Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Strawberry Cultivars Based on Growth-Related Attributes

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Applied Fruit Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant growth in strawberry is very important for high yield and quality, and for maintaining yield and quality throughout the season. For this reason, the growth behaviors of the cultivars are crucial parameters taken into account in breeding and adaptation studies. Thus, short-day and day-neutral strawberry cultivars were evaluated for growth-related characteristics such as leaf stalk length, number of leaves per plant, leaf area, total leaf area per plant, number of crowns per plant, chlorophyll content, plant canopy area, plant length, root length, total plant fresh weight, and total plant dry weight. In addition, the growth habits of the examined strawberry cultivars were categorized as vigorous, medium, and weak according to root fresh weight, root dry weight, leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight, and crown number by a modified weighted ranked method. In addition, the relationships among the growth parameters taken into consideration were also examined. For this purpose, the frigo plants of 31 strawberry cultivars were transplanted to 2 L pots having a soil mixture of garden soil, peat moss, and perlite (3:1:1). As a result of this study, 12 cultivars, namely ‘Kabarla’, ‘Alba’, ‘Amiga’, ‘Asia’, ‘Favette’, ‘Fortuna’, ‘Fronteras’, ‘Hood’, ‘Jive’, ‘Roxana’, ‘Sabrina’, and ‘Splendor’, were found in the vigorous, 16 cultivars in the medium, and three cultivars (‘Albion’, ‘Merced’, and ‘Tillamook’) in the weak growing group. In addition, the analysis of data revealed significant variation among cultivars for most of the growth-related attributes of strawberry. This information will be very important, especially for strawberry cultivar breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adak N, Tozlu I, Gubbuk H (2018) Influence of different soilless substrates to morpho-physiological characteristics and yield relations in strawberries. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0382-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahad I, Kumar A (2012) Growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry under protected cultivation in South Kashmir. 88–91

  • Ahsan MK, Mehraj H, Hussain MS, Rahman MM, Uddin AFM (2014) Study on growth and yield of three promising strawberry cultivars in Bangladesh. Int J Bus Soc Sci Res 1(3):205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ateş N (2021) Growth and fruiting behavior of some day-neutral strawberry cultivars in summer and autumn in fruit production. Ondokuz Mayis University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, p 105 (Msc thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcı G, Keles H, Aras S (2022) Comparison of different cover materials and external brassinosteroid application in strawberry growing in temperate climate conditions. Erwerbs-Obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00768-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringhurst RS, Voth V (1984) Breeding octoploid strawberries. Iowa State J Res 58:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelikel G, Demirsoy L, Demirsoy H (2008) The strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) selection in Turkey. Sci Hortic 118(2):115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.05.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla W, Singh SK, Bal SS (2020) Evaluation of performance of strawberry cultivars for vegetative attributes and runner production. Plant Arch 20(2):3759–3762

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor AM, Luby JJ, Hancock JF, Berkheimer S, Hanson EJ (2002) Changes in fruit antioxidant activity among blueberry cultivars during cold-temperature storage. J Agric Food Chem 50(4):893–898. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011212y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran PJ, Dungan JL, Gholz HL (1990) Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine. Tree Physiol 7:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dale A (2009) How climate change could influence breeding and modern pro-duction systems in berry crops. Acta Hortic 838:161–167. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.838.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrow GM (1936) Interrelation of temperature and photoperiodism in the production of fruit-buds and runners in the strawberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 34:360–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow GM (1966) The strawberry: history, breeding and physiology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, p 447

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow GM, Waldo GF (1934) Responses of strawberry varieties and species to the duration of the daily light period. USDA Tech Bul 453

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash PK, Rabbani MG, Mondal MF (2013) Effect of variety and planting date on the growth and yield of okra. Int J Biosci 3(9):123–131. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.9.123-131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy H (2009) Leaf area estimation in some species of fruit tree by using models as a non destructive method. Fruits 64:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2008049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy L, Demirsoy H, Balci B (2012) Different growing conditions affect nutrient elements content, fruit quality, yield and growth in strawberry. Pack J Bot 44(1):125–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy L, Mısır D, Kandemir A, Soysal D, Lizalo A, Demirsoy H (2023) Influence of high tunnel conditions and cultivars on the growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry in Northern Türkiye. Turk J Agric For

  • Durner EF (1988) Strawberry developmental responses to photoperiod and temperature. Adv Strawberry Prod 7:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2023) https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Accessed 12 Dec 2020

  • Filella I, Serrano I, Serra J, Penuelas J (1995) Evaluating wheat nitrogen status with canopy reflectance indices and discriminant analysis. Crop Sci 35:1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050023x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaikwad SP, Sali VM, Chalak S (2018) Performance of strawberry cultivars under Mahableshwar conditions. J Pharm Phytochem 7:1850–1852

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletta GJ, Himelrick DG, Chandler LE (1990). Small fruit crop management. Prentice Hall; First Edition 602 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg S (2013) Variability and association studies in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis, MSc, Dr. YSPUHF, Solan (HP), India)

    Google Scholar 

  • Julkowska MM, Saade S, Agarwal G, Gao G, Pailles Y, Morton M et al (2019) MVApp-multivariate analysis application for streamlined data analysis and curation. Plant Physiol 180(3):1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kadir S, Sidhu G (2006) Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch) growth and productivity asaffected by temperature. HortScience 41(6):1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.6.1423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Prakash S, Singh MK, Kumar V, Kumar A (2020) Growth and floral behavior of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) varieties under western Uttar Pradesh condition. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 9(9):2064–2068. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizalo A (2022) Effect of flower removal on fruit production and harvest season of day neutral strawberries under greenhouse condition. Ondokuz Mayis University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, p 143 (phD thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miri SM, Haghighat F, Hassani D (2020) Morpho-physiological performance of seven short-day and day-neutral strawberry cultivars in the soilless culture. J Plant Physiol Breed 10(1):127–139. https://doi.org/10.22034/jppb.2020.12573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mısır D (2016) Adaptation of some strawberry cultivars. Determining of performance of some strawberry cultivars. Ondokuz Mayis University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, p 73 (Msc thesis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama M, Kanahama K (2000) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower bud initiation of day-neutral and everbearing strawberries. Acta Hortic 567:253–255. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.567.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama M, Kanahama K (2002) Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the development of inflorescences in ever bearing strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) plants. Acta Hortic 514:261–267. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.514.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama M, Ohkawa W, Kanayama Y, Kanahama K (2006) Critical photoperiod for flower bud initiation in everbearing strawberry summer berry ‘plants grown at high temperatures. Tohoku J Agric Res 56(3/4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritts M, Dale A (1989) Day neutral strawberry production guide. Cornell Cooperative Extension. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/3275

  • Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP (2002) An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol 153:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00289.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risser G, Robert F (1993) What cold treatments promote growth in strawberry? Acta Hortic 348:381–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riyaphan P, Pipattanawong N, Subhadrabandu S (2005) Influence of different climatic conditions on growth and yield of strawberry plants in Thailand. Prod Technol Low-chill Temp Fruits 61:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajid M, Ullah I, Rab A, Shah ST, Fazal-i-Wahid, Ahmad N, Ahmad I, Ali A, Basit A, Fareeda B, Ahmad M (2020) Foliar application of calcium improves growth, yield and quality of tomato cultivars. Pure Appllied Biol 9(1):10–19. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2020.90002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samdur MY, Singh AL, Mathur RK, Manivel P, Chikani BM, Gor HK, Khan MA (2000) Field evaluation of chlorophyll meter for screening groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes tolerant to iron-deficiency chlorosis. Curr Sci 79:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Kachwaya DS, Kumar R, Vikas G, Singh L (2018) Genetic variability and association analysis in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). Electron J Plant Breed 9(1):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y, Mizuta M (1974) Nutritional–physiological studies on strawberry cv. Hokowase in long term cultivation. I. Influence of nitrogen on growth, yield and absorption of nutrients. Bul Nara Agri Expt Sta 6:38–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Soysal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I. Ullah, H. Demirsoy, D. Soysal, A. Lizalo, D.E. Doğan and L. Demirsoy declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, I., Demirsoy, H., Soysal, D. et al. Evaluation of Strawberry Cultivars Based on Growth-Related Attributes. Applied Fruit Science 66, 431–439 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-01025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-01025-0

Keywords

Navigation