Skip to main content
Log in

Hysteretic Behavior of Rubber Bearing with Yielding Shear Devices

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the perforated yielding shear plates as an energy dissipated device instead of lead core in rubber bearing is assessed in this paper. The advantage of this innovative isolator compared to lead rubber bearing is the ability of being replaced easily and its less displacement with high ability of energy dissipation. Three different isolators with perforated shear plates with hole cross-section of 15%, 18%, and 33% of cross-sectional of plate surface area are investigated. Three types of shear plates of 2, 3 and 4 mm thicknesses made of two types of steel with different yield stress are assessed. By decreasing the shear plate thickness and increasing the number of the plate holes and selecting the shear plate with lower yield stress, the effective stiffness and the amount of energy dissipation and lateral force in the isolator are reduced. Changing shear plate thickness and number of holes do not affect the viscous damping, while increasing the plate yield stress increases viscous damping. Therefore the choice of the shear plate with appropriate thickness, number of holes and plate yield stress can lead to an isolator with acceptable behavior. The suggested isolator can achieve similar characteristics of lead rubber bearing at 50% shear strain and therefore its design basics should be defined differently rather than lead rubber bearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, M., Yoshida, J., & Fujino, Y. (2004). Multiaxial behaviors of laminated rubber bearings and their modeling. I: Experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(8), 1119–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H. J., Kim, Y. J., & Bae, J. H. (2016). Cyclic loading test of wall damping system with steel dampers. Advances in Structural Engineering, 19(8), 1262–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asl, M. J., Rahman, M., & Karbakhsh, A. (2014). Numerical analysis of seismic elastomeric isolation bearing in the base-isolated buildings. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 3(01), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, A., Okui, Y., Mitamura, H., & Imai, T. (2009). A rheology model of high damping rubber bearings for seismic analysis: Identification of nonlinear viscosity. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46(7), 1778–1792.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. W., Albermani, F., & Kitipornchai, S. (2013). Experimental study of perforated yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 91, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. W., Albermani, F., & Williams, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(2), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis, G., Sarracco, G., & Brando, G. (2016). Experimental tests and optimization rules for steel perforated shear panels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 123, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezfuli, F. H., & Alam, M. S. (2013). Shape memory alloy wire-based smart natural rubber bearing. Smart Materials and Structures, 22(4), 045013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezfuli, F. H., & Alam, M. S. (2015). Hysteresis model of shape memory alloy wire-based laminated rubber bearing under compression and unidirectional shear loadings. Smart Materials and Structures, 24(6), 065022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezfuli, F. H., & Alam, M. S. (2017). Smart lead rubber bearings equipped with ferrous shape memory alloy wires for seismically isolating highway bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezfuli, F. H., Li, S., Alam, M. S., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). Effect of constitutive models on the seismic response of an SMA–LRB isolated highway bridge. Engineering Structures, 148, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formisano, A., Lombardi, L., & Mazzolani, F. (2016). Perforated metal shear panels as bracing devices of seismic-resistant structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 126, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, H., Chen, X., & Kang, L. (2012). Demand on stiffened steel shear panel dampers in a rigid-framed bridge pier under repeated seismic ground motions. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(3), 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah, A., & Ali, H. (1990). Seismic design of base-isolated highway bridges utilizing lead–rubber bearings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(3), 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, M. (2000). A macroscopic model for predicting large-deformation behaviors of laminated rubber bearings. Engineering Structures, 22(4), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeim, F., & Kelly, J. M. (1999). Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S. H., Song, S. H., Lee, S. H., & Kim, H. J. (2013). Experimental study of seismic performance of base-isolated frames with U-shaped hysteretic energy-dissipating devices. Engineering Structures, 56, 2014–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (2016). Effect of lead in elastomeric bearings for structures located in seismic region. Procedia Technology, 25, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purba, R., & Bruneau, M. (2009). Finite-element investigation and design recommendations for perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(11), 1367–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. M., & Sabouri-Ghomi, S. (1992). Hysteretic characteristics of unstiffened perforated steel plate shear panels. Thin-Walled Structures, 14(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. L., Kelly, J. M., & Chopra, A. K. (2005). Nonlinear model for lead-rubber bearings including axial-load effects. Journal of engineering mechanics, 131(12), 1270–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J., Masroor, A., Mosqueda, G., & Ryan, K. (2012). Static and dynamic stability of elastomeric bearings for seismic protection of structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(7), 1149–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toopchi-Nezhad, H., Tait, M. J., & Drysdale, R. G. (2008). Testing and modeling of square carbon fiber-reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 15(6), 876–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh, H., Sheidaii, M., & Showkati, H. (2012). Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70, 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vian, D., Bruneau, M., Tsai, K. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2009). Special perforated steel plate shear walls with reduced beam section anchor beams. I: Experimental investigation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(3), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warn, G. P., & Ryan, K. L. (2012). A review of seismic isolation for buildings: historical development and research needs. Buildings, 2(3), 300–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. S., & Albermani, F. (2003). Monotonic and cyclic tests on shear Diaphragm dissipators for steel frames. Civil Engineering Research Bulletin No. 23, University of Queensland, Australia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Tajmir Riahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saadatnia, M., Tajmir Riahi, H. & Izadinia, M. Hysteretic Behavior of Rubber Bearing with Yielding Shear Devices. Int J Steel Struct 19, 747–759 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0159-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0159-y

Keywords

Navigation