Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of short day treatment on autumn fruit production of June-bearing strawberry cultivars

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short-day (SD) strawberry cultivars were grown in 2008 and 2009 fall each year to evaluate effects of short-day (SD) treatment on flowering and fall fruit production in the high elevation of South Korea. In 2008, daughter plants of six cultivars ‘Maehyang’, ‘Seolhyang’, ‘Keumhyang’ (Korean short-day cultivars), ‘Akihime’, ‘Red pearl’, and ‘Sachinoka’ (Japanese short-day cultivars) were exposed to short-day (10-h photoperiods) conditions at the high elevation (HE, 800 m elevation) for 35 days beginning in late June. On 31 July, plants were removed from the SD environment and established in a substrate system at the highland. In 2009, the ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ were examined again. In 2008, flower bud initiation rate was above 90.0% for all cultivars except for ‘Akihime’ (83.3%). Fruit harvest commenced 1st of October 2008 and average fruit weight was consistently > 20g except for ‘Sachinoka’ (18 g). By mid-November, plants of ‘Seolhyang’ and ‘Akihime’ produced 222–260 more grams of fruit compared to other cultivars, with ‘Seolhyang’ having the earliest production. In 2009 experiment, flower bud initiation rates of ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ plants were 85.4% and 82.4%. Due to the earlier planting in 2009, fruit harvest commenced on 8 September (one month earlier than in 2008) and extended over 10 weeks. Yield and fruit numbers of ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ were 397.7 g, 22.7 and 331.7 g, 19.8, respectively. Results of this study indicate that exposure to SD photoperiods and relatively cool temperatures at HE can increase autumn fruit production in SD strawberry cultivars ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Durner, E.F. and E.B. Poling. 1988. Strawberry developmental response to photoperiod and temperature: a review. Adv. Strawberry Prod 7:6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, G. and J. Ballington. 2003. Double cropping of strawberries in an annual system using conditioned plug. Acta Hort. 614:547–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttridge, C.G. 1985. Fragaria × ananassa, p. 16–33. In: A.H. Halevy (ed.). Handbook of flowering. Vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytönen, T., P. Palonen, K. Mouhu, and O. Junttila. 2004. Crown branching and cropping potential in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) can be enhanced by daylength treatments. J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 79:466–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, K.D. 1994. Strawberry. p. 271–297. In: B. Schaffer and P.C. Anderson (eds.). Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. vol. 1, Temperate Crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieten, P. 1993. Methods and strategies of strawberry forcing in central Europe: historical perspectives and recent development. Acta Hort. 348:58–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serçe, S. and J.F. Hancock. 2005. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and runnering in the strawberries, Fragaria chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. × ananassa. Sci. Hort. 103:167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sønsteby, A. and A. Nes. 1998. Short day and temperature effects on growth and flowering in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 73:730–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sønstedy, A. and O.M. Heide. 2006. Dormancy relations and flowering of the strawberry cultivars Korona and Elsanta as influenced by photoperiod and temperature. Sci. Hort. 110:57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sønstedy, A. and O.M. Heide. 2008. Temperature responses, flowering and fruit yield of the June-bearing strawberry cultivars Florence, Frida and Korona. Sci. Hort. 119:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.R. 2002. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Acta Hort. 348:158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehranifar, A., P. Le Miere, and N.H. Battey. 1998. The effects of lifting date, chilling duration and forcing temperature on vegetative growth and fruit production in the June-bearing strawberry cultivar Elsanta. J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 73:453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, M.J., A. Sonsteby, and S.O. Grimstad. 2006. Interaction of photoperiod, temperature, duration of short-day treatment and plant age on flowering of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Cv. Korona. Sci. Hortic. 107:164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, M.J., A. Sonsteby, and S.O. Grimstad. 2007. Influences of day and night temperature on flowering of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Korona and Elsanta. Sci. Hortic. 112:200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki, A., T. Yano, and H. Sasaki. 2003. Out-of-season production of strawberry: effect of a short day treatment in summer. Acta Hort. 626:276–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Rog Yeoung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruan, J., Lee, Y.H., Yeoung, Y.R. et al. Influence of short day treatment on autumn fruit production of June-bearing strawberry cultivars. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 52, 259–264 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-011-0001-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-011-0001-3

Additional key words

Navigation