1 Introduction

Laser deep penetration welding is known to produce narrow and deep weld seams with a comparatively small heat affected zone [1]. By exceeding a threshold intensity, evaporation and the formation of a vapor capillary called keyhole are caused, which is maintained by the steam pressure from the vapor being generated [2], resulting in higher absorption rates as a result of multiple reflexions of the laser beam in the keyhole [3]. The depth of the keyhole can either be determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement or based on metallographic cross-sections, since the weld depth determined there corresponds approximately to the keyhole depth [4] and the OCT measurement [5]. Due to interaction of solid, liquid, and gaseous material, the physical phenomena occurring during the process are quite complex and, as the pressure in the keyhole oscillates at high frequencies [6], the process of laser deep penetration welding is highly dynamic. Measured frequencies reach from less than 100 Hz created by melt pool oscillations [7] to fluctuations observed at the keyhole front wall with frequencies up to 100 kHz [8]. Due to material properties such as a lower viscosity, changed keyhole behaviors including increased dynamics and instabilities such as spatter and pore formation can be observed in aluminum compared to steels [9].

The plasma, which is created by the ionized metal vapor mixed with ambient gases, plays an essential role for the energy transport from the laser beam to the workpiece [10]. It may affect the complex absorption mechanism by influencing the resulting laser beam power within the keyhole, the beam radius, and divergence depending on the laser beam properties [11]. The absorption mechanism in a plasma is mainly inverse bremsstrahlung [12] and depends quadratically on the wavelength [13], resulting in 100 times higher plasma absorption rates for CO2 laser beams with a wavelength of approximately 10 µm than for laser beams with a wavelength of approximately 1 µm, such as Nd:YAG, fiber, or disk laser sources. [14]. While the energy absorbed in the plasma inside the keyhole can be partially released back to the keyhole wall, the energy absorbed in the plasma above the keyhole is almost completely not introduced into the workpiece. In the field of laser deep penetration welding of metal sheets with high laser beam intensities, the effect of plasma shielding (decrease of the penetration depth despite increase of the laser power or line energy) has therefore also been observed above the keyhole due to a possibly too high absorption of the laser beam energy in the torch, especially in CO2 laser beam processes [13]. When using laser sources with a wavelength of 1 µm, this phenomenon does not usually occur.  

Numerical simulations, which are also increasingly used in the field of laser beam welding to gain a deeper understanding of the process, for optimization and for minimizing production problems, must take into account these highly complex and dynamic process properties. In spite of the rising computer efficiency, a complete simulation of the entire process of laser deep penetration welding is currently not fully conceivable [15]. Instead, numerical codes are constrained to simulate the process scale by scale and to concatenate results, starting with the laser–material interaction (multiple reflection) which gives the heat input to a heat transfer and fluid flow calculation [15]. In order to implement this, raytracing algorithms are a simple technique used by many researchers when it comes to analyzing the keyhole behavior [16], molten pool dynamics [17], mechanisms leading to defect occurrence [18], and absorption conditions within the keyhole [19]. In the process of raytracing, the dimensional aspects and the energy distribution of the laser beam are taken and discretized in rays with the objective to compute, one by one, the ray properties and their interaction with the vapor/liquid interface [15]. For this, the assumption is made, that the region of gas or plasma can be treated as a void into which the laser beam can enter and pass through without being influenced until it hits the surface of the keyhole and interactions occur [17]. So far, this assumption could not be confirmed, meaning that it was not clear if a laser beam can be transmitted through an existing keyhole without getting affected by vapor, plasma, or the fluctuating keyhole itself.

This study investigates the hypothesis that the narrower beam of an additional laser source can be transmitted to a significant extent through an existing wider keyhole generated by the initial laser beam and acts predominantly at its keyhole bottom. Therefore, a laser processing optic was used that coaxially combines two individual and freely adjustable laser beam sources. It is assumed that the highly focused second laser beam forms an additional narrower keyhole peak at the original keyhole bottom, i.e., a kind of keyhole-in-keyhole. Since the welding depth depends strongly on the focal plane of the laser, depending on the focal position of the second laser beam and thus the local beam diameter at the initial keyhole bottom, the shape of the additional keyhole peak would have to vary. Figure 1 illustrates the hypothesis as well as the derived assumptions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of the hypothesis that the highly focused beam of a single-mode laser source can be transmitted through an existing keyhole, induced by a disk laser source with a wider focal diameter, and act predominantly at the keyhole bottom depending on its focal plane

Full size image

2 Experimental

2.1 Setup for welding experiments

The experiments were carried out by using a custom-made laser processing optic system (Fig. 2), which is described in more detail in [20]. It coaxially combined two individual laser beams and an additional OCT measuring beam. The optics contained one dichroic mirror that reflected a wavelength of 1030 nm, distributed by the disk laser source TruDisk12002 (TRUMPF GmbH + Co. KG), and transmitted the wavelength range of 800 nm to 900 nm used by the OCT system Laser Depth Dynamics LD-600 (Laser Depth Dynamics Inc.; nowadays part of IPG Photonics Corporation). The second integrated dichroic mirror transmitted both of the aforementioned wavelength ranges and reflected a wavelength of 1070 nm, which was provided by a single-mode fiber laser source YLR-1000SM (IPG Photonics Corporation). The collimation and focusing lenses were positioned in front of the dichroic mirrors when looking in the beam direction from the source to the workpiece. This allowed to set the focal plane of each laser source individually with an accuracy of ± 50 µm along the beam axis by moving the positions of the lenses within the beam path. Beam parameters as the focal diameter and the Rayleigh length, as well as the power, could also be set independently of each other. The settings and properties of the two laser sources used in this study can be seen in Table 1. The intensity profiles in the focal plane for both laser beams as well as their combination, measured by the HighPowerMSM (Primes GmbH), are given in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematical laser processing and experimental setup (OCT: optical coherence tomography)

Full size image
Table 1 Constant settings of the laser beams
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Intensity profiles of the used laser beams and their combination measured in the focal plane (P: laser power used for measurement, F: measured focal position, I: intensity)

Full size image

To investigate the influences of both laser sources on different specimen materials, bead-on-plate welding experiments were carried out using mild steel S235JRC and technical pure aluminum EN AW-1050A H111 (Al99.5), whose compositions are given in Table 2.

Table 2 Chemical composition of S235JRC according to [21] (left) and chemical composition of EN AW-1050A H111 (Al99.5) according to [22] (right)
Full size table

The experimental program is shown in Table 3 (steel) and Table 4 (aluminum). Apart from the material and the used laser powers, both material-specific plans are comparable, including one sample welded with 3000 W (steel) resp. 3700 W (aluminum) laser power from TruDisk12002, which is the maximum power (named 100%) used in each experimental plan. The maximum power of 3700 W for aluminum was chosen to match the same weld depth which is caused by 3000 W in steel. One sample was welded only with the TruDisk12002 laser beam at approximately 80% power (2400 W steel and 3100 W aluminum, respectively) and one sample only with the YLR-1000SM laser beam at approximately 20% power (600 W steel and 600 W aluminum, respectively). All other samples were welded with a combination of both laser beams, with a constant power distribution of about 80% TruDisk12002 and 20% YLR-1000SM, varying only the focal plane of the YLR-1000SM (FYLR) from “0” to “ − 8 mm.”

Table 3 Experimental plan S235JRC
Full size table
Table 4 Experimental plan EN AW-1050 H111
Full size table

Figure 2 also shows the experimental welding setup. The specimen was placed on a moving table, which provided a constant welding speed of 2 m/min. The irradiation angle of the processing setup was tilted by 5° to the vertical orientation against the welding direction, resulting in forehand welding. Argon was used as shielding gas with a flow rate of 7 l/min and a nozzle diameter of 8 mm. The size of the specimen and the seam lengths of 50 mm are given in Fig. 4. On a single specimen, each parameter listed in Tables 3 and 4 was repeated five times. However, the specimen was changed after every single welding process to let the specimen temperature decrease to room temperature before the next weldment. The execution of the experimental plans was random. Cross-sections were taken from the center of the seam of each sample (cf. Fig. 4 A-A) and longitudinal-sections of the first seam from selected samples (cf. Fig. 4 B-B). Steel samples were etched with 1% nitric acid, and aluminum samples with 20% sodium hydroxide solution. Due to the difficulty of catching the very narrow weld peak in the center in the longitudinal sections, especially in the case of welds produced by the single-mode laser, the weld depth was determined based on the average of the 5 cross-sections. A MATLAB (MATrix LABoratory by MathWorks)-based algorithm, which analyzed pictures of the etched metallographic cross-sections, was applied to measure the size of the cross-section areas of the seams based on contrast differences and output the average seam area from the 5 cross-sections.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dimensions and design of the specimen (specimen was changed after every single welding process to let the specimen temperature decrease to room temperature before the next weldment)

Full size image

3 Results

3.1 Steel

Table 5 shows characteristic metallographic cross-sections of the welded steel samples. From 3.0 kW TruDisk12002 to 2.4 kW TruDisk12002, the weld depth decreases, whereby the rest of the seam shape remains comparable. For 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM, the weld depth resembles the weld depth of 2.4 kW TruDisk12002, but the seam shape is significantly narrower resulting in a sharp peak at the bottom of the seam. In comparison, the seam shapes of the samples with combined laser beams (2.4 kW Trudisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM) show no clear addition of the individual seam cross-sections for steel, as the seam welded by the single-mode laser beam only is much more pronounced. Nevertheless, it can be seen that, while at FYLR =  − 8 mm, no significant difference in seam form to 3.0 kW TruDisk12002 without YLR-1000SM superposition is noticeable, with increasing focal plane and local intensity at the bottom by the single-mode laser beam; the weld depth increases; and a local peak at the bottom of the seam is formed which becomes increasingly pronounced as the focal plane of the single-mode laser beam approaches the disk laser beam induced keyhole bottom and then also decreases as the focal plane is further increased to FYLR = 0 mm. With all combinations, we also see that the size of the upper "base seam" is larger than the seam welded with only 2.4 kW of the disk laser source and that it also increases from FYLR =  − 8 mm to FYLR =  − 2 mm.

Table 5 Exemplary metallographic cross-sections of welded steel samples
Full size table

In Fig. 5, the longitudinal section and the weld depth in seam direction for 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM at FYLR = 0 mm are shown. Especially in a range of about 5 to 10 mm after the start of the weld, relatively uniform fluctuations in the weld depth can be observed so that it can be assumed that the keyhole depth fluctuates slightly. This is only clearly visible in an area of about 5 mm, which is due to the fact that the seam was not hit exactly in the center due to the very narrow width, and therefore, only this area characterizes the seam center. The longitudinal section presented in Fig. 6 shows the weld depth in seam direction for the combination of 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM at FYLR =  − 2 mm. The slightly fluctuating weld depth, which can be seen in the cross-section in Table 5, is also visible but significantly stronger, while its average, however, corresponds to the average of the 5 cross-sections.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Exemplary metallographic longitudinal-section of a steel sample welded with 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM at the focal plane FYLR = 0 mm

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Exemplary metallographic longitudinal-section of a steel sample welded with the combination of 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM for the focal plane FYLR =  − 2 mm

Full size image

The results of the weld depths for the different used laser beams, beam combinations, laser powers, and focal planes are presented in Fig. 7. Furthermore, the idealized theoretical sum of the weld depths of the single-beam variants with 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM is added. It can be seen that the average weld depth decreased slightly from 3.30 mm at 3 kW TruDisk12002 (blue bar) to 2.71 mm at 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 (green bar) and further to 2.63 mm at 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM (yellow bar). This means that the weld depth of the 2.4 kW disk laser–induced seam (2.71 mm) lies between the selected focal planes of the YLR-1000SM FYLR =  − 4 mm and FYLR =  − 2 mm. The theoretical sum of the two last mentioned separate processes is 5.34 mm (green/yellow bar), whose power add up to a theoretical overall power of 3.0 kW, and is significantly higher than the weld depth of the comparable process with 3 kW of the TruDisk12002 alone. The weld depths according to the real experimental combinations of both laser beams as function of the focal plane position of the YLR-1000SM beam, with a constant focal plane of the TruDisk12002 beam at 0 mm, are also displayed on the right in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the measurement data clearly support the observations from the cross-sections that there is no clear addition of the welding depths of the individual tests in the combined test since all weld depths from FYLR =  − 8 mm to FYLR = 0 mm are below the value of the theoretical sum, but equal or over the weld depth of the 3.0 kW of the TruDisk12002 alone, rising from FYLR =  − 8 mm (3.26 mm) to its maximum at − 2 mm (4.38 mm).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Left: Influence of the laser beam power and the laser source on the weld depth in S235JRC (all focal planes at 0 mm) and theoretical sum of the weld depth of 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM. Right: Influence of the focal plane of the coaxially superimposed single-mode laser beam (0.6 kW) in disk laser deep penetration welding (2.4 kW, focal plane 0 mm) on the weld depth in S235JRC

Full size image

The resulting average cross-section areas of the seams are presented in Fig. 8 with equal x-axis and colors than already used in Fig. 7. The seam cross-section area decreases slightly from 2.59 mm2 at 3.0 kW TruDisk12002 (blue bar) to 2.12 mm2 at 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 (green bar), whereby it drops sharply to 0.38 mm2 at 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM (green bar), resulting in a theoretically added seam cross-section area (green/yellow bar) of 2.50 mm2, which is just below the value of the 3.0 kW TruDisk12002. The seam cross-section areas of the experimental combinations are above the values of the 3.0 kW TruDisk12002 and the theoretical sum and differ only slightly between 2.82 mm2 (FYLR =  − 2 mm) and 2.93 mm2 (FYLR =  − 4 mm).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Left: Influence of the laser beam power and the laser source on the seam cross-section area in S235JRC (all focal planes at 0 mm) and theoretical sum of the seam cross-section area of 2.4 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM. Right: Influence of the focal plane of the coaxially superimposed single-mode laser beam (0.6 kW) in disk laser deep penetration welding (2.4 kW, focal plane 0 mm) on the seam cross-section area in S235JRC

Full size image

3.2 Aluminum

Table 6 shows characteristic metallographic cross-sections of the welded aluminum samples. From 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 to 3.1 kW TruDisk12002, the weld depth decreases, whereby the actual shape of the seam remains comparable. The seam shape of the sample welded with 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM is, in contrast, significantly narrower with an even more reduced weld depth. As seen for steel, the seam shapes of the samples with combined laser sources (3.1 kW Trudisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM) differ with different focal planes of the YLR-1000SM but show no clear addition of the individual seam cross-sections forms. At FYLR =  − 8 mm, no big difference to 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 can be seen in weld depth or seam shape but with increasing focal plane and local intensity at the bottom by the single-mode laser beam, the weld depth increases, and a local peak at the bottom of the seam is formed which also becomes increasingly pronounced as the focal plane of the single-mode laser beam approaches the disk laser beam–induced keyhole bottom and then also decreases as the focal plane is further increased to FYLR = 0 mm. As with steel, it can be seen that the size of the upper “base seam” cross-section shape also increases for the combination compared to 3.1 kW disk laser beam only.

Table 6 Exemplary metallographic cross-sections of welded aluminum samples
Full size table

The longitudinal section, presented in Fig. 9, shows the weld depth in seam direction for the combination of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM at FYLR =  − 2 mm. The fluctuating weld depth which can be seen in the cross-section in Table 6, and which average corresponds to the average weld depth of the 5 cross-sections, is also visible in the longitudinal section. In comparison to the longitudinal section of the steel sample, these maxima occur less frequently and have a wider shape. Pores within the seam can be detected.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Exemplary metallographic longitudinal-section of an aluminum sample welded with the combination of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM for the focal plane FYLR =  − 2 mm

Full size image

The results of the weld depths in aluminum over the different used laser sources, their combination, and their power and focal plane are presented in Fig. 10. The theoretical sum of the weld depths of the processes with 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM is also shown. It can be seen that the average weld depth constantly decreases from 3.19 mm at 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 (blue bar) to 2.47 mm at 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 (green bar) to 1.37 mm at 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM (yellow bar). As for steel, this means that the weld depth of the 3.1 kW disk laser–induced seam (2.47 mm) lies between the selected focal planes FYLR =  − 4 mm and FYLR =  − 2 mm. The theoretical sum of the weld depth of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM is with 3.84 mm (green/yellow bar) only slightly above the value of 3.7 kW TruDisk12002. The weld depth of the real experimental combination of both laser sources over the focal plane of the YLR-1000SM with a constant focal plane of the TruDisk12002 at 0 mm is displayed on the right in Fig. 10. As seen in the cross-section results, the weld depth of 3.01 mm for the combination of both laser sources at FYLR =  − 8 mm resembles the weld depth of 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 alone, rising to a maximum weld depth of 4.02 mm at FYLR =  − 2 mm which is higher than the weld depth of the theoretical sum of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Left: Influence of the laser beam power and the laser source on the weld depth in EN AW-1050 H111 (all focal planes at 0 mm) and theoretical sum of the weld depth of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM. Right: Influence of the focal plane of the coaxially superimposed single-mode laser beam (0.6 kW) in disk laser deep penetration welding (3.1 kW, focal plane 0 mm) on the weld depth in EN AW-1050 H111

Full size image

The resulting average cross-section areas of the aluminum seams are presented in Fig. 11. The seam cross-section area decreases slightly from 5.56 mm2 at 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 (blue bar) to 3.84 mm2 at 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 (green bar), whereby it drops significantly to 0.48 mm2 at 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM (yellow bar), resulting in a theoretically summed seam cross-section area of 4.32 mm2 (green/yellow bar), which is below the value of 3.7 kW TruDisk12002. As already seen with the steel samples, all seam cross-section areas of the experimental combinations are above the values of the 3.7 kW TruDisk12002 and the theoretical sum and differ between 5.90 mm2 (FYLR = -6 mm) and 7.19 mm2 (FYLR = 0 mm). Compared to the average cross-section areas of the steel seams, the cross-section areas of the aluminum seams show the same peculiarities, whereas all their values except for the 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM only are approximate twice as high as the values of steel.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Left: Influence of the laser beam power and the laser source on the seam cross-section area in in EN AW-1050 H111 (all focal planes at 0 mm) and theoretical sum of the seam cross-section area of 3.1 kW TruDisk12002 and 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM. Right: Influence of the focal plane of the coaxially superimposed single-mode laser beam (0.6 kW) in disk laser deep penetration welding (3.1 kW, focal plane 0 mm) on the seam cross-section area in EN AW-1050 H111

Full size image

4 Discussion

In the following, the hypothesis that the narrower beam of an additional laser source can be transmitted to a significant extent through an existing wider keyhole generated by the initial laser beam, acts predominantly at the bottom of the keyhole by forming an additional narrower keyhole peak, i.e., a kind of keyhole-in-keyhole, is evaluated.

For both materials, some addition effect of the welding depths can be confirmed, since nearly all weld depth of the combined process exceed the values for the only disk laser powered processes and the measured maximum weld depth, which was observed for both materials at FYLR =  − 2 mm, is even slightly above the idealized value of the sum of the individual processes for aluminum, and is only slightly below the idealized value of the sum of the individual processes for steel. However, a clear addition of the two seam shapes could not be observed for both materials, since the seam that was welded with 0.6 kW single-mode laser is clearly more pronounced than the peaks in the weld depth that can be seen in the cross-sections of the combinations. The cross-section of the seam made from the steel sample (Table 5; FYLR =  − 2 mm), which allows conclusions to be drawn about the keyhole depth [4], can be divided into two parts. The upper part of the seam and thus of the former keyhole has a shape comparable to the shape of 3 kW disk laser beam only, meaning that it was mainly induced by the disk laser beam. Since the size of the upper, mainly disk laser–induced cross-section shape, increases for the combination compared to 2.4 kW for steel, respectively, 3.1 kW disk laser beam for aluminum, it can be concluded that there is also an energy input from the single-mode laser beam into the mainly disk laser beam–induced keyhole for both materials. The lower, pointed part of the seam was mainly induced by the single-mode laser beam as the shape is comparable to the bottom of the shape of the seam welded with 0.6 kW single-mode laser beam only. The described division of the seam into a mainly disk laser beam induced and a mainly single-mode laser beam–induced part means that the single-mode laser beam was to a significant extent transmitted through the disk laser induced keyhole, created an additional narrower keyhole peak at its bottom, and thus caused a kind “keyhole-in-keyhole formation,” regardless of the material, which supports the hypothesis.

When looking at the longitudinal sections (Figs. 6 and 9), however, it becomes clear that the additional keyhole tip leads to an unstable overall keyhole shape. The keyhole strives to adopt a more stable shape, which results in periodic inconstant welding behavior in the longitudinal direction of the seam. As was mentioned above, especially in laser deep welding of aluminum, the keyhole is also inherently unstable, which can cause the keyhole to collapse [9] or high dynamic keyhole shape changes. If this happens, the single-mode laser beam temporary can no longer hit the bottom of the disk laser induced keyhole and thus cannot cause a local deepening of the weld depth. For this reason, the effect occurs much more frequently in steel as the keyhole is much more stable. Looking at the longitudinal section of the sample welded with 0.6 kW YLR-1000SM at FYLR = 0 mm (Fig. 5), it becomes clear that the deep fluctuations are caused by the combination of both laser beams and the addition of their intensities in the seam center, since they cannot be seen to a similar depth here.

Based on the cross-sections, it could also be shown that the weld depth and the expression of the peaks have their measured maximum at FYLR =  − 2 mm for both materials. Making the assumption that the keyhole depth corresponds approximately to the weld depth measured in cross-sections [4], the depth of the disk laser beam–induced keyhole was 2.71 mm in steel, as measured for 2.4 kW disk laser beam power only (cf. Fig. 7), and 2.47 mm in aluminum, as measured for 3.1 kW disk laser beam power only (Fig. 10). Assuming further that the single-mode laser beam set to FYLR =  − 2 mm transmitted through the disk laser beam–induced keyhole, it was therefore focused closest to its bottom. Changing the value to FYLR =  − 4 mm or FYLR =  − 0 mm resulted in defocusing relative to the disk laser beam–induced keyhole bottom and a lower intensity, which was followed by a wider diameter and a lower depth of the single-mode laser beam additionally induced keyhole tip. This shows the clear correlation between the focal plane and the weld penetration depth and indicates that a maximum weld depth would be expected if the focal plane of the YLR-1000SM had been exactly set on the former disk laser beam–induced keyhole bottom, supporting the confirmation of the hypothesis. Furthermore, it could be a possible explanation why the idealized value of the theoretical sum of the weld depth could not be reached in case of steel but aluminum. Since the distance between the focal plane and the average depth of the disk laser beam–induced keyhole bottom (0.71 mm for steel, 0.47 mm for aluminum) exceeds the Rayleigh length of 0.51 mm of the single-mode laser beam for steel, but not for aluminum, the intensity of the laser beam at the keyhole bottom was lower for steel, resulting in a lower weld penetration depth. This also indicates that the results of the weld depth of steel and aluminum compared to the idealized theoretical sum can hardly be compared, since the same distance between the focal plane of the single-mode laser beam and the disk laser beam–induced keyhole bottom was not achieved and fluctuations in weld depth could be seen. From the increased cross-section areas of the combinations compared to the theoretical sums, it can be concluded that the total coupling of the laser radiation increases for steel and for aluminum which may also explain why the weld depth in aluminum exceeds the theoretical sum of the individual processes.

5 Conclusions

In this study, a specially designed optical system, which allows to coaxially combine two laser beams and adjust their settings like the power and the focal plane individually has been used to investigate the hypothesis that the narrower beam of an additional laser source can be transmitted to a significant extent through an existing wider keyhole generated by the initial laser beam, acts predominantly at the bottom of the keyhole by forming an additional narrower keyhole peak, i.e., a kind of keyhole-in-keyhole. For this purpose, combinations of a disk laser beam and a single-mode fiber laser beam with different focal planes were investigated. Effects of the single-mode fiber laser beam at the bottom of the seam as a function of its focal position could be visualized in the form of a peak in the weld depth due to a kind of “keyhole-in-keyhole formation.” Two conclusions can be drawn:

  1. (1)

    The hypothesis that the narrower beam of an additional laser source can be transmitted to a significant extent through an existing wider keyhole generated by the initial laser beam, acts predominantly at the bottom of the keyhole by forming an additional narrower keyhole peak, i.e., a kind of keyhole-in-keyhole, could be confirmed, whereby the effect has so far always fluctuated and not been stable.

  2. (2)

    With regard to the expression of the keyhole peak, a clear influence of the focal plane of the additional laser source could be identified.