de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57.
Article
Google Scholar
McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 105–42.
Google Scholar
Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Muhlbacher A, Regier DA, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Louviere J, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Book
Google Scholar
Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Book
Google Scholar
Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transp Rev. 2009;29(5):587–617.
Article
Google Scholar
Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ryan M, Gerards K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.
Google Scholar
Oteng B, Marra F, Lynd LD, Ogilvie G, Patrick D, Marra CA. Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(1):52–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, Pols HA, Koes BW, Steyerberg EW. Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(7):1029–37.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Guimaraes C, Marra CA, Gill S, Simpson S, Meneilly G, Queiroz RH, et al. A discrete choice experiment evaluation of patients’ preferences for different risk, benefit, and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes management. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:433–40.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hiligsmann M, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, Goemaere S, Reginster JY, et al. Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(1):R36.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Dam L, Hol L, de Bekker-Grob EW, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Habbema JD, et al. What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(1):150–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bessen T, Chen G, Street J, Eliott J, Karnon J, Keefe D, et al. What sort of follow-up services would Australian breast cancer survivors prefer if we could no longer offer long-term specialist-based care? A discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(4):859–67.
PubMed Central
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kimman ML, Dellaert BG, Boersma LJ, Lambin P, Dirksen CD. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):328–37.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dixon S, Nancarrow SA, Enderby PM, Moran AM, Parker SG. Assessing patient preferences for the delivery of different community-based models of care using a discrete choice experiment. Health Expect. 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12096.
Google Scholar
de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, van Ballegooijen M, Helmerhorst TJ, Raat H, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yeo ST, Edwards RT, Fargher EA, Luzio SD, Thomas RL, Owens DR. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):869–77.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ. Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. Transportation. 2013;40:1021–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Huicho L, Miranda JJ, Diez-Canseco F, Lema C, Lescano AG, Lagarde M, et al. Job preferences of nurses and midwives for taking up a rural job in Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50315.
PubMed Central
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Blaauw D, Erasmus E, Pagaiya N, Tangcharoensathein V, Mullei K, Mudhune S, et al. Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(5):350–6.
PubMed Central
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Scott A. Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ. 2001;20(3):329–47.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bridges JF, Dong L, Gallego G, Blauvelt BM, Joy SM, Pawlik TM. Prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia: a conjoint analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:376.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bridges JF, Gallego G, Kudo M, Okita K, Han KH, Ye SL, et al. Identifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:298.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bridges JF, Mohamed AF, Finnern HW, Woehl A, Hauber AB. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(1):224–31.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bridges JF, Searle SC, Selck FW, Martinson NA. Designing family-centered male circumcision services: a conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2012;5(2):101–11.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gerard K, Tinelli M, Latter S, Blenkinsopp A, Smith A. Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(5):699–707.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Landfeldt E, Jablonowska B, Norlander E, Persdotter-Eberg K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wramsby M, et al. Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):760–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Manjunath R, Yang JC, Ettinger AB. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: a conjoint analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(4):474–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Philips H, Mahr D, Remmen R, Weverbergh M, De Graeve D, Van Royen P. Predicting the place of out-of-hours care–a market simulation based on discrete choice analysis. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):284–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robyn PJ, Barnighausen T, Souares A, Savadogo G, Bicaba B, Sie A, et al. Health worker preferences for community-based health insurance payment mechanisms: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:159.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rockers PC, Jaskiewicz W, Wurts L, Kruk ME, Mgomella GS, Ntalazi F, et al. Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:212.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tinelli M, Ozolins M, Bath-Hextall F, Williams HC. What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial. BMC Dermatol. 2012;12:19.
PubMed Central
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Orme B. Sample size issues for conjoint analysis studies. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Technical Paper; 1998.
Google Scholar
Johnson R, Orme B. Getting the most from CBC. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software; 2003.
Google Scholar
Pearmain D, Swanson J, Kroes E, Bradley M. Stated preference techniques: a guide to practice. 2nd ed. Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group. 1991.
Pedersen LB, Kjaer T, Kragstrup J, Gyrd-Hansen D. Do general practitioners know patients’ preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(3):514–23.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM. Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transp Res B Methodol. 2010;44(6):720–34.
Article
Google Scholar
de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MC. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1169–83.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar