Skip to main content

Umbilical Cord Blood and Serum for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract

Several blood derivatives have been proposed for the treatment of various ocular diseases that affect either the anterior or the posterior segment of the eye. Blood sources may range from the patient’s own peripheral blood (autologous) to donor tissues, mainly allogeneic peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood (UCB). The utilization of the latter permits the collection of a large amount of serum all at once, and is characterized by therapeutic feasibility in patients with a poor general condition or anemia and blood dyscrasia. Products derived from UCB have two potential uses. First, serum in the form of eye drops can be applied topically onto the ocular surface to efficiently treat anterior segment disorders such as dry eye syndrome or corneal epithelial defects with different etiologies. The rationale for and efficacy of this application derive from the high concentrations of biologically active components and growth factors in UCB, which can nourish the ocular surface. Second, UCB is a source of stem cells, which are used in the field of regenerative medicine because they differentiate into various mature cells, including corneal and retinal cells. Therefore, UCB-derived stem cells have been proposed as a replacement therapy for the treatment of retinal and optic nerve diseases, given that current standard treatments often fail. The present review explores the clinical results that have been obtained using UCB-derived products in the field of ophthalmology, as well as the current limitations of those products in this field. Furthermore, given the promising development of UCB-based therapies, possible future directions in this area are discussed.

FormalPara Key Summary Points
The use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) derivatives for the treatment of ocular diseases has become increasingly popular in recent years.
These derivatives include serum-based eye drops for the treatment of ocular surface disorders and stem-cell-based products for regenerating injured corneal, retinal, and optic nerve tissues.
Studies evaluating the use of UCB-derived stem cells in human models are required.
There is a need for a standardized therapeutic protocol that specifies the optimal formulation, dilution, and treatment duration for serum eye drops derived from UCB.

Introduction

Whole blood and various derivatives of it are used to treat a wide range of ophthalmic diseases that affect the ocular surface, the retina, and the optic nerve. Blood for ophthalmic clinical use can be extracted from the patient’s own peripheral blood (autologous blood) or from donors (allogeneic peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood, UCB). The most widely used blood-derivative products are fibrin-based products, albumin, serum, cryoprecipitate, platelets, plasmin, and fresh frozen plasma. Among platelet products, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has a high concentration of essential growth factors and cell adhesion molecules, which is achieved by concentrating platelets into a small volume of plasma. PRP is applied as eye drops or clots to aid wound healing by enhancing the physiological process at the site of an injury [1].

The ocular application of blood and its derivatives ranges from instillation to the ocular surface in the form of eye drops (e.g., serum) to the use of whole blood on the retina during vitreoretinal surgery. The idea of using products derived from blood to treat ocular disease was first described over 40 years ago by Ralph and coauthors, who developed a mobile ocular perfusion pump to deliver autologous serum (AS) to the ocular surfaces of patients affected by chemical burns [2]. Since then, the application of eye drops derived from AS (UCB serum, UCBS) or allogeneic serum (allo-S) to treat a wide range of ocular surface diseases, mainly severe dry eye due to either Sjögren syndrome (SS) or ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD), has been explored [3,4,5,6,7]. More recently, stem cells obtained from different sources, including UCB, have been used in cell replacement therapies for a variety of ocular pathologies (ranging from corneal scar to optic nerve degeneration) that are traditionally characterized by poor outcomes when treated with conventional therapies [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In the present review, we summarize the various types of products obtained from UCB and their current indications for the treatment of ocular diseases.

Literature Review: Methods

In this review article, a systematic computerized search of the literature was conducted from inception until November 2019. All English-language articles dealing with the topic of UCB derivatives in the treatment of ocular diseases were retrieved from the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trilals and then checked for applicability by the authors. The searches were performed by two independent investigators (G.G. and C.S.). The following keywords and MeSH terms were used: ‘allogeneic serum,’ ‘cornea,’ ‘ocular surface disease,’ ‘optic nerve,’ ‘retina,’ ‘stem cells,’ ‘umbilical cord blood,’ and ‘umbilical cord blood serum.’ All pertinent articles were thoroughly assessed, and their reference lists were scritinized to identify any other studies that were applicable to this review. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

UCB

The main application of UCB is hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation for the treatment of a variety of malignant and benign hematological disorders. The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research reported that over 8000 allogeneic transplant procedures were performed in the US in 2016 [18]. However, it is noteworthy that besides being a rich source of HSCs and hematopoietic progenitor cells, UCB is also a source of other cells with broad-ranging proliferation and differentiation capacities. These include mesenchymal stromal cells, capable of producing cells of the osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic lineages, and unrestricted somatic stem cells, a primitive cell type that expresses some features of pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that are defined by their ability to self-renew and differentiate into mature cells. They are attractive because of their high proliferative capacity, implying that an inexhaustible number of mature cells can be generated from a given stem cell source. Thus, cell replacement therapy has been proposed in recent years as a viable alternative treatment for various retinal pathologies, especially Stargardt’s disease, retinitis pigmentosa, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). An effective treatment of AMD is of particular importance since it is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss among the elderly. Although the pathogenesis of AMD is yet to be fully elucidated, there is increasing evidence of the involvement of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, which are known to play a key role in promoting and supporting photoreceptor cell survival. As a result, dysfunction and loss of RPE cells can lead to photoreceptor degeneration and subsequent decreased vision. Stem cell therapy that represents a combined rescue and cell replacement strategy has been proposed as a means to manage vision-threatening complications of AMD. Additionally, RPE cells derived from stem cells are able to produce neurotrophic factors that support photoreceptor survival through the paracrine effect. Koh et al. investigated whether treatment with cells derived from human umbilical tissue was able to preserve photoreceptors and synaptic connectivity in a rat model of retinal degeneration caused by Mertk loss of function. Subretinal transplantation of cells derived from umbilical tissue was shown to rescue visual function by preserving retinal synaptic connectivity and attenuating glial reactivity. Multiple injections provided enhanced effects, thus confirming the potential therapeutic application of these cells in the setting of human retinal degeneration [19]. Recently, ischemic retinopathies such as diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, and retinal vein occlusion have been treated using vasoregenerative cell therapy [20,21,22,23,24]. Furthermore, cell therapy has emerged as a promising tool for optic nerve regeneration and is expected to fill current gaps in the field of optic nerve protection. Zhang and coauthors evaluated the effects of intravitreal injection of neural stem cells originating from UCB-derived mesenchymal cells on neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy in rats. The treated group exhibited attenuated vascular dysfunction 4 weeks following the transplantation procedure and increased levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) compared to untreated rats. Moreover, morphologic retinal improvements were accompanied by signs of improved vision, as documented by flash electroretinogram. Several studies have since been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of UCB-based therapy in treating optic nerve injury with various etiologies. Chung and coauthors detected increased axon survival rates and decreased ganglion cell apoptosis in a model of optic nerve crush injury following a single intravitreal injection, whereas Zhang and Lv pointed out the positive effect of UCB treatment on optic nerve biomechanical properties, as shown by the increased maximum load, stress, and strain and the greater elasticity [8, 12, 13]. Furthermore, Ji and coauthors investigated the potential therapeutic benefits of intravitreally transplanted UCB-derived mesenchymal stem cells in an animal model of elevated intraocular pressure, which is a well-known risk factor for both the onset and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. The transplantation procedure revealed a neuroprotective effect that could be related to the secretion of trophic factors such as BDNF and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor [19, 24, 25]. Table 1 summarizes the main published studies on UCB use in ophthalmic practice.

Table 1 Results of animal studies of the application of UCB therapy to ocular diseases

UCBS

Serum is the noncellular supernatant that is left when whole blood clots. The rationale for applying serum to the ocular surface is that, compared to conventional lubricant treatments, it more closely resembles natural tears due to several of its biochemical constituents [3]. UCBS has been extensively used in the setting of ocular surface diseases and has produced satisfactory results in terms of efficacy and safety [3, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Yoon and coauthors were among the first to test the use of UCBS in the management of several ocular surface disorders, such as dry eye with or without SS, oGVHD, persistent epithelial defects, neurotrophic keratitis, and ocular chemical injury. Serum eye drops were administered topically 6–10 times a day over a period ranging from 2 to 6 months. Treated patients showed a faster epithelial healing rate, greater improvement in symptoms, and increased goblet cell density and corneal sensitivity when compared to healthy subjects. In particular, patients with neurotrophic keratitis experienced a 100% healing rate after approximately 1 month of therapy [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Furthermore, a significant improvement in corneal epitheliopathy (as indicated by a decreased Oxford staining score) and a higher number of nerves with improved morphology and lower tortuosity were reported by our group, who successfully treated moderate-to-severe forms of dry eye disease with UCBS [6]. Furthermore, the efficacy of serum-based therapy was measured objectively as the decreased expression of inflammatory markers such as cytokines and growth factors via histological examination in mouse models [34, 35]. A recent randomized crossover clinical trial compared the efficacy of UCBS and peripheral adult donor blood serum in the treatment of severe dry eye. Overall, signs improved after either treatment, but the UCBS treatment was found to be superior in terms of ameliorating subjective symptoms and reducing corneal damage [44].

The potential useful role of serum-based therapy is not limited to ocular surface diseases; it extends to neurodegenerative disorders such as glaucoma. A preliminary study that analyzed the effect of UCBS topically administered to glaucoma patients observed positive results, as shown by improvements in visual field test parameters. This efficacy is thought to be related to the high growth factor content of the serum, which potentially exerts a neuroprotective action on the optic nerve [45]. However, the authors stated that the incidentally observed amelioration in these glaucoma patients requires further investigation.

The main advantages of using serum eye drops obtained from donors such as UCBS are related to the elimination of the proinflammatory cytokines and autoantibodies present in the sera of patients with dry eye caused by systemic diseases (e.g., SS and oGVHD), as those proinflammatory cytokines and autoantibodies could cause damage if applied to the ocular surface [6]. This aspect should theoretically discourage the use of AS in these patients, who represent a significant percentage of severe dry eye cases. However, a recent study showed positive effects of AS on both the subjective symptoms and the objective signs of dry eye caused by systemic autoimmune diseases [46]. In another study, an attempt to predict the quality of AS by categorizing patients with SS into active and inactive groups according to the clinical activity of the disease failed to show any significant difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups [47]. Therefore, additional evidence is needed to clarify whether the use of AS can also be advantageous in patients with concomitant systemic diseases. Other advantages include the ability to use these products in patients with poor venous access, anaemia, and blood dyscrasia, and the potential to create a pool with the desired content of each growth factor. In fact, there is marked interindividual variability in growth factor content, which is thought to be the consequence of a combination of genetic, clinical, and pharmacological factors [48, 49]. Therefore, in order to reduce the variability in the biological constituents of the serum, pooling of serum samples from multiple donors is implemented to obtain final serum products containing required levels of the main constituents. This can be achieved in the laboratory by dosing serum with the desired growth factor, but such a procedure is expensive. Recently, preselection of UCBS with the ideal concentration of epidermal growth factor was realized by collecting UCB samples from young mothers (< 30 years) with a high CD34+ cell content (0.05 × 106/mL) following a long labor (> 6 h) [50]. The same approach could be applied to the other growth factors that play a pivotal role in ocular surface homeostasis (e.g., nerve growth factor).

The main disadvantage of allogeneic serum eye drops is the risk of transmitting infections, so it is essential to produce the serum according to good manufacturing practices. There are controversial theories concerning the need for ABO matching between donor and recipient. On the one hand, it is known that serum contains high levels of ABO substances that might act as antigens and initiate immune-complex‐mediated inflammation. On the other hand, the sporadic clinical use of ABO-mismatched eye drops has not been associated with overt immune-complex‐mediated hypersensitivity. Table 2 summarizes the main published studies on the use of UCBS in ophthalmic practice.

Table 2 Results of clinical studies of UCBS therapy in ocular diseases

The frequency and duration of treatment depends upon individual circumstances and are not governed by evidence-based guidelines. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists recently provided two examples of protocols for serum-derived eye drops: (1) withdrawal of treatment after 1 year of therapy in patients with ocular surface disease to define induction of remission, before reinstating indefinite treatment if the symptoms relapse; (2) withdrawal of treatment after the ocular surface has healed in patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects, with treatment restored only if the surface shows signs of recurrence. Recently, a research group summarized the current unanswered questions in this field and termed them the 5 W’s and 2 H’s: Who is the patient? Why is a blood-based treatment needed? When is it appropriate? Where are products dispensed? What is the product of choice? How is the product standardized? How is the treatment used in terms of posology, treatment duration, and number of cycles [51]?

Conclusions and Future Directions

Umbilical cord tissue is a major source of stem cells, which can be efficiently used to treat several ocular disorders. Therapeutic strategies based on stem cells depend not only on the synthesis of trophic and growth factors but also on the application of both mesenchymal and epithelial stem cells with anti-inflammatory and immune-privileged properties, as they can replace damaged tissues by differentiating into retinal and corneal epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells. Several studies have evaluated the use of UCB in experimental models of induced retinal and corneal injuries, but there are still no data on its application in humans [52]. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the effect and long-term safety of this therapy in human ophthalmic disorders, to clarify pharmacokinetic aspects, and to provide a standardized therapeutic scheme for the clinical use of UCB. Future research should also focus on standardizing protocols for cell culture, differentiation, expansion, and cryopreservation, as well as optimizing cell culture media and scaffolds that can support cell proliferation, maintenance, and differentiation.

On the other hand, more robust evidence is available on the use of UCBS for the treatment of ocular surface diseases. In fact, various randomized clinical trials have been conducted in humans to not only assess UCBS efficacy and safety but also its clinical superiority to both autologous and allogeneic serum eye drops [28, 44]. However, there are still some aspects of the therapeutic use of UCBS that need to addressed in further clinical trials or laboratory analyses. For instance, clinical trials comparing autologous to allogeneic serum eye drops in terms of clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness are required. Detailed analyses of the constituents of allogeneic serum are required to investigate the biovariability among donations and the impact that this biovariability could have on the effectiveness of the final product. Further research is also required on the optimal formulation (type of vehicle), dilution (20% vs 50–100%), duration of treatment (one or more months), and timing of repeated cycles (fixed or individualized for each clinical case). Last but not least, the development and validation of specific tools for both patient-reported and objective outcomes as well as minimal clinical datasets for collecting, analyzing, and sharing data are required.

References

  1. 1.

    Alio JL, Arnalich-Montiel F, Rodriguez AE. The role of “eye platelet rich plasma” (E-PRP) for wound healing in ophthalmology. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1257–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ralph RA, Doane MG, Dohlman CH. Clinical experience with a mobile ocular perfusion pump. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:1039–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Giannaccare G, Versura P, Buzzi M, Primavera L, Pellegrini M, Campos EC. Blood derived eye drops for the treatment of cornea and ocular surface diseases. Transfus Apher Sci. 2017;56:595–604.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Na KS, Kim MS. Allogeneic serum eye drops for the treatment of dry eye patients with chronic graft-versus-host diseases. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012;28:479–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chiang CC, Lin JM, Chen WL, Tsai YY. Allogeneic serum eye drops for the treatment of severe dry eye in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Cornea. 2007;26:861–3.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Giannaccare G, Buzzi M, Fresina M, Velati C, Versura P. Efficacy of 2-month treatment with cord blood serum eye drops in ocular surface disease: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Cornea. 2017;36:915–21.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mukhopadhyay S, Sen S, Datta H. Comparative role of 20% cord blood serum and 20% autologous serum in dry eye associated with Hansen’s disease: a tear proteomic study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:108–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chung S, Rho S, Kim G, et al. Human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells and chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote axon survival in a rat model of optic nerve crush injury. Int J Mol Med. 2016;37(5):1170–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang W, Wang Y, Kong J, Dong M, Duan H, Chen S. Therapeutic efficacy of neural stem cells originating from umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:408.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhu X, Jiang B, Zhang P, Zhou D. Effect of human umbilical cord blood stem cells on flash visual evoked potential in traumatic optic neuropathy in rats. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011;36:405–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang W, Wang C, Xie L, et al. Traditional two-dimensional mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are better than spheroid MSCs on promoting retinal ganglion cells survival and axon regeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2019;185:107699.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang ZJ, Li YJ, Liu XG, et al. Human umbilical cord blood stem cells and brain-derived neurotrophic factor for optic nerve injury: a biomechanical evaluation. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(7):1134–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lv XM, Liu Y, Wu F, Yuan Y, Luo M. Human umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells and brain-derived neurotrophic factor protect injured optic nerve: viscoelasticity characterization. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11(4):652–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shao C, Chen J, Chen P, et al. Targeted transplantation of human umbilical cord blood endothelial progenitor cells with immunomagnetic nanoparticles to repair corneal endothelium defect. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24:756–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jiang B, Zhang P, Zhou D, Zhang J, Xu X, Tang L. Intravitreal transplantation of human umbilical cord blood stem cells protects rats from traumatic optic neuropathy. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69938.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen M, Xiang Z, Cai J. The anti-apoptotic and neuro-protective effects of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) on acute optic nerve injury is transient. Brain Res. 2013;1532:63–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhao T, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, Fan F, Jiang B. Protective effects of human umbilical cord blood stem cell intravitreal transplantation against optic nerve injury in rats. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1021–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pasquini MC, Wang Z, Horowitz MM, Gale RP. 2010 Report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR): current uses and outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplants for blood and bone marrow disorders. Clin Transpl. 2010;2010:87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Koh S, Chen WJ, Dejneka NS, et al. Subretinal human umbilical tissue-derived cell transplantation preserves retinal synaptic connectivity and attenuates Müller glial reactivity. J Neurosci. 2018;38:2923–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Reid E, Guduric-Fuchs J, O’Neill CL, et al. Preclinical evaluation and optimization of a cell therapy using human cord blood-derived endothelial colony-forming cells for ischemic retinopathies. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7:59–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    He GH, Zhang W, Ma YX, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes ameliorate blue light stimulation in retinal pigment epithelium cells and retinal laser injury by VEGF-dependent mechanism. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:559–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mohamed EM, Abdelrahman SA, Hussein S, Shelaby SM, Mosaad H, Awad AM. Effect of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells administered by intravenous or intravitreal routes on cryo-induced retinal injury. IUBMB Life. 2017;69:188–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dong M, Zhang W, Chen S, et al. The protective effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-induced neural stem cells in the vitreous on the blood-retinal barrier in diabetic rats. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017;53:53–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang D, Zhang B, Shi H, et al. Effect of endothelial progenitor cells derived from human umbilical cord blood on oxygen-induced retinopathy in mice by intravitreal transplantation. J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:1578–83.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ji S, Lin S, Chen J, et al. Neuroprotection of transplanting human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in a microbead induced ocular hypertension rat model. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43:810–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yoon KC, Im SK, Park YG, Jung YD, Yang SY, Choi J. Application of umbilical cord serum eyedrops for the treatment of dry eye syndrome. Cornea. 2006;25:268–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yoon KC, You IC, Im SK, Jeong TS, Park YG, Choi J. Application of umbilical cord serum eyedrops for the treatment of neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1637–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yoon KC, Heo H, Im SK, You IC, Kim YH, Park YG. Comparison of autologous serum and umbilical cord serum eye drops for dry eye syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:86–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yoon KC, Heo H, Jeong IY, Park YG. Therapeutic effect of umbilical cord serum eyedrops for persistent corneal epithelial defect. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19:174–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yoon KC, Jeong IY, Im SK, Park YG, Kim HJ, Choi J. Therapeutic effect of umbilical cord serum eyedrops for the treatment of dry eye associated with graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2007;39:231–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yoon KC, Choi W, You IC, Choi J. Application of umbilical cord serum eyedrops for recurrent corneal erosions. Cornea. 2011;30:744–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yoon KC, Oh HJ, Park JW, Choi J. Application of umbilical cord serum eyedrops after laser epithelial keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(1):e22–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yoon KC. Use of umbilical cord serum in ophthalmology. Chonnam Med J. 2014;50:82–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Han KE, Park MH, Kong KH, Choi E, Choi KR, Jun RM. Therapeutic effects of three human-derived materials in a mouse corneal alkali burn model. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019;38(4):315–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Oh HJ, Jang JY, Li Z, Park SH, Yoon KC. Effects of umbilical cord serum eye drops in a mouse model of ocular chemical burn. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:1084–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Giannaccare G, Bonifazi F, Sessa M, et al. Dry eye is already present in hematological patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cornea. 2016;35:638–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Giannaccare G, Fresina M, Vagge A, Versura P. Synergistic effect of regenerating agent plus cord blood serum eye drops for the treatment of resistant neurotrophic keratitis: a case report and a hypothesis for pathophysiologic mechanism. Int Med Case Rep J. 2015;8:277–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Versura P, Giannaccare G, Pellegrini M, Sebastiani S, Campos E. Neurotrophic keratitis: current challenges and future prospects. Eye Brain. 2018;10:37–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vajpayee RB, Mukerji N, Tandon R, et al. Evaluation of umbilical cord serum therapy for persistent corneal epithelial defects. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(11):1312–6.

  40. 40.

    Sharma N, Goel M, Velpandian T, Titiyal JS, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Evaluation of umbilical cord serum therapy in acute ocular chemical burns. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1087–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Erdem E, Yagmur M, Harbiyeli I, Taylan-Sekeroglu H, Ersoz R. Umbilical cord blood serum therapy for the management of persistent corneal epithelial defects. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7:807–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Versura P, Profazio V, Buzzi M, et al. Efficacy of standardized and quality-controlled cord blood serum eye drop therapy in the healing of severe corneal epithelial damage in dry eye. Cornea. 2013;32:412–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kamble N, Sharma N, Maharana PK, et al. Evaluation of the role of umbilical cord serum and autologous serum therapy in reepithelialization after keratoplasty: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(5):324–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Campos E, Versura P, Buzzi M, et al. Blood derived treatment from two allogeneic sources for severe dry eye associated to keratopathy: a multicentre randomised cross over clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Campos E, Versura P, Giannaccare G, et al. Topical treatment with cord blood serum in glaucoma patients: a preliminary report. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2018;2018:2381296.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ali TK, Gibbons A, Cartes C, et al. Use of autologous serum tears for the treatment of ocular surface disease from patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;189:65–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ma IH, Chen LW, Tu WH, Lu CJ, Huang CJ, Chen WL. Serum components and clinical efficacies of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye patients with active and inactive Sjogren syndrome. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2017;7:213–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Damasiewicz MJ, Lu ZX, Kerr PG, Polkinghorne KR. The stability and variability of serum and plasma fibroblast growth factor-23 levels in a haemodialysis cohort. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:325.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dziankowska-Bartkowiak B, Waszczykowska E, Dziankowska-Zaboroszczyk E, et al. Decreased ratio of circulatory vascular endothelial growth factor to endostatin in patients with systemic sclerosis—association with pulmonary involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006;24:508–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Versura P, Buzzi M, Giannaccare G, et al. Targeting growth factor supply in keratopathy treatment: comparison between maternal peripheral blood and cord blood as sources for the preparation of topical eye drops. Blood Transfus. 2016;14:145–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bernabei F, Roda M, Buzzi M, Pellegrini M, Giannaccare G, Versura P. Blood-based treatments for severe dry eye disease: the need of a consensus. J Clin Med. 2019;8(9):E1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091478.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ng TK, Fortino VR, Pelaez D, Cheung HS. Progress of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for neural and retinal diseases. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:111–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or the publication of this article.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Giuseppe Giannaccare, Adriano Carnevali, Carlotta Senni, Laura Logozzo, and Vincenco Scorcia declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano Carnevali.

Additional information

Enhanced Digital Features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11835852.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannaccare, G., Carnevali, A., Senni, C. et al. Umbilical Cord Blood and Serum for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Ophthalmol Ther 9, 235–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-020-00239-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Allogeneic serum
  • Cornea
  • Ocular surface disease
  • Optic nerve
  • Retina
  • Stem cells
  • Umbilical cord blood
  • Umbilical cord blood serum