Skip to main content
Log in

An eco-friendly EnZolv pretreatment optimization in banana fiber biomass using response surface methodology (RSM) and its structural characterization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An EnZolv is a recently developed novel pretreatment technique used for efficient delignification in lignocellulosic biomass and recognized as a greener approach. Mostly, banana fiber was pretreated by chemical process which causes environmental pollution and for the first time, we report here EnZolv-based banana fiber biomass pretreatment and its optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Thus, the present study aimed to optimize the influential parameters in EnZolv process for banana fiber biomass delignification. Pre-optimization studies resulted in an increased cellulose recovery and lignin reduction when banana fiber was pretreated at 100% moisture content, incubated at 40 °C temperature, with enzyme load of 50 U per gram of biomass for an incubation time of 5 h at a shaking speed of 100 rpm. Based on pre-optimization, the EnZolv pretreatment process for banana fiber was optimized using RSM in Box-Behnken design which revealed enhanced cellulose recovery (74.7%) at 100% initial moisture content of substrate using laccase enzyme load of 50 U g−1 of biomass, and incubation time of 5.7 h at a temperature of 40 °C and shaking at 100 rpm. Biophysical and structural analysis of treated biomass revealed a reduction in lignin peak intensity at lignin region in FTIR spectrum, deconstruction of biomass as visualized in scanning electron microscope image, increased crystallinity (62.7%) of biomass by XRD analyses, and thermal stability of pretreated biomass analyzed by TGA. The EnZolv process generated industrially important high-value compounds like vanillin, benzaldehyde, hydroquinone, hydroxytoluene, and benzoic acid during the delignification process. All the biophysical techniques and generated lignin-derived compounds validated the efficiency of the optimized EnZolv conditions in banana fiber biomass. Thus, the result from the manuscript will be highly useful for eco-friendly pretreatment-based research on lignocellulosic biomass.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

CrI:

crystallinity index

CV:

coefficient of variance

FT-IR:

Fourier-transform infrared

LCB:

lignocellulosic biomass

NREL:

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

RSM:

response surface methodology

SEM:

scanning electron microscopy

TGA:

thermogravimetric analysis

UTBF:

untreated banana fiber

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

References

  1. Hoang AT, Nizetic S, Ong HC et al (2021) Acid-based lignocellulosic biomass biorefinery for bioenergy production: advantages, application constraints, and perspectives. J Environ Manage 296:113194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng W, Feng Y, Fu J et al (2023) Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels. Green Energy Environ 8:10–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2022.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Velvizhi G, Balakumar K, Shetti NP et al (2022) Integrated biorefinery processes for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to value-added materials: paving a path towards circular economy. Bioresour Technol 343:126151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel A, Shah AR (2021) Integrated lignocellulosic biorefinery: gateway for production of second generation ethanol and value-added products. J Bioresour Bioprod 6:108–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng Y-S, Mutrakulcharoen P, Chuetor S et al (2020) Recent situation and progress in biorefining process of lignocellulosic biomass: toward green economy. Appl Sci Eng Prog 13:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sidana A, Yadav SK (2022) Recent developments in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment with a focus on eco-friendly, non-conventional methods. J Clean Prod 335:130286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar R, Kim TH, Basak B et al (2022) Emerging approaches in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment and anaerobic bioprocesses for sustainable biofuels production. J Clean Prod 333:130180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D (2012) Biomass recalcitrance. Part II: fundamentals of different pre-treatments to increase the enzymatic digestibility of lignocellulose. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 6:561–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheah WY, Sankaran R, Show PL et al (2020) Pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biofuels production: current advances, challenges and future prospects. Biofuel Res J 7:1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2020.7.1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elgharbawy AA, Alam MZ, Moniruzzaman M, Goto M (2016) Ionic liquid pretreatment as emerging approaches for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biochem Eng J 109:252–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu H, Peng J, Kong Y et al (2020) Key process parameters for deep eutectic solvents pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass materials: a review. Bioresour Technol 310:123416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Devendra LP, Kumar MK, Pandey A (2016) Evaluation of hydrotropic pretreatment on lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 213:350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R et al (2011) Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anwar Z, Gulfraz M, Irshad M (2014) Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass a key to unlock the future bio-energy: a brief review. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dharmaraja J, Shobana S, Arvindnarayan S et al (2023) Lignocellulosic biomass conversion via greener pretreatment methods towards biorefinery applications. Bioresour Technol 369:128328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muniraj IK, Anbu PV, Parthiban KT, Uthandi S (2022) A new Enzolv process for simultaneous delignification and lignin-derived chemical production from the woody biomass of Melia dubia. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-022-03084-X

  18. Liu S, Liu H, Shen C et al (2021) Comparison of performances of different fungal laccases in delignification and detoxification of alkali-pretreated corncob for bioethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 48:kuab013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuab013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad Rizal N, Ibrahim M, Zakaria M et al (2018) Combination of superheated steam with laccase pretreatment together with size reduction to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of oil palm biomass. Molecules 23:811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kandasamy S, Muniraj IK, Purushothaman N et al (2016) High level secretion of laccase (LccH) from a newly isolated white-rot basidiomycete, Hexagonia hirta MSF2. Front Microbiol 7:707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thangavelu K, Desikan R, Taran OP, Uthandi S (2018) Delignification of corncob via combined hydrodynamic cavitation and enzymatic pretreatment: process optimization by response surface methodology. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1204-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Linger JG, Vardon DR, Guarnieri MT et al (2014) Lignin valorization through integrated biological funneling and chemical catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:12013–12018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410657111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishanth S, Chikunov AS, Thankappan S et al (2022) Lignin derived aromatic monomers from birch wood by laccase (LccH) pretreatment and Ru/C catalyst: a two-pot approach for sustainable biorefineries. Biomass Convers Biorefinery:1–16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03197-3

  24. Subramaniam S, Karunanandham K, Raja ASM, Uthandi S (2023) Delignification of the cotton stalk and ginning mill waste via EnZolv pretreatment and optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology (RSM). Bioresour Technol 387:129655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabhane J, Prince William SPM, Gadhe A et al (2014) Pretreatment of banana agricultural waste for bio-ethanol production: Individual and interactive effects of acid and alkali pretreatments with autoclaving, microwave heating and ultrasonication. Waste Manag 34:498–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cherian BM, Pothan LA, Nguyen-Chung T et al (2008) A novel method for the synthesis of cellulose nanofibril whiskers from banana fibers and characterization. J Agric Food Chem 56:5617–5627. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8003674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Twebaze C, Zhang M, Zhuang X et al (2022) Banana fiber degumming by alkali treatment and ultrasonic methods. J Nat Fibers 19:12911–12923. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2079581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R et al (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure 1617(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira LMS, Milan TM, Tapia-Blácido DR (2021) Using response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize 2G bioethanol production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 151:106166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Panakkal EJ, Sriariyanun M, Ratanapoompinyo J et al (2022) Influence of sulfuric acid pretreatment and inhibitor of sugarcane bagasse on the production of fermentable sugar and ethanol. Appl Sci Eng Prog 15(1):5238

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morshedi A, Akbarian M (2014) Application of response surface methodology: design of experiments and optimization: a mini review. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 4:2434–2439

    Google Scholar 

  32. Box GEP, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Cecci RRR, Passos AA, de Aguiar Neto TC, Silva LA (2020) Banana pseudostem fibers characterization and comparison with reported data on jute and sisal fibers. SN Appl Sci 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-019-1790-8/TABLES/3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Banerjee R, Chintagunta AD, Ray S (2019) Laccase mediated delignification of pineapple leaf waste: an ecofriendly sustainable attempt towards valorization. BMC Chem 13:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-019-0576-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sherpa KC, Ghangrekar MM, Banerjee R (2018) A green and sustainable approach on statistical optimization of laccase mediated delignification of sugarcane tops for enhanced saccharification. J Environ Manage 217:700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ewanick S, Bura R (2011) The effect of biomass moisture content on bioethanol yields from steam pretreated switchgrass and sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 102:2651–2658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malhotra M, Suman SK (2021) Laccase-mediated delignification and detoxification of lignocellulosic biomass: removing obstacles in energy generation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:58929–58944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13283-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rico A, Rencoret J, del Río JC et al (2014) Pretreatment with laccase and a phenolic mediator degrades lignin and enhances saccharification of Eucalyptus feedstock. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Arora R, Behera S, Sharma NK, Kumar S (2015) A new search for thermotolerant yeasts, its characterization and optimization using response surface methodology for ethanol production. Front Microbiol 6:889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo W-Q, Ren N-Q, Wang X-J et al (2009) Optimization of culture conditions for hydrogen production by Ethanoligenens harbinense B49 using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 100:1192–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Prakash Maran J, Manikandan S, Vigna Nivetha C, Dinesh R (2017) Ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from Nephelium lappaceum L. fruit peel using central composite face centered response surface design. Arab J Chem 10:S1145–S1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu J-Z, Weng L-P, Zhang Q-L et al (2003) Optimization of glucose oxidase production by Aspergillus niger in a benchtop bioreactor using response surface methodology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023622925933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheng Z, Gao J, Jin Z et al (2014) Effect of steam explosion on degumming efficiency and physicochemical characteristics of banana fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 131. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40598

  44. Cherian BM, Leão AL, de Souza SF et al (2010) Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydr Polym 81:720–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Silva TAL, Zamora HDZ, Varão LHR et al (2018) Effect of steam explosion pretreatment catalysed by organic acid and alkali on chemical and structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Waste Biomass Valoriz 9:2191–2201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9989-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Labb N, Rials TG, Kelley SS et al (2005) FT-IR imaging and pyrolysis-molecular beam mass spectrometry: new tools to investigate wood tissues. Wood Sci Technol 39:61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-004-0274-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li F, Hu H, Yao R et al (2012) Structure and saccharification of rice straw pretreated with microwave-assisted dilute lye. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:6270–6274. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202547w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Borysiak S, Garbarczyk J (2003) Applying the WAXS method to estimate the supermolecular structure of cellulose fibers after mercerization. Fibers Text East Eur 11:44

    Google Scholar 

  49. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA et al (2011) Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohydr Polym 86:1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dhabhai R, Chaurasia SP, Dalai AK (2013) Effect of pretreatment conditions on structural characteristics of wheat straw. Chem Eng Commun 200:1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2012.743895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Corrales RCNR, Mendes FMT, Perrone CC et al (2012) Structural evaluation of sugar cane bagasse steam pretreated in the presence of CO2 and SO2. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Álvarez C, Rojano B, Almaza O et al (2011) Self-bonding boards from plantain fiber bundles after enzymatic treatment: adhesion improvement of lignocellulosic products by enzymatic pre-treatment. J Polym Environ 19:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0260-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Marcilla A, García AN, Pastor MV et al (2013) Thermal decomposition of the different particles size fractions of almond shells and olive stones. Thermal behaviour changes due to the milling processes. Thermochim Acta 564:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rambo M, Rambo M, Almeida K, Alexandre G (2015) Study of thermo-gravimetric analysis of different lignocellulosic biomass using principal component analysis. Ciênc Nat 37:862–868

    Google Scholar 

  55. Castillo-Ortega MM, Romero-García J, Rodríguez F et al (2010) Fibrous membranes of cellulose acetate and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) by electrospinning method: preparation and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 116. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31722

  56. Sun FF, Wang L, Hong J et al (2015) The impact of glycerol organosolv pretreatment on the chemistry and enzymatic hydrolyzability of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 187:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang W, Zhang C, Sun X et al (2017) Efficient, environmentally-friendly and specific valorization of lignin: promising role of non-radical lignolytic enzymes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33:125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2286-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Uthandi S, Muniraj I, Anbu P V., Kumarasamy R (2015) Novel delignification process for biomass deconstruction of woody biomass and corn cob

    Google Scholar 

  59. Banerjee G, Chattopadhyay P (2019) Vanillin biotechnology: the perspectives and future. J Sci Food Agric 99:499–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tortosa V, Pietropaolo V, Brandi V et al (2020) Computational methods for the identification of molecular targets of toxic food additives. Butylated Hydroxytoluene as a Case Study. Molecules 25:2229. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Searle T, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR (2021) Hydroquinone: myths and reality. Clin Exp Dermatol 46:636–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are grateful to ICAR-CIRCOT–CRP (CRP-TNAU.02) on Natural Fibers “Bioprocessing of Natural fibers and agro-residues for production of oligosaccharides and starch” for financial support to SU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sivakumar Uthandi received the financial support, conceptualized the workflow, and designed the experiments; Oviya Govindaraj performed all the experiments and wrote the manuscript; Nellaiappan Olaganathan Gopal supervised the workflow and assisted in manuscript preparation; Sivakumar Uthandi, Nellaiappan Olaganathan Gopal, and Raja ASM reviewed and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sivakumar Uthandi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 184 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Govindaraj, O., Olaganathan, G.N., ASM, R. et al. An eco-friendly EnZolv pretreatment optimization in banana fiber biomass using response surface methodology (RSM) and its structural characterization. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 1329–1342 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04829-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04829-y

Keywords

Navigation