Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The opportunities and challenges of research partnerships in teacher education

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative research partnerships are widely recognised as being of value. This paper examines the benefits, constraints and challenges of research partnerships between teacher education faculties in universities and teacher employing authorities or departments of education and schooling. A case study of a collaborative research partnership between an education faculty and a teacher employing authority is examined to illustrate the features that supported a truly collaborative partnership and also to provide insights about the challenges that occurred. This research partnership was studied using self-study methods. The partnership between the individual researchers was examined in the context of the systemic partnership, to investigate the impact of the two contexts on each other and on the partnership. Constraints and facilitators of this collaborative partnership are identified in this paper. The feasibility of truly collaborative partnerships between institutions with differing aims and methods of operation is critiqued, using this particular partnership as an illustrative case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school-university research partnerships: an analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1981). School/college partnerships that work. Current Issues in Higher Education, 1, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L. (2002). School-university partnerships: What do the schools want. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, S., & Greher, G. (2007). School-university partnerships: What do we know and why do they matter? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, P. (2001). A grassroots approach to educational partnerships. The Journal, 29(3), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, M., & Prescott, A. E. (2010). The growth of reflective practice among three beginning secondary mathematics teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M., & Holmes, K. (2001). Challenges for educational research: International development, partnerships and capacity building in small states. Oxford Review of Education, 27(3), 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. (1991). Collaborative inquiry and the professional development of science teachers. The Journal of Educational Thought, 25(3), 228–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasley, T., Matczynski, T., & Williams, J. (1992). Collaborative and noncollaborative partnership structures in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 257–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaughlin, C., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2007). School-university partnerships for educational research: Distinctions, dilemmas and challenges. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Advisory Council on the Quality of Teaching (MACQT). (1998). Raising the Standing of Teachers and Teaching. Sydney: MACQT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., Dobbins, B., & Johnson, B. (1996). November). Paper presented at the Joint ERA-AARE Conference, Singapore: Collaborative learning through school-university partnerships.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (1997). Renewing teacher professionalism through innovative links. Educational Action Research, 5, 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S. (2009). How did we do? Beginning teachers teaching mathematics in elementary schools. Studying Teacher Education, 5(2), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., & Buchanan, J. (2008). Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeatman, A. (1996). Building effective university-school partnerships: Issues and possibilities. Forum of Education, 51(2), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Research in Learning and Change, University of Technology, Sydney, P. O. Box 222, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, Australia

    Sandy Schuck

Authors
  1. Sandy Schuck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandy Schuck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuck, S. The opportunities and challenges of research partnerships in teacher education. Aust. Educ. Res. 40, 47–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0069-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0069-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation