Abstract
This study focuses on the effect of academic self-concept on the use of learning strategies conducive to academic achievement. Data from 407 national vocational college students in Taiwan were analyzed by structural equation modeling through the LISREL 8.80 version. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: (a) academic self-concept has a significant positive effect on deep, surface and strategic approaches, as well as academic achievement, (b) of all the learning strategies, strategic approach has a significant positive effect, and surface approach has a significant negative effect on academic achievement, and (c) strategic approach mediated a positive relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement. Overall, these findings suggest that higher level educators may offer positive encouragement to increase students’ learning motivation, efficiency, and self-concept and assist in the development of recognition concerning self-learning and meta-cognitive skills. These findings may help students to select the best learning approaches and improve their academic performance. Implications for the design of educational models and curricula in vocational college education are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. J. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of meta-learning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4), 185–212.
Biggs, J. B. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 3–19.
Bodovski, K., & Farkas, G. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 115–130.
Brunner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burnett, P. C., & Proctor, R. M. (2002). Elementary school students’ learner self-concept, academic self-concepts and approaches to learning. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18(4), 325–333.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains: Longman.
Chen, H. (1998). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Testing, 45(1), 105–124.
Chiou, H. J. (2003). Examination of validity and related concepts for the dimension/component model of self-concept on adolescence. Journal of Education and Psychology, 26(1), 85–131.
Chonko, L. B. (1993). Business school education: Some thoughts and recommendations. Marketing Education Review, 3(1), 1–9.
Chonko, L. B., & Caballero, M. J. (1991). Marketing madness, or how marketing departments think they’re in two places at once when they’re not anywhere at all (according to some). Journal of Marketing Education, 13(1), 14–25.
Chung, I. F. (2013). Are learners becoming more autonomous? The role of self-access center in EFL college students’ english learning in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 701–708.
Coles, C. R. (1990). Elaborated learning in undergraduate medical education. Medical Education, 24(1), 14–22.
Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle and Tait’s revised approaches to studying inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 529–539.
Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23, 123–139.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920.
Entwistle, N. (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 72–101). Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.
Entwistle, N. J., & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(4), 258–265.
Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 507–528.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marking Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Green, J., Nelson, G., Martin, J. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). The causal ordering of self-concept and academic motivation and its effect on academic achievement. International Education Journal, 7(4), 534–546.
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124–136.
Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123–142.
Hattie, J. A. (1992). Self-Concept. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1992). The initial development of a scale to ensure perception of self as reader. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects on literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 111–117). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
House, J. D. (1994). The predictive relationship between academic self–concept, achievement expectancies and grade performance in college calculus. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(1), 111–112.
Huang, F. M. (2004). The study of applying structure equation model in education. Taipei: Wu-nan book co. Ltd.
Huang, C. J. (2007). A causal analysis of self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis (NSC 96-2413-H-018-001). Taipei: National Science Council.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.
Jaramillo, F., & Spector, P. E. (2004). The effect of action orientation on the academic performance of undergraduate marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 250–260.
Jenkins, E. K. (1998). The significant role of critical thinking in predicting auditing students’ performance. Journal of Education for Business, 73(5), 274–279.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kirk, E. R. (1995). Experimental design-procedures for the behavioral sciences, Pacific Grove. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Lenz, B. K. (2006). Creating school-wide conditions for high-quality learning strategy classroom instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(5), 261–266.
Liu, Y. L., & Hsueh, Y. (2013). The effects of mathematics self-concept and learning strategies on academic achievement: A self-enhancement model. Curriculum and Instruction Quarterly, 16(1), 179–208.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623–636.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept. An interim test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–180.
Marsh, H. W., & Koller, O. (2003). Unification of two theoretical models of relations between academic self-concept and achievement. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 17–47). CT: Information Age.
Michie, F., Glachan, M., & Bray, D. (2001). An evaluation of factors influencing the academic self-concept, self-esteem and academic stress for direct and re-entry students in higher education. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 455–472.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Education statistics. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Murphy, H., & Roopchand, N. (2003). Intrinsic motivation and self-esteem in traditional and mature students at a post-1992 university in the north-east of England. Educational Studies, 29(2–3), 243–259.
Ozgen, K. (2013). An analysis of high school students’ mathematical literacy self-efficacy beliefs in relation to their learning styles. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 91–100.
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-efficacy, self-concept, and academic achievement. In J. Aronson & D. Cordova (Eds.), Psychology of education: Personal and interpersonal forces. New York: Academic Press.
Peltier, J. W., Hay, A., & Drago, W. (2006). Reflecting on reflection: Scale extension and a comparison of undergraduate business students in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 5–16.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments, (Vol. 6, pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes, 7, 371–402.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.
Rodriguez, M. C. (2009). The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: the case of business student. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(5), 523–539.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Self-concept and self-efficacy in mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Journal of Education Research, 3(3), 255–278.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Cognitive psychology. NY: Thomson.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2003). Student’s perception about new modes of assessment: A review. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 171–223). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31(1), 97–116.
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Self-esteem, academic selfconcept and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 334–349.
Walberg, H. J., & Tsai, S. L. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 359–373.
Waugh, R. F. (2002). Measuring self-reported studying and learning for university students: Linking attitudes and behaviours on the same scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 573–604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Status of Higher Education in Taiwan
Higher education in Taiwan is primarily divided into two types of systems, general universities (academic oriented) and vocational colleges (practical oriented). The pools of students enrolled in these two educational systems are markedly different. Senior high school students, who are primarily concerned with general fundamental subjects, attend general universities, whereas senior (industrial) vocational high school students who are focused on practical training and pursuing a career are primarily enrolled in vocational colleges. However, the exam-oriented education system in Taiwan has driven most students to choose universities over vocational colleges. Furthermore, attending general universities is commonly considered a higher education opportunity (Lin and Wang 2011).
Vocational college has thus become a secondary choice for students. The support provided by the government to general universities doubles that given to vocational colleges. Therefore, a gap exists between these two types of higher education avenues
.
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, B.H., Chiu, WC. & Wang, CC. The Relationship Among Academic Self-concept, Learning Strategies, and Academic Achievement: A Case Study of National Vocational College Students in Taiwan via SEM. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 419–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0194-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0194-1