Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exposure-Toxicity Relationships of Mycophenolic Acid in Adult Kidney Transplant Patients

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid is commonly prescribed in adult kidney transplant recipients for preventing graft rejection. A therapeutic target for total mycophenolic acid area under the concentration–time curve (30–60 mg h/L) has been established in adult kidney transplant recipients and widely referenced today. However, this specific target range does not adequately characterize mycophenolic acid-associated adverse effects. The primary objective of this qualitative and critical review was to characterize the exposure-toxicity relationships of mycophenolic acid in an attempt to determine whether exposure thresholds can be identified. The secondary objective was to determine the associations of clinical variables with specific adverse effects. The inclusion criteria consisted of all peer-reviewed papers in adult kidney transplant subjects (average study age > 18 years) with both exposure (area under the concentration–time curve) and toxicity data. The exclusion criteria were papers involving the pediatric population, studies lacking either area under the concentration–time curve or toxicity data, or studies with no apparent reported variations in area under the concentration–time curves. Of the 28 papers identified, inconsistent findings have been reported for the most frequently characterized adverse events of mycophenolic acid (gastrointestinal, infectious, and hematological), while promising exposure thresholds (i.e., > 40–60 mg h/L for total mycophenolic acid) have been suggested by a few studies. The roles of free mycophenolic acid exposure, mycophenolic acid metabolites, or clinical factors influencing the manifestation of the toxicities also remain to be clarified. Although it is not yet possible to define toxicity threshold(s) for the purpose of mycophenolic acid therapeutic drug monitoring, the information obtained and the limitations identified in this comprehensive literature body have provided a good foundation for future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staatz CE, Tett SE. Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88(7):1351–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1247-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Meur Y, Borrows R, Pescovitz MD, Budde K, Grinyo J, Bloom R, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolates in kidney transplantation: report of The Transplantation Society consensus meeting. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2011;25(2):58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2011.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Staatz CE, Tett SE. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(1):13–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiang TK, Ensom MH. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate in adult solid organ transplant patients: an update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(5):545–53. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2016.1170806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Gelder T, Hilbrands LB, Vanrenterghem Y, Weimar W, de Fijter JW, Squifflet JP, et al. A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1999;68(2):261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuypers DR, de Jonge H, Naesens M, de Loor H, Halewijck E, Dekens M, et al. Current target ranges of mycophenolic acid exposure and drug-related adverse events: a 5-year, open-label, prospective, clinical follow-up study in renal allograft recipients. Clin Ther. 2008;30(4):673–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiang TK, Ensom MH. Anti-rejection drugs. In: Murphy JE, editor. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 6th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2017. p. 205–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiang TK, Ensom MH. Immunosuppressants. In: Beringer PE, editor. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics. 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Wolters Kluwer; 2017. p. 320–57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helderman JH, Goral S. Gastrointestinal complications of transplant immunosuppression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(1):277–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zafrani L, Truffaut L, Kreis H, Etienne D, Rafat C, Lechaton S, et al. Incidence, risk factors and clinical consequences of neutropenia following kidney transplantation: a retrospective study. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(8):1816–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02699.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Filler G, Bendrick-Peart J, Christians U. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus in children. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30(2):138-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0b013e31816ba73a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sommerer C, Muller-Krebs S, Schaier M, Glander P, Budde K, Schwenger V, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: limited sampling strategies and clinical outcome in renal transplant patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(4):346–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03612.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kagaya H, Miura M, Satoh S, Inoue K, Saito M, Inoue T, et al. No pharmacokinetic interactions between mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;33(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00906.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pillans PI, Rigby RJ, Kubler P, Willis C, Salm P, Tett SE, et al. A retrospective analysis of mycophenolic acid and cyclosporin concentrations with acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. Clin Biochem. 2001;34(1):77–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Atcheson BA, Taylor PJ, Mudge DW, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Campbell SB, et al. Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and related outcomes early after renal transplant. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59(3):271–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Meur Y, Buchler M, Thierry A, Caillard S, Villemain F, Lavaud S, et al. Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(11):2496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gourishankar S, Houde I, Keown PA, Landsberg D, Cardella CJ, Barama AA, et al. The CLEAR study: a 5-day, 3-g loading dose of mycophenolate mofetil versus standard 2-g dosing in renal transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(7):1282–9. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.09091209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Le Meur Y, Thierry A, Glowacki F, Rerolle JP, Garrigue V, Ouali N, et al. Early steroid withdrawal and optimization of mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil. Transplantation. 2011;92(11):1244–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318234e134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu L, Huang Z, Song T, He S, Zeng D, Rao Z, et al. Short-term therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid reduces infection: a prospective, single-center cohort study in Chinese living-related kidney transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(5):760–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glander P, Sommerer C, Arns W, Ariatabar T, Kramer S, Vogel EM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intensified versus standard dosing of mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(3):503–11. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06050809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Budde K, Tedesco-Silva H, Arns W, Shoker A, Zeier M, Klinger M, et al. Improved rejection prophylaxis with an initially intensified dosing regimen of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;92(3):321–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318223d7f3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arns W, Sommerer C, Glander P, Ariatabar T, Porstner M, May C, et al. A randomized trial of intensified vs. standard dosing for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients: results at 1 year. Clin Nephrol. 2013;79(6):421–31. https://doi.org/10.5414/cn107908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding C, Xue W, Tian P, Ding X, Pan X, Xiang H, et al. Which is more suitable for kidney transplantation at the early post-transplantation phase in China: low dosing or standard dosing of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium? Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2014;181:10–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peng W, Liu G, Huang H, Wu J, Chen J. Short-term intensified dosage regimen of mycophenolic acid is associated with less acute rejection in kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death. Urol Int. 2018;101(4):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heller T, van Gelder T, Budde K, de Fijter JW, Kuypers D, Arns W, et al. Plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid acyl glucuronide are not associated with diarrhea in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(7):1822–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Agteren M, Armstrong VW, van Schaik RH, de Fijter H, Hartmann A, Zeier M, et al. AcylMPAG plasma concentrations and mycophenolic acid-related side effects in patients undergoing renal transplantation are not related to the UGT2B7-840G > A gene polymorphism. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30(4):439–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0b013e318180c709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tornatore KM, Meaney CJ, Wilding GE, Chang SS, Gundroo A, Cooper LM, et al. Influence of sex and race on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable African American and Caucasian renal transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(4):423–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-014-0213-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Borni-Duval C, Caillard S, Olagne J, Perrin P, Braun-Parvez L, Heibel F, et al. Risk factors for BK virus infection in the era of therapeutic drug monitoring. Transplantation. 2013;95(12):1498–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3182921995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuypers DR, Claes K, Evenepoel P, Maes B, Vanrenterghem Y. Clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in relation to combined long-term pharmacokinetics in de novo renal allograft recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75(5):434–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gaston RS, Kaplan B, Shah T, Cibrik D, Shaw LM, Angelis M, et al. Fixed- or controlled-dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(7):1607–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02668.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Okamoto M, Wakabayashi Y, Higuchi A, Kadotani Y, Ogino S, Ushigome H, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(2):859–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Satoh S, Tada H, Murakami M, Tsuchiya N, Inoue T, Togashi H, et al. The influence of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine and mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics on the incidence of acute rejection and infectious complications after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(4):1751–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mourad M, Malaise J, Chaib Eddour D, De Meyer M, Konig J, Schepers R, et al. Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation. Clin Chem. 2001;47(7):1241–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mourad M, Malaise J, Chaib Eddour D, De Meyer M, Konig J, Schepers R, et al. Correlation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters with side effects in kidney transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Chem. 2001;47(1):88–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuypers DR, Vanrenterghem Y, Squifflet JP, Mourad M, Abramowicz D, Oellerich M, et al. Twelve-month evaluation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of total and free mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in renal allograft recipients on low dose tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25(5):609–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiang TKL, Partovi N, Shapiro RJ, Berman JM, Collier AC, Ensom MHH. Regression and genomic analyses on the association between dose-normalized mycophenolic acid exposure and absolute neutrophil count in steroid-free, de novo kidney transplant recipients. Clin Drug Investig. 2018;38(11):1011–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-018-0694-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sobiak J, Kaminska J, Glyda M, Duda G, Chrzanowska M. Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on hematological side effects incidence in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(4):E407–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, Budde K, Kuypers D, Tyden G, et al. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008;86(8):1043–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sommerer C, Glander P, Arns W, Ariatabar T, Kramer S, Vogel EM, et al. Safety and efficacy of intensified versus standard dosing regimens of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo renal transplant patients. Transplantation. 2011;91(7):779–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31820d3b9b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Room 3-142D, 11361-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada

    Tony K. L. Kiang

  2. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Mary H. H. Ensom

Authors
  1. Tony K. L. Kiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary H. H. Ensom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony K. L. Kiang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding or editorial assistance was received for the preparation of this article.

Conflict of Interest

Tony K.L. Kiang and Mary H.H. Ensom have no conflicts of interest that are directly related to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiang, T.K.L., Ensom, M.H.H. Exposure-Toxicity Relationships of Mycophenolic Acid in Adult Kidney Transplant Patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 58, 1533–1552 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00802-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00802-z

Search

Navigation