Abstract
We study the global existence and decay rates of the Cauchy problem for the generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations in multi-dimensional spaces. By using Fourier analysis, frequency decomposition, pseudo-differential operators and the energy method, we obtain global existence and optimal L 2 convergence rates of the solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we study the global existence and decay rates of the smooth solution u(x,t) to the scalar multi-dimensional generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony (GBBM) equations of the form
Here η is a positive constant, β is a real constant vector, f(u)=(u 2,u 2,…,u 2), \(\Delta=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_{x_{j}}^{2}\) is the Laplacian, ∇ is a gradient operator, n≥2 is the spatial dimension.
The well known Benjamin–Bona–Mahony (BBM) equation
and its counterpart, the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation
were both suggested as model equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive media. The BBM equation was advocated by Benjamin, Bona and Mahony [3] in 1972. Since then, the periodic boundary value problems, the initial value problems and the initial boundary value problems, for various generalized BBM equations have been studied. The existence and uniqueness of solutions for GBBM have been proved by many authors [2, 3, 7, 8]. The decays of solutions were also studied in [1, 4–6, 10]. In [1, 4, 5, 10], the authors studied the equation in low spatial dimension. In [6], the equation in high spatial dimension was studied, but the authors just got a global solution u(x,t)∈H 1. In this paper, the goal is to get a global smoother solution and give its L 2 decay rates in high spatial dimension.
Throughout this paper, we denote the generic constants by C and write \(D^{\alpha}f=\partial_{x_{1}}^{\alpha_{1}}\partial_{x_{2}}^{\alpha_{2}}\cdots \partial_{x_{n}}^{\alpha_{n}}\) for a multi-index α=(α 1,α 2,…,α n ). Let \(W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\), s∈Z +, p∈[1,∞], be the usual Sobolev space with the norm
In particular, W s,2=H s. The Fourier transformation with respect to the variable \(x\in{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\) is
and the inverse Fourier transformation with respect to the variable ξ is
In this paper, all convolutions are only with respect to the spatial variable x.
Our main result is the following:
Theorem 1.1
If \(E=(\|u_{0}\|_{H^{l}}+\|\bigtriangledown u_{0}\|_{H^{l}})\) is small enough, \(l\geq1+[\frac{n}{2}]\), then there exists a global solution u(x,t) of (1.1) such that
Moreover, we have \(\|D_{x}^{\alpha}u\|_{L_{2}}\leq C(1+t)^{-\frac{n}{4}-\frac{|\alpha|}{2}}\) for |α|≤l.
Remark
The decay rate is the same as that of the heat equation, so our estimate is optimal.
The rest of the paper is arranged as follows. In Sect. 2, we get the local existence of the solution directly by constructing a Cauchy sequence and using energy estimation. In Sect. 3, by means of the Green function, we obtain a bound of the solution, then we extend the local solution to the global one. In Sect. 4, we get an L 2 decay estimate of the solution.
2 Local existence
In this section, we will construct a convergent sequence {u (m)(x,t)} to get the local solution, where u (m)(x,t) satisfy the following linear problem
We will construct a Banach space and prove that the sequence is convergent in this space, so the limit is the solution of (1.1).
First, we define a function space
Here \(E=(\|u_{0}\|_{H^{l}}+\|\nabla u_{0}\|_{H^{l}})\) is small enough, \(C_{0}>\sqrt{l},l\geq1+[\frac{n}{2}]\) and n≥2. The metric in \(\textbf{X}_{T_{0}}\) is induced by the norm \(\|u\|_{\textbf{X}_{T_{0}}}\):
It is obvious that \(\textbf{X}_{T_{0}}\) is a nonempty complete space.
Lemma 2.1
There exists some constant T 1 such that {u (m)(x,t)} belongs to \(\textbf{X}_{T_{1}}\).
Proof
We will prove this lemma by induction on m. When m=1, we have
Multiplying the first equation by u (1) and integrating with respect to the variable x in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\), we get
here we use the fact that ∫(β⋅∇u (1))⋅u (1) dx=0. Then
From (2.2) we have
Multiplying the two sides in (2.3) by \(D_{x}^{\alpha}u^{(1)}\) and integrating with respect to the variable x in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\), we also get
From (2.4) we have
Thus, for every T 1, we have \(u^{(1)}\in\textbf{X}_{T_{1}}\). Supposing that \(u^{(m)}(x,t)\in\textbf{X}_{T_{1}}\), we next prove that \(u^{(m+1)}(x,t)\in\textbf{X}_{T_{1}}\). By definition, u (m+1)(x,t) satisfies the following equation:
Then
so, we get
To proceed, we need the following inequality:
where 1≤r,p,q≤∞ and \(\frac{1}{r}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}\).
Noticing that f(u)=(u 2,u 2,…,u 2), we have
By the Sobolev embedding inequality, we have \(\|u\|_{L_{\infty}}\leq C\|u\|_{H^{l}}\) if \(l\geq1+[\frac{n}{2}]\). From (2.5), (2.7), we get
Then
When \(T_{1}\leq(C_{0}^{2}-1)\frac{1}{CE^{2}}\), from (2.8) we have \(\{u^{(m+1)}(x,t)\}\in\textbf{X}_{T_{1}}\). By the induction method, our lemma is proved. □
Lemma 2.2
There exists a positive constant T 0 such that {u (m)(x,t)} constructed by (2.1) is a Cauchy sequence in \(\textbf{X}_{T_{0}}\).
Proof
We only need to prove that
for some 0<λ<1. By (2.1), for every m, u (m+1)−u (m) satisfies the following equation:
Thus we have
Multiplying the two sides of (2.11) by \(D_{x}^{\alpha}(u^{(m+1)}-u^{(m)})\) and integrating with respect to the variable x in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\), we get
Thus
Noticing that (u (m+1)−u (m))(0,x)=0, and choosing \(T_{0}=\min(T_{1}, \frac{1}{4CE^{2}})\), we have
Thus we can get (2.9). □
Since \(\textbf{X}_{T_{0}}\) is a complete metric space, by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, there exists a \(u(x,t)\in\textbf {X}_{T_{0}}\) such that
Thus we have proved the local existence of (1.1). Next we will prove the global existence.
3 Bounded estimates and global existence
In this section, we want to get \(\|u\|\ _{H^{l}}\leq CE\), then extend the local solution to a global one.
Lemma 3.1
If u 0∈H 1, we have u∈L ∞(0,+∞;H 1).
Proof
Multiplying the first equation by u and integrating with respect to the variable x in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\), we get
then we have
Thus
and our lemma is proved. □
In order to get a bound of u, first we want to get an explicit expression of u through the Green function. The linearized system of (1.1) is of the form
The Green function of (3.2) is defined as
Direct calculation shows that the Fourier transformation of G is
Set
Due to Duhamel’s principle, we know that the solution of (1.1) can be expressed by
Next we want to analyze u through estimates of G,H. For this part, we must estimate decay rates of \(\hat{G}, \hat{H}\) separately for low and high frequencies. Thus we set
where χ 1,χ 2 are smooth cut-off functions and χ 1(ξ)+χ 2(ξ)=1.
Set \(\hat{G}_{i}=\chi_{i}\hat{G}, \hat{H}_{i}=\chi_{i}\hat{H} \). For low frequencies, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 3.2
For 2≤p≤∞, we have \(\|D_{x}^{\alpha}G_{1}\|_{L_{p}}\leq Ct^{-\frac{|\alpha|}{2}-\frac{n}{2}(1-\frac{1}{p})}, \|D_{x}^{\alpha}H_{1}\|_{L_{p}}\leq Ct^{-\frac{|\alpha|}{2}-\frac{n}{2}(1-\frac{1}{p})}\).
Proof
By the Hausdorff–Young inequality, if the integers p≥2 and q satisfy \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1\), then we have
and
□
Next we analyze the constructions of G,H for high frequencies.
Lemma 3.3
There exist a positive constant b and functions f 1(x),f 2(x),f 3(x) such that G 2≤Ce −bt(δ(x)+f 1(x)),H 2≤Ce −bt(δ(x)+f 2(x)), ∇H 2≤Ce −bt(δ(x)+f 3(x)). Here \(\|f_{1}\|_{L_{1}}<C,\|f_{2}\|_{L_{1}}<C,\|f_{3}\|_{L_{1}}<C\).
Proof
We just prove the first inequality; the proofs of the others are similar. By (3.3), if |β|≥1 then we have
From this and Lemma 3.2 in [9], we get our result. □
Lemma 3.4
\(\|u\|_{L_{\infty}}\leq CE\).
Proof
By Young’s inequality, from (3.5) we have
By Lemmas 3.2, 3.3 and the Sobolev embedding inequality, we have
Setting \(M(t)=\sup_{0\leq s\leq t, |\alpha|\leq 1}\|D_{x}^{\alpha}u\|_{L_{\infty}}\), we have
Next we will prove that M≤CE. From (3.1) we have
By Lemma 3.2, (3.1) and Hölder inequality, we have
By Lemma 3.3 and (3.8),
By (3.6), (3.7), (3.9), and (3.10), we have
Thus M(t)≤CE+CM 2(t). Because \(M(0)=\sup_{|\alpha|\leq1}\|D_{x}^{\alpha}u_{0}\|_{L_{\infty}}\leq \|u_{0}\|_{H^{l}}+\|\nabla u_{0}\|_{H^{l}}\leq CE\), this implies that M(t)≤CE; thus our result is proved. □
Lemma 3.5
\(\|u\|_{H^{l}}\leq CE\). \(\|\nabla u\|_{H^{l}}\leq CE\).
Proof
By (2.6) and the formula f(u)=(u 2,u 2,…,u 2), we can assert that
From (1.1) we have
By (3.12) and Hölder inequality, we have
From (3.11), (3.13) and Lemma 3.4, we have
Then
By (3.1), if |α|=1 then
Using induction, we have
Thus our lemma is proved. □
According to Lemma 3.5 and using the local solution, by the usual method, we can derive a global solution for (1.1) such that u∈L ∞(0,∞,H l(R n)).
4 Decay estimation
Setting \(M(t)=\sup_{|\alpha|\leq l, 0\leq s\leq t}\|D_{x}^{\alpha}u\|_{L_{2}}(1+s)^{\frac{n}{4}+\frac{|\alpha|}{2}}\), we have
By (4.1),
From (3.11), Lemma 3.4 and (4.1), it follows that
By (3.4) and Young’s inequality,
From Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3, we have
When |α|≤l, from Lemma 3.2, (4.2) and (3.1), we get
From Lemma 3.3 and (4.3), with |α|≤l, we have
thus M(t)≤CE+CM 2(t)+CEM(t). In addition, since M(0)≤CE, we have M(t)≤CE. Therefore,
Thus we get Theorem 1.1, our main result in this paper.
References
Albert, J.: On the decay of solutions of the generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 141, 527–537 (1989)
Avrin, J., Goldstein, J.A.: Global existence for the Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation in arbitrary dimensions. Nonlinear Anal. 9, 861–865 (1985)
Benjamin, T.B., Bona, J.L., Mahony, J.J.: Model equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 272, 47–78 (1972)
Biler, P.: Long time behavior of solutions of the generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation in two space dimensions. Differ. Integral Equ. 5, 891–901 (1992)
Fang, S.M., Guo, B.L.: Long time behavior for solution of initial-boundary value problem for one class of system with multidimensional inhomogeneous GBBM equations. Appl. Math. Mech. 26(6), 659–664 (2005)
Fang, S., Guo, B.: The decay rates of solutions of generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations in multi-dimensions. Nonlinear Anal. 69, 2230–2235 (2008)
Goldstein, J.A., Wichnoski, B.J.: On the Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation in higher dimensions. Nonlinear Anal. 4, 665–675 (1980)
Guo, B.L.: Initial boundary value problem for one class of system of multidimensional inhomogeneous GBBM equations. Chin. Ann. Math., Ser. B 8(2), 226–238 (1987)
Wang, W., Yang, T. : The pointwise estimate of solutions of Euler equations with damping in multi-dimensions. J. Differ. Equ. 173, 410–450 (2001)
Zhang, L.H.: Decay of solutions of generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burgers equations in n-space dimensions. Nonlinear Anal. 25, 1343–1369 (1995)
Acknowledgements
The first author was supported by NNSF 11101121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, H., Xin, G. Global Existence and Decay Rates of Solutions of Generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony Equations in Multiple Dimensions. Acta Math Vietnam. 39, 121–131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-014-0054-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40306-014-0054-3
Keywords
- Cauchy problem
- Generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation
- Multiple dimensions
- Global existence
- Optimal L 2 decay estimate