Skip to main content
Log in

Isolated and Integrated Form-Focused Instruction from Learners’ Perspective

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In place of categorical hypotheses for rejection or acceptance of isolated or integrated form-focused instruction (FFI) in (quasi) experimental studies, this survey was intended to gauge the complementary versus competing nature of isolated and integrated FFI from learners’ perspective. The impetus behind this study was the overwhelming lack of learner-centered surveys and overconduction of experimental, quantitative and non-ethnographic examination of FFI. Adopting the questionnaire developed and validated by Spada et al. (System 37:70–81, 2009), the researchers gave it to 454 Turkish low- and high-proficiency learners of English to test their preference toward grammar learning. Statistically speaking, whereas beginner learners did not have a specific preference toward isolated or integrated FFI, advanced learners showed a particular preference toward integrated FFI. The nonexistence of determination among beginner learners was likely to be related to their lower proficiency. In contrast, advanced learners’ decided preference toward integrated FFI is correlated with their higher proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barcelos, A. M. F. (2008). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs within a Deweyean framework: Conflict and influence. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 171–199). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119–132). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. (1999). Cultural and situation influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, T., Hansen, C., & Zukowski-Faust, J. (2005). Interchange passages: Placement and evaluation package. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). Cambridge: Newbury House/Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research [State of the Art Article]. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N. (2010). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, Plenary paper on 27 May 2010.

  • Spada, N., Barkaoui, K., Peters, C., So, M., & Valeo, A. (2009). Developing a questionnaire to measure learners’ preferences for isolated and integrated form-focused instruction. System, 37, 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Akbar Ansarin.

Appendices

Appendix 1

figure a

Appendix 2

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansarin, A.A., Arasteh Abbas Abad, B. & Banan Khojasteh, M.R. Isolated and Integrated Form-Focused Instruction from Learners’ Perspective. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 299–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0180-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0180-7

Keywords

Navigation