Abstract
Increase of greenhouse gases surrounding the earth has recently put the world in a dangerous condition. Thus, the term green building technology has progressively been used to control sustainability matters and to develop standards that can control carbon emissions and energy consumptions. University buildings are not excluded from the energy conservation problems due to their population and activities. Consequently, this study intended to find and prioritize the criteria, sub-criteria, and the associated indicators based on their level of importance in assessing green building universities in Malaysia. Based on the green building index (GBI), the most well-known sustainability rating system for buildings in Malaysia, the criteria and their associated indicators were identified. A panel of experts in consultation and implementation of green buildings in Malaysia was selected for data collection purposes. Criteria and their associated indicators were ranked based on their level of significance using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Results showed that indoor environmental quality and energy efficiency were the most significant criteria while the innovation was the least important criteria in evaluating green building universities. Findings of this research provide new knowledge for stakeholders involved in the implementation of green building in universities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd Rahman NM, Lim CH, Fazlizan A (2021) Optimizing the energy saving potential of public hospital through a systematic approach for green building certification in Malaysia. J Build Eng 43:103088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103088
AbdelAzim AI, Ibrahim AM, Aboul-Zahab EM (2017) Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using analytic hierarchy process-the case of Egypt. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.071
Ahmed MF, Mokhtar MB, Lim CK, Hooi AWK, Lee KE (2021) Leadership roles for sustainable development: the case of a Malaysian green hotel. Sustainability 13(18):10260
Al Horr Y, Arif M, Kaushik A, Mazroei A, Katafygiotou M, Elsarrag E (2016b) Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build Environ 105:369–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001
Al-Horr Y, Arif M, Katafygiotou M, Mazroei A, Kaushik A, Elsarrag E (2016a) Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: a review of the literature. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006
Ali HH, Al Nsairat SF (2009) Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries–case of Jordan. Build Environ 44(5):1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.015
Ali A-S, Kamaruzzaman S-N, Sulaiman R, Cheong Peng Y (2010) Factors affecting housing maintenance cost in Malaysia. J Facil Manag 8(4):285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961011078990
Alyami SH, Rezgui Y, Kwan A (2013) Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.011
Asadi S, Nilashi M, Samad S, Abdullah R, Mahmoud M, Alkinani MH, Yadegaridehkordi E (2021) Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 282:124474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474
Asadi S, Nilashi M, Iranmanesh M, Ghobakhloo M, Samad S, Alghamdi A, Almulihi A, Mohd S (2022) Drivers and barriers of electric vehicle usage in Malaysia: A DEMATEL approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 177:105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105965
Atici KB, Yasayacak G, Yildiz Y, Ulucan A (2021) Green University and academic performance: an empirical study on UI GreenMetric and World University Rankings. J Clean Prod 291:125289
Baharuddin WNA, Abdullah SNHS, Sahran S, Qasem A, Abdullah AB, Iqbal R, Ismail F(2016) Type 2 fuzzy logic for mammogram breast tissue classification. Paper presented at the 2016 international conference on industrial informatics and computer systems (CIICS)
Barmparesos N, Papadaki D, Karalis M, Fameliari K, Assimakopoulos MN (2019) In situ measurements of energy consumption and indoor environmental quality of a pre-retrofitted student dormitory in Athens. Energies 12(11):2210
Busch JF, Du Pont P, Chirarattananon S (1993) Energy-efficient lighting in Thai commercial buildings. Energy 18(2):197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90104-L
Calabrese A, Costa R, Levialdi N, Menichini T (2019) Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: a fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technol Forecast Soc Change 139:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005
Cegan JC, Filion AM, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2017) Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environ Syst Decis 37(2):123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9642-9
Champagne CL, Aktas CB (2016) Assessing the resilience of LEED certified green buildings. Procedia Eng 145:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.095
Chandratilake S, Dias W (2013) Sustainability rating systems for buildings: comparisons and correlations. Energy 59:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.026
Chen Y, Xu J, Zhao D, Wang J, Lund PD (2021) Exergo-economic assessment and sensitivity analysis of a solar-driven combined cooling, heating and power system with organic Rankine cycle and absorption heat pump. Energy 230:120717
Chi B, Lu W, Ye M, Bao Z, Zhang X (2020) Construction waste minimization in green building: a comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China. J Clean Prod 256:120749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749
Choong WW, Chong YF, Low ST (2012) Implementation of energy management key practices in Malaysian universities. Int J Emerg Sci 2(3):455
Fissi S, Romolini A, Gori E, Contri M (2021) The path toward a sustainable green university: the case of the University of Florence. J Clean Prod 279:123655
Foo KY (2013) A vision on the role of environmental higher education contributing to the sustainable development in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 61:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.014
Gan X, Fernandez IC, Guo J, Wilson M, Zhao Y, Zhou B, Wu J (2017) When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecol Indic 81:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068
Gandhi NS, Thanki SJ, Thakkar JJ (2018) Ranking of drivers for integrated lean-green manufacturing for Indian manufacturing SMEs. J Clean Prod 171:675–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.041
Goni FA, Chofreh AG, Mukhtar M, Sahran S, Shukor SA, Klemeš JJ (2017) Strategic alignment between sustainability and information systems: a case analysis in Malaysian public higher education institutions. J Clean Prod 168:263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.021
Goudarzi S, Anisi MH, Soleymani SA, Ayob M, Zeadally S (2021) An IoT-based prediction technique for efficient energy consumption in buildings. IEEE Trans Green Commun Network. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGCN.2021.3091388
Greenbuildingindex (2009a) Retrieved from https://www.greenbuildingindex.org/how-gbi-works/gbi-rating-system/
Greenbuildingindex (2009b. GBI assessment criteria for non-residential new construction (NRNC). Retrieved from https://www.greenbuildingindex.org/Files/Resources/GBI%20Tools/GBI%20NRNC%20Non-Residential%20Tool%20V1.0.pdf
Hamid ZA, Roslan A, Ali M, Hung F, Noor M, Kilau NM (2014) Towards a national green building rating system for Malaysia. Malays Constr Res J 14:1–16
Haroglu H (2013) The impact of Breeam on the design of buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng Sustain 166:11–19
Illankoon ICS, Lu W (2019) Optimising choices of ‘building services’ for green building: Interdependence and life cycle costing. Build Environ 161:106247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106247
Illankoon ICS, Tam VW, Le KN, Shen L (2017) Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. J Clean Prod 164:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.206
Joppolo CM, Del Curto D, Luciani A, Valisi LP, Bellebono M (2017) Keeping it modern, making it sustainable. Monitoring and energy retrofitting the Urbino University Colleges. Energy Procedia 133:243–256
Khalil N, Kamaruzzaman SN, Baharum MR (2016) Ranking the indicators of building performance and the users’ risk via analytical hierarchy process (AHP): case of Malaysia. Ecol Indic 71:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.032
Khoshnava SM, Rostami R, Valipour A, Ismail M, Rahmat AR (2018) Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method. J Clean Prod 173:82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.066
Kibert CJ (2016) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Wiley, Hoboken
Leong WD, Teng SY, How BS, Ngan SL, Rahman AA, Tan CP, Ponnambalam SG, Lam HLoong (2020) Enhancing the adaptability: lean and green strategy towards the industry revolution 4.0. J Clean Prod 273:122870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122870
Li M, Wang H, Wang D, Shao Z, He S (2020) Risk assessment of gas explosion in coal mines based on fuzzy AHP and Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot 135:207–218
Lim G-H, Hirning MB, Keumala N, Ghafar NA (2017) Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in Malaysia. Energy Build 141:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.028
Liu H, Lin B (2016) Ecological indicators for green building construction. Ecol Indic 67:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.024
Liu Y, Eckert CM, Earl C (2020) A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst Appl 161:113738
Love PE, Niedzweicki M, Bullen PA, Edwards DJ (2011) Achieving the green building council of Australia’s world leadership rating in an office building in Perth. J Constr Eng Manag 138(5):652–660. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000461
MacNaughton P, Cao X, Buonocore J, Cedeno-Laurent J, Spengler J, Bernstein A, Allen J (2018) Energy savings, emission reductions, and health co-benefits of the green building movement. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol 28(4):307–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-017-0014-9
Mafarja M, Abdullah S (2015) A fuzzy record-to-record travel algorithm for solving rough set attribute reduction. Int J Syst Sci 46(3):503–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.791000
Mahdiyar A, Mohandes SR, Durdyev S, Tabatabaee S, Ismail S (2020) Barriers to green roof installation: an integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach. J Clean Prod 269:122365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122365
Mahmood N, Tawil N, Hussain A (2021) Active and passive design factors that affect rental depreciation in purpose-built office green buildings. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol IJARET. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.12.1.2021.086
Malmqvist T, Glaumann M, Assefa G, Kindembe B, Hult H, Myhr U, Eriksson O (2005) Environmental assessment of real estates–where natural and social sciences meet: the case of EcoEffect. Paper presented at the the international conference sustainable building 2005
Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D, Jusoh A, Nor KM, Khoshnoudi M (2016) Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy saving technologies and solutions in five star hotels: a new hierarchical framework. Energy 117:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.076
Mat S, Sopian K, Mokhtar M, Ali B, Hashim HS, Rashid AKA, Abdullah NG (2009) Managing sustainable campus in Malaysia-Organisational approach and measures. Eur J Soc Sci 8(2):201–214
Mattoni B, Guattari C, Evangelisti L, Bisegna F, Gori P, Asdrubali F (2018) Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:950–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105
Mokhtar Azizi NS, Fassman E, Wilkinson S, Che Ani AI (2013) Management practice to achieve energy efficiency performance: Green versus conventional office building in Malaysia. J Legal Aff Dispute Resolut Eng Constr 5(4):205–214
Mun TL (2009) The development of GBI Malaysia (GBI) Pam/Acem, 1–8
Munda G (2005) “Measuring sustainability”: a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7(1):117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0
Najihah N, Bakar A, Hassan M, Rahman H (2013) Sustainable energy management practices and its effect on EEI: a study on university buildings. J Mod Sci Technol 2:1–11
Nilashi M, Zakaria R, Ibrahim O, Majid MZA, Zin RM, Chugtai MW, Yakubu DA (2015) A knowledge-based expert system for assessing the performance level of green buildings. Knowl Based Syst 86:194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.009
Pan BT-C, Kao J-J (2021) Comparison of indices for evaluating building green values based on greenhouse gas emission reductions. Ecol Indic 122:107228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107228
Papargyropoulou E, Padfield R, Harrison O, Preece C (2012) The rise of sustainability services for the built environment in Malaysia. Sustain Cities Soc 5:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.008
Petidis I, Aryblia M, Daras T, Tsoutsos T (2018) Energy saving and thermal comfort interventions based on occupants’ needs: a students’ residence building case. Energy Build 174:347–364
Qian QK, Chan EH (2010) Government measures needed to promote building energy efficiency (BEE) in China. Facilities 28(11/12):564–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011066602
Ragazzi M, Ghidini F (2017) Environmental sustainability of universities: critical analysis of a green ranking. Energy Procedia 119:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.054
Rosa LV, Haddad AN (2013) Assessing the sustainability of existing buildings using the analytic hierarchy process. Am J Civ Eng 1(1):24–30
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26
Safari F, Safari N, Hasanzadeh A (2015) The adoption of software-as-a-service (SaaS): ranking the determinants. J Enterp Inf Manag 28(3):400–422
Saleh AA, Mohammed AH, Abdullah MN (2015) Critical success factors for sustainable university: a framework from the energy management view. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 172:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.392
Serrano-Baena MM, Triviño-Tarradas P, Ruiz-Díaz C, Hidalgo Fernández RE (2020) Implications of BREEAM sustainability assessment on the design of hotels. Sustainability 12(16):6550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166550
Shad R, Khorrami M, Ghaemi M (2017) Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: case study in Mashhad city. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:324–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.004
Shaikh PH, Nor NBM, Sahito AA, Nallagownden P, Elamvazuthi I, Shaikh M (2017) Building energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.128
Shan M, Hwang B-G (2018) Green building rating systems: global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustain Cities Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.034
Singh A, Syal M, Grady SC, Korkmaz S (2010) Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am J Public Health 100(9):1665–1668
Song Y, Thatcher D, Li Q, McHugh T, Wu P (2021) Developing sustainable road infrastructure performance indicators using a model-driven fuzzy spatial multi-criteria decision making method. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 138:110538. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.180687
Suruhanjaya T (2014) Energy commission, national energy balance. ISSN: 0128– 6323. Retrieved from http://www.st.gov.my
Tabatabaee S, Mahdiyar A, Durdyev S, Mohandes SR, Ismail S (2019) An assessment model of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks of green roof installation: a multi criteria decision making approach. J Clean Prod 238:117956
Tans ED (2017) Sustainable academic libraries: a campus partnership at Michigan state university handbook of theory and practice of sustainable. In: Development in higher education. Springer, pp 89–100
Tupenaite L, Lill I, Geipele I, Naimaviciene J (2017) Ranking of sustainability indicators for assessment of the new housing development projects: case of the Baltic states. Resources 6(4):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6040055
Ulubeyli S, Kazanci O (2018) Holistic sustainability assessment of green building industry in Turkey. J Clean Prod 202:197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.111
Wang L, Gwilliam J, Jones P (2009) Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energy Build 41(11):1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.001
Wang Y, Shi H, Sun M, Huisingh D, Hansson L, Wang R (2013) Moving towards an ecologically sound society? Starting from green universities and environmental higher education. J Clean Prod 61:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.038
Wang Y, Xu L, Solangi YA (2020) Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach. Sustain Cities Soc 52:101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101861
Yadegaridehkordi E, Nizam Bin Md Nasir H, Fazmidar Binti Mohd Noor N, Shuib L, Badie N (2018) Predicting the adoption of cloud-based technology using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and structural equation modelling approaches. Appl Soft Comput 66:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.051
Yadegaridehkordi E, Hourmand M, Nilashi M, Alsolami E, Samad S, Mahmoud M, Alarood AA, Zainol A, Majeed HD, Shuib L (2020) Assessment of sustainability indicators for green building manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. J Clean Prod 277:122905
Yang W, Zhang J (2021) Assessing the performance of gray and green strategies for sustainable urban drainage system development: a multi-criteria decision-making analysis. J Clean Prod 293:126191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126191
Yazdani M, Chatterjee P, Zavadskas EK, Hashemkhani Zolfani S (2017) Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 142:3728–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095
Yin S, Li B (2018) Matching management of supply and demand of green building technologies based on a novel matching method with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J Clean Prod 201:748–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.055
Yu W, Li B, Yang X, Wang Q (2015) A development of a rating method and weighting system for green store buildings in China. Renew Energy 73:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.013
Yuan X, Zuo J, Huisingh D (2013) Green Universities in China—What matters? J Clean Prod 61:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.030
Yusoff WZW, Wen WR (2014) Analysis of the international sustainable building rating systems (SBRSS) for sustainable development with special focused on green building index (GBI) Malaysia. J Environ Conserv Res 11:11–26
Zou Y (2019) Certifying green buildings in China: LEED vs. 3-star. J Clean Prod 208:880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.204
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Chenxi Li.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Green building index assessment criteria for NRNC (Greenbuildingindex 2009b)
See Tables 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
Appendix 2: Compassion matrices for criteria, sub-criteria and indicators
See Tables 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadegaridehkordi, E., Nilashi, M. Moving towards green university: a method of analysis based on multi-criteria decision-making approach to assess sustainability indicators. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 8207–8230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04086-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04086-y