Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Perinatology Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

Pulse oximetry screening (POS) is an effective tool to detect critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in asymptomatic term infants, but its value in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) requires further clarification.

Study design:

A retrospective review of 1005 babies without previously diagnosed CCHD admitted to a level III NICU was performed to assess the risk for missed CCHD and performance of POS.

Result:

Of the 1005 NICU patients, 812 had documented POS and none failed POS. In 812 patients, 547 had delayed POS because of the use of supplemental oxygen. In 259/812 patients, POS was delayed until the baby was >2 weeks old. CCHD was excluded by echocardiography, irrespective of POS, in 287/1005 patients.

Conclusion:

POS can be performed in the NICU with minimal adverse effects. However, in many NICU patients CCHD is confirmed or excluded before POS, and POS will frequently be performed after CCHD would have been expected to become symptomatic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lakshminrusimha S, Turkovich S, Manja V, Nair J, Kumar VHS . Critical congenital heart disease screening with pulse oximetry in the neonatal intensive care unit. e-Journal Neonatal Res 2012; 2 (2): 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osterman MJ, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE . Expanded data from the new birth certificate, 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011; 59 (7): 1–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter MF, Xenakis E, Holden A, Dudley D . Neonatal intensive care unit admissions and their associations with late preterm birth and maternal risk factors in a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (4): 343–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on F, Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (3): 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Neonatal intensive-care unit admission of infants with very low birth weight—19 States, 2006. Morb Mort Weekly Rep 2010; 59 (44): 1444–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de-Wahl Granelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K, Mellander M, Bejlum C, Inganas L et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns. BMJ 2009; 338: a3037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, Bhoyar A, Daniels JP, Thangaratinam S et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet 2011; 378 (9793): 785–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao QM, Ma XJ, Ge XL, Liu F, Yan WL, Wu L et al. Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: a prospective study. Lancet 2014; 384: 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg LF, Van Naarden Braun K, Knapp MM, Anderson TM, Koppel RI, Hirsch D et al. Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (2): e314–e323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meberg A, Brugmann-Pieper S, Due R Jr, Eskedal L, Fagerli I, Farstad T et al. First day of life pulse oximetry screening to detect congenital heart defects. J Pediatr 2008; 152 (6): 761–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suresh GK . Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol 2013; 33 (8): 586–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iyengar H, Kumar P, Kumar P . Pulse-oximetry screening to detect critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Cardiol 2014; 35 (3): 406–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manja V, Mathew B, Carrion V, Lakshminrusimha S . Critical congenital heart disease screening by pulse oximetry in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2015; 35 (1): 67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Preterm Birth, November 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/en/ (last accessed 9 September 2015).

  15. Ng B, Hokanson J . Missed congenital heart disease in neonates. Congenit Heart Dis 2010; 5 (3): 292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang RK, Gurvitz M, Rodriguez S . Missed diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162 (10): 969–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J S Hokanson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Perinatology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goetz, E., Magnuson, K., Eickhoff, J. et al. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 36, 52–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.150

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.150

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation