Skip to main content
Log in

Emotion, Perception, and Natural Kinds

  • Thematic Issue Article: Natural Kinds: New Dawn?
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question addressed in this paper is whether particular emotional experiences or episodes of an emotion (such as two experiences of happiness) belong to a natural kind. The final answer to this question is that although some, even many, single episodes of an emotion may group into a natural kind, belonging to a natural kind is a highly contextual matter. The proposal relies on two premises. First, a conception of natural kind-hood that follows Boyd’s Homeostatic Property Cluster Theory. Second, a view of emotional episodes that fits with the External Theory of Perception: typical emotional episodes are perceptual experiences of emotional affordances. After pointing out what candidates for emotional homeostatic properties could be like and suggesting some examples of emotional homeostatic mechanisms, the authors conclude that there are property clusters of emotional perceptions stabilized by homeostatic mechanisms. In spite of this, what counts as an emotional natural kind depends on many factors, not all of them natural: world properties, bodily and mental states of the agent, learning mechanisms that help us to satisfactorily navigate in the world, cultural differences that determine our perceptual style, as well as different interests which guide the explanation and prediction of emotional episodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett L (2006a) Are emotions natural kinds? Perspect Psychol Sci 1:28–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett L (2006b) Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emotion. Pers Soc Psychol 10:20–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee H, Sabbarton-Leary N (2010) Are psychiatric kinds “real”? Eur J Anal Phil 6:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1991) Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philos Stud 61:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (2010) Homeostasis, higher taxa, and monophyly. Philos Sci 77:686–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charland L (2002) The natural kind status of emotion. Brit J Philos Sci 53:511–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1895) The theory of emotion: (2) The significance of emotions. Psychol Rev 3:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan S, Barrett LF (2007) Affect is a form of cognition: a neurobiological analysis. Cogn Emot 21(6):1184–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N (1988) The laws of emotion. Am Psychol 43:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N (2005) Emotion experience. Cogn Emot 19:473–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1986) The ecological approach to perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1997) What emotions really are. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1739/1984) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • James W (1884) What is an emotion? Mind 9:188–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambie JA, Marcel AJ (2002) Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: a theoretical Framework. Psychol Rev 109:219–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda T, Ellsworth P, Mesquita B, Leu J, Tanida S, Van de Veerdonk E (2008) Placing the face in context: cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita B (2003) Emotions as dynamic cultural phenomena. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 871–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses L, Baldwin A, Rosicky J, Tidball G (2001) Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. Child Dev 72:718–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett R (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently and why. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J (2000) Emotions as natural kinds within the brain. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds) Handbook of emotions, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 137–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz J (2004) Gut reactions: a perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz J (2006) Is emotion a form of perception? Can J Philos 36(suppl. vol. 32):137–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Reydon TAC (2009) How to fix kind membership: a problem for HPC theory and a solution. Philos Sci 76:724–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev 110:145–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA, Barrett LF (1999) Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:805–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarantino A (2009) Core affect and natural affective kinds. Philos Sci 76:940–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon RC (1976/1993) The passions: emotions and the meaning of life. Hackett, Indianapolis

  • Sorce J, Ende R, Campos J, Klinnert M (1985) Maternal emotion signalling: its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Dev Psychol 21:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke ES (2000) Core knowledge. Am Psychol 55:1233–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1953/2000) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Oxford

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Sean Crawford and Miles MacLeod for their comments on previous versions of the paper. Neither of them is responsible for the conclusions argued for in it. The research reported here has been financed by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Educacion (FFI2008-064221-C02-01/FISO) and by the Andalusian Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Tecnologia (HUM-4099). The second author was also backed by the FPU Grant AP2007-04344.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan José Acero Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acero Fernández, J.J., Palma Muñoz, J.M. Emotion, Perception, and Natural Kinds. Biol Theory 7, 153–161 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0081-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0081-z

Keywords

Navigation