Abstract
Growing population and climate change are increasing the challenges to the global water situation. Due to a continuous elevating level of pollution, there is the requirement of novel innovative water technologies to ensure the good supply of drinking water. This review is mainly focused on the recent advances in nanotechnology aspects for water and wastewater treatment that include nano-based materials such as nanosorbents, metal oxides of nanoscale materials, polymer-based nanosorbents, membranes of nanoscale materials (nanomembranes), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). These nanomaterials are beneficial when the properties and specific characteristics of these materials are compared with conventional processes of the wastewater treatment. The aim and objective of this review are to provide an overview of different types of nanomaterials and their applicability in the removal of heavy metals and bacterial pathogens from wastewater during the treatment process.
Similar content being viewed by others
![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-021-12395-x/MediaObjects/11356_2021_12395_Figa_HTML.png)
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Water is a precious and finite resource for the existence of life on earth. Extensive withdrawal of water in different sectors such as agriculture, industries and for domestic purpose is responsible for the depletion of groundwater at an alarming rate (Boretti and Rosa 2019). The water scarcity and contamination are the major challenges for all around the globe, and almost one billion people are currently facing these challenges. Therefore, it is important to develop various advanced technologies to clean the wastewater and reuse in many sectors. Wastewater is the result of the discharge of untreated sewage sludge, toxic heavy metals, radio-nucleosides, organic & inorganic solutes, fertilizers and microbial contamination which is inappropriate for consumption. The major sectors for wastewater generation are municipal corporations, industries, clinical laboratories, hospitals and household wastes. Wastewater causes numerous bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases like typhoid, cholera, hepatitis, encephalitis, gastrointestinal, skin infection, diarrhoea, etc. The accumulation of heavy metals in wastewater can cause genetic alteration and can affect hormone metabolism which leads to cancer and foetal growth restriction (Cebi et al. 2011). It is largely observed that the people residing near the heavy metal-contaminated sites are suffering from the spine and other bone-related diseases (Rodríguez and Mandalunis 2018). Cadmium is most widely known for causing musculoskeletal diseases (Fukushima et al. 1970). Mercury and lead are commonly known toxic and hazardous heavy metals; exposure to the mercury directly affects the nervous system of humans, especially who are actively associated in drinking and smoking, while lead contamination may be a serious risk factor for osteopenia or osteoporosis (Houston 2007). It is also important to discuss the harmful effects of arsenic (As) because it is a human carcinogen, and according to the studies, it may cause bone and kidney cancer (Jarup 2003). As per the recommendation of WHO (1984) and Indian standard drinking water specification 1991, the permissible limit of fluoride content in the drinking water is 1.5–1.0 ppm and it will be beneficial for normal human health, but a slight increase in the permissible limit of fluoride content in drinking water can cause detrimental effects leading to dental and brittle bones, osteoporosis, skeletal fluorosis and arthritis (Kumar and Puri 2012). In previous years, enormous conventional techniques such as activated carbon, sedimentation, flocculation, coagulation and membrane filtration were involved in wastewater treatment. However, these traditional techniques were not effectual to treat complex polluted materials like pharmaceuticals, surfactants, beauty care products and numerous hazardous chemicals (Amin et al. 2014). These conventional methods are also not able to dislodge the toxic chemicals as well as microorganisms present in water (Ruzhitskaya and Gogina 2017; Awaleh and Soubaneh 2014). In this perspective, nanotechnology has attracted many researchers towards the treatment of wastewater using nanomaterials. Nanotechnology facilitates the observation and manipulation of the things at a nanometre scale (Cloete et al. 2010). On the nanoscale, any material exhibits completely different properties like colour, tensile strength, surface area, magnetic property, catalytic activity, etc. than their original size. Nanotechnology has been established as an auspicious and effective technology to solve water-related problems (Obare and Meyer 2004). It comes with the introduction of various nanoscale materials like carbon nanotube (CNT), metal nanoparticles, nanoclusters, dendrimers, quantum dots, nanowires and zeolites (Liu et al. 2013). Nanomaterials are also called a wonder of modern medicine (Khan and Rehman 2016). Moreover, nanoparticles have been proved as a very effective antibacterial agent rather than conventionally used antibiotics (Wang et al. 2017). The high surface area, actively strong adsorption sites, extensive antimicrobial activity, low toxicity makes CNTs, AgNPs and other nanoscale metal oxides are widely acceptable for adsorption, disinfection and microbial control (Raghunath and Perumal 2017), whereas fullerene derivatives, TiO2 nanoparticle, are extensively used as photocatalysts because of their photocatalytic activity, high stability and low cost (Ratan and Bansal 2013). Zeolites and nanofibres are applied in membrane filtration as they possess the properties of molecular sieving, hydrophilicity and comparatively short internal diffusion distance. Quantum dots are also used for sensing due to its broad absorption spectrum and high conductivity.
In this review, we briefly discussed the applications of different nanomaterials which are effectively used in the removal of different pollutants, especially heavy metals and microbes from effluent water, because the discharge of heavy metals (Cd, As, Co, Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr) and pathogenic bacteria in wastewater can contaminate the aquatic environment. Therefore, it is very much essential to treat the wastewater before discharge into the river or other downstream environments.
Application of nanomaterials in heavy metals removal
A broad range of heavy metals generally present in different industrial wastewater, which is toxic to human health and also responsible for the contamination of other environments (Jaishankar et al. 2014). Apart from many conventional treatment methods, various nanomaterials are also applied for the removal of heavy metals (Kahrizi et al. 2016, Baby et al. 2019). Nanomaterials are considered to be very efficient and prominent in the elimination of environmental contaminants (Selvi et al. 2019). In this regard, here we briefly discussed the few applications and examples of these nanomaterials.
Nanoscale materials as sorbents
Industrialization is the major cause for the release of different contaminations in the wastewater. These contaminants include different inorganic and organic wastes including heavy metal ions such as Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Co2+. These heavy metals are toxic and non-biodegradable; therefore, these are responsible for the many serious diseases and hazardous for environmental health (He et al. 2005). These heavy metals are usually introduced into the environment through chemical manufacturing industries, battery manufacturing industries, leather industries, mining and metallurgical industries, and these are usually discharged directly to the water bodies. Untreated industrial wastewater can cause a severe risk to the aquatic species, and it will also affect the food chain through its absorbance and accumulation (Drozdova et al. 2019). It is very important to consider the various damages caused by these heavy metals; it became crucial to deal with these toxins. Traditionally, many methods are being adopted for the removal of pollutants from different types of wastewater such as reverse osmosis, electrochemical treatment, ion exchange techniques, coagulation, extraction, adsorption and irradiation. Although there have been many traditionally adaptive techniques to remove these toxins from wastewater, it is always expected to come up with such a technique which should be cost-effective, highly efficient and simple to operate. Among many techniques, the adsorption comes up with the most favourable approach for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Adsorption techniques have been providing benefits to adsorbed heavy metal on the solid surface, and they established stability when the concentration of heavy metal is adsorbed, but it has some limitations such as low sorption capacities and efficiency. To solve these defects, nanoscale materials are used for the removal of heavy metals from the wastewater. There is a wide range of nanoscale sorbents such as CNT, carbon-based materials composites, graphene, nanometals or metal oxides and polymeric sorbents with high adsorption capacities (Wang et al. 2011). They are briefly discussed below:
-
(1)
Nanoscale materials based on carbon.
Nanomaterials based on carbon are used widely to remove heavy metals from the wastewater as it shows the high sorption capacity and it is non-toxic. Carbon-based nanomaterials are firstly used as nanosorbents, but it shows difficulties to reach ppb levels while removal of heavy metals. So these carbon-based nanomaterials are used in the formation of CNT, fullerene and graphene. These synthesized CNT, fullerene and graphene are used as nanosorbents.
-
CNTs are the macromolecules, which are shaped like a cylinder and arranged in hexagonal fashion and capped by a fullerene-like molecule (Iijima 1991). CNTs exhibit unique structural, chemical, semiconductor mechanical, optoelectronic and physical properties. These plethoras of properties enable them to be used for the removal of pollutants from wastewater. Carbon nanotubes can be characterized into two major categories, i.e. (1) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and (2) multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Though CNTs have abundant variability to remove contaminants from wastewater, they are also used as remarkable nanosorbents as they come up with high sorption efficiency. SWCNTs have diameters ranging from 0.3 to 3 nm, whereas the MWCNTs consist of concentric arrangements of many cylinders, and its size can range up to 100 nm (Iijima and Ichihashi 1993). According to these studies, CNT will be a promising adsorbent material due to its large surface area and tubular structure. To enhance the capacities of sorption, these CNTs are modified by oxidation, combining with other metal ions or metal oxides; also they can be coupled with organic compounds. By various combinations of CNTs with metal oxides, organic compounds, it is found that carboxyl-carbon sites are over 20 times more promising for the sorption of zinc other than un-oxidized carbon sites. The adsorption parameters of such carbon nanotubes can be optimized by the variation in temperature, pH, ionic strength and metal ion concentration. Many evaluations of CNTs to improve the sorption were reported (Srivastava et al. 2004). For the sorption of 1,2 dichlorobenzene (DCB), CNTS show a wide range in pH of 3–10 and this sorption of DCB on to CNTS shows maximum sorption capacity of 30.8 mg/g by taking 40 min to reach to the equilibrium. Apart from these, CeO2-based carbon nanotubes (CeO2-CNT) or on aligned carbon nanotubes (CeO2-ACNTS) are developed which claims high surface areas (over 189 m2/g). Though the CeO2-CNTS are active sorbents for As (V), its efficiency was enhanced from 10 to 82 mg/g when incorporated with divalent cations Ca(II) and Mg(II) at concentrations stretch between 1 and 10-mg/L (Peng et al. 2005). Another study revealed the potential of CeO2-ACNTS for Cr(VI) adsorption from drinking water. The maximum Cr(VI) adsorption ability achieved was 30.2 mg/g at pH7.0, which was two times greater than that of activated carbon and Al2O3 (Khaydarov et al. 2010). Therefore, the capacity of adsorption of metal ions or any other functional contaminant in wastewater can be enhanced by increasing the electrostatic interaction between the ions and nanoscale sorbents. This strategy also enhances the tendency of adsorption of organic compounds by nanosorbents.
-
Graphene is the nanosorbent which is formed by synthesizing some layers of graphene oxide and converted into nanosheets. These atomic layered graphites have good mechanical and thermal properties with two-dimensional (2D) structures. These graphene nanosheets are good nanosorbents to remove Cd2+ and Co2+ ions from aqueous solution. The adsorption of heavy metals contaminants from the wastewater depends on ionic strength, pH and the functional groups containing oxygen. Graphene adsorbents show good adsorption results for As5+ with a particle size of 10 nm to give high binding capacity.
-
(2)
Nanoscale particles synthesized from oxides of metals.
Nanoscale materials synthesized by oxides of metals are the type of inorganic nanomaterials. These metal oxides nanomaterials extensively used nanoparticles for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater (Ray and Shipley 2015; Shukla and Iravani 2017). There are few examples of these nanomaterials such as ferric oxides, silver nanoparticles, manganese oxides, titanium oxides, magnesium oxides, copper oxides, cerium oxides. They remove heavy metals from wastewater by providing high surface area and specific affinity. Metal oxide nanoparticles show a good capacity to remove arsenate (Hristovski et al. 2007). Studies reveal that nanopowders of TiO2, FeO3, ZnO2 and NiO have high efficacy and they exhibit the highest amount of removal of arsenate from the water (Hristovski et al. 2007). Another type of nanopowder is introduced called titanate nanoflowers. They are synthesized by hydrothermal treatment of anatase nanopowders with a concentrated solution of NaOH. These nanoflowers have a good capacity of removal of heavy metal ions due to their large and specific surface area. Titanate nanoflowers are highly selective and show larger absorption of heavy metal ions from highly toxic to less toxic metal ions. Some examples of these metal ions are Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, etc., and they are efficiently removed by titanate nanoflowers (Huang et al. 2012). Although nanoscale metal oxides are a great source of removal of heavy metal ions because of high surface energy and nanosize, they show some difficulties in separation of them from wastewater. With this problem, another approach was introduced to prepare nanosorbents with polymers, usually called as polymer-based nanosorbents.
-
(3)
Polymer-based nanosorbents.
Polymer-based nanosorbents are highly efficient sorbents due to the main characteristic feature of having a high capacity of having high capacity and fast rate of adsorption. This characteristic is due to the main feature of having a large surface area with an additional functional group. There is a presence of both types of sorbents like inorganic sorbents and organic sorbents (Zhao et al. 2018). Most of the organic sorbents possess high surface area but lacking the adsorbing functional group. Unlikely organic sorbents show the presence of a functional group to adsorb heavy metal ions, but the absence of a specific area limits their adsorption rate. Therefore, there comes the need of having such sorbents which possess both the features of having specificity and polyfunctional groups to increase the rate of adsorption of heavy metal ions. To meet these requirements, new hybrid sorbents has introduced to provide the application of deep removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. For example, hybrid polymer of pyromellitic acid dianhydride (PMDA) and phenylaminomethyl trimethoxysilane (PAMTMS), this hybrid polymer adsorbs Cu2+ and Pb2+ efficiently (Liu et al. 2010). Therefore, the hybridized inorganic and organic nanosorbents are efficient sorbents to remove heavy metal ions from wastewater (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Advantages of nanoscale materials for adsorption
-
Nanosorbents themselves are non-toxic.
-
Nanosorbents show high sorption capacities.
-
The adsorbed nanomaterials can be easily removed from the surface of nanoscale adsorbents.
-
These nanosorbents can be recycled also.
Removal of bacterial pathogens from wastewater using different nanomaterials
Wastewater consisted of many pollutants from different sources like municipal corporations, clinics, hospitals and pharma industries gives rise to numerous bacteria, viruses, fungi and pathogens. Waterborne pathogens, Salmonella species, Vibrio Species and protozoa contamination are responsible for various diseases like diarrhoea, gastrointestinal illness dysentery, etc. (Lukhele et al. 2010). According to the WHO, any water is only considered as safe for drinking purpose, if it is free from faecal contamination and coliform counts. Availability of pure water is the uttermost demand of humanity, but increasing pollution makes this demand on very high priority. Microorganisms are of the major pollutant in the water bodies as they participate in the process of removing nutrients and adding toxic metabolites in the wastewater. Sources of water availability are very limited so as to meet the high demand for pure and drinking water; it is important to have a check on some unconventional sources of water. In an attempt to remove the bacterial pathogens from wastewater, nanoscale technology is another big approach. There are several categories of the nanoscale materials which remove the microbes in the wastewater. High permselectivity and higher hydrophilicity of nano-sized composite membrane integrated with inorganic materials enable it as an efficient tool for the enhanced treatment of contaminated water (Khaydarov et al. 2010). In many previous studies, the efficacy of metal ions has been displayed in the term to disinfect the water (Yang et al. 2007). These metal ions have their changed capacity which makes them antibacterial. There are many types of nanoscale materials present which can disinfect waterborne disease caused by microorganisms such as silver, titanium and zinc. Implementation of nanotechnology can be very useful for the detection and removal of bacteria, viruses and other pathogenic microorganisms. Nanoparticles can be used as biosensors for the in situ detection of waterborne microbes (Rainbow et al. 2020). Studies have shown that nanosensors are highly sensitive and selective for the detection of a very amount of E. coli (Zhu et al. 2005, Kumar et al. 2019). The implication of Nanoparticles as nanosensors is a rapid procedure and easy to execute.
Nanoscale particles of ZnO
After the remarkable development of science and nanotechnology, it is very obvious to rely on the antibacterial characteristics of nanoparticles of various metals. These metal nanoparticles are capable option to disinfect the water and wastewater systems. Various studies have been carried out with the ZnO nanoparticle and concluded that it has the potential to remove the total coliforms from the municipal wastewater treatment plant (Hozyen et al. 2019). These ZnO nanoparticles are working by their enhanced time to contact in the water because, at the time of attachment increased, the removal percentage of coliforms will also increase in the wastewater. These ZnO nanoparticles attached the membrane cells of bacteria ensures the inhibition rate of coliforms in the wastewater to a high level. Bacterial growth will be inhibited by the aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles in the membrane and cytoplasm of bacteria. ZnO nanoparticles penetrate the membrane and cytoplasm of bacteria easily, and when their penetration time is being increased, there will be more secretion of H2O2 which help in increasing toxic effects to the bacteria.
TiO2 nanoparticles
TiO2 nanoparticles are found to be an appealing substance due to their optical, dielectric and photocatalytic characteristics. These properties enable it with the capability to remove bacteria and harmful organic materials from water and air (Pişkin et al. 2013). TiO2 is a photocatalyst, widely applied as a self-cleaning and self-sanitizing material for surface coating in many applications, as it is non-toxic and exhibits photoinduced super-hydrophobicity and extensively used as an antifogging agent and performs a key role in our environmental decontamination.
Carbon nanotubes
CNTs are very effective to remove bacterial pathogens from water. It possesses antimicrobial characteristic against a wide range of microorganisms including bacteria such as E. coli, Salmonella and viruses (Deng et al. 2008; Upadhyay et al. 2008a, b; Nepal et al. 2008; Akasaka and Watari 2009). Researchers have studied the antimicrobial effects of carbon nanotubes as they remove impurities from water. CNTs possess structure like cylindrical and exist in a honeycomb lattice structure which looks like crystalline graphite. Apart from their two types (1) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) and (2) multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNT), they contain a unique property which is suitable to capture microbial agents strong and stable membranous. A novel approach, continuous spray pyrolysis can also be adopted for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes structures. By using this method, CNTs can be fabricated with 10–12 nm inner diameter and 20–40 nm outer diameter, several cm in length and can withstand the fracture load up to 2 N. These CNTs were successfully tested against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and also found to be very efficient for the elimination of even the smallest poliovirus from saline suspensions (Rojas-Chapana et al. 2004). Unique characteristics of size, cytotoxicity and surface functionalizing properties, their fibrous shape, and length of the tubes and membrane of layers made carbon nanotubes a potent antimicrobial agent. CNTs are having a mechanism to kill microorganisms by initiating oxidative stress and disturbance to cell membrane, etc. Single-walled carbon nanotubes are much potent antimicrobial than multiwalled carbon nanotubes by dispersivity of CNTs against microorganisms. Not only bacteria, even viruses can be effectively eliminated from water using filtration membrane containing radically ACNTs in a very short time due to size exclusion and depth filtration which enables these filters to be more widely applicable disinfection devices for wastewater treatment and cost-effective at the same time (Brady-Estevez et al. 2010; Vecitis et al. 2011; Rahaman et al. 2012). Various studies proved their high potential in CNTs to remove bacteria and serve as an effective aquatic bacterial removal. These carbon nanotubes are not only effective bacterial absorbents but also they serve as effective magnetic separation agent. Supermagnetism and excellent electronic properties enable magnetic nanoparticles for sensing and monitoring of heavy metals and microbes in wastewater.
Silver nanoscale materials
Silver is the extensively used material for nanoparticles synthesis due to its low toxicity and microbial inactivation in water (Spadaro et al. 1974; Zhao and Stevens 1998; Inoue et al. 2002) with well-reported antibacterial mechanism (Feng et al. 2000; Yamanaka et al. 2005). In nanoscale materials, silver nanoparticles are having very prominent results against the microorganisms present in wastewater. These silver nanoparticles can be obtained from the salts of silver like silver nitrate, silver chloride, etc. The antibacterial effects of these silver nanoparticles are because of their size and shape which make them capable to inactivate the microorganisms in wastewater. The main active principle of these antibacterial silver nanoparticles is their efficiency to damage the bacterial membranes, altering the membrane properties of bacterial, damaging the active enzyme, alters the interaction with silver nanoparticles gained the interest of being a high antimicrobial agent because they have reported with robust killing effect against Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative bacteria. Son et al. (2004) integrated the cellulose acetate fibres embedded with Ag nanoparticles by direct electrospinning method and achieved good efficacy against both types of bacteria. As their wide range of applicability, silver nanoparticles are also being integrated with various polymers for the fabrication of antimicrobial nanofibres and nanocomposites (Balogh et al. 2001; Chen et al. 2003; Botes and Cloete 2010). Poly(ε-caprolactone)-based polyurethane nanofibre mats containing Ag nanoparticles can be used as antimicrobial nanofilter (Jeon et al. 2008). Likewise, various other nanofibres, assimilated with Ag nanoparticles, can be used as an unconventional tool in the antimicrobial application and exhibit excellent antimicrobial properties (Lala et al. 2007; Chen and Chiang 2008; Vimala et al. 2009). Water filters prepared by polyurethane’s foam coated with Ag nanofibre can act as an efficient barrier for the growth of Escherichia coli (Jain and Pradeep 2005).
Conclusion
The adaptation of vastly cutting-edge nanotechnology evolves novel prospects for the expansion of advanced water and wastewater technology processes. Here the applications of various nanomaterials like silver nanoparticles, carbon-based nanoparticles, polymer-based nanoparticles and oxide metal nanoparticles were reported for the removal of heavy metal and microbial pathogens from wastewater. These materials show a great impact on the removal of wastewater contaminants. Nanotechnology has been considered effective in solving water-related problems of quality and quantity (Bottero et al. 2006). However, there are few studies also reported the toxic nature of nanoparticles which are harmful to the human and environmental health and it should be further investigated and regulated. Overall, the use of nanomaterials in the removal of heavy metal and microbial pathogens from the wastewater has very much importance in the respect of human and environmental health, but the risk associated with the nanoparticles should not be ignored. Based on previous and current studies, nanotechnology and application of nanomaterials can be recommended for various sewage treatment plants and wastewater treatment plants.
References
Akasaka T, Watari F (2009) Capture of bacteria by flexible carbon nanotubes. Acta Biomater 5:607–612
Ambrose AM, Larson DS, Borzelleca JR, Hennigar GR Jr (1976) Long-term toxicological assessment of nickel in rats and dogs. J Food Sci Technol 13:181–187
Amin MT, Alazba AA, Manzoor U (2014) A review of removal of pollutants from water/wastewater using different types of nanomaterials. J Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014:1–24
Awaleh MO, Soubaneh YD (2014) Waste water treatment in chemical industries: the concept and current technologies. Hydrol Current Res 5:164
Azevedo BF, Furieri LB, Peçanha FM, Wiggers GA, Vassallo PF, Simões MR et al (2014) Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J Prev Med Public Health 47:74–83
Baby R, Saifullah B, Hussein MZ (2019) Carbon nanomaterials for the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated water and environmental remediation. Nanoscale Res Lett 14:341
Balogh L, Swanson DR, Tomalia DA, Hagnauer GL, McManus AT (2001) Dendrimer-silver complexes and nanocomposites as antimicrobial agents. Nano Lett 1:18–21
Bent S, Bohm K (1995) Copper induced liver cirrhosis in a 13-month-old boy. Gesundheitswesen 57:667–669
Boretti A, Rosa L (2019) Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report. NP J Clean Water 2:15
Botes M, Cloette TE (2010) The potential of nanofibers and nanobiocides in water purification. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:68–81
Bottero JY, Rose J, Wiesner MR (2006) Nanotechnologies: tools for sustainability in a new wave of water treatment processes. Int Environ Asses Manag 2:391–395
Brady-Estévez AS, Schnoor MH, Kang S, Elimelech M (2010) SWNT–MWNT hybrid filter attains high viral removal and bacterial inactivation. Langmuir 26:19153–19158
Cebi A, Kaya Y, Gungor H, Demir H, Youruk H, Soylemez N, Gunes Y, Tuncer M (2011) Trace elements, heavy metals and vitamin levels in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Med Sci 8:455–460
Chen CY, Chiang CL (2008) Preparation of cotton fibers with antibacterial silver nanoparticles. Mater Lett 62:3607–3609
Chen Y, Wang L, Jiang S, Yu H (2003) Study on novel antibacterial polymer materials (I) preparation of zeolite antibacterial agents and antibacterial polymer composite and their antibacterial properties. J Polym Mater 20:279–284
Cloete TE, Kwaadsteniet MD, Botes M (2010) Nanotechnology in water treatment applications. Caister Academic Press, Poole, UK
Deng S, Upadhyayula VKK, Smith GB, Mitchell MC (2008) Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of microorganisms on single-wall carbon nanotubes. IEEE Sens J 8:954–962
Devi RR, Umlong LM, Raul PK, Das B, Banerjee S, Singh L (2014) Defluoridation of water using nano-magnesium oxide. J Exp Nanosci 9:512–524
Drozdova J, Raclavska H, Raclavsky K, Skrobankova H (2019) Heavy metals in domestic wastewater with respect to urban population in Ostrava, Czech Republic. Water Environ J 33(1):77–85
Duruibe JO, Ogwuegbu MOC, Egwurugwu JN (2007) Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int J Phys Sci 2:112–118
Feng QL, Wu J, Chen GQ, Cui FZ, Kim TN, Kim JO (2000) A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Mater Res 52:662–668
Fukushima M, Ishizaki A, Sakamoto M (1970) On distribution of heavy metals in rice field soil in the “Itai-itai” disease epidemic district. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi 24:526–535
He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ (2005) Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elem Med Biol 19(2–3):125–140
Houston MC (2007) The role of mercury and cadmium heavy metals in vascular disease, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction. Altern Ther Health Med 13(2):S128–S133
Hozyen HF, Ibrahim ES, Khairy EA, El-Dek SI (2019) Enhanced antibacterial activity of capped zinc oxide nanoparticles: a step towards the control of clinical Bovine mastitis. Vet World 12(8):1225–1232
Hristovski K, Baumgardner A, Westerhoff P (2007) Selecting metal oxide nanomaterials for arsenic removal in fixed bed columns: from nanopowders to aggregated nanoparticle media. J Hazard Mater 147(1–2):265–274
Huang J, Cao Y, Liu Z, Deng Z, Wang W (2012) Application of titanate nanoflowers for dye removal: a comparative study with titanate nanotubes and nanowires. Chem Eng J 191:38–44
Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58
Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363:603–605
Inoue Y, Hoshino M, Takahashi H, Noguchi T, Murata T, Kanzaki Y, Hamashima H, Sasatsu M (2002) Bactericidal activity of Ag-zeolite mediated by reactive oxygen species under aerated conditions. J Inorg Biochem 92:37–42
Jain P, Pradeep T (2005) Potential of silver nanoparticle-coated polyurethane foam as an antibacterial water filter. Biotechnol Bioeng 90:59–63
Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7(2):60–72
Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68:167–182
Jeon HJ, Kim JS, Kim TG, Kim JH, Yu WR, Youk JH (2008) Preparation of poly-caprolactone based polyurethane nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 254:5886–5890
Kaaber K, Vein N, Tjell JC (1978) Low nickel diet in the treatment of patients with chronic nickel dermatitis. Br J Derma 98:197–201
Kahrizi H, Bafkar A, Farasati M (2016) Effect of nanotechnology on heavy metal removal from aqueous solution. J Cent South Univ 23:2526–2535
Khan K, Rehman S (2016) Wonders of Nanotechnology. In: Khan SB, Asiri AM, Akhtar K (eds) Development and prospective applications of nanoscience and nanotechnology (Nanomaterials and their Fascinating Attributes), 1st edn. Bentham Publishers, UK
Khaydarov RA, Khaydarov RR, Gapurova O (2010) Water purification from metal ions using carbon nanoparticle-conjugated polymer nanocomposites. Water Res 44:1927–1933
Kocabas ZO, Aciksoz B, Yurum Y (2012) Binding mechanisms of As(III) on activated carbon/titanium dioxide nanocomposites: a potential method for arsenic removal from water MRS online proceedings library, vol 1449. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kumar R, Chawla J (2014) Removal of cadmium ion from water/wastewater by nano-metal oxides. Water quality exposure and health, 5th edn. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-013-0100-8
Kumar M, Puri A (2012) A review of permissible limits of drinking water. Indian J Occup Environ Med 16:40–44
Kumar S, Nehra M, Mehta J, Dilbaghi N, Marrazza G, Kaushik A (2019) Point-of-care strategies for detection of waterborne pathogens. Sensors 19(20):4476
Lala NL, Ramaseshan R, Li B, Sundarrajan S, Barhate RS, Liu YJ, Ramakrishna S (2007) Fabrication of nanofibers with antimicrobial functionality used as filters: protection against bacterial contaminants. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:1357–1365
Li YH, Wang S, Wei J, Zhang X, Xu C, Luan Z, Wu D (2002) Lead adsorption on carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 3:263–266
Liu J, Ma Y, Xu T, Shao G (2010) Preparation of zwitterionic hybrid polymer and its application for the removal of heavy metal ions from water. J Hazard Mater 178:1021–1029
Liu X, Wang M, Zhang S, Pan B (2013) Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: a review. J Environ Sci 25:1263–1280
Lu C, Liu C (2006) Removal of nickel (II) from aqueous solution by purified carbon nanotubes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1932–1940
Lu C, Chiu H, Liu C (2006) Removal of zinc (II) from aqueous solution by purified carbon nanotubes: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2850–2855
Lukhele LP, Krause R, Mamba B, Momba M (2010) Synthesis of silver impregnated carbon nanotubes and cyclodextrin polyurethanes for the disinfection of water. Water Res Commun 36:4
Madsen H, Poultsen L, Grandjean P (1990) Risk of high copper content in drinking water. Ugeskr Laeger 152(25):1806
Mousa SM, Ammar NS, Ibrahim HA (2016) Removal of lead ions using hydroxyapatite nano-material prepared from phosphogypsum waste. J Saudi Chem Soc 20:357–365
Nepal D, Balasubramanian S, Simonian AL, Davis VA (2008) Strong antimicrobial coatings: single-walled carbon nanotubes armored with biopolymers. Nano Lett 8:1896–1901
Nolan K (2003) Copper toxicity syndrome. J Orthomol Med 12:270–282
Obare SO, Meyer GJ (2004) Nanostructured materials for environmental remediation of organic contaminants in water. J Environ Sci Health A 39:2549–2582
Peng X, Luan Z, Ding J, Di Z, Li Y, Tian B (2005) Ceria nanoparticles supported nanotubes for the removal of arsenate from water. Mater Lett 59:399–403
Pişkin S, Palantöken A, Yılmaz MS (2013) Antimicrobial activity of synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles. In: International conference on emerging trends in engineering and technology (ICETET’2013), Thailand
Puzas JE, Campbell J, O’Keefe RJ, Rosier RN (2004) Lead toxicity in the skeleton and its role in osteoporosis. Nutrition and bone health. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 373–376
Raghunath A, Perumal E (2017) Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: a promise for the future. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:137–152
Rahaman MS, Vecitis CD, Elimelech M (2012) Electrochemical carbonnanotube filter performance toward virus removal and inactivation in the presence of natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 7:1556–1564
Rainbow J, Sedlackova E, Jiang S, Maxted G, Moschou D, Richtera L, Estrela P (2020) Integrated electrochemical biosensors for detection of waterborne pathogens in low-resource settings. Biosensors 10(4):E36
Ratan JK, Bansal A (2013) Photocatalysis by nanoparticles of titanium dioxide for drinking water purification: a conceptual and state-of-art review. Mater Sci Forum Trans Tech Publ Switzerland 764:130–150
Raul PK, Devi RR, Umlong LM, Banerjee S, Singh L, Purkait M (2012) Removal of fluoride from water using iron oxide-hydroxide nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:3922–3930
Ray PZ, Shipley HJ (2015) Inorganic nano-adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals and arsenic: a review. RSC Adv 5:29885–29907
Rodríguez J, Mandalunis PM (2018) A review of metal exposure and its effects on bone health. J Toxicol 2018:4854152
Rojas-Chapana JA, Correa-Duarte MA, Ren ZF, Kempa K, Giersig M (2004) Enhanced introduction of gold nanoparticles into vital acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans by carbon nanotube-based microwave electroporation. Nano Lett 4:985–988
Ruzhitskaya O, Gogina E (2017) Methods for removing of phosphates from wastewater. MATEC Web Conf 106:67
Salem HM, Eweida EA, Farag A (2000) Heavy metals in drinking water and their environmental impact on human health. In: ICEHM2000, pp 542–556
Selvi A, Rajasekar A, Theerthagiri J, Ananthaselvam A, Sathishkumar K, Madhavan J, Rahman PKSM (2019) Integrated remediation processes toward heavy metal removal/recovery from various environments—a review. Front Environ Sci 7:66
Sheet I, Kabbani A, Holail H (2014) Removal of heavy metals using nanostructured graphite oxide, silica nanoparticles and silica/graphite oxide composite. Energy Proc 50:130–138
Shukla AK, Iravani S (2017) Metallic nanoparticles: green synthesis and spectroscopic characterization. Environ Chem Lett 15:223–231
Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) Preparation of antimicrobial ultrafine cellulose acetate fibers with silver nanoparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1632–1637
Spadaro JA, Berger TJ, Barranco SD, Chapin SE, Becker RO (1974) Antibacterial effects of silver electrodes with weak direct current. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 6:637–642
Srivastava A, Srivastava ON, Talapatra S, Vajtai R, Ajayan PM (2004) Carbon Nanotube Filters. Nat Mater 3:10–14
Upadhyayula VKK, Deng S, Mitchell MC, Smith GB, Nair VK, Ghoshroy S (2008a) Adsorption kinetics of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus on singlewalled carbon nanotube aggregates. Water Sci Technol J Int Assoc Water Pollut Res 58:179–184
Upadhyayula VKK, Ghoshroy S, Nair VS, Smith GB, Mitchell MC, Deng S (2008b) Single-walled carbon nanotubes as fluorescence biosensors for pathogen recognition in water systems. J Nanotechnol 2008:156358
Vecitis CD, Schnoor MH, Rahaman MS, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2011) Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filters for viral and bacterial removal and inactivation. Environ Sci Technol 45:3672–3679
Vélez E, Campillo GE, Morales G, Hincapié C, Osorio J, Arnache O et al (2016) Mercury removal in wastewater by iron oxide nanoparticles. J Phys Conf Ser 687:012050
Vimala K, Samba Sivudu K, Murali Mohan Y, Sreedhar B, Mohana Raju K (2009) Controlled silver nanoparticles synthesis in semi-hydrogel networks of poly (acrylamide) and carbohydrates: a rational methodology for antibacterial application. Carbohydr Polym 75:463–471
Wang H, Yang L, Yu H, Peng F (2011) A highly efficient and stable visiblelight plasmonic photocatalyst Ag–AgCl/CeO2. WJNSE 1:129–136
Wang L, Hu C, Shao L (2017) The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomed 12:1227–1249
World Health Organization ( 1984) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: volume 1: recommendations. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252072
Yama Naka M, Hara K, Kudo J (2005) Bactericidal actions of a silver ion solution on Escherichia coli, studied by energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy and proteomic analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7589–7593
Yang Y, Zhang H, Wang P, Zheng Q, Li J (2007) The influence of nano-sized TiO2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane. J Membr Sci 288:231–238
Zhao G, Stevens SE Jr (1998) Multiple parameters for the comprehensive evaluation of the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to the silver ion. Biometals 11:27–32
Zhao G, Huang X, Tang Z, Huang Q, Niu F, Wang X (2018) Polymer-based nanocomposites for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solution: a review. Polym Chem 9:3562–3582
Zhu P, Shelton DR, Karns JS, Sundaram A, Li S, Amstutz P, Tang CM (2005) Detection of water-borne E coli O157 using the integrating waveguide biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 21(4):678–683
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Soni, R., Pal, A.K., Tripathi, P. et al. An overview of nanoscale materials on the removal of wastewater contaminants. Appl Water Sci 10, 189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01275-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01275-3