Abstract
In this paper, the structural performance of the prestressed concrete T-girder bridge with a newly proposed diaphragm transverse connections (DTCs) have been investigated. The DTCs are composed of diagonal braces and horizontal brace, and the braces are structural steel with square cross section. A series of simulations have been carried out to study the effectiveness of the proposed DTCs on enhancing the transverse connection of the prestressed concrete T-girder bridge. Load Model 1 in accordance with Eurocode 1 is considered in the simulations, which consists of tandem system and uniformly distributed loads (UDL system). The Von Mises stress of the DTCs has been checked and corresponding steel grade has been given. The force on the surface between the T-girder bridge and the proposed DTCs has been studied and detailed connection design has been given for both new bridge construction and existing bridge retrofitting. The simulation results show that the maximum deflection arises when the deck is fully loaded with the UDL system and with lane 1 centrally located on exterior girder, and the tandem systems are applied at midspan simultaneously. It is revealed that with the proposed DTCs installed at midspan, the maximum deflection of the prestressed concrete T-girder bridge reduces 12.8% in the most unfavorable load case. In all the discussed load cases, the Von Mises stress of the proposed DTCs is within the reasonable range and can be borne by normal steel material. Additionally, connection methods have been given for the DTCs’ application to new bridge and existing bridge. For the use of chemical anchor in existing bridge, the concrete and prestress tendons should be checked in case of any additional damage during the installing of the DTCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO. (2002). Standard specification for highway bridges. AASHTO.
Abendroth, R. E., Klaiber, F. W., & Shafer, M. W. (1995). Diaphragm effectiveness in prestressed-concrete girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 121(9), 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:9(1362)
ANSYS. (2013). ANSYS user’s manual revision 15. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS
Chen, C., & Yang, C. Q. (2019). Experimental and simulation studies on the mechanical performance of T-girder bridge strengthened with transverse connection. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 33(5), 04019055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001318
CEN, European Committee for Standardization. (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. Brussels, Belgium.
Cai, C. S., Araujo, M., Chandolu, A., Avent, R. R., & Alaywan, W. (2007). Diaphragm effects of prestressed concrete girder bridges: Review and discussion. Practice Periodical on Structural Design & Construction, 12(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2007)12:3(161)
CEN, European Committee for Standardization. (1992). Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures: Part 1.1, General rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium.
CEN, European Committee for Standardization. (1994). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Brussels, Belgium.
Dwairi, H., Al-Hattamleh, O., & Al-Qablan, H. (2019). Evaluation of live-load distribution factors for high-performance prestressed concrete girder bridges. Bridge Structures., 15, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/BRS-190149
EOTA, European Organization for Technical Approvals. (2010). Etag 001: Guideline for European technical approval of metal anchors for use in concrete, annex C: Design methods for anchorages. 3rd Amendment. Brussels, Belgium.
EOTA. European Organization for Technical Approvals. . (2010). Design of Bonded Anchors. Belgium.
ISO 13918. (2008). Welding-Studs and ceramic ferrules for arc stud welding. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva.
Lui, E., Liu, Y., & Oguzmert, M. (2006). Effects of diaphragm spacing and stiffness on the dynamic behavior of curved steel bridges. Steel Structures., 6, 163–174.
Mohseni, I., Rashid, A. K. A., & Kang, J. (2014). Effect of intermediate diaphragm on lateral load distribution factor of multicell box-girder bridges. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(7), 2128–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0148-4
Murray, C. D., Arancibia, M. D., Okumus, P., & Floyd, R. W. (2019). Destructive testing and computer modeling of a scale prestressed concrete I-girder bridge. Engineering Structures, 183, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.018
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. (2004). Code for design of Highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. JTG D62-2004. Beijing: China Communication Press.
Niu, Y. W., Liu, B. J., Zhao, Y., Rong, S., & Huang, P. M. (2014). Diaphragm damage of precast concrete T-shape girder bridge: Analysis and strengthening. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 8, 396–405. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501408010434
Sieffert, Y., Michel, G., Ramondenc, P., & Jullien, J. F. (2006). Effects of the diaphragm at midspan on static and dynamic behaviour of composite railway bridge: A case study. Steel Construction, 28(11), 1543–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.02.011
Saber, A., & Alaywan, W. (2010). Full-scale test of continuity diaphragms in skewed concrete bridge girders. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 16(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000126
Zheng, B. S. (2017). Analysis of diaphragms influence on the fatigue properties of reinforced concrete rib beam bridge. Dissertation of Northeast Forestry University.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078122) and China Scholarship Council (201806090099).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C., Yang, C., Pan, Y. et al. Simulation and Design Considerations on Transverse Connection of Prestressed Concrete T-girder Bridge. Int J Steel Struct 21, 1182–1196 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00495-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00495-w