippopoulos CJ (2004) MTBE, methane, ethylene and regulated exhaust emissions from vehicles with deactivated catalytic converters”. Atm Environ 38:4495–4500
Rampe T, Heinzel A, Vogel B (2000) Hydrogen generation from biogenic and fossil fuels by autothermal reforming. J Power Sources 86:536–541
Shelef M, McCabe RW (2000) Twenty-five years after introduction of automotive catalysts: what next? Catal Today 62:35–50
Silva R, Veses RC, Menezes EW, Samios D, Piatnicki CMS (2005) Effect of additives on the antiknock properties and Reid vapor pressure of gasoline. Fuel 84:951–959
Ortega RJC (2006) TAEE (Terc-amil etil éter) como aditivo para Gasolinas Automotivas, Síntese, Purificação e Aplicação, Dissertação Mestrado. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
Piel WJ (1994) Diversify future fuel needs with ethers. Fuel Reformul 4:28–33
American Society for Testing and Materials. D 2700-97. Standard test method for motor octane of spark-ignition engine fuel. West Conshohocken, PA. USA; 1998
American Society for Testing and Materials. D 2699-97. Standard test method for research octane of spark-ignition engine fuel. West Conshohocken, PA. USA; 1998
Reuter RM, Benson JD, Burns VR, Gorse RA, Hochheauser AM, Koehl WJ, Painter LJ, Rippon BH, Rutherford JA (1992) SAE Technical Paper 92036, 391
Rippon BH, Rutherford JA (1992) Effects of Oxygenated Fuels and RVP on Automotive Emissions – The Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program SAE Technical Paper 920326
Lappas AA, Iatridis DK, Vasalos IA (1999) Production of reformulated gasoline in the FCC unit. Effect of feedstock type on gasoline composition. Catal Today 50:73–85
Leong ST, Muttamara S, Laortanakul P (2002) Applicability of gasoline containing ethanol as Thailand’s alternative fuel to curb toxic VOC pollutants from automobile emission. Atmos Environ 3495–3503
American Society for Testing and Materials. D 86-1996. Standard test method for distillation of petroleum products. West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 1998
Cataluña R, Silva R (2006) Desenvolvimento de um equipamento para avaliação do efeito do etanol na pressão de vapor e entalpia de vaporização em gasolinas automotivas. Quim Nova 29:580–585
Bradley D, Hicks RA, Lawes M, Sheppard CGW, Woolley R (1998) The measurement of laminar burning velocities and Markstein numbers for Iso-octane–Air and Iso-octane–n-Heptane–Air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures in an explosion bomb. Combust Flame 115:126–144
Jessup PJ, Croudace MC (2000) Gasoline fuel. US Pat 6(030):521
Lawes M, Ormsby MP, Sheppard CGW, Woolley R (2005) Variation of turbulent burning rate of methane, methanol, and iso-octane air mixtures with equivalence ratio at elevated pressure. Combust Sci Tech 177:1273–1289
Gulder OI (1984) Burning velocities of ethanol-isooctane blends. Combust Flame 56:261–268
Salooja KC (1965) The role of aldehydes in combustion: studies of the combustion characteristics of aldehydes and of their influence on hydrocarbon combustion processes. Combust Flame 9:373–382
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Demetrio Neto.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Mello, P., Wildner, F., de Andrade, G.S. et al. Combustion time of the oxygenated and non-oxygenated fuels in an Otto cycle engine. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 36, 403–410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0094-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0094-y