Abstract
Huge amount of efforts were done on saturated steam flow in wellbores with relatively little work on superheated multi-component thermal fluid (SMTF) flow in wellbores. In this paper, based on the continuity, energy and momentum balance equations, a flow model in the vertical wellbores is proposed. Then, coupled with the real gas model and transient heat flow model in formation, a comprehensive model is established for estimating thermophysical properties of SMTF in wellbores. Results show that (a) the effect of mass content of non-condensing gases on temperature profiles is negligible. The enthalpy of SMTF decreases rapidly with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases. (b) When the injection rate is small, heat loss is the main factor on temperature drop, while when the injection rate is large enough, pressure drop becomes the dominant factor on temperature drop. (c) The two components of non-condensing gases and superheated steam in SMTF have a relatively independent mechanism of enhanced oil recovery, which should be selected based on the unique characteristics of each reservoir.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Superheated steam or SMTF comprised of superheated steam and non-condensing gases have been proved effective in heavy oil recovery by field practices (Sun et al. 2017a, b, c, d, e; Sun et al. 2018a). In order to obtain a satisfactory oil recovery effect, practicing engineers are requested to predict thermophysical properties of SMTF at well-bottom condition. Therefore, a series of works are done in this paper to establish a mathematical model to analyze flow behaviors of SMTF in wellbores.
Modeling of thermal fluid flow in wellbores was firstly conducted in the 1950s. Both analytical and numerical solutions were obtained of thermal fluid flow in wellbores. Alves et al. (1992) and Hasan and Kabir (1994) presented two rigorous models for estimating temperature and steam quality in wellbores by solving the continuity, energy and momentum balance equations simultaneously. Then, huge amount of works were done by Hasan et al. (Hasan and Kabir 1996, 2012; Hasan et al. 2009) and Kabir et al. (1996) on heat conduction rate in radial direction and flow models in wellbores under various injection conditions, which laid a solid foundation for following studies on multiphase flow, coupling effect of wellbore/formation and Joule–Thomson effect, etc. (Pourafshary et al. 2009; Livescu et al. 2010; Bahonar and Azaiez 2011a, b; Mao and Harvey 2013; Gu et al. 2014; Sivaramkrishnan et al. 2015).
However, these early models were focused on the conventional saturated steam, which cannot be used to predict thermophysical properties of SMTF in wellbores. In recent years, Zhou et al. (2010), and Xu et al. (2013a, b) and Fan et al. (2016) proposed models for estimating pressure and temperature of superheated steam in vertical wellbores. However, predicted temperature from their models showed deviation from field data under high injection rate. Sun et al. (2017f, g, h, i, j) have done a series of works on superheated steam flow in onshore, offshore and concentric dual-tubing wells, etc. Besides, the predicted values of temperature from Sun et al.’s model showed a good agreement with field data under high injection rate, which overcame the technical difficulty in precise estimation of temperature values over a wide range of injection rate.
However, these previous models were focused on the single-phase flow of superheated steam in wellbores, which cannot be used to analyze the effect of non-condensing gases on SMTF in wellbores (de Almeida et al. 2017). Dong et al. (2014) proposed a numerical model for estimating pressure and temperature of SMTF in perforated horizontal wellbores. However, the predicted values of temperature from their model deviated from field data under high injection rate. At present, the study on SMTF flow in wellbores is still at the early stage. In this paper, based on the momentum and energy balance equations, a flow model in wellbores is established. Then, coupled with S-R-K real gas model and transient heat conduction model in formation, a comprehensive model is proposed. The new model is useful for practicing engineers to estimate key parameters of SMTF at well-bottom condition.
Model description
General assumptions
The wellbore structure is shown in Fig. 1. The model is established based on the assumptions listed below (Sun et al. 2017a, b, c, d, e; Sun et al. 2018a):
-
(a)
Injection parameters of SMTF at well-head are kept unchanged throughout the entire injection period.
-
(b)
Heat transfer rate from SMTF to formation is steady state.
-
(c)
Heat transfer rate in formation is transient state.
Governing equations
The continuity equation. There exists no mass loss during the flow process of SMTF in wellbores. Therefore, the continuity equation can be expressed as (Sun et al. 2017c, g, h, i):
where \(w_{\text{SMTF}}\) denotes the mass flow rate of SMTF in the vertical wellbores, kg/s; \(r_{i}\) denotes the inner radius of the inner tubing, as shown in Fig. 1, m; \(\rho_{\text{SMTF}}\) denotes the density of SMTF in wellbores, which is discussed in “Appendix A in Electronic supplementary material”, kg/m3; \(v_{\text{SMTF}}\) denotes the flow velocity of SMTF in wellbores, m/s; \(z\) denotes the well depth, m.
The energy balance equation. As mentioned in the introduction, Zhou et al. (2010), Xu et al. (2013a, b), Fan et al. (2016) and Dong et al. (2014) proposed their energy balance equations. However, their energy balance equations showed limitation in predicting temperature values at high injection rate condition. Therefore, a new energy balance equation is established (Sun et al. 2017c, g, h, i):
where \(Q_{\text{loss}}\) denotes the heat loss rate from SMTF to formation, which is discussed in “Appendix B in Electronic supplementary material”, J/s; \(h_{\text{SMTF}}\) denotes the enthalpy of SMTF in wellbores, which is discussed in “Appendix A in Electronic supplementary material”, J/kg.
The momentum balance equation can be expressed as (Sun et al. 2017c, g, h, i):
where \(p_{\text{SMTF}}\) denotes the SMTF pressure in wellbores, Pa; \(\tau_{f}\) denotes the shear stress in wellbores, which is discussed in “Appendix C in Electronic supplementary material”, N.
Numerical solution of the mathematical model
In this paper, the established model is solved by numerical method. The energy and momentum balance equations are represented as difference equations, as shown below:
where \(p_{\text{SMTF, out}}\) and \(\rho_{\text{SMTF, out}}\) denote the outlet pressure and density of SMTF, respectively; \(p_{\text{SMTF, in}}\) and \(\rho_{\text{SMTF, in}}\) denote the inlet pressure and density of SMTF, respectively; \(\Delta z\) is the length of the segment; \(v_{\text{SMTF, out}}\) and \(v_{\text{SMTF, in}}\) denote the flow velocity of SMTF at the outlet and inlet of the segment, respectively.
where \(q_{\text{SMTF, out}}\) and \(q_{\text{SMTF, in}}\) denote the heat transfer rate from SMTF to formation per unit depth at the outlet and inlet of the segment, respectively, W/m; \(h_{\text{SMTF, out}}\) and \(h_{\text{SMTF, in}}\) denote the specific enthalpy of SMTF at the outlet and inlet of the segment, respectively.
Given the fact that the injection parameters at well-head are known, pressure and temperature at outlet of the first segment can be calculated using Eqs. (4) and (5) with iteration method. Then, this pair of pressure and temperature is input for the inlet of the second segment and another iteration begins. Finally, distributions of pressure and temperature along the entire vertical wellbore are obtained.
Results and discussions
Injection temperature
In order to study the effect of injection temperature, various injection temperatures (590, 610 and 630 K) are tested based on no change in values of injection pressure and mass flow rate (Chen et al. 2016, 2017; Zhang et al. 2017a, b; Sun et al. 2017k, l, 2018b; Feng et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2017, 2018a, b). Besides, various values of mass content of non-condensing gases are added for comparison. In oil field, non-condensing gases are obtained by burning of diesel oil and air at a mass ratio of about 1.0:14.9. According to the relation of mass fraction of elements, the mass ratio of \({\text{N}}_{2}\) and \({\text{CO}}_{2}\) is about 4: 1 (Cheng and Han 2015). Therefore, the mass ratio of 5%:1%, 20%:5% and 40%:10% between \({\text{N}}_{2}\) and \({\text{CO}}_{2}\) are selected. The predicted results are shown in Fig. 2.
It is observed from Fig. 2 that: (a) under the condition that the mass content of non-condensing gases is kept unchanged, SMTF pressure decreases with increasing of injection temperature. This is because the density of SMTF decreases with increasing of injection temperature, which causes the increase of flow velocity. As a result, a higher flow velocity leads to a larger shear stress, which causes a higher pressure gradient. (b) Under the condition that injection temperature is kept unchanged, SMTF pressure increases with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases. This is because the density of SMTF increases with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases, which causes a smaller shear stress, and a smaller pressure gradient.
It is observed from Fig. 2b that the effect of mass content of non-condensing gases on temperature profiles is negligible. However, due to the decrease of SMTF pressure, superheat degree decreases with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases, as shown in Fig. 2c. It is observed from Fig. 2d that under the condition that the mass content of non-condensing gases is kept unchanged and the effect of temperature increase on enthalpy of SMTF is negligible.
Mass injection rate
In order to study the effect of injection rate, various injection rate (160, 200 and 240 t/d) is tested based on no change in values of injection pressure and temperature. Besides, various values of mass content of non-condensing gases are added for comparison. The predicted results are shown in Fig. 3.
It is observed from Fig. 3a that under the condition that the mass content of non-condensing gases is kept unchanged, SMTF pressure decreases with increasing of injection rate. It is observed from Fig. 3b that under the condition that the mass content of non-condensing gases is kept unchanged, SMTF temperature increases at first and then turns to decrease with increasing of injection rate. This is because when the injection rate is relatively small, heat loss has a significant influence on temperature drop. However, the effect of heat loss on temperature drop becomes weaker with increasing of injection rate. It is observed from Fig. 3c that under the condition that the mass content of non-condensing gases is kept unchanged, superheat degree increases with increasing of injection rate. Besides, under the condition that the injection rate is kept unchanged, superheat degree decreases with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases. It is observed from Fig. 3d that the effect of injection rate on enthalpy profiles is negligible, but the enthalpy decreases rapidly with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases.
Conclusions
In this paper, a comprehensive model is proposed for estimating thermophysical properties of SMTF in wellbores under various injection conditions. Some meaningful conclusions are listed below:
-
(a)
The effect of mass content of non-condensing gases on temperature profiles is negligible. The enthalpy of SMTF decreases rapidly with increasing of mass content of non-condensing gases. The non-condensing gas content should be selected reasonably in the mine to make full use of the superheated steam in the mixed steam.
-
(b)
SMTF pressure in wellbores decreases with increasing of injection rate. SMTF temperature increases at first and then turns to decrease with increasing of injection rate. When the injection rate is small, heat loss is the main factor on temperature drop, while when the injection rate is large enough, pressure drop becomes the dominant factor on temperature drop.
-
(c)
The two components of non-condensing gases and superheated steam in SMTF have a relatively independent mechanism of enhanced oil recovery, which should be selected based on the unique characteristics of each reservoir.
References
Alves IN, Alhanati FJS, Shoham O (1992) A unified model for predicting flowing temperature distribution in wellbores and pipelines. SPE Prod Eng 7(4):363–367
Bahonar M, Azaiez J (2011a) Transient nonisothermal fully coupled wellbore/reservoir model for gas-well testing, part 1: modelling. J Can Pet Technol 50(9–10):37–50
Bahonar M, Azaiez J (2011b) Transient nonisothermal fully coupled wellbore/reservoir model for gas-well testing, part 2: applications. J Can Pet Technol 50(9):51–70
Chen ZS (2008) Advanced engineering thermodynamics. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 153–180
Chen Z, Liao X, Zhao X, Lv S, Zhu L (2016) A semianalytical approach for obtaining type curves of multiple-fractured horizontal wells with secondary-fracture networks. SPE J 21(02):538–549
Chen Z, Liao X, Zhao X, Dou X, Zhu L, Sanbo L (2017) A finite-conductivity horizontal-well model for pressure-transient analysis in multiple-fractured horizontal wells. SPE J 22(4):1112–1122
Cheng WL, Han BB (2015a) Wellbore heat transfer model of multiple thermal fluid based on real gas state equation. Acta Petrolei Sinica 36(11):1402–1410
Cheng WL, Han BB (2015b) Wellbore heat transfer model of multiple thermal fluid based on real gas state equation. Acta Petrolei Sinica 36(11):1402–1410
Cheng WL, Huang YH, Lu DT et al (2011) A novel analytical transient heat-conduction time function for heat transfer in steam injection wells considering the wellbore heat capacity. Energy 36:4080–4088
de Almeida RV, Rahnema Hamid, McMillan Marcia D (2017) Wellbore modeling for hybrid steam-solvent processes. Fuel 188:50–60
Dong XH, Liu HQ, Zhang ZX et al (2014) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of multi-thermal fluid in horizontal wellbore coupled with flow in heavy oil reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 122:56–68
Du J, Chen H (2003) Advanced engineering thermodynamics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp 160–168
Fan ZF, He CG, Xu AZ (2016) Calculation model for on-way parameters of horizontal wellbore in the superheated steam injection. Pet Explor Dev 43(5):798–805
Feng D, Li X, Wang X, Li J, Zhang X (2018) Capillary filling under nanoconfinement: the relationship between effective viscosity and water-wall interactions. Inte J Heat Mass Trans 118:900–910
Gu H, Cheng L, Huang S, Du B, Hu C (2014) Prediction of thermophysical properties of saturated steam and wellbore heat losses in concentric dual-tubing steam injection well. Energy 75:419–429
Gu H, Cheng LS, Huang SJ et al (2015) Steam injection for heavy oil recovery: modeling of wellbore heat efficiency and analysis of steam injection performance. Energy Convers Manag 97:166–177
Guo R (1995) Fugacity and activity. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 15–30
Hasan AR, Kabir CS (1994) Aspects of wellbore heat transfer during two-phase flow. SPE Prod Facil 9(3):211–216
Hasan AR, Kabir CS (1996) A mechanistic model for computing fluid temperature profiles in gas-lift wells. SPE Prod Facil 11(3):179–185
Hasan AR, Kabir CS (2012) Wellbore heat-transfer modeling and applications. J Pet Sci Eng 86–87:127–136
Hasan AR, Kabir CS, Wang X (2009) A robust steady-state model for flowing-fluid temperature in complex wells. SPE Prod Oper 24(24):269–276
Huang L, Ning Z, Wang Q et al (2017) Thermodynamic and Structural Characterization of Bulk Organic Matter in Chinese Silurian Shale: experimental and Molecular Modeling Studies. Energ Fuels 31(5):4851–4865
Huang L, Ning Z, Wang Q et al (2018a) Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery. Appl Energ 210:28–43
Huang L, Ning Z, Wang Q et al (2018b) Molecular simulation of adsorption behaviors of methane, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on kerogen: effect of kerogen maturity and moisture content. Fuel 211:159–172
Kabir CS, Hasan AR, Kouba GE, Ameen M (1996) Determining circulating fluid temperature in drilling, workover, and well control operations. SPE Drill Complet 11(2):74–79
Liu HQ (2013) Principle and design of thermal oil recovery, 1st edn. Petroleum industry press, Beijing
Livescu S, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K, Ginestra JC (2010) A fully-coupled thermal multiphase wellbore flow model for use in reservoir simulation. J Pet Sci Eng 71(3):138–146
Mao D, Harvey A (2013) Transient-nonisothermal-multiphase-wellbore-model development with phase change and its application to producer wells. SPE J 18(6):1169–1180
Pourafshary P, Varavei A, Sepehrnoori K, Podio A (2009) A compositional wellbore/reservoir simulator to model multiphase flow and temperature distribution. J Pet Sci Eng 69(1):40–52
Sivaramkrishnan K, Huang B, Jana AK (2015) Predicting wellbore dynamics in a steam-assisted gravity drainage system: numeric and semi-analytic model, and validation. Appl Therm Eng 91:679–686
Soave G (1972) Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state. Chem Eng Sci 27(6):1197–1203
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Yu PL, Zhao L, Zhang Y (2017a) A numerical approach for obtaining type curves of superheated multi-component thermal fluid flow in concentric dual-tubing wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 111:41–53
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Zhao L, Ding GY, Zhang XJ (2017b) The mass and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam coupled with non-condensing gases in perforated horizontal wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 156:460–467
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2017c) Effect of gaseous CO2 on superheated steam flow in wells. Eng Sci Technol Int J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.10.003
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2017d) Numerical simulation of superheated steam flow in dual-tubing wells. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 3–4:1–13
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2017e) The heat and mass transfer characteristics of superheated steam in horizontal wells with toe-point injection technique. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 121:356–371
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Yu PL, Ding GY, Zou M (2017f) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam in offshore wells and analysis of superheated steam performance. Comput Chem Eng 100:80–93
Sun FR, Yao YD, Chen MQ, Li XF, Zhao L, Meng Y, Sun Z, Zhang T, Feng D (2017g) Performance analysis of superheated steam injection for heavy oil recovery and modeling of wellbore heat efficiency. Energy 125:795–804
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Zhao L (2017h) Type curve analysis of superheated steam flow in offshore horizontal wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 113:850–860
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li H, Chen G, Sun Z (2017i) A numerical study on the non-isothermal flow characteristics of superheated steam in ground pipelines and vertical wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 159:68–75
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Tian J, Zhu GJ, Chen ZM (2017j) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam in concentric dual-tubing wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 115:1099–1108
Sun Z, Li X, Shi J, Zhang T, Sun F (2017k) Apparent permeability model for real gas transport through shale gas reservoirs considering water distribution characteristic. Int J Heat Mass Tran 115:1008–1019
Sun Z, Li X, Shi J, Yu P, Huang L, Xia J, Sun F, Zhang T, Feng D (2017l) A semi-analytical model for drainage and desorption area expansion during coal-bed methane production. Fuel 204:214–226
Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018a) The heat and mass transfer characteristics of superheated steam coupled with non-condensing gases in horizontal wells with multi-point injection technique. Energy 143:995–1005
Sun Z, Li X, Shi J, Zhang T, Feng D, Sun F, Chen Yu, Deng J, Li L (2018b) A semi-analytical model for the relationship between pressure and saturation in the CBM reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 49:365–375
Tong JS, Li J (1966) Thermal physical properties if fluid. Petrochemical Press, Beijing, pp 209–238
Xu AZ, Mu LX, Fan ZF, Wu XH, Zhao L, Bo B (2013a) Mechanism of heavy oil recovery by cyclic superheated steam stimulation. J Petrol Sci Eng 111:197–207
Xu AZ, Mu LX, Fan ZF, Zhao L (2013) New findings on heat loss of superheated steam transmitted along the wellbore and heating enhancement in heavy oil reservoirs. In: The international petroleum technology conference held in Beijing, China, 26–28 Mar
Yuan EX (1982) Engineering fluid mechanics. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, pp 87–163
Zhou TY, Cheng LS, He CB, Pang ZX, Zhou FJ (2010) Calculation model of on-way parameters and heating radius in a superheated steam injection wellbore. Pet Explor Dev 37(1):83–88
Zhang T, Li X, Sun Z, Feng D, Miao Y, Li P, Zhang Z (2017a) An analytical model for relative permeability in water-wet nanoporous media. Chem Eng Sci 174:1–12
Zhang T, Li X, Li J, Feng D, Li P, Zhang Z, Chen Yu, Wang S (2017b) Numerical investigation of the well shut-in and fracture uncertainty on fluid-loss and production performance in gas-shale reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng (46):421–435
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the State Key Laboratory of efficient development of offshore oil (2015-YXKJ-001). This work was also supported in part by a grant from National Science and Technology Major Projects of China (2016ZX05039 and 2016ZX05042) and the National Natural fund of China (51490654). The authors recognize the support of the China University of Petroleum (Beijing) for the permission to publish this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, F., Yao, Y. & Li, X. Effect analysis of non-condensable gases on superheated steam flow in vertical single-tubing steam injection pipes based on the real gas equation of state and the transient heat transfer model in formation. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 8, 1325–1330 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0419-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0419-y