MicroRNA-1 (miR-1) inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration by targeting MET
- 1.5k Downloads
MicroRNAs (miRs) are short endogenous non-coding RNAs that act as posttranscriptional regulatory factors of gene expression. Downregulation of miR-1 has been reported in gastric cancer; however, the mechanisms underlying its functions via target genes in gastric cancer remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which miR-1 inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration. The effects of miR-1 on gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration were determined by MTT and wound-healing assays. Cell protein expression of the miR-1 target gene MET was analyzed by Western blotting. Finally, MET expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a stomach tumor tissue microarray (TMA). Ectopic expression of miR-1 inhibited proliferation and migration in both AGS and SGC-7901 gastric cancer cell lines. miR-1 directly targets the MET gene and downregulates its expression. MET siRNA also inhibited proliferation and migration in both cell lines. Immunohistochemistry revealed significantly higher MET expression levels in gastric cancer tissues compared with matched adjacent non-cancer tissues. These findings indicate that the miR-1/MET pathway is a potential therapeutic target due to its crucial role in gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration.
KeywordsGastric cancer miR-1 Non-coding RNA Tumor suppressor gene Target therapy
Gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignancy worldwide. It is more common in men and in developing countries, including East Asian and Eastern European nations. There were approximately 700,000 gastric cancer deaths in 2012, making this malignancy the third leading cause of cancer death after lung and liver cancers [1, 2]. Treatment of stomach cancer may include surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Despite the demonstrated benefits of these treatments, gastric cancer remains virtually incurable with the metastatic disease. Therefore, it is urgent to improve the overall survival rate of patients with gastric cancer by identifying novel therapeutic strategies.
MicroRNAs (miRs) are endogenous small non-coding RNA molecules that bind to complementary sequences in specific regions of multiple target mRNAs to act as posttranscriptional gene expression regulators [3, 4]. MiRs impair gene expression by repressing translation or promoting mRNA degradation. Dysregulation of miRs therefore interferes with many biological processes such as cell proliferation, metabolism, differentiation, apoptosis, immunity, and development [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Moreover, multiple studies have shown that miRs play an important role in human cancers; they could be used as diagnostic and prognostic cancer biomarkers and even be applied to therapy [10, 11]. MicroRNA-1 (miR-1) is a known tumor suppressor that is downregulated in several types of malignancies such as lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma, and chordoma [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. It has also been shown that miR-1 is underexpressed in gastric cancer compared to normal stomach epithelium, in line with its potential tumor suppressor role . However, other studies have demonstrated that miR-1 levels are increased in gastric cancer samples compared with the control samples . These inconsistencies indicate that miR-1 and its function need further characterization.
The MET gene is a direct target of miR-1 [4, 10]. MET is a known oncogene that encodes a cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase, which is upregulated in a variety of human cancers [20, 21, 22]. The activation of MET is due to binding of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), followed by MET dimerization and auto-phosphorylation. These events contribute to tumor growth, metastasis, migration, and drug resistance [23, 24]. Furthermore, MET has been used as a target to improve cancer therapy and ameliorate the sensitivity of chemotherapy in different cancers [25, 26]. MET has been predicted and confirmed to be a target gene for multiple miRs, including miR-1.
In this study, we investigated the functions of miR-1 in gastric cancer cell proliferation and migration. Specifically, we focused on the miR-1 target gene MET to determine its expression in gastric tumor tissues.
Materials and methods
Human gastric cancer cell lines AGS and SGC-7901 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Both cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere containing 5 % CO2 at 37 °C.
MicroRNA mimics transfection and siRNA treatment
The following RNA products were used in this research: hsa-miR-1 mimics, negative control miR mimics, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and negative control siRNA mimics; these RNA products were chemically synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co. Ltd. A total of 2 × 105 cells in 2 ml of culture medium were seeded per well of a six-well plate 1 day before transfection. For transfection, miR or siRNA sample was mixed with LipofectamineTM RNAiMax (Invitrogen, CA, USA), then Opti-MEM (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was added dropwise into the well after incubation for 10 min.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR for quantification of miR-1
For detecting the expression of miR, total RNA from cells were harvested by TRIzol (Invitrogen, CA, USA) reagent. SYBR Green real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed to validate expressed miR-1 after transfection of miR-1 mimics. For mature miR-1 detection, cDNA reverse transcription was performed from total RNA samples using specific miR-1 primers from the SYBR Green MicroRNA Assays and reagents from the miR Reverse Transcription Kit (Novland Biopharma, Shanghai, China).
Cell proliferation and motility assays
Cells were transfected with various amounts of miR-1 mimics and siRNA by reverse transfection according to the manufacturer’s instructions and plated at a density of 4 × 103 cells per well in 96-well plates. After 72 h, cell proliferation was detected by MTT (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) assay. For each treatment group, triplicate wells were analyzed for cell viability.
To evaluate cell motility, a wound-healing assay was carried out. AGS cells were plated in six-well plates at 2 × 105 cells per well, and wounds were generated using a micropipette tip. Then, cells were rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and fresh culture medium was added. The residual gap widths were evaluated from photomicrographs after 48 and 72 h of wound establishment. The wound-healing assays were repeated three times. The data were then analyzed using Prism 5.0 software and expressed as mean ± SEM.
Western blot analysis
AGS and SGC-7901 cells were seeded in six-well plates (2 × 105 cells/well) and cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10 % FBS for 24 h. After transfection for 72 h, the cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline and subjected to lysis with RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % Triton X-100, 1 % sodium deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS, and other protease inhibitors) on ice. Afterward, equal amounts of protein lysate (30 μg) and Precision Plus Protein™ Dual Color Standards (Cat#: 161-0374, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were separated by NuPAGE on 4–12 % bis-tris gel (Invitrogen, CA, USA), transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and blocked in 5 % non-fat milk for 1 h. Immunoblotting was carried out overnight with diluted polyclonal antibodies against MET (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), survivin (1:1000), and beta-actin (1:3000). Afterward, the membranes were washed three times with TBS-T and incubated with IRDye 680LT Goat anti-rabbit (H + L) (1: 5000) or IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse (H + L) (1:15,000; Li-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. The bound complexes were detected by using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), and images were analyzed with the Odyssey Application Software.
Tissue microarray assay
Clinical parameters of gastric cancer tissue microarray
Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. For comparison between MET expression and clinical/pathologic variables, a two-sided Student t test was used. Statistical significance is described in the figures and respective legends. For comparison between MET expression and immune infiltrates, a one-way ANOVA analysis was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ectopic expression of miR-1 inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation and motility in vitro
MET is a direct target for miR-1 in gastric cancer
MET silencing inhibits gastric cancer cell growth
MET expression level is higher in gastric cancer tissues than matched specimens
Recent studies have demonstrated that different miRs contribute to many fundamental biological processes, including the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer [10, 18, 19]. In the present study, we found that miR-1 inhibits gastric cell proliferation and migration by targeting MET, in agreement with several recent studies suggesting that MET is a direct miR-1 target gene [16, 27].
Recent studies have shown the low expression level of miR-1 in other types of cancers compared with matched normal tissues [16, 28, 29, 30]. We also demonstrated that MET is highly expressed in gastric tumor tissues compared with matched normal tissues. Ectopic re-expression of miR-1 has been found to inhibit various types of cancers [31, 32]. Furthermore, multiple studies have shown that overexpression of miR-1 in non-miR-1-expressing lung cancer cells reverses their tumorigenic properties of growth, replication potential, motility/migration, clonogenic survival, and tumor formation in nude mice . In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, miR-1 inhibits cell growth and reduces the replication potential and clonogenic survival [9, 29, 33]. Similarly, overexpression of miR-1 was shown to inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, wound healing, and invasion activity . Besides, ectopic expression of miR-1 has equal features of candidate tumor suppressor in other human cancers [32, 35]. Our current collectively showed that ectopic expression of miR-1 inhibited proliferation and migration in gastric cancer cells. miR-1 directly targets the MET gene and downregulates its expression.
MiRs cannot directly play their biological roles: they bind to the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of target genes and inhibit gene expression by degrading the target mRNA or repressing its translation. It is therefore important to identify novel miR-mediated cancer pathways. In previous studies, miR-1 has been shown not only to target PIK3CA and inhibit the tumorigenic properties of lung cancer cells but also to be useful in predicting lymph node metastasis and postoperative recurrence in patients with NSCLC [36, 37]. In addition, miR-1 also targets TAGLN2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) . However, to our knowledge, the target gene of miR-1 in human gastric cancer has not been previously described. MET was significantly downregulated by ectopic expression of miR-1 in gastric cancer cell lines as shown above (Fig. 2).
MET, also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR), is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is overexpressed and/or mutated in a variety of malignancies, including gastric cancer [38, 39, 40]. Expression of MET has been shown to be correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and cancer patients’ prognosis . As shown above, the expression levels of the MET oncogene in gastric cancer tissues were higher than in matched tissues (Fig. 6h), indicating that overexpression of MET is related to gastric tumorigenesis. However, MET expression was not significantly different among various pathological grades. This might be due to the relatively limited samples number.
In conclusion, we showed that restoration of miR-1 expression in gastric cancer cells results in the inhibition of cell proliferation and migration. These findings support miR-1 as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. In addition, we demonstrated that MET may have an oncogenic function, which is directly regulated by miR-1. The identification of novel miR-1-regulated MET cancer pathways provides new insights into potential molecular mechanisms, target therapy, and prevention of gastric cancer.
Conflicts of interest
- 15.Yoshino H, Enokida H, Chiyomaru T, Tatarano S, Hidaka H, Yamasaki T, et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-1 mediated novel apoptosis pathways through direct inhibition of splicing factor serine/arginine-rich 9 (SRSF9/SRp30c) in bladder cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;417(1):588–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Duan Z, Choy E, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg A, Iafrate J, Yang C, et al. Differential expression of microRNA (miRNA) in chordoma reveals a role for miRNA-1 in Met expression. J Orthop Res: Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 2010;28(6):746–52.Google Scholar
- 18.Kim CH, Kim HK, Rettig RL, Kim J, Lee ET, Aprelikova O, et al. miRNA signature associated with outcome of gastric cancer patients following chemotherapy. BMC Med Genet. 2011;4:79.Google Scholar
- 22.Li B, Torossian A, Sun Y, Du R, Dicker AP, Lu B. Higher levels of c-Met expression and phosphorylation identify cell lines with increased sensitivity to AMG-458, a novel selective c-Met inhibitor with radiosensitizing effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(4):e525–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Siemens H, Neumann J, Jackstadt R, Mansmann U, Horst D, Kirchner T, et al. Detection of miR-34a promoter methylation in combination with elevated expression of c-Met and beta-catenin predicts distant metastasis of colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2013;19(3):710–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Nasser MW, Datta J, Nuovo G, Kutay H, Motiwala T, Majumder S, et al. Down-regulation of micro-RNA-1 (miR-1) in lung cancer. Suppression of tumorigenic property of lung cancer cells and their sensitization to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis by miR-1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(48):33394–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.