Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 493–513 | Cite as

Parent and teacher perceptions of NAPLAN in a sample of Independent schools in Western Australia

  • S. L. Rogers
  • L. Barblett
  • K. Robinson
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 271 Downloads

Abstract

Stories appear frequently in the Australian media regarding parent and teacher perceptions and attitudes towards the National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy. However, thorough empirical investigations of parent perceptions are sparse. This study presents a survey of 345 parents across Years 3 and 5 from a sample of Independent schools in Western Australia. A representative sample of teachers from these schools were also surveyed in order to compare and contrast parent and teacher perspectives about the transparency and accountability associated with testing, the usefulness of results for helping individual students, and the perceived clarity of communication of results. Findings reveal mixed positive and negative views that reside within an overall prevailing low opinion of the testing. Some ways for improving the perception of the testing with the general public are discussed.

Keywords

NAPLAN Standardised testing Parent perspectives Teacher perspectives Transparency Accountability Communication of results 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by The Association of Independent Schools of Western Australia (AISWA). The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of all the principals, teachers, parents, and students that made this research possible. We would also like to thank the feedback from three anonymous reviewers and the editor to help improve the article prior to publication.

References

  1. ACARA. (2015). Measurement Framework for Schooling in Australia 2015. Assessment and Reporting Authority: Australian Curriculum.Google Scholar
  2. Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using stata. Texas, USA: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  3. APPA. (2013). Primary Principals: Perspectives on NAPLAN testing and assessment. Report conducted by CANVASS strategic opinion research: Comissioned by The Australian Primary Principals Association (APPA)Google Scholar
  4. Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: high-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Currculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Au, W. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in U.S. education. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  6. Australian_Senate_Enquiry (2010). Administration and reporting of NAPLAN testing. Australian Education, Employment, and Workplaces Relations References Committee.Google Scholar
  7. Australian_Senate_Enquiry. (2014). Effectiveness of the National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy. Australian Education and Employment References Committee.Google Scholar
  8. Brockmeier, L. L., Green, R. B., Pate, J. L., Tsemunhu, R., & Bockenko, M. J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about the effects of high stakes testing. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families: An educator’s perspective. Whitlam Institute within the University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  12. Grasby, K. L., Byrne, B., & Olson, R. K. (2015). Validity of large-scale reading tests: A phenotypic and behaviour-genetic analysis. Australian Journal of Education, 59(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardy, I. (2014). A logic of appropriation: Enacting national testing (NAPLAN) in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardy, I. (2015). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, P., Chinnappan, M., Castleton, G., Carter, J., De Courcey, M., & Barnett, J. (2013). Impact and consequence of Australia’s national assessment program—literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN)—using research evidence to inform improvement. TESOL in Context, 23(1/2), 30–52.Google Scholar
  16. Houng, B., & Justman, M. (2014). NAPLAN scores as predictors of access to higher education in Victoria, (pp. 33). University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  17. Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lingard, B., Thompson, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). National testing in schools: An Australian assessment. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Newspoll. (2013). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Parental attitudes and perceptions concerning NAPLAN.Google Scholar
  20. Pierce, R., & Chick, H. (2011). Teachers’ intentions to use national literacy and numeracy assessment data: A pilot study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polesel, J., Dulfer, N., & Turnbull, M. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families: Literature review. Whitlam Institute within University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  22. Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N. (2014). The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 640–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ragusa, A. T., & Bousfield, K. (2015). ‘It’s not the test, it’s how it’s used!’ Critical analysis of public response to NAPLAN and MySchool Senate Inquiry. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–22.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, S. L., Barblett, L., & Robinson, K. (2016). Investigating the impact of NAPLAN on student, parent and teacher emotional distress in Independent schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubio, D. M., & Gillespie, D. F. (1995). Problems with error in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Segool, N. K., Carlson, J. S., Goforth, A. N., Von Der Embse, N., & Barterian, J. A. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 50(5), 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shine, K. (2015). Are Australian teachers making the grade? A study of news coverage of NAPLAN testing. Media International Australia, 154(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, G. (2013). NAPLAN, MySchool and accountability: Teacher perceptions of the effects of testing. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 62–84.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, G., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2013). A preliminary analysis of teacher perceptions of the effects of NAPLAN on pedagogy and curriculum. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wyn, J., Turnbull, M., & Grimshaw, L. (2014). The experience of education: the impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. A qualitative study. Sydney, NSW: Whitlam Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and HumanitiesEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options