Skip to main content
Log in

Combined effects of micropolarity and surface roughness on the hydrodynamic lubrication of slider bearings

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, theoretical analysis of combined effects of micropolarity and surface roughness on the performance characteristics of hydrodynamic lubrication of slider bearings with various film shapes such as plane slider bearing, exponential slider bearing, secant-shaped slider bearing and hyperbolic slider bearing is presented. A stochastic random variable with non-zero mean, variance and skewness is assumed to mathematically model the surface roughness of the slider bearing. The Eringen’s (J Math Mech 16:1–18, 1) micropolar fluid is used to characterize the rheological behavior of the lubricant with polymer additives. The averaged modified Reynolds equation is derived and the closed form of expressions for the bearing characteristics such as load carrying capacity, frictional force, center of pressure are obtained. Numerical results are compared for various film shapes under consideration, the negatively skewed surface roughness increases the load carrying capacity, frictional force and temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( C_{\text{f}} \) :

Coefficient of friction

C :

Maximum deviation from the mean film thickness

\( F^{*} \) :

Frictional force per unit width on the surface \( y = 0 \)

\( F \) :

Dimensionless frictional force corresponding to \( \left( { = \frac{{F^{*} s_{h} }}{{\mu UL_{1} }}} \right) \)

\( H \) :

Film thickness [given is Eq. (1)]

\( h(x) \) :

Mean film thickness

\( h_{1} \) :

Inlet film thickness

\( H_{0} \) :

Outlet film thickness

\( \bar{h} \) :

Dimensionless film thickness \( \left(= h /{s_h}\right)\)

\( \bar{h}_{\text{m}} \) :

Is the non-dimensional film thickness when P is maximum

\( h_{\text{s}} \) :

Stochastic film thickness measured from the mean levels of the bearing

\( l \) :

Characteristic length of micropolar fluid \( \left(= ({\gamma/{4\mu })}^{1/2}\right) \)

\( L \) :

Length ratio \( \left(= s_h/l\right) \)

\( N \) :

Coupling number \( \left(= {(\chi/2\mu + \chi)}^1/2\right) \)

\( p \) :

Lubricant film pressure

\( \bar{p} \) :

Expected value of the lubricant film pressure \( \left( { = E(p)} \right) \)

\( P \) :

Dimensionless film pressure \( \left( { = \frac{{\bar{p}s_{h}^{2} }}{{\mu UL_{1} }}} \right) \)

\( W \) :

Non-dimensional load carrying capacity per unit width \( \left( { = \frac{{ws_{h}^{2} }}{{\mu UL_{1}^{2} }}} \right) \)

\( x,y \) :

Cartesian coordinates

X :

Dimensionless form of x \( = x/L_1 \)

\( \alpha^{*} \) :

Mean of the stochastic film thickness

\( \sigma^{*} \) :

Standard deviation of the film thickness

\( \varepsilon^{*} \) :

Measure of symmetry of the stochastic random variable

\( \alpha \) :

Non-dimensional form of \( \alpha^{*} \) \( (= \alpha^*/s_h) \)

\( \varepsilon \) :

Non-dimensional form of \( \varepsilon^{*} \) \( (= \varepsilon^*/s_h^3) \)

\( \sigma \) :

Non-dimensional form of \( \sigma^{*} \) \( (= \sigma^*/s_h^2) \)

\( \gamma ,\,\chi \) :

Viscosity coefficients for micropolar fluids

\( \mu \) :

Classical viscosity coefficient

References

  1. Eringen AC (1966) Theory of micropolar fluids. J Math Mech 16:1–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Eringen AC (1964) Simple microfluids. Int J Eng Sci 2:205–217

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen SJ, Kline KA (1971) Lubrication theory for micropolar fluids. J Appl Mech 38:646–650

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Prakash J, Sinha P (1975) Lubrication theory for micropolar fluids and its application to journal bearings. Int J Eng Sci 13:217–232

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramanaiah G, Dubey JN (1977) Optimum slider profile of a slider bearing lubricated with a micropolar fluid. Wear 42:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang TW (1988) Analysis of finite width journal bearing with micropolar fluids. Wear 123:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bessonov NM (1994) A new generalization of the Reynolds equation for a micropolar fluid and its application to bearing theory. Tribol Int 27(1):105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das S, Guha SK, Chattopadhyay AK (2001) On the conical whirl instability of hydrodynamic journal bearings lubricated with micropolar fluids. Proc IMechE Part-J J Eng Tribol 215:431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verma Suresh, Kumar Vijay, Gupta KD (2012) Performance analysis of flexible multirecess hydrostatic journal bearing operating with micropolar lubricant. Lubr Sci 24(6):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walicka A, Walicki E (2004) Pressure distribution in a curvilinear hydrostatic bearing lubricated by a micropolar fluid in the presence of a cross magnetic field. Lubr Sci 17(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsharkawy Abdallah A, Al-Fadhalah Khaled J (2011) Squeeze film characteristics between a sphere and a rough porous flat plate with micropolar fluids. Lubr Sci 23(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron A (1966) The principles of lubrication theory. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pinkus O, Sternlicht B (1981) Theory of hydrodynamic lubrication. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamrock BJ (1994) Fundamentals of fluid film thickness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Majumdar BC (1999) Introduction to tribology of bearings. Wheeler Publishing, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andharia PI, Gupta JL, Deheri GM (2001) Effect of surface roughness on hydrodynamic lubrication of slider bearings. Tribol Trans 44(2):291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Siddangouda A (2012) Surface roughness effects in porous inclined stepped composite bearings lubricated with micropolar fluid. Lubr Sci 24(8):339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naduvinamani NB, Kashinath B (2006) Surface roughness effects on curved pivoted slider bearings with couple stress fluids. Lubr Sci 18(4):293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Siddangouda.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Francisco Ricardo Cunha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siddangouda, A., Biradar, T.V. & Naduvinamani, N.B. Combined effects of micropolarity and surface roughness on the hydrodynamic lubrication of slider bearings. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 36, 45–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0053-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0053-7

Keywords

Navigation