Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the cortical response elicited by wrist manipulation via a nonlinear delay differential embedding

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regarding motor processes, modeling healthy people’s brains is essential to understand the brain activity in people with motor impairments. However, little research has been undertaken when external forces disturb limbs, having limited information on physiological pathways. Therefore, in this paper, a nonlinear delay differential embedding model is used to estimate the brain response elicited by externally controlled wrist movement in healthy individuals. The aim is to improve the understanding of the relationship between a controlled wrist movement and the generated cortical activity of healthy people, helping to disclose the underlying mechanisms and physiological relationships involved in the motor event. To evaluate the model, a public database from the Delft University of Technology is used, which contains electroencephalographic recordings of ten healthy subjects while wrist movement was externally provoked by a robotic system. In this work, the cortical response related to movement is identified via Independent Component Analysis and estimated based on a nonlinear delay differential embedding model. After a cross-validation analysis, the model performance reaches 90.21% ± 4.46% Variance Accounted For, and Correlation 95.14% ± 2.31%. The proposed methodology allows to select the model degree, to estimate a general predominant operation mode of the cortical response elicited by wrist movement. The obtained results revealed two facts that had not previously been reported: the movement’s acceleration affects the cortical response, and a common delayed activity is shared among subjects. Going forward, identifying biomarkers related to motor tasks could aid in the evaluation of rehabilitation treatments for patients with upper limbs motor impairments.

Graphical abstract

A: General scheme of the methodology to identify the cortical response caused by external disturbances. B. Estimation of the best time delays. C: Sequence of the mathematical model from the perturbation to the cortical response and decomposition of the base matrix through Principal Component Analysis (PCA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The information utilized in this article is available in [16].

Code availability

The source code used to produce the results and analyses presented in this manuscript are available by sending an email to martin.duranss@udlap.mx.

Notes

  1. EEG: Electroencephalogram.

  2. VAF: Variance Accounted For.

  3. LNS: National Supercomputing Laboratory of Southeast Mexico, https://lns.buap.mx/.

  4. ICA: Independent Component Analysis.

  5. SNR: Signal-to-Noise Ratio.

References

  1. Bullock D (2001) Cortical models for movement control. In: Mastebroek HAK, Vos JE (eds) Plausible neural networks for biological modelling. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 135–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Úbeda A, Hortal E, Iáñez E, Perez-Vidal C, Azorín JM (2015) Assessing movement factors in upper limb kinematics decoding from EEG signals. PLoS ONE 10:e0128456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshimura N, Tsuda H, Kawase T, Kambara H, Koike Y (2017) Decoding finger movement in humans using synergy of EEG cortical current signals. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09770-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu F, Li Y, Shi Z, Lin H (2022) Nonlinear identification and time-frequency domain analysis of corticomuscular responses during card-grabbing using the NARMAX method. In: 2022 8th international conference on control, automation and robotics (ICCAR). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAR55106.2022.9782654

  5. Kulkarni V, Joshi Y, Manthalkar R et al (2022) Band decomposition of asynchronous electroencephalogram signal for upper limb movement classification. Phys Eng Sci Med 45:643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01132-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang X, Dai X, Liu Y, Chen X, Hu Q, Hu R et al (2023) Motor imagery electroencephalogram classification algorithm based on joint features in the spatial and frequency domains and instance transfer. Front Hum Neurosci 17:1175399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1175399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hervault M, Zanone P-G, Buisson J-C, Huys R (2021) Cortical sensorimotor activity in the execution and suppression of discrete and rhythmic movements. Sci Rep 11:22364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01368-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohbayashi M (2021) The roles of the cortical motor areas in sequential movements. Front Behav Neurosci 15:640659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Ji H, Yu J, Li J, Jin L, Liu L et al (2023) A sequential learning model with GNN for EEG-EMG-based stroke rehabilitation BCI. Front Neurosci 17:588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1125230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schnapp E, Breithaupt H (2017) Understanding the brain in health and disease. EMBO Rep 18(6):873–877. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nozari HA, Rahmani Z, Castaldi P, Simani S, Sadati SJ (2020) Data-driven modelling of the nonlinear cortical responses generated by continuous mechanical perturbations. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2):322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu Y, Yang Y, Dewald JP, Van der Helm FC, Schouten AC, Wei HL (2021) Nonlinear modeling of cortical responses to mechanical wrist perturbations using the NARMAX method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 68(3):948–958. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3013545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Blum KP, D’Incamps BL, Zytnicki D, Ting LH (2017) Force encoding in muscle spindles during stretch of passive muscle. PLoS Comput Biol 13(9):e1005767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lainscsek C, Terrence JS (2015) Delay differential analysis of time series. Neural Comput 27(3):594–614. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00706

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lainscsek C, Hernandez ME, Weyhenmeyer J, Sejnowski TJ, Poizner H (2013) Non-linear dynamical analysis of EEG time series distinguishes patients with Parkinson’s disease from healthy individuals. Front Neurol 4:200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schouten AC, Vlaar M, Vardy A, Escalante TS, Van-Der-Helm F (2019) Data underlying the research of cortical responses evoked by wrist joint manipulation. TU Delft—4TU.ResearchData [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.4121/UUID:176D8F78-D9FD-491E-90E7-9370E249B701

  17. He F, Yang Y (2021) Nonlinear system identification of neural systems from neurophysiological signals. Neuroscience 458:213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Y, Solis-Escalante T, Van de Ruit M, Van der Helm FC, Schouten AC (2016) Nonlinear coupling between cortical oscillations and muscle activity during isotonic wrist flexion. Front Comput Neurosci 10:126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Campfens SF, Schouten AC, van Putten MJ, van der Kooij H (2013) Quantifying connectivity via efferent and afferent pathways in motor control using coherence measures and joint position perturbations. Exp Brain Res 228:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3545-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vlaar MP, Birpoutsoukis G, Lataire J, Schoukens M, Schouten AC, Schoukens J et al (2018) Modeling the nonlinear cortical response in EEG evoked by wrist joint manipulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 26(1):205–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2751650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian R, Yang Y, Van der Helm FC, Dewald JP (2018) A novel approach for modeling neural responses to joint perturbations using the NARMAX method and a hierarchical neural network. Front Comput Neurosci 12:96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pont MD (2020) Non-linear Bayesian system identification of cortical responses using Volterra series: Delft University of Technology [Master thesis]. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:56a8b74e-ffe7-40dd-b382-4fcad1d3b005. Acceded 11 July 2023

  23. Trivedi G, Rawat TK (2022) Volterra series based nonlinear system identification methods and modelling capabilities. Int J Model Identif Control 41:222–230. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIC.2022.127513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vlaar MP, Solis-Escalante T, Vardy AN, Helm FCTVD, Schouten AC (2017) Quantifying nonlinear contributions to cortical responses evoked by continuous wrist manipulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(5):481–491. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2579118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Savitzky A, Golay MJ (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36(8):1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dai W, Selesnick I, Rizzo JR, Rucker J, Hudson T (2017) A nonlinear generalization of the Savitzky-Golay filter and the quantitative analysis of saccades. J Vis 17(9):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.9.10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Breugel F, Kutz JN, Brunton BW (2020) Numerical differentiation of noisy data: a unifying multi-objective optimization framework. IEEE Access 8:196865–196877. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Vlaar M (2017) Characterizing cortical responses evoked by robotic joint manipulation after stroke: Delft University of Technology [Doctoral thesis]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:04b4caa3-1d27-4b97-85ff-2036deb70be8. Accessed 11 July 2023

  29. Riemann BL, Lephart SM (2002) The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train 37(1):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang Y, Guliyev B, Schouten AC (2017) Dynamic causal modeling of the cortical responses to wrist perturbations. Front Neurosci 11:518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00518

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hideaki O, Kazuhiro S, Koya Y, Daisuke S, Makoto S, Hikari K et al (2013) Neuromagnetic activation following active and passive finger movements. Brain Behav 3(2):178–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thankfully acknowledge computer resources, technical advice, and support provided by the Laboratorio Nacional de Supercómputo del Sureste de México (LNS), a member of the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) national laboratories, with Project No. 202101014C. This work was supported by the CONAHCYT [Grant Number 443962] and the Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) [scholar registration number 604161].

Funding

This work was supported by the Laboratorio Nacional de Supercómputo del Sureste de México (LNS), a member of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) national laboratories, with project No. 202101014C, the CONACYT [grant number 443962] and the Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) [scholar registration number 604161].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martín Durán-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Ethical approval

A public dataset from the Delft University of Technology (the Netherlands) is used in this work. The experimental procedure was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the TU Delft. All participants delivered written informed consent before the performance of experiments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durán-Santos, M., Salazar-Varas, R. & Etcheverry, G. Modeling the cortical response elicited by wrist manipulation via a nonlinear delay differential embedding. Phys Eng Sci Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01427-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01427-8

Keywords

Navigation