Skip to main content
Log in

Paperless medical physics QA in radiation therapy

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physics quality assurance (QA) is an integral part of a medical physicist’s role in the radiotherapy centre. Management of physics QA documents is an issue with a long-term accumulation. Storage space, archive administration and paper consumption are just some of the difficulties faced by physicists. Plotting trends and drawing meaningful conclusions from these results can be challenging using traditional QA methods. Remote checking of QA within a hospital network can also be problematic. The aim of this project is introduce a paperless QA system that will provide solutions to many of these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ARPANSA RPS14.3 Radiation protection in radiotherapy

  2. Thwaites DJ, Mijnheer BJ, Mills JA (2005) Quality assurance of external beam radiotherapy. In: Podgorsak EB (ed) Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 407–450

    Google Scholar 

  3. Millar M, Cramb J, Das R, Ackerly T, Brown G, Webb D (1997) ACPSEM position paper. Recommendations for the safe use of external beams and sealed brachytherapy sources in radiation oncology. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 20(3 Suppl):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40 (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology. Med Phys 21:581–618

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Electrotechnical Commission (1989) Medical electrical equipment—medical electron accelerators: functional performance characteristics, IEC 976. IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. Physics QA Protocols, Nepean Cancer Care Centre

  7. Luo J, Yau S, White S, Wilfert L (1996)The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL; 10–300 kV generating potential). Phys. Med. Biol. 41:2605–2625

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aukett RJ, Burns JE, Greener AG, Harrison RM, Moretti C, Nahum AE, Rosser KE, IPEM Working Party (2005) Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL). Phys Med Biol 50:2739–2748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy, technical reports series No. 398, IAEA, Vienna (2000)

  10. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66 (2003) Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process. Med Phys 30:2762–2790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Luo.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 Protocols comparison with NCCC varian CLINAC 21EX—LA2 QA tests

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, J., Yau, S., White, S. et al. Paperless medical physics QA in radiation therapy. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 237–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0137-1

Keywords

Navigation