Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of intermediate diaphragm on lateral load distribution factor of multicell box-girder bridges

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The current American bridge design codes state that intermediate diaphragms should be used to preserve section geometry against accidental overturning of girders and during construction of a bridge. There is inconsistency in practice for the design of intermediate diaphragms, such that most specifications either ignore or underestimate the contribution of these members to the lateral distribution of live load. Current studies indicate that neglecting the effect of intermediate diaphragms might lead to highly conservative values for bending moment distribution factors and result in non-economic designs for skew bridges. This paper reports on a parametric study performed on 160 prototypes of straight and skew concrete multicell box-girder bridges. The obtained results were used to develop practical expressions to account for the diaphragm effects on American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officialsformulas for live load distribution factors. It was observed that decks with internal transverse diaphragms perpendicular to the longitudinal webs are the best arrangement for load distribution in skew bridges. Thus, a sufficient number of diaphragms should be provided between span lengths and over the supports of bridge decks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (2002). Bridge design specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 14th Edition, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTOLRFD (2007). American association of state highway and transportation officials: Load resistance factor design, 5th Edition, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abendroth, R., Klaiber, F., and Shafer, M. (1995). “Diaphragm effectiveness in prestressed-concrete girder bridges.” J. Struct Eng., ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 9, pp. 1362–1369, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:9(1362).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashebo, D. B., Chan, T. H. T., and Yu, L. (2007a). “Evaluation of dynamic loads on a skew box girder continuous bridge Part I: Field test and modal analysis.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1052–1063, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashebo, D. B., Chan, T. H. T., and Yu, L. (2007b). “Evaluation of dynamic loads on a skew box girder continuous bridge Part II: Parametric study and dynamic load factor.” J. Struct. Eng., DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. and Puckett, J. (1997). Design of highway bridges: Based on AASHTO LRFD, Bridge Design Specifications, Inc: Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, C., Araujo, M., Chandolu, A., Avent, R. R., and Alaywan, W. (2007). “Diaphragm effects of prestressed concrete girder bridges: Review and discussion.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., Vol. 12, 3, pp. 161–167, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2007)12:3(161).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, C. and Chandolu, Araujo, M. (2009). “Quantification of intermediate diaphragm effects on load distributions of prestressed concrete girder bridges. PCI Journal, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, O. C, Bruneau, M. (2011). “Skewed Slab-on-Girder Steel Bridge superstructures with bidirectional-ductile end diaphragms.” J. Bridge Eng., ASCE, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 207–218, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, O. C., Bruneau, M. (2012). “Bidirectional-resistant ductile end diaphragms with buckling restrained braces for skewed steel bridges.” 15 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSI (2008–2012). CSIBRIDGE, Computer software, Version 15.0, Computer amp; Structures Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, C. and Nowak, A. (2002). “Effects of Edge-Stiffening elements and diaphragms on bridge resistance and load distribution.” J. Bridge Eng., ASCE, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 258–266, DOI: (ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(258).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. (1997). Influence of diaphragms on load distribution in P/C I-Girder bridges, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D., Grubb, M., and Yoo, C. (1999). Improved design specifications for horizontally curved steel girder highway bridges, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, X., Conner, S., and Iqbal, R. (2003). Re-examination of the simplified method (Henry’s Method) of distribution factors for live load moment and shear, Final Report, Tennessee DOT Project No. TNSPR-RES, 1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaleel, M. A. and Itani, R. Y. (1990). “Live load moments for continuous skew bridges.” J Struct Eng., ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 9, pp. 2361–2374, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:9(2361).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaloo, A. and Mirzabozorg, H. (2003). “Load distribution factors in simply supported skew bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., ASCE, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 241–245, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:4(241).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LA DOTD (2002). Bridge design manual, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. and Ma, Z. J. (2010). “Effect of intermediate diaphragms on decked bulb-tee bridge system for accelerated construction.” J. Bridge Engrg, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 715–723, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni, I. and Khalim, R. (2012). “Development of the applicability of simplified Henry’s Method (EDF) For skewed multicell box-girder bridges under truck loads.” J. Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng), Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 915–925, DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A1200098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni, I. and Khalim, R. (2013). “Transverse load distribution of skew cast-in-place concrete multicell box- girder bridges subjected to traffic condition.” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 247–262, DOI: 10.1590/S1679-78252013000200002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saber, A. and Alaywan, W. (2011). “Full-scale test of continuity diaphragms in skewed concrete bridge girders.” J. Bridge Eng., Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 21–28, DOI: 1943-5592.0000126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaan, M. (2004). Dynamic and static analyses of continuous curved composite multiple-box girder bridges, PhD Thesis, Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S., Chai, Y., and Hida, S. (2003). “Live-load distribution factors for concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Engrg., Vol. 8, No. 5, 273–281, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:5(273).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A. Y. C. and Gamble, W. L. (1973). Effects of diaphragms in continuous slab and girder highway bridges, College of Engineering, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Qiao, P., Mclean, D. I., and Khaleghi, B. (2010). “Effects of overheight truck impacts on intermediate diaphragms in prestressed concrete bridge girders.” PCI Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahrai, S. M. and Bruneau, M. (1998). “Impact of diaphragms on seismic response of straight slab-on-girder steel bridges.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 8, pp. 938–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iman Mohseni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohseni, I., Rashid, A.K.A. & Kang, J. Effect of intermediate diaphragm on lateral load distribution factor of multicell box-girder bridges. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 2128–2137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0148-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0148-4

Keywords

Navigation