Abstract
We study the nonholonomic motion of a point particle on the Heisenberg group around the fixed “sun” placed at the origin whose potential is given by the fundamental solution of the sub-Laplacian. In contrast with several recent papers that approach this problem as a variational one (hence a control problem) we study the equations of dynamical motion which are non-variational in nonholonomic mechanics. We find three independent first integrals of the system and show that its bounded trajectories are wound up around certain surfaces of the fourth order. We also describe some particular cases of trajectories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the cited papers [1, 6] the potential U has the term \(\frac{z^2}{16}\) instead of \(16z^2\). One can check that 16 is the correct coefficient since only in this case \(\Delta _H U = 0\) away from the origin. The confusion in the coefficient is most likely due to the fact that G. Folland used a different basis from the aforementioned papers.
References
Montgomery, R., Shanbrom, C.: Keplerian dynamics on the Heisenberg Group and elsewhere. Fields Inst. Commun. 73, 319–342 (2015)
Bloch, A.M.: Nonholonomic mechanics and control. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics, vol. 24. Springer, New York (2003)
Lobachevsky, N.I.: The New Foundations of Geometry with Full Theory of Parallels. Collected Works 1835–1838, vol. 2. GITTL, Moscow (1949). (in Russian)
Serret, P.J.: Théorie Nouvelle Géométrique et Mécanique des Lignes a Double Courbre. Librave de Mallet-Bachelier, Paris (1860)
Diacu, F., Pérez-Chavela, E., Santoprete, M.: The \(n\)-body Problem in Spaces of Constant Curvature. Part I: Relative Equilibria. Journal of Nonlinear Science 22, 247–266 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-011-9116-z
Shanbrom, C.: Periodic orbits in the Kepler-Heisenberg problem. J. Geometr. Mech. 6(2), 261–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3934/jgm.2014.6.261
Dods, V., Shanbrom, C.: Numerical methods and closed orbits in the kepler-heisenberg problem. Exper. Math. 28(4), 420–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2017.1416709
Dods, V., Shanbrom, C.: Self-similarity in the Kepler-Heisenberg problem. J. Nonlinear Sci. 31, 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-021-09709-1
Stachowiak, T., Maciejewski, A.J.: Non-integrability of the Kepler and the two-body problems on the Heisenberg group. SIGMA 17, 074 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2021.074
Folland, G.: A fundamental solution for a subellipic operator. Bull. AMS 79, 373–376 (1973)
Derridj, M.: Sur un théoréme de traces. Annales de l’institut Fourier 22(2), 73–83 (1972)
Acknowledgements
The first author is very grateful to the second author for deriving the first integrals (Proposition 2, Theorem 3 and the supplied Appendix) which significantly progressed the research and for overall critical comments. Authors are thankful to an anonymous reviewer for valuable advices and references. The images were prepared using GNUPlot and Maxima free software.
Funding
The work of the first author is supported by the Mathematical Center in Akademgorodok under the Agreement No. 075-15-2022-282 with the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. The work of the second author was performed according to the Government research assignment for IM SB RAS, Project No. FWNF-2022-0004.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Derivation of quadratic first integrals
Derivation of quadratic first integrals
By definition any first integral F of (6) must satisfy the following relation:
It is quite natural to search for the first integrals of (6) having the form of non-homogeneous polynomials in momenta.
We shall search for the quadratic integral of (6) in the form:
where all the coefficients are unknown functions which depend on r, \(\theta \), z.
Lemma 10
If F is the first integral of (6), then functions f, g must vanish identically.
Proof
Writing down the condition (A1) for such an integral F, we obtain the system of PDEs which splits into two parts. The first part contains relations between the unknown functions a, b, d, h only (see equations (A2)–(A7) below), the second one is between f and g and has the following form:
One can verify that the only solution to this system is \(f \equiv g \equiv 0.\) We skip these calculations. \(\square \)
So we start our analysis with an integral of the form
The condition (A1) implies:
Integrating the Eqs. (A2)–(A4) successively, we obtain
where \(\alpha (\theta ,z)\), \(\gamma (\theta ,z)\), \(\omega (\theta ,z)\) are arbitrary functions. Then (A5) takes the form
This is a polynomial in r with coefficients depending on \(\theta \), z only. Since this polynomial must vanish, all its coefficients must vanish as well. This allows one to find \(\alpha (\theta ,z)\), \(\gamma (\theta ,z)\), \(\omega (\theta ,z)\) and, consequently, the coefficients \(a(r,\theta ,z)\), \(b(r,\theta ,z)\), \(d(r,\theta ,z)\) explicitly. We omit these long but simple calculations and skip the final form of these coefficients since they are quite cumbersome.
After that we are left with two Eqs. (A6), (A7) on the unknown function \(h(r,\theta ,z)\) which take the form:
Here \(c_k\), \(s_k\) are arbitrary constants. The Eq. (A8) can be integrated. However, the general solution \(h(r,\theta ,z)\) to (A8) is expressed in terms of elliptic integrals. We consider the simplest case
In this case h(x, y, z) can be found from (A8) in terms of elementary functions as follows:
where \(\psi (\theta ,z)\) is an arbitrary function and
The unknown function \(\psi (\theta ,z)\) should be chosen such that the relation (A9) holds identically. It seems that the only possible way to satisfy this requirement is to put
In this case (A9) is satisfied. Thus we found all the coefficients of F. Notice that \(\widetilde{F}=4F-8c_7H\) is also the first integral of (6) having the simpler form:
where
Here \(c_2\), \(c_3\), \(c_4\) are arbitrary constants. It is left to notice that \(\widetilde{F}\) is linear in these constants, i. e. it has the form \(\widetilde{F}=c_2F_1+c_3F_2+c_4F_3\). This implies that the functions
are also integrals of (6).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Basalaev, S., Agapov, S. Dynamics in the Kepler problem on the Heisenberg group. Anal.Math.Phys. 14, 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-024-00921-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-024-00921-2