Skip to main content
Log in

Preterm-term birth classification using EMD-based time-domain features of single-channel electrohysterogram data

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preterm birth anticipation is a crucial task that can reduce both the rate and the complications of preterm birth. Electrohysterogram (EHG) or uterine electromyogram (EMG) data have shown that they can provide useful information for preterm birth anticipation. Four distinct time-domain features (mean absolute value, average amplitude change, difference in absolute standard deviation value, and log detector) that are commonly applied to EMG signal processing were utilized and investigated in this study. A single channel of EHG data was decomposed into its constituent components (i.e., into intrinsic mode functions) by using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) before their time-domain features were extracted. The time-domain features of the intrinsic mode functions of the EHG data associated with preterm and term births were applied for preterm-term birth classification by using a support vector machine with a radial basis function. The preterm-term birth classifications were validated by using 10-fold cross validation. From the computational results, it was shown that excellent preterm-term birth classification can be achieved by using single-channel EHG data. The computational results further suggested that the best overall performance concerning preterm-term birth classification was obtained when thirteen (out of sixteen) EMD-based time-domain features were applied. The best accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and \(F_1\)-score achieved were 0.9382, 0.9130, 0.9634, and 0.9366, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO (1976) WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 56:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB et al (2013) Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health 10(suppl 1):S2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayo Clinic. Premature birth; 2021 [cited May 27, 2021]. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/premature-birth/symptoms-causes/syc-20376730

  4. Wolrd Health Organization. Preterm birth; 2018 [cited May 27, 2021]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preterm birth; 2020 [cited May 27, 2021]. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pretermbirth.htm

  6. Fele-Žorž G, Kavšek G, Novak-Antolič v, Jager F (2008) A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maner WL, Garfield RE (2007) Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data. Ann Biomed Eng 35:465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leman H, Marque C, Gondry J (1999) Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46:1222–1229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fergus P, Cheung P, Hussain A, Al-Jumeily D, Dobbins C, Iram S (2013) Prediction of preterm deliveries from EHG signals using machine learning. PLoS ONE 8:e77154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng J, Hao D, Yang L, Du M, Song X, Jiang H et al (2020) Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random forest. Biocybern Biomed Eng 40:352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaleem AM, Kokate RD (2021) Prediction of pre-term groups from EHG signals using optimal multi-kernel SVM. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12:3689–3703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain AJ, Fergus P, Al-Askar H, Al-Jumeily D, Jager F (2015) Dynamic neural network architecture inspired by the immune algorithm to predict preterm deliveries in pregnant women. Neurocomputing 151:963–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. You J, Kim Y, Seok W, Lee S, Sim D, Park KS et al (2019) Multivariate time-frequency analysis of electrohysterogram for classification of term and preterm labor. J Electr Eng Technol 14:897–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemthanon C, Janjarasjitt S (2019) Examination of time-domain features of EHG data for preterm-term birth classification. J Comput 30:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fergus P, Idowu I, Hussain A, Dobbins C (2016) Advanced artificial neural network classification for detecting preterm births using EHG records. Neurocomputing 188:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hemthanon C, Janjarasjitt S (2020) Correlation between time-domain features of electrohysterogram data of pregnant women and gestational age. In: Lin KP, Magjarevic R, de Carvalho P (eds) IFMBE Proceedings. vol 74, pp 212–218

  17. Acharya UR, Sudarshan VK, Rong SQ, Tan Z, Lim CM, Koh JE et al (2017) Automated detection of premature delivery using empirical mode and wavelet packet decomposition techniques with uterine electromyogram signals. Comput Biol Med 85:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ren P, Yao S, Li J, Valdes-Sosa PA, Kendrick KM (2015) Improved prediction of preterm delivery using empirical mode decomposition analysis of uterine electromyography signals. PLoS ONE 10:e0132116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen L, Hao Y (2017) Feature extraction and classification of EHG between pregnancy and labour group using Hilbert-Huang transform and extreme learning machine. Comput Math Methods Med 10:10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7949507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smrdel A, Jager F (2015) Separating sets of term and pre-term uterine EMG records. Physiol Meas 36:341–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mas-Cabo J, Ye-Lin Y, Garcia-Casado J, Díaz-Martinez A, Perales-Marin A, Monfort-Ortiz R et al (2020) Robust characterization of the uterine myoelectrical activity in different obstetric scenarios. Entropy 22:743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q et al (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc A. 454:903–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang NE, Shen SS (2014) Hilbert-Huang transform and its applications, 2nd edn. World Scientific, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontugne R, Borgnat P, Flandrin P (2017) Online empirical mode decomposition. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 4306–4310

  25. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Mark RG et al (2000) PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23):e215–e220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang NE, Wu MLC, Long SR, Shen SSP, Qu W, Gloersen P et al (2003) A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis. Proc R Soc A 459:2317–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tibshirani Hastie R T, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abe S (2010) Support vector machines for pattern classification, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Gu S, Tan Y, He X (2010) Discriminant analysis via support vectors. Neurocomputing 73:1669–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a TRF Research Career Development Grant jointly funded by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and Ubon Ratchathani University (Contract Number RSA6180041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suparerk Janjarasjitt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janjarasjitt, S. Preterm-term birth classification using EMD-based time-domain features of single-channel electrohysterogram data. Phys Eng Sci Med 44, 1151–1159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01051-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01051-w

Keywords

Navigation