Abstract
A problem of further generalization of generalized Choi maps Φ[a,b,c] acting on \(\mathbb M_{3}\) introduced by Cho, Kye, and Lee is discussed. Some necessary conditions for positivity of the generalized maps are provided as well as some sufficient conditions. Also, some sufficient conditions for decomposability of these maps are shown.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
The paper concerns linear maps acting between matrix algebras. For \(n\in \mathbb N\), by \(\mathbb M_{n},\) we denote the algebra of square n × n-matrices X = (xij) with complex coefficients. Let \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{m}\to \mathbb M_{n}\) be a linear map. We say that Φ is a positive map if Φ(X) is a positive definite matrix in \(\mathbb M_{n}\) for every positive definite matrix \(X\in \mathbb M_{m}\). Be reminded that for \(k\in \mathbb N,\) there are the following identifications: \(\mathbb M_{k}(\mathbb M_{m})=\mathbb M_{k}\otimes \mathbb M_{m}=\mathbb M_{km}\), where \(\mathbb M_{k}(\mathbb M_{m})\) denotes the C*-algebra of k × k-matrices (Xij) with \(X_{ij}\in \mathbb M_{m}\). Define a map \({\Phi }_{k}:\mathbb M_{k}(\mathbb M_{m})\to \mathbb M_{k}(\mathbb M_{n})\) by Φk(Xij) = (Φ(Xij)). We say that the map Φ is k-positive if Φk is a positive map. If Φ is k-positive for every \(k\in \mathbb N,\) then it is called a completely positive map.
The transposition map \(\theta _{n}:\mathbb M_{n}\to \mathbb M_{n}:(x_{ij})\mapsto (x_{ji})\) is known to be not completely positive map (even not 2-positive) [22]. We say that a map \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{n}\to \mathbb M_{n}\) is k-copositive (respectively completely copositive) if the composition 𝜃n ∘Φ is k-positive (respectively completely positive). A map Φ is said to be decomposable if it can be expressed as a sum Φ = Φ1 + Φ2, where Φ1 is a completely positive map while Φ2 is a completely copositive one. Otherwise, Φ is called indecomposable. For further details, we refer the reader to the book of Størmer [22].
The systematic study of positive maps on C*-algebras was started by a pioneering work of Erling Størmer in the 1960s of the last century [20]. Although the definitions are easy and the above notions seem to be rather elementary, the problem of description of all positive maps is still unsolved even in the case of low dimensional matrix algebras. In particular, still, there is no effective characterization of decomposable maps. In recent years, the importance of the theory of positive maps drastically increased because of its applications in mathematical physics, especially in rapidly emerging theory of quantum information [6, 10, 13].
It was shown by Størmer [20] and Woronowicz [25] that every positive map \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{2}\to \mathbb M_{2}\) (Størmer) or \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{2}\to \mathbb M_{3}\) (Woronowicz) is decomposable. The first example of an indecomposable positive map was given by Choi [3, 4]. It is a map \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{3}\to \mathbb M_{3}\) given by
Although there is no systematic prescription of indecomposable maps, there are numerous examples scattered across literature [5, 7,8,9, 14,15,16,17,18,19, 23, 24].
An interesting approach to generalization of (1.1) was presented in [1]. For any triple of nonnegative numbers a,b,c define a map \({\Phi }_{[a,b,c]}:\mathbb M_{3}\to \mathbb M_{3}\) by
with xij being the matrix elements of \(X\in \mathbb M_{3}(\mathbb C)\). One proves
Theorem 1.1
([1]) The map Φ[a,b,c] is positive but not completely positive if and only if
-
(1)
0 ≤ a < 2,
-
(2)
a + b + c ≥ 2,
-
(3)
if a ≤ 1,then bc ≥ (1 − a)2.
Moreover, being positive it is indecomposable if and only if4bc < (2 − a)2.
Slightly different class was considered by Kye [12]
with a,c1,c2,c3 ≥ 0. He proved the following
Theorem 1.2
A map \({\Phi }_{[a;c_{1},c_{2},c_{3}]}\) is positive but not completely positive if and only if (1) 1 ≤ a < 2,(2) c1c2c3 ≥ (2 − a)3.Moreover, \({\Phi }_{[a;c_{1},c_{2},c_{3}]}\) is indecomposable and atomic.
Interestingly, Osaka shown
Theorem 1.3
([17]) A map \({\Phi }_{[1;c_{1},c_{2},c_{3}]}\) is extremal if c1c2c3 = 1.
Let us be reminded that for a linear map \({\Phi }:\mathbb M_{m}\to \mathbb M_{n},\) one can define its Choi matrix [2]. It is an element \(C_{{\Phi }}\in \mathbb M_{m}(\mathbb M_{n})\) defined by
where {Eij : 1 ≤ i,j ≤ n} is a system of matrix units in \(\mathbb M_{m}\). The mapping Φ↦CΦ is the so called Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism between \(L(\mathbb M_{m},\mathbb M_{n})\) and \(\mathbb M_{m}(\mathbb M_{n})\) [11]. One has
Theorem 1.4
([2]) A mapΦ is completely positive if and only if its Choi matrixCΦ is positive definite.
It turns out also that it is possible to characterize positivity and decomposability of Φ in terms of the matrix CΦ. To this end, let us recall that CΦ can be considered as an element of the tensor product \(\mathbb M_{m}\otimes \mathbb M_{n}\). An element ρ ∈ Mm ⊗ Mn is called a PPT matrix if both ρ and \((\text {id}_{\mathbb M_{m}}\otimes \theta _{n})(\rho )\) are positive definite.
Theorem 1.5
([10, 13, 21]) Let Φ be a linear map.
-
(i)
Φ is positive if and only if
$$\left\langle\xi\otimes\eta,C_{{\Phi}}\xi\otimes\eta\right\rangle\geq 0 $$for every vectors \(\xi \in \mathbb C^{m}\), \(\eta \in \mathbb C^{n}\).
-
(ii)
Φ is decomposable if and only if
$$\text{Tr}(\rho C_{{\Phi}})\geq 0 $$for every PPT matrix \(\rho \in \mathbb M_{m}\otimes \mathbb M_{n}\).
The property (i) in the above theorem is called block-positivity [13].
2 Choi-Like Maps
In this paper, we consider the following generalization of the maps described in Introduction. Let
with ai,bj,ck ≥ 0, and define \({\Phi }_{A}:\mathbb M_{3}\to \mathbb M_{3}\) as follows
Our aim is to describe some conditions for positivity of ΦA as well as for decomposability.
Firstly, let us make the following observation.
Proposition 2.1
A mapΦA is completely positive if and only if
is positive definite matrix.
Proof
Observe that the Choi matrix of the map ΦA is of the form
where we used dots instead of zeros. Now, we apply Theorem 1.4. Since bj,ck are nonnegative, positive definiteness of \(C_{{\Phi }_{A}}\) is equivalent to positive definiteness of the submatrix (2.3). □
Now, let us discuss some necessary conditions for positivity.
Theorem 2.2
A necessary condition for positivity of ΦA is positivity of \({\Phi }_{[\overline {a},\overline {b},\overline {c}]}\), where
Proof
Let ΦA be a positive map and consider a linear map
where S denotes a unitary shift Sei = ei+ 1. It is clear that \(\overline {{\Phi }}_{A}\) is positive. Moreover, \(\overline {{\Phi }}_{A}={\Phi }[\overline {a},\overline {b},\overline {c}]\) with \(\overline {a},\overline {b},\overline {c}\) defined in (2.4). □
Let us introduce the following notation
To find sufficient conditions, consider a positive map Φ[a,b,c] and define
where \(V={\sum }_{i = 1}^{3}p_{i}E_{ii}\) with pi > 0. It is clear that \({\Phi }_{[a,b,c]}^{V}\) is positive. Moreover, one easily finds that \({\Phi }_{[a,b,c]}^{V}={\Phi }_{A}\) with
that is, A = V − 1A[a,b,c]V. Note that b∗ = b, c∗ = c, and bici+ 1 = bc. Hence, one arrives at the following
Theorem 2.3
Assume that there exista,b,c and V such thatΦ[a,b,c] is a positive map and all coefficients of the matrix
are non-negative numbers. Then ΦA is a positive map.
Corollary 2.4
Assume that there exist a,b,c ≥ 0 such that
-
(1)
Φ[a,b,c] defines a positive map,
-
(2)
min{a1,a2,a3}≥ a,b∗≥ b,c∗≥ c,
-
(3)
bici+ 1 ≥ bc for i = 1,2,3.
Then ΦA is a positive map.
Proof
We have b1b2b3 ≥ b3 and c1c2c3 ≥ c3. We construct a positive map with \(b^{\prime }_{k}\) and \(c^{\prime }_{k}\) such that \(b_{k} \geq b^{\prime }_{k}\) and \(c_{k} \geq c^{\prime }_{k}\). Let us take p1,p2,p3 such that
Clearly, \(b_{1} b_{2} b_{3} \geq b^{\prime }_{1} b^{\prime }_{2} b^{\prime }_{3} = b^{3}\). Now, b1c2 ≥ bc and hence, let us take \(c_{2} \geq c^{\prime }_{2} := \frac {p_{1}}{p_{2}} c\) and similarly for c3 and c1.
Now, the map with \(b^{\prime }_{k}\) and \(c^{\prime }_{k}\) is positive due to (2.5). Hence, the map with bk and ck is positive as well. □
Remark 2.5
If b1b2b3 = 0, then a sufficient condition reduces to (1) a1,a2,a3 ≥ a, (2) c1c2c3 ≥ (2 − a)3, with 1 ≤ a < 2. Interestingly, if a1 = a2 = a3 = a, then a ≥ 1 and c1c2c3 ≥ (2 − a)3 are necessary and sufficient [12]. Indeed, if ΦA is positive and c1c2c3 = c3 let us define V by taking
Note the map Φ[a,b,c] has to be positive and b = 0, hence a + c ≥ 2. Therefore, \(a+\sqrt [3]{c_{1}c_{2}c_{3}}\geq 2\) which implies c1c2c3 ≥ (2 − a)3.
We end this section with the following remark.
Remark 2.6
Let us observe that condition (3) in Theorem 1.1 can equivalently be written as
On the other hand, the condition (2) of Theorem 1.2 can be rewritten as
Let us also remind that for a matrix
one can define a map \({\Phi }_{A}:\mathbb M_{2}\to \mathbb M_{2}\) similarly to (2.2). It was shown by Kossakowski (see [6, Example 7.1]) that ΦA is positive if and only if ai ≥ 0, bi ≥ 0 and
Having all these observations in mind, one can conjecture that positivity of the map (2.2) is related to the following set of conditions:
In next sections, we shall discuss these conditions.
3 Condition (2.6)
Now, we consider further generalization. Let A=\(\left (a_{ij}\right )_{i,j = 1}^{n}\) be a matrix with nonnegative coefficients. Let us define a map \({\Phi }_{A}:\mathbb M_{n}\to \mathbb M_{n}\) by
where
In the above formula \(a_{ij}^{\prime }=a_{ij}+\delta _{ij}\), where δij stands for the Kronecker delta.
Observe that positivity of ΦA is equivalent to the inequality 〈η,ΔA (ζζ∗)η〉 ≥ 〈η,ζζ∗η〉 for every \(\zeta ,\eta \in \mathbb C^{n}\). One can easily show that the above is equivalent to
In the following main result of this section, we discuss the role of the condition (2.6).
Theorem 3.1
LetΦA be given by (3.1). If the mapΦA is positive, then
Proof
Let i≠j be fixed. Observe that
Consider the case pk = 0 and qk = 0 for every k∉{i,j}. Then, the above expression is equal to
Now, take
Then, the expression from lines (3.7) and (3.8) reduces to
It follows from the assumption that the expression (3.3) is nonnegative for every choice of pk, qk. Thus, we arrive at the inequality
which is equivalent to (3.2). □
Having in mind, Theorem 1.1 one cannot expect that a converse theorem is also true. However, it turns out that a slight modification of (3.2) gives a sufficient condition for positivity and even decomposability.
Theorem 3.2
If
then the map ΦA is positive and decomposable.
Proof
Let us observe that
According to the lines (3.3)–(3.6) and (3.10), one has
It follows from (3.9) that the above expression is nonnegative for every nonnegative pi and qi, so ΦA is positive.
Now, we will show that ΦA is decomposable. Let \(\rho \in \mathbb M_{n}(\mathbb M_{n})\) be a PPT matrix. We have ρ = (ρij), where \(\rho _{ij}\in \mathbb M_{n}\). For i≠j, let rij be the (i,j)-coefficient of the matrix ρij. For any i,j, let βij denote the j-th diagonal term in the matrix ρii. Thus, the matrix ρ looks like
while
where ρΓ = (𝜃n(ρij)) is the partially transposed ρ, and stars stand for any numbers. Since ρ and ρΓ are positive definite, βij ≥ 0, \(r_{ji}=\overline {r_{ij}}\), and
Now, observe that
The expression (3.12) was obtained by arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, while (3.13) is due to inequalities (3.11). Since ρ is an arbitrary PPT matrix, we conclude that ΦA is decomposable (cf. Theorem 1.5 (ii)). □
For n = 2, we immediately get the following corollary (cf. Remark 2.6).
Corollary 3.3
For n = 2, a map ϕA is positive if and only if
Remark 3.4
For n = 3, the above theorem assures that the condition (2.6) is necessary for positivity of ΦA.
4 Condition (2.7)
Now, we are going to discuss necessity of condition (2.7). Let us start with the following
Theorem 4.1
Assume that the matrix (2.1) is of the form
for some arbitrary, a1,a2,a3 ≥ 1 and b,c > 0. If the map ΦA given by (2.2) is positive, then
Proof
Observe that the Choi matrix of the map ΦA is of the form
It follows from positivity of ΦA that CA is block positive, i.e.,
for every \(\xi ,\eta \in \mathbb C^{3}\).
Let
Then,
Hence,
Thus, inequality (4.3) leads to (4.2). □
Remark 4.2
The vector ξ in the above proof can be taken even simpler:
Remark 4.3
For the case n = 2, one can prove a similar result for
where ai ≥ 1, bi > 0 are arbitrary. In this case, one takes
Theorem 4.4
Assume that the matrix (2.1) is of the form
for some arbitrary, a1,a2,a3 ≥ 1 and b1,b2,b3 > 0. If the map ΦA given by (2.2) is positive, then
Proof
The same idea as above. Observe that the Choi matrix of ΦA has the form
Consider the following vectors ξ and η (see (4.4)):
Then, the vector ξ ⊗ η is of the form
Like in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we calculate
□
5 Problem of Sufficiency
Let us consider the matrix A given by (4.1). We have shown that the following conditions (cf. (3.2), (4.2))
are necessary for positivity of ΦA. For a1 = a2 = a3, these condition are also sufficient [1]. Note that they are special cases of conditions (2.6) and (2.7).
However, these conditions are not sufficient for general case. Namely, we have the following no-go result.
Proposition 5.1
Let a1,a2,a3 > 0 and b ≥ 0 be such that
Let A be the matrix in given by (4.1) with c = 0. Then, ΦA is positive if and only if a1 = a2 = a3.
Proof
Sufficiency part follows from Theorem 1.1. We will show necessity. Assume that ΦA is a positive map. Let
Then,
and
Calculate the determinant of the above matrix
In the last line, the assumption that a∗ + b = 2 was applied. It follows from positivity of ΦA that \(a_{*}\geq \overline {a}\). Hence, \(a_{*}=\overline {a}\) and consequently all ai are equal. □
Remark 5.2
The above considerations show that (2.6) and (2.7) do not form a set of sufficient conditions for positivity of the map ΦA in the case when ai are distinct numbers. At this stage, it is still an open problem how to generalize Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 for arbitrary numbers ai, bj, ck.
References
Cho, S.-J., Kye, S.-H., Lee, S.G.: Generalized Choi maps in three-dimensional matrix algebra. Linear Algebra Appl. 171, 213–224 (1992)
Choi, M.-D.: Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285–290 (1975)
Choi, M.-D.: Positive semidefinite biquadratic forms. Linear Algebra Appl. 12 (2), 95–100 (1975)
Choi, M.D., Lam, T.Y.: Extremal positive semidefinite forms. Math. Ann. 231(1), 1–18 (1977)
Chruściński, D., Sarbicki, G.: Exposed positive maps in M 4(C). Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 19(3), 1250017 (2012). 8 pp.
Chruściński, D., Sarbicki, G.: Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification. J. Phys. A 47(48), 483001 (2014). 64 pp.
Ha, K.C.: Atomic positive linear maps in matrix algebras. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 34(6), 591–599 (1998)
Ha, K.C.: Positive projections onto spin factors. Linear Algebra Appl. 348, 105–113 (2002)
Ha, K.C.: A class of atomic positive linear maps in matrix algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 359, 277–290 (2003)
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223(1–2), 1–8 (1996)
Jamiołkowski, A.: An effective methods of investigation of positive maps on the set of positive definite operators. Rep. Math. Phys. 5, 415–424 (1974)
Kye, S. -H.: A class of atomic positive maps in 3-dimensional matrix algebras. Elementary Operators and Applications. World Scientific (1992)
Majewski, W.A., Marciniak, M.: On a characterization of positive maps. J. Phys. A 34(29), 5863–5874 (2001)
Marciniak, M., Rutkowski, A.: Merging of positive maps: a construction of various classes of positive maps on matrix algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 529, 215–257 (2017)
Miller, M., Olkiewicz, R.: Stable subspaces of positive maps of matrix algebras. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 22(2), 1550011 (2015). 16 pp.
Osaka, H.: Indecomposable positive maps in low dimensional matrix algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 153, 73–83 (1991)
Osaka, H.: A class of extremal positive maps on 3×3 matrix algebras. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 28(5), 747–756 (1992)
Osaka, H.: A series of absolutely indecomposable positive maps in matrix algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 186, 45–53 (1993)
Robertson, A.G.: Schwarz inequalities and the decomposition of positive maps on C*-algebras. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 94(2), 291–296 (1983)
Størmer, E.: Positive linear maps of operator algebras. Acta Math. 110, 233–278 (1963)
Størmer, E.: Decomposable positive maps on C*-algebras. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 86(3), 402–404 (1982)
Størmer, E.: Positive Linear Maps of Operator Algebras. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Tanahashi, K., Tomiyama, J.: Indecomposable positive maps in matrix algebras. Canad. Math. Bull. 31(3), 308–317 (1988)
Tang, W.-S.: On positive linear maps between matrix algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 79, 33–44 (1986)
Woronowicz, S.L.: Positive maps of low dimensional matrix algebras. Rep. Math. Phys. 10(2), 165–183 (1976)
Funding
DC was supported by the Polish National Science Centre project 2015/19/B/ST1/03095, while MM was supported by Templeton Foundation Project “Quantum objectivity: between the whole and the parts”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Chruściński, D., Marciniak, M. & Rutkowski, A. Generalizing Choi-Like Maps. Acta Math Vietnam 43, 661–674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-018-0272-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-018-0272-1