Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pulse oximetry screening to detect cyanotic congenital heart disease in sick neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate pulse oximetry for detection of congenital cyanotic heart disease in sick neonates using echocardiography as gold standard.

Methods

Pulse oximetry readings were taken at admission from 950 neonates from right upper limb and either foot with infant breathing room air. Pulse oximetry was considered abnormal if oxygen saturation at room air measured <90% or difference between right hand and foot was more than 3%. Persistent abnormality was considered positive result. Echocardiography was performed on all neonates with positive pulse oximetry (study group) and on one subsequent neonate with negative screen for each neonate with positive screen (controls).

Results

Pulse oximetry was positive in 210 neonates. It detected 20 out of 21 (95.2%) true positives. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and odds ratio (95% CI) of pulse oximetry was 95.2%, 52.4 %, 9.5, 99.5 and 22 (5.3, 91.4), respectively.

Conclusion

Pulse oximetry screening is useful in detecting cyanotic heart diseases in sick newborns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khwaja K. Twenty year trends in diagnosis of life threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaidyanathan B, Satish G, Mohannan ST, Sundaram KR, Warrier KKR, Kumar RK. Clinical screening for congenital heart disease at birth: A prospective study in a community hospital in Kerala. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakshi KD, Vaidyanathan B, Sundaram KR, Roth SJ, Shivaprakasha K, Rao SG, et al. Determinants of early outcome after neonatal heart surgery in a developing country. J Thoracic Cardio Vascular Surgery. 2007;134:765–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KL, Ridout DA, Hoskote A, Verhulst L, Ricci M, Bull C. Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates. Heart. 2006;92:1298–302.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kemper AR, Mahle WT, Martin GR, Cooley WC, Kumar P, Morrow WR, et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sendelbach DM, Jackson GL, Lai SS, Fixler DE, Stehel EK, Engle WD. Pulse oximetry screening at 4 hours of age to detect critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e815–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, Bhoyar A, Daniels JP, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pulseox Study Group. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (Pulseox): A test accuracy study. Lancet. 2011;378:785–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arlettaz R, Bauschatz AS, Monkoff Messers B, Bauersfeld U. The contribution of pulse oximetry for early diagnosis of congenital heart disease in newborns. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:94–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de-Wahl Granelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K, Mellander M, Bejlum C, Inganas N, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: A Swedish prospective screening study in 39, 821 newborns. BMJ. 2009;338: 3037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meberg A, Andreasson A, Brunvand L, Markestad T, Moster D, Nietsch L, et al. Pulse oximetry screening as a complimentary strategy to detect critical congenital heart defects. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:682–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koppel LR, Druschel CM, Carter T, Goldberg BE, Mehta PN, Talwar R, et al. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatrics. 2003;111:451–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2459–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haq FU, Jalil F, Hashmi S, Jumani MI, Imdad A, Jabeen M, et al. Risk factors predisposing to congenital heart defects. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2011;4:117–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. B. Mathur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathur, N.B., Gupta, A. & Kurien, S. Pulse oximetry screening to detect cyanotic congenital heart disease in sick neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit. Indian Pediatr 52, 769–772 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0714-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0714-y

Keywords

Navigation