Abstract
Response surface methodology based at three levels and four factors central composite rotatable design was employed to develop groundnut meal (GM) incorporated extruded snack-food using twin screw extruder. The effect of GM incorporation (15–25%), moisture content of extruder feed (14–18%), screw speed (300–330 rpm) and barrel temperature (110–130 °C) on responses like expansion ratio (ER), breaking strength (BS), water solubility index (WSI) and overall acceptability (OAA) score of extrudates. A second-order polynomial model was used to study and explain the relationships between the responses and independent variables. GM content was found to be the most significant variable as it affected negatively ER and OAA (p < 0.01) while positively BS (p < 0.01) and WSI (p < 0.1). Moisture content significantly affected negatively on ER (p < 0.05), WSI (p < 0.01), OAA (p < 0.05) and positively on BS (p < 0.01). Screw speed significantly affected negatively ER (p < 0.05), OAA (p < 0.01) and positively BS (p < 0.05). Barrel temperature did not affect significantly on the responses within experimental levels. By employing graphical superimposition GM content of 20%, moisture content of 15%, screw speed of 309 rpm and barrel temperature of 130 °C were optimized. Extruded snack-food at optimized variables showed higher protein and fiber content as compared with control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington DC
Asare E, Safa-Dedeh S, Afoakwa EO, Sakyi-Dawson E, Simpson BA (2012) Extrusion cooking of rice-groundnut-cowpea mixtures—effects of extruder characteristics on nutritive value and physico-functional properties of extrudates using response surface methodology. J Food Process Preserv 36:465–476
Badwaik LS, Prasad K, Seth D (2014) Optimization of ingredient levels for the development of peanut based fiber rich pasta. J Food Sci Technol 51:2713–2719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0779-8
Brennan MA, Derbyshire E, Tiwari BK, Brennan CS (2013) Ready to eat snack products: the role of extrusion technology in developing consumer acceptable and nutritious snacks. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:893–902
Chavan JK, Shinde VS, Kadam SS (1991) Utilization of expeller pressed partially defatted peanut cake meal in the preparation of bakery products. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 41:253–259
De Pilli T, Carbone BF, Derossi A, Fiore AG, Severini C (2008) Effects of operating conditions on oil loss and structure of almond snacks. Int J Food Sci Technol 43:430–439
Desai BB, Kotecha PM, Salunkhe DK (1999) Composition and nutritional quality in introduction science and technology of groundnut: biology, production, processing and utilization. Naya Prakash Publications, New Delhi, pp 185–199
Ding QB, Ainsworth P, Tucker G, Marson H (2005) The effect of extrusion conditions on the physicochemical properties and sensory characteristics of rice based expanded snacks. J Food Eng 66:283–289
Falcone RG, Phillips RD (1988) Effects of feed composition, feed moisture and barrel temperature on physical and rheological properties of snack-like products prepared from cowpea and sorghum flour by extrusion. J Food Sci 53:1464–1469
FAOSTAT (2017) Food and agricultural organization of the United Nation. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
FAS USDA (2017) Foreign agricultural services. United States Department of Agriculture Commodity Intelligence Report. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/2017/01/India/index.htm
Gan HE, Karim R, Muhammad SKS, Bakar JA, Hashim DM, Rahman RA (2007) Optimization of the basic formulation of a traditional baked cassava cake using response surface methodology. Lebensm Wiss Technol 40:611–618
Ganorkar PM, Patel JM, Shah V, Rangrej VV (2016) Defatted flaxseed meal incorporated corn-rice flour blend based extruded product by response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol 53:1867–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2134-3
Guy R (2001) Extrusion cooking: technologies and application. Wood Head Publishing Ltd, Cambridge
Hashemi N, Mortazavi SA, Milani E, Yazdi FT (2017) Microstructural and textural properties of puffed snack prepared from partially defatted almond powder and corn flour. J Food Process Preserv 2017(00):e13210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13210
Ilo S, Liu Y, Berghofer E (1999) Extrusion cooking of rice flour and amaranth blends. Lebensm Wiss Technol 32:79–88
Liu Y, Hsieh F, Heymann H, Huff HE (2000) Effect of process conditions on the physical and sensory properties of extruded oat-corn puff. J Food Sci 65:1253–1259
Meng X, Threinen D, Hansen M, Driedger D (2010) Effects of extrusion conditions on system parameters and physical properties of chickpea flour-based snack. Food Res Int 43:650–658
Onwulata CI, Konstance RP (2006) Extruded corn meal and whey protein concentrate: effect of particle size. J Food Process Preserv 30:475–487
Pankyamma V, Basu S, Bhadran SS, Chouksey MK, Gudipati V (2014) Fish oil-fortified extruded snacks: evaluation of physical properties and oxidative stability by response surface methodology. J Food Process Eng 37:349–361
Purohit C, Rajyalakshmi P (2011) Quality of products containing defatted groundnut cake flour. J Food Sci Tech 48:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0125-y
Rais M, Acharya S, Sharma N (2013) Food processing industry in India: S&T capability, skills and employment opportunities. J Food Process Technol 4:260. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000260
Ranganna S (2000) Sensory evaluation. In: Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetable products, pp. 623–629. Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Co Ltd, New Delhi
Shahmohammadi HR, Jamilah B, Russly AR, Noranizan MA (2016) Optimization of puffed corn-fish snack extrusion conditions using response surface methodology. Int Food Res J 23:1685–1693
Singh N, Smith AC (1997) A comparison of wheat starch, whole wheat meal and oat flour in the extrusion cooking process. J Food Eng 34:15–32
Sun Y, Muthukumarappan K (2002) Changes in functionality of soybased extrudates during single-screw extrusion processing. Int J Food Prop 5:379–389
Thachil MT, Subrato B, Chouksey MK, Venkateshwarlu G (2016) Modeling the inclusion of fish powder and fish oil into extruded snacks by response surface methodology. J Aquat Food Product Technol 25:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2013.826316
Thymi S, Krokida MK, Pappa A, Maroulis ZB (2005) Structural properties of extruded corn starch. J Food Eng 68:519–526
van der Sman RGM, Broeze J (2013) Structuring of indirectly expanded snacks based on potato ingredients: a review. J Food Eng 114:413–425
Venkataraghavan U (1998) Newer dimensions in the processing of oilseeds for food uses Indian. Food Ind 17:272–275
Wu W, Huff HE, Hsieh F (2007) Processing and properties of extruded flaxseed–corn puff. J Food Process Preserv 31:211–226
Yagci S, Goguş F (2008) Response surface methodology for evaluation of physical and functional properties of extruded snack foods developed from food-by-products. J Food Eng 86:122–132
Yu L, Ramaswamy HS, Boye J (2012) Protein rich extruded products prepared from soy protein isolate-corn flour blends. LWT-Food Sci Technol 50:79–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.012
Zhao X, Chen J, Du F (2012) Potential use of peanut by-products in food processing: a review. J Food Sci Tech 49:521–529
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to the management of A.D. Patel Institute of Technology, New Vallabh Vidya Nagar, Anand, Gujarat, India, for providing extrusion facility and financial help for conducting the present investigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ganorkar, P.M., Shah, M.V., Kamariya, J.C. et al. Development of Groundnut Meal Incorporated Rice–Corn Flour Based Extruded Snack-Food. Agric Res 10, 324–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00495-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00495-y