Introduction

Carbon nanostructures are attractive, environmentally friendly materials for developing electrochemical charge storage devices, which includes capacitors, supercapacitors, and batteries. Owing to the wide degree of polarizability of carbon electrodes, a possibility of tweaking the conductivity by introducing hetero atoms such as nitrogen in the carbon nanostructures [1,2,3,4]. The amphoteric nature of carbon and its existence in multiple forms such as powder, fiber, and sheets, makes it a ‘material of choice’ for developing charge storage devices.

Since a decade, there has been an increasing industrial demand for producing high-quality raw carbon materials for application in energy storage devices. The most abundant source of carbon is biomass. Photosynthetic machinery fixes carbon and produces biomass in the biosphere. The nitrogen-fixing microbes fix nitrogen into the biomass. When the biomass is carbonized at high temperature (> 300 °C), in the absence of oxygen, thermal decomposition of the organic matter results in the rearrangement of the atoms during carbonization [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The resultant material is commonly termed as ‘biochar’. The process itself is called ‘biocharring’. Biocharring results in the production of carbon materials of myriad geometries and such geometry and quantity of heteroatom further influences the electrochemical performance. Different biomasses were reported as a precursor for the synthesis of charred carbon for usage in charge storage device [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Thus, the chemical nature of the biomass greatly influences the structure and the properties of biocharred carbon derived from them. It has been observed that abundance of nitrogen in the precursor (raw biomass) results in significant doping of nitrogen in the biocharred nano-carbon matrix. In the present work, we have made a comparative study of the structures and the electrochemical properties of two forms of biocharred carbon obtained from raw silk cocoon and jute. Silk is a protein fiber of insect origin, with high nitrogen content (15%), whereas jute is a carbohydrate fiber with almost no nitrogen. The working hypothesis of this study is to test the electrochemical performance and the suitability of these two kinds of biocharred carbon for developing charge storage devices, where one is having natural nitrogen doping viz., biocharred silk and the other is pure carbon viz., biocharred jute. The overall layout of the work is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overall philosophy of the work. a Plant kingdom fixes carbon and nitrogen from atmosphere. A Tassar silk producing forest, where the wild Tassar silk grows. b Tassar silkworm. c Silkworm feeding on leaves. d Tassar silk cocoon ready for reeling and silk moth (Antheraea mylitta). e Tassar silk cocoon, a composite of fibroin and sericin protein. f Bombyx mori silk cocoon. g Tassar silk thread, a protein thread made up of fibroin. h Jute crop. i Jute fiber, a carbohydrate fiber. j Developing charge storage devices from the biocharred carbon obtained from silk and jute

Full size image

Materials and methods

Electrode material synthesis

The synthesis of electrode material consists of a three-step reaction: (a) biocharring of the biomass, (b) oxidation of biocharred material and (c) reduction of oxidized biocharred material. These three steps were followed for three investigating materials (Tassar cocoon, Mulberry cocoon and, Tassar silk thread) individually as shown in Fig. 2. Biocharring or pyrolysis of these plant and insect-derived organic materials was done using previously reported reaction condition [13]. In brief, the material was cut into small pieces and was kept in a muffle furnace using alumina boat. The argon gas at required flow was allowed to run for 15 min before the furnace was switched on, to remove the already present air and set the desired atmosphere for the reaction. The temperature of the furnace was raised to 400 °C with the ramp rate of 5 °C/min. The furnace was kept on for a period of 4 h and then turned off to allow slow cooling till it attains room temperature. The biocharred material was crushed in pestle and mortar and was packed in a Whatman filter paper to remove impurities using acetone in Soxhlet apparatus as reported previously [6,7,8, 20, 21]. This was then allowed to dry and then was oxidized using 20 ml of HNO3 diluted with water in 2:1 for every 1 g of charred carbon with continuous stirring at 60 °C for 24 h. After 24 h, the solution turned dark brown, marking the completion of the oxidation process. This solution was centrifuged and washed using deionized water and then with methanol until the supernatant became transparent with pH 6–7. This dark brown material is the oxidized carbon which was dried and further reduced using hydrazine hydrate. 20 ml of hydrazine hydrate per 500 mg of oxidized carbon was taken and the mixture was stirred continuously at 40 °C for 12 h. The mixture changed its color to black after 12 h. The reduced carbon was cleaned with methanol. This reduced charred carbon was further characterized using different microscopic and spectroscopic techniques and then was used as electrode material. Jute, a plant biomass, was processed through one step, as shown in Fig. 3. It was cut in small pieces and biocharred at 400 °C temperature in an argon atmosphere. This charred material was cleaned using acetone in soxhlet apparatus as described above.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Graphical schematic showing the preparation of biocharred carbon from silk cocoon and silk thread

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Graphical schematic showing the preparation of biocharred carbon from jute fiber

Full size image

Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using Carl Zeiss (Model Number—EVO18) Scanning Electron Microscope operated at 10 kV. The samples were sputter coated with gold using SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater by Quorum Technology. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis was performed using Agilent Technologies Atomic Force Microscope (Model 5500) in ACAFM mode. After calibration, the scanner model N9520AUSO8380185xml was used for the imaging at room temperature and at a scanning speed of 2.0 lines per second. Microfabricated silicon nitride cantilevers with resonance frequencies (f) of 181 and 349 kHz were used. Pico View® 1.8 and Pico Image® Basic software were employed for data acquisition and analysis, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using FEI Titan G2 60–300 TEM. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was performed using Perkin-Elmer FTIR spectrum BX spectrometer, operated in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed using X’ Pert powder—PANalytical XRD at 25 °C and wavelength K-Alpha1in the angular range (2θ) of 20°–70°. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using PHI 5000 Versa Prob II, FEI. XPS and SEM were performed for both raw and biocharred materials obtained from corresponding materials.

Electrode and device preparation

A powdered sample of 50 mg was mixed with 3 ml isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and 50 μl Nafion (1:10 dilution in water) by sonication. For electrode preparation, this suspension was spray-coated on a graphite sheet (dimensions = 2 × 1 cm). For device preparation, two such electrodes were taken (coated sides facing each other) and a semipermeable membrane along with the electrolyte was sandwiched between them, as mentioned in our previous publications [6, 22].

Electrochemical testing of electrode and device

Electrochemical tests were conducted on ZIVE SP1 single-channel electrochemical workstation with three electrode arrangement, with Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode, platinum wire as the counter electrode and the synthesized material as the working electrode. To examine the performance of four proposed electrode materials [Tassar-reduced graphene oxide (RGO), Mulberry-reduced graphene oxide (RGO), Tassar thread reduced carbon (RC), and biocharred Jute], cyclic voltammetry was conducted for each electrode in 1 M H3PO4 as the electrolyte at different scan rates. After obtaining the best electrode material of four proposed materials from the above comparison, further tests were performed only for this material. For this material, the best biocompatible aqueous electrolyte was explored out of available choices, the salts of sodium, potassium and weak biocompatible acid H3PO4 were examined by testing the electrode in four different electrolytes, namely 1 M Na2SO4, 1 M H3PO4, 1 M NaCl, 1 M KCl at different scan rates (mV/s). The charge–discharge and electrochemical impedance analysis were also conducted on ZIVE SP1single channel electrochemical workstation with three electrode arrangement for the best found electrode material. The charge–discharge was conducted for the electrode at different scan rates of 1, 2, 3, and, 5 mA/cm2 with 1 M H3PO4 to investigate the behavior and performance of the electrode. The life cycle analysis was done by performing 10,000 cycles of charge–discharge in the same electrolyte at a current density of 5 mA/cm2.

Results

The schematic for preparation of reduced graphene oxide from Tassar cocoon and Mulberry cocoon and reduced carbon from Tassar silk thread is shown in Fig. 2. Biocharred carbon obtained from Jute is shown in Fig. 3.

The four raw materials that we explored are shown in Fig. 4a–d. Tassar cocoon or Antheraea mylitta shown in Fig. 4a was obtained from Jharkhand, India. Mulberry cocoon or Bombyx mori shown in Fig. 4b was obtained from Karnataka, India. Tassar silk thread obtained from Tassar cocoon is shown in Fig. 4c. Jute is shown in Fig. 4d. Tassar cocoon, Mulberry cocoon and, Tassar silk thread show sheet-like structure as shown in Fig. 4e–g, respectively [7, 9], and Jute exhibits thin tube-like structure as shown in Fig. 4h [6]. Presence of carbon and nitrogen in Tassar cocoon, Mulberry cocoon, Tassar silk thread and, Jute are shown by XPS broad spectra in Fig. 4i–l. Jute has least amount of nitrogen (2.4%) and the Tassar cocoon has the highest amount of nitrogen (14.6%) among all four materials.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Insect-generated and plant-generated fibrous materials. a, b. Tassar cocoon (Antheraea mylitta) and Mulberry cocoon (Bombyx mori). c Processed Tassar silk thread. d Jute. e–h SEM images of raw Tassar cocoon, Mulberry cocoon, Tassar silk thread and Jute, respectively. i–l XPS broad spectrum of Tassar cocoon, Mulberry cocoon, Tassar silk thread and Jute surface, respectively

Full size image

The optical images of the reduced graphene oxide obtained from Tassar cocoon and Mulberry cocoon, reduced carbon from Tassar silk thread and biocharred carbon from jute are shown in Fig. 5a–d, respectively. The corresponding XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 5e–h, show a prominent peak at around 2Θ = 25º corresponding to plane indices of (002) indicates that each sample contains good graphitic structure. The Raman spectra for each of the four samples are shown in Fig. 5i–l, show two prominent peaks at around 1347 and 1584 cm−1 corresponding to D and G band, respectively, supporting the presence of the graphitic structure. Tassar cocoon and Mulberry cocoon derived RGO, and Tassar silk thread derived reduced carbon possess 2D band communicated by spectrum at 2687 and 2678 cm−1, respectively. The D-band and G-band are merged and thus confirm the higher defects density due to presence of hetero atom, O-containing groups and the structural defects, etc. in synthesized rGO. The 2D band is most likely suppressed by “Pauli blocking effect” [23,24,25,26,27,28]. FTIR spectra are shown in Fig. 5m–p, the four peaks approximately common for four materials are around 3100–3400, 2910–2980, 1600–1720 and 1365–1440 cm−1 corresponding to hydroxyl (–OH) group, C–H stretching, carbonyl (C=O) group and ether or epoxide (C–O) bond, respectively. Presence of ether group is also mapped to peaks at 1032 and 750–875 cm−1 seen in jute derived biocharred carbon. Multiple small peaks observed in range 1200–1300 cm−1 represent C–N stretching for RGO and reduced carbon [6, 7, 9].

Fig. 5
figure 5

XRD, Raman Spectra and FTIR for Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon, respectively. a–d Synthesized samples. e–h XRD patterns. i–l Raman spectrum. m–p FTIR patterns

Full size image

Survey XPS spectra shown in Fig. 6a–d, shows all the four samples contain more than 75% carbon, and Jute derived biocharred carbon outstands other three samples with a total of 95.1% carbon. Nitrogen content in Jute derived biocharred carbon is 4.9%, Tassar cocoon-derived RGO is 24.9%, Mulberry cocoon-derived RGO is 23.8% and Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon is 14.1%. XPS narrow spectrum corresponding to carbon (C1 s) in four samples are shown in Fig. 6e–h. The C1 s spectrum revealed the presence of three types of carbon bonds: C–C/C=C (284.6 eV) (C–) C–N (285.9 eV), C=C–N (286.5 eV), C=N/C=O (287.9 eV) and O–C=O (289.0 eV), respectively [9, 19]. XPS narrow spectrum corresponding to nitrogen (N1 s) in four samples are shown in Fig. 6i–l, peaks around 397 and 399.9 eV correspond to nitride bond and nitrogen bond in an organic matrix, respectively, a peak around 398 eV is seen in RGO obtained from Tassar cocoon corresponds to cyanide bond [9]. In earlier works with carbon materials, similar XPS spectra have been observed [26,27,28].

Fig. 6
figure 6

XPS analysis of synthesized materials. a–d Broad spectrum analysis of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon, respectively. e–h XPS narrow spectrum of carbon peaks of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread derived reduced carbon and Jute derived biocharred carbon, respectively. i–l Narrow spectrum of nitrogen peaks of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon, respectively

Full size image

AFM and TEM studies for the biocharred materials have been discussed in Fig. 7a–i. AFM scan of Tassar cocoon derived RGO in Fig. 7a shows a single-layered sheet-like structure of around 10 nm which corroborates with the graphene-like structure in TEM and HRTEM images as shown in Fig. 7e and i, respectively. AFM scan of Mulberry RGO in Fig. 7b shows multiple-layers of sheets of 20 nm stacked together which is also seen in TEM and HRTEM images in Fig. 7f and j, respectively. Similar to RGO obtained from Mulberry cocoon, Tassar silk thread derived reduced carbon also has multiple-layered sheet-like structure of around 10–15 nm, with lesser number of layers than the former (Fig. 7c), which upholds with the TEM and HRTEM images shown in Fig. 7g and k. AFM scans of Jute derived biocharred carbon in Fig. 7d1 does not show sheet-like structure. Another AFM scan in Fig. 7d2 shows some deep-hollow zones, which are corroborated by hollow tube-like structure cut parallel to its plane of assembly as shown in TEM image in Fig. 7h. The HRTEM image of biocharred jute shown in Fig. 7i shows that these individual hollow tubes are made up of carbon sheets similar to graphene.

Fig. 7
figure 7

AFM and TEM analysis of synthesized materials. a–c AFM images of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread derived reduced carbon, respectively. d1, d2 AFM image of Jute derived biocharred carbon. e–h TEM images of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread derived reduced carbon and Jute derived biocharred carbon, respectively. i–l HRTEM images of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon, respectively

Full size image

Electrochemical characterization of electrode and device

The electrode was made by spraying individual materials on graphite sheets (current collector) and the sandwiching of electrolyte and semipermeable membrane in between the similar two electrodes became symmetrical device was used to perform cycle voltammetry, charge–discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The area coated with electrode material is 2 cm2 and the material amount is 1 mg per electrode. The initial electrolyte choice was phosphoric acid for electrode testing and comparison, because of its biocompatible nature.

Cyclic voltammetry of electrodes

The three electrode arrangement was used for cyclic voltammetry of these four different electrode materials. Figure 8a corresponds to comparison among these electrode materials in 1 M H3PO4 (used as electrolyte) at a scan rate of 300 mV/s in a voltage window of 0–800 mV. The cyclic voltammetry for all electrode materials is almost rectangular and symmetrical about the current axis at 0. The Tassar RGO (shown in violet) showed outstandingly better specific capacitance (coverage area) and current density. The specific capacitance for Tassar RGO is 284 F/g corresponding to 300 mV/s scan rate, whereas for Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon are 56, 68, and 75 F/g, respectively. In addition, the current density for Tassar RGO is 0.037 Amp/cm2 whereas that for Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon is 0.004, 0.02, and 0.01 Amp/cm2, respectively. After concluding Tassar RGO to be the best electrode material of all four materials, the best biocompatible electrolyte was to be found out, so biocompatible and easily available salts and weak acids were explored, namely 1 M H3PO4, 1 M Na2SO4, 1 M NaCl and, 1 M KCl. Figure 8b shows the comparison of the aforesaid electrolytes with Tassar RGO electrode at a scan rate of 300 mV/s in a voltage window of 0–800 mV. It was observed that the biocompatible, weak acid 1 M H3PO4 showed the prominent specific capacitance and current density as compared to other electrolytes. The Tassar RGO electrode with 1 M H3PO4 showed a specific capacitance of 284 F/g and a current density of 0.037 Amp/cm2 whereas other electrolytes with the same electrode showed almost half specific capacitance and current density approximately equating to180 F/g and 0.015 Amp/cm2, respectively. Thus, it can now be concluded that Tassar RGO electrode with 1 M H3PO4 shows the best electrochemical performance. Now, the electrode and device were investigated by performing cyclic voltammetry in a voltage range of 0–800 mV at different scan rates (as shown in Fig. 8c, at scan rates of 5, 50, 100 and, 300 mV/s) for Tassar RGO and 1 M H3PO4.

Fig. 8
figure 8

CV, impedance and lifetime analysis. a CV comparison of Tassar RGO, Mulberry RGO, Tassar silk thread-derived reduced carbon and Jute-derived biocharred carbon at a scan rate of 300 mV/s in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte. b CV comparison of Tassar RGO in different electrolytes (1 M H3PO4, 1 M Na2SO4, 1 M NaCl, 1 M KCl) at a scan rate of 300 mV/s. c CV of Tassar RGO electrode in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte at different scan rates of 5, 50, 100 and, 300 mV/s. d Schematic diagram of a symmetrical charge storage device. e CV of Tassar RGO symmetrical device in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte at different scan rates of 5, 50, 100 and, 300 mV/s. f Graph between specific capacitance and scan rate for Tassar RGO electrode. g Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of Tassar RGO electrode in an aqueous 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte. h Charge–discharge of Tassar RGO electrode in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte at different current densities ranges of 1, 2, 3 and, 5 mA/cm2. i Life cycle analysis by 10,000 cycles of charge–discharge in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte at the current density of 5 mA/cm2

Full size image

In an earlier work, using H2SO4 as an electrolyte, a characteristic redox couple was observed [9], but with the following electrolytes viz., 1 M H3PO4, 1 M Na2SO4, 1 M NaCl and, 1 M KCl; we did not observe any such redox couple at any scan rates, which signifies prominent double-layer capacitance and further it shows that the electrode could perform for a longer period of time without any deposition or etching. The cyclic voltammetry for each scan rate is almost rectangular and symmetrical to the current axis which shows the supercapacitor behavior of the electrode. The specific capacitance corresponding to the scan rate of 5 mV/s is approximately 400 F/g and current density corresponding to the scan rate of 300 mV/s is 37 mA/cm2.

Device structure and its cyclic voltammetry

The symmetrical device has both electrodes of Tassar RGO. The schematic diagram of symmetrical charge storage device is shown in Fig. 8d, where purple layers show thin graphite current collector, green mesh shows electrode material, transparent layer in between shows semipermeable membrane, and spheres show H+ ions and phosphorous ions. As we connect one electrode to the positive terminal of dc supply and other to the negative terminal of the supply, the device forms the Helmholtz double layer and this double layer is prominent for charge storage with other redox and battery effect.

Thus, for electrochemical investigation of the symmetrical device, the cyclic voltammetry is performed with the same electrolyte (1 M H3PO4) at different scan rates and in a voltage range of 0–800 mV as shown in Fig. 8e. Similar to electrode characterization, the symmetric device curves are almost rectangular and symmetrical to current density axis with a maximum current density of 0.025 Amp/cm2 for 300 mV/s and a minimum of 0.0025 Amp/cm2 at 5 mV/s. All the curves follow the same pattern with no observable redox.

Specific capacitance versus scan rate graph

The Fig. 8f shows the graph between specific capacitance and scan rates for Tassar RGO electrode in 1 M H3PO4 (electrolyte). It can be observed that the electrode is showing very high storage capacity with weak biocompatible electrolyte (1 M H3PO4), i.e., approximately 400 F/g for 5 mV/s scan rate and as scan rate is increasing the values for specific capacitance decrease but still at 100 mV/s it has a specific capacitance of 220 F/g. There may be a possible reason for the decrement in specific capacitance as scan rates increase as the ions may get lesser chance to interact with electrode material with increasing scan rate.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of Tassar RGO in an aqueous 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte in the range of 10 kHz–10 MHz is shown in Fig. 8g. The Nyquist plot between the imaginary impedance versus real impedance shows an almost straight line curve and the inset shows a model equivalent circuit of the setup that signifies series contact resistance and ohmic loss at the electrolyte and electrode contact. Q1 and Q2 are the high-frequency elements that are related to the dielectric character of the coating which may be reinforced by ionic conduction through its pores R1. The low-frequency contribution Q3 is attributed to the double-layer capacitance with inbuilt resistance R2.

Charge discharge and life cycle of the electrode

The charge–discharge characteristics of Tassar RGO electrode in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte in a voltage range of 0–800 mV were performed at different current densities of 1, 2, 3, 5 mA/cm2. Figure. 8h shows that the charging and discharging curve almost shows a mirror symmetry within all current densities. The specific capacitance is 426 F/g at a current density of 1 mA/cm2. The charging and discharging times corresponding to the current density of 1 mA/cm2 are 520, 550 s, respectively, which is almost same and this same ratio is same for all current densities so it shows an ideal supercapacitor characteristic. The cyclic voltammetry and charge–discharge show the very ideal performance of the Tassar RGO electrode material so it is important to investigate its stability in terms of life cycle. Figure 8i shows the life cycle analysis of the Tassar RGO electrode material, in which charge–discharge cycle was run for 10,000 cycles in 1 M H3PO4 electrolyte at 5 mA/cm2 current density. It could be observed that the shape and overall time taken for a cycle of all the charge–discharge curves over time is perfectly similar. The charge storage capability is 99.5% after 10,000 cycles so the specific capacitance retention is 99.5% even after 10,000 cycles.

Discussion

During last one decade, a significant amount of work has been carried out, where biocharring process has been utilized to convert a wide range of biomass like cotton, banana peel, recycled paper, dried leaves, silk cocoon, wood waste, etc., to obtain activated porous carbon. Further, such biomass derived carbon has been composited with graphene/CNTs and used for constructing supercapacitors and batteries [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Yet a classification of the chemical origin of these biomass is critical for understanding the electrochemical performance of the biocharred carbon. Here, we tested two different class of biomass viz., a pure protein and a pure carbohydrate. Interestingly, the protein biomass is a rich source of nitrogen. Thus, upon biocharring such a source, there is always a possibility that the carbon matrix will be inherently doped with nitrogen. The presence of this nitrogen could significantly improve the electrochemical performance of the material, as documented in the earlier works [9].

There is another aspect where tremendous interest has been generated for the use of activated porous carbon obtained from biomass viz., stabilizing the lithium–sulfur electrode material for lithium–sulfur battery. Li–S materials are commonly used electrode for high-energy Li/S batteries. Yet Li–S compounds have inherently low conductivity, sluggish electrochemical activation and are extremely unstable in the presence of moisture. These anomalous behavior of Li–S complex is partly due to the extremely small size of Li ion and formation of a covalent complex with sulfur ion. Further, a strong affinity of H+ ion for sulfur makes these Li–S complex, susceptible to moisture [41]. To stabilize Li–S complex and further improving its conductivity, one approach is caging the complex in a hydrophobic 3-D porous atomic matrix of a carbon material possessing superior electrical properties. Several attempts in this direction is underway where Li–S complexes have been stabilized using porous carbon matrix [34, 35, 39, 40]. One of the very recent study has shown that if Li and S is sequentially entrapped in a hydrophobic conductivity cage of N-doped reduced graphene oxide supercapacitor derived from silk cocoon, it results in a hybrid Li–S-silk supercapacitor [41]. Essentially, Li–S complexes which otherwise are always considered as battery material, could now find wide application in the supercapacitor development [41]. Thus, these studies are highlighting the fact that the chemical origin of the biomass is of extreme significance in determining the electrochemical properties of the biocharred, porous carbon obtained from them. The present study is one such systematic attempt to chemically categorize the biomass and then post-biocharring, studying the electrochemical profiles of these materials.

Thus, while summarizing, in the present work, we have explored the electrical and charge storage properties of four plant-derived and insect-derived materials, namely Tassar cocoon, mulberry cocoon, processed Tassar silk thread and, Jute. We expected Tassar cocoon and Mulberry cocoon, both being protein sources, to behave similarly. To our surprise, Tassar cocoon showed better electrochemical profile as compared to Mulberry cocoon. We are presently exploring why there is such a difference between two different protein fibers where nitrogen content is fairly similar. As we aim towards developing green-biocompatible materials, we further explored the performance of Tassar cocoon in four biocompatible/bio-tolerable electrolytes, of which, a combination of Tassar cocoon and 1 M H3PO4 showed best results. The electrode material is extremely stable with a capacitive retention of approximately 99.5% after 10,000 cycles. We have also shown its functioning in the form of a symmetric device showing Tassar cocoon, a nitrogen-doped carbon source that can be used to develop different kinds of charge storage devices.

Conclusion

Comparison of Tassar cocoon with Jute shows how structural differences along with the addition of nitrogen influence the electrical properties of a carbon-based material. This would open a totally new field for business of wild cocoon which otherwise remains confined in the textile industry.