Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of stigma receptivity via papillar integrity in Kigelia pinnata (Bignoniaceae)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stigma of Kigelia pinnata is spathulate, wet and sensitive to touch. Consisting of two flaps or folds, the inner surface of these stigmatic flaps is papillate. Covered by a prominent papillar zone, each papilla contains lipid and phenolic deposits which remain entrapped below the thick cuticle till the stigma attains receptivity. Gradual unfolding of stigmatic flaps; about 1 h post anthesis, marks the beginning of stigma receptivity. Reaching a peak at 24 h after anthesis, the stigma remains receptive for 48 h. Papillae gradually lose turgidity after 72 h post anthesis and liberate their contents into the outside medium. During this time, stigma receptivity declines sharply as can be made out from the germination of only 10% pollen. Thereafter, none of the pollen deposited on the stigma germinates. The papillar phenology exhibits a close coordination with stigma receptivity indicating that both the processes are proportionately related to each other. Therefore, evaluation of papillar integrity can be used as a quick method to check stigma receptivity in K. pinnata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kulloli SK, Ramasubbu R, Sreekala AK, Pandurangan AG (2010) Cytochemical localization of stigma surface esterases in three species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) of Western Ghats. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 1:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR (1977) The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann Bot 41:1233–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1985) Surfaces and secretions in the pollen-stigma interaction: a brief review. J Cell Sci Suppl 2:287–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Slater AT, Calder DM (1990) Fine structure of the wet, detached cell stigma of the orchid Dendrobrium speciosum Sm. Sex Plant Reprod 3:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kenrick J, Knox RB (1981) Post pollination exudate from stigmas of Acacia (Mimosaceae). Ann Bot 48:103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME (1993) Pollen-stigma signalling in the sporophytic self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell 5:1325–1335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez MV, Coque M, Herrero M (1995) Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigma receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J Exp Bot 46:263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghose S, Shivanna KR (1984) Structure and cytochemistry of the stigma and pollen-pistil interaction in Zephyranthus. Ann Bot 53:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gentry AH (1976) Relationships of the Madagascar Bignoniaceae: a striking case of convergent evolution. Plant Syst Evolut 126:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raina M (2013) Morpho-anatomical studies of pistil with emphasis on the type of self-incompatibility in Kigelia pinnata (Jacq.) DC. Dissertation, University of Jammu

  11. Raina M, Kumar R, Kaul V (2017) Stigmatic limitations on reproductive success in a paleotropical tree: causes and consequences. AoB Plants 9:plx023. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Benes K (1968) On the stainability of pollen cell walls with alcian blue. Biolia Plant 10:334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feder N, O’Brien TP (1968) Plant microtechniques: some principles and new methods. Am J Bot 55:123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnamurthy KV (1999) Methods in cell wall cytochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y, Knox RB, Howlett B (1973) Pollen wall proteins: gametophytic and sporophytic fractions in the pollen wall of the Malvaceae. Ann Bot 37:403–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shivanna KR, Rangaswamy NS (1992) Pollen biology—a laboratory manual. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 45–47

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin FW (1970) Compounds of the stigmatic surface of Zea mays L. Ann Bot 34:835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heslop-Harrison Y (1981) Stigma characteristics and angiosperm I, taxonomy. Nord J Bot 1:401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Szember E, Wocior S (1991) Influence of flavanoids and other phenolic compounds on pollen germination and growth of the pollen tube. Fruit Sci Rep 28:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholson RL, Hammerschmidt R (1992) Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:369–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stpiczynska M (2003) Stigma receptivity during the life span of Platanthera chlorantha Custar (Rchib.) flowers. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 45/1:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kandasamy MK, Thorsness MK, Rundle SJ, Goldberg ML, Nasrallah JB, Nasrallah ME (1993) Ablation of papillar cell function in Brassica flowers results in the loss of stigma receptivity to pollination. Plant Cell 5:263–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Galen C, Shykoff JA, Plowright RC (1986) Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. Am Soc Nat 127:462–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cresti M, Tiezzi A (2011) Sexual plant reproduction. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fahn A (1988) Secretory tissue in vascular plants. New Phytol 108:229–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rana A (2009) Morphological differences in the stigma of fruit bearing and fruitless plants of Kigelia pinnata DC. (Bignoniaceae). J Plant Reprod Biol 1(1):43–48

    Google Scholar 

  27. Verma S, Magotra R, Koul AK (2001) Insect induced anther dehiscence, pollination and maximization of maternal rewards. In: Ganeshaiah KN, Uma Shanker R, Bawa KS (eds) Tropical ecosystems: structure, diversity and human welfare. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 211–213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authors acknowledges the award of Junior Research Fellowship (No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2014/124) by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), INSPIRE, New Delhi. The authors thank the Head, Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu for providing the necessary library and laboratory facilities. They also acknowledge Mr. Ishwar Singh for his assistance in the field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Jammu, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 180006, India

    Madhu Raina & Veenu Kaul

Authors
  1. Madhu Raina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veenu Kaul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhu Raina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.

Additional information

Significance statement This is the first ever comprehensive study of the patterns of stigma receptivity and fundamentals of papillar phenology in K. pinnata. This article provides a novel method to check stigma receptivity instantly; without using the conventional methods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raina, M., Kaul, V. Assessment of stigma receptivity via papillar integrity in Kigelia pinnata (Bignoniaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 89, 867–875 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-0999-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-0999-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation