Introduction

Many industries, such as textiles, cosmetics, leather, pulp mills, printing, dye synthesis, foods and plastics industries widely use dyes as coloring agents. The removal of color from effluents discharged from these industries is of great concern from the environmental viewpoint because most of these dyes are toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic (Joshi et al. 2008). Dyes, even in low concentrations, are visually detected and affect the aquatic life and food web. The discharge of colored wastes into receiving streams not only affects the esthetic nature but also interferes with transmission of sunlight into streams and therefore hinders photosynthesis in aquatic plants (Kagalkar et al. 2010). In the present study, methylene blue (MB) has been chosen as a model dye. Methylene blue is a basic dye of thiazine group and is also known as swiss blue and tetramethyl thionine. It appears as a dark green powder that yields a blue solution when dissolved in water. MB has wide applications including cottons or wools dyeing, paper coloring, temporarily coloring hair, and coating for paper stock (Wu et al. 2009). Although not strongly hazardous, it can cause some harmful effects in humans such as heartbeat increase, vomiting, shock, cyanosis, jaundice, quadriplegia, and tissue necrosis. Hence, their removal from industrial effluents before discharging into the environment is extremely important.

The methods of color removal from industrial effluents include coagulation, floatation, biological treatment, filtration, oxidation and adsorption. Among them, liquid phase adsorption techniques have proved to be an excellent method to treat dye containing wastewater due to its low initial cost, flexibility, simplicity of design, ease of operation and insensitivity to toxic pollutants (Ahmad et al. 2015; Uddin et al. 2009a, b; Jain and Shrivastava 2008). Due to its effectiveness and versatility, activated carbon is widely employed in water and wastewater treatment. However, the operating cost of activated carbon as adsorbent is high. In addition, problems of regeneration and difficulty in separation from the wastewater after use are another two major concerns of using this material. These have led many researchers to search for more cheap and viable alternative adsorbents.

The use of natural biomaterials is a promising alternative due to their relative abundance and their low commercial value. The research works on various low-cost alternative adsorbents derived from agricultural waste or natural materials for dye removal from aqueous solutions have been reviewed intensively (Sanghi and Verma 2013; Bharathi and Ramesh 2013; Rafatullah et al. 2010; Gupta 2009; Crini 2006; Sanghi and Bhattacharya 2002; Allen and Koumanova 2005). Recently, a nice review on the application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater has been presented (Vakili et al. 2014). Another review has been presented regarding the use of date palm as a potential adsorbent for wastewater treatment (Ahmad et al. 2015). Among different low cost botanic materials used as adsorbents, jackfruit leaf powder (Uddin et al. 2009a, b), gulmohar plant leaf powder (Ponnusami et al. 2009), grapefruit peel (Saeeda et al. 2010), orange peel (Mansour et al. 2012), Ashoka leaf powder (Gupta et al. 2012), water hyacinth leaves (Coronilla et al. 2015), Platanus orientalis leaf powder (Peydayesh and Kelishami 2015), date palm leaves (Gouamid et al. 2013), and banana peel (Mohammed and Chong 2014) have been shown to give satisfactory results in the removal of different dyes from aqueous solution.

Mango (Mangifera indica) is widely cultivated in the tropical and subtropical countries of the world. Bangladesh is one of the major mango producing countries along with India, Pakistan, Mexico, Brazil, the Philippines, etc. Mango trees grow widely throughout Bangladesh and are raised mostly as homestead plantations. Bangladesh produced about 1047849 metric tons of mangoes from an area of about 32011 hectares (Barua et al. 2013). With the production of mango fruits, tons of mango leaves are produced annually. Fallen leaves of mango trees are in great supply, inexpensive and easily available. These leaves have no commercial usage and are not eaten by livestock. Moreover, the waste leaves results in environmental pollution. Hence, the utilization of mango leaves as an adsorbent to remove dyes from industrial effluent can greatly reduce the amount of waste produced. To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous published reports on the use of these leaves for the removal of dyes from aqueous solution. So, the mango leaves as a low-cost and abundant biosorbent could be an alternative for the removal of dyes from wastewater.

The main objective of the present study was to assess the potentiality of mango leaf powder (MLP) as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of MB from aqueous solution in batch system. The effects of different parameters including solution pH, biosorbent dosage, initial dye concentration and contact time were studied. Additionally, the isotherm and kinetic parameters were explored to describe the experimental data.

Materials and methods

Preparation of adsorbent

Matured mango leaves were collected from local area near the campus of Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh. The leaves were then repeatedly washed with tap water and subsequently with distilled water to remove all the dirt and earthy materials. The washed leaves were allowed to dry first at room temperature for several days and then in an oven at 105 °C overnight. The dried leaves were then grounded with grinder and powder leaves were then dispersed in distilled water followed by boiling the water to remove coloring components of the leaves. After boiling, the powder was dried at 105 °C for 24 h and sieved to obtain the particle size in the range of 75-300 µm and stored in a plastic bottle for use as an adsorbent.

Preparation of dye solutions

MB (basic blue 9, C.I. 52015; chemical formula, C16H18N3SCl, MW, 319.85 g/mol) was used as a model cationic dye for this experiment. MB (Merck) was purchased from local supplier and was used as received without further purification. MB stock solution was prepared by dissolving an accurately weighed amount of MB in distilled water to achieve a concentration of 1000 mg/L. The experimental solutions of desired concentration were prepared by diluting stock solution with suitable volume of double-distilled water. The pH of solution was maintained at a desired value by adding 0.1 M NaOH or HCl solution.

Characterization of adsorbent

The chemical composition of the MLP (lignin, hemicelluloses, cellulose, ash and extractive components) was determined following conventional analytical methods described elsewhere (Li et al. 2004). The MLP samples that have particle size ranging from 75 to 300 mesh were used for this analysis method.

Infrared spectrums of MLP was obtained with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Model: FTIR 2000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to investigate the surface functional groups of the adsorbent. About 150 mg KBr disks containing approximately 2% of MLP samples was prepared shortly before recording the FTIR spectra in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 and with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The resulting spectra were the average of 16 scans.

Brunauer, Emmett, Teller (BET) specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore size of the MLP was analyzed by nitrogen sorption isotherm (77 K) measurements. Data were collected using the static volumetric method with an ASAP2010 (Micromeritics) apparatus. Samples were degassed at 120 °C in vacuum for a time interval long enough to reach a constant pressure (<10 μm Hg). Specific surface areas were calculated by applying the BET equation between 0.1 and 0.3 relative pressures. Pore size distributions were evaluated by the Barrett, Joyner, Halenda (BJH) method. The calculation was performed by the Micromeritics software package which uses the recurrent method and applies the Harkins and Jura equation for the multilayer thickness.

Scanning electron micrographs were obtained on a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Tabletop Microscope TM-1000) to study the surface morphology of MLP. Prior to scanning, the adsorbent was coated with gold using a sputter coater and subsequently the SEM images were taken.

The pH at the point of zero charge (pHPZC) of the adsorbent in aqueous phase was analyzed by titration method described elsewhere. 0.1 g adsorbent was taken in 50 ml of 0.1M KNO3 solution and agitated with magnetic stirrer. Then the pH of the solution was measured after an equilibrium time of 30 min. The titration was carried out with 0.1M NaOH and 0.1M HCl, respectively.

Adsorption studies

All the adsorption experiments were carried out by batch technique. Batch adsorption studies were performed at different doses of adsorbent, pH, initial dye concentrations and contact time. For each experimental run, 200 ml of MB solution of known concentration was taken in a 250-mL plastic Erlenmeyer flask and was agitated with a known amount of MLP at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) using a flash shaker (Stuart Scientific Co. Ltd. Model SF1, U.K.) at constant oscillation of 350 osc/min for a desired period of time. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that the equilibrium established in about 120 min of contact time. Longer times gave practically the same uptake. Therefore, a contact time of 120 min was selected for the entire equilibrium test. At the end of adsorption tests, samples were centrifuged and the concentration of residual MB in the supernatant solution was analyzed using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Model UV-1601) by monitoring the absorbance at a maximum wavelength (λ max) of 664 nm. Blank experiments with only adsorbent in 200 ml of distilled water were conducted simultaneously at the identical conditions to account for any color leached by the adsorbent and adsorbed by glass containers.

The effect of pH on the removal of MB was investigated over the pH range from 2.5 to 10. The pH was adjusted with 0.1N NaOH and 0.1N HCl solutions. In this study, 200 ml of MB dye solution with a concentration of 50 mg/L was taken in a plastic Erlenmeyer flask and was agitated with 0.25 g of MLP. There was no appreciable change in pH of the solution during adsorption. It was presumed that the change in solution pH would cause a change in the structure of MB, and consequently, in its adsorption process. The change in the structure of MB would be detected by the variations in the visible spectra of MB. To verify such possibilities, the effect of pH on the visible spectra of MB solution was tested in the absence of adsorbents. As the variation in the spectra at given pH might be time-dependent, the visible spectra of MB solution was recorded at the same interval time after the pH was adjusted. It was found that the absorbance of the spectra was stable in the investigated pH range (pH 2.5–10).

The effect of dose of the adsorbent was studied by contacting 200 ml dye solution of initial concentration 100 mg/L with different amounts of MLP (0.1–0.8 g) till the equilibrium was attained.

The equilibrium isotherms are very important in designing adsorption systems. To estimate the adsorption characteristics of an adsorbent, the adsorption isotherm of that adsorbent with a specific adsorbate is registered. Concentration variation method was used to calculate the adsorption characteristic of adsorbent. It was mainly carried out by selecting an appropriate concentration range of the adsorbate with a fixed mass of adsorbent. Adsorption equilibrium isotherms were performed in a set of Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml) where 200 mL solutions of MB dye with different initial concentrations (100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/L) were placed in these flasks. Equal mass of 0.25 g of MLP was added to dye solutions and was agitated at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C for 5 h to reach equilibrium. The shaking time of 5 h was sufficiently high for the attainment of adsorption equilibrium. After equilibrium had reached, the concentrations in the samples were analyzed as before. The amount of adsorption at equilibrium, q e (mg/g), was calculated using the following equation

$$ q_{\text{e}} = \frac{{(C_{0} - C_{\text{e}} )V}}{W} $$
(1)

where C 0 and C e (mg/L) were the liquid-phase concentrations of dye at initial and equilibrium, respectively. V was the volume of the solution (L), and W was the mass of dry adsorbent used (g).

The kinetic experiments were performed using a procedure similar to the equilibrium studies. Kinetic studies were carried out to establish the effect of time on the adsorption process and to quantify the adsorption rate. Adsorption kinetic experiments were carried out by agitating 200 mL MB solution of different initial concentrations ranging from 100 to 250 mg/L with 0.25 g MLP in a 250 ml plastic Erlenmeyer flask at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C. The aqueous samples were taken at different time intervals, centrifuged and the residual concentration of MB in the supernatant solution was analyzed as before. The amount of MB adsorbed at contact time t (min), q t (mg/g), was calculated using Eq. (2):

$$ q_{\text{t}} = \frac{{(C_{0} - C_{\text{t}} )V}}{W} $$
(2)

where C t (mg/L) was the liquid-phase concentrations of MB at any time t.

A desorption study was carried out by agitating 200 ml solution of methylene blue of 50 mg/L with 0.25 g of adsorbent. During adsorption the pH of the solution was increased gradually from 2.3 to 10 while during desorption the pH of the solution was decreased gradually from 10 to 2.5. The concentrated HCl and NaOH were used to change the pH so that the change in volume of the solution is negligible.

Results and discussions

Characterization of adsorbent

The main components of the MLP determined by chemical analysis are given in Table 1. It is seen that cellulose is the dominant macromolecular component in the MLP, and lignin is the second richest group. According to the results, it can be said that the MLP possess typical lignocellulosic structure which contain –OH groups as main functional groups.

Table 1 Chemical composition of mango leaf powder

FTIR spectrum of MLP showed the presence of functional groups responsible for adsorption of dye onto MLP. The FTIR spectra obtained for MLP are shown in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1, the spectra displayed a number of absorption peaks, indicating the complex nature of the material examined. The peaks in the FTIR spectra were assigned to various groups and bonds in accordance with their respective wave number (cm−1). The broad band observed at 3435 cm−1 was assigned to the stretching vibrations of O–H bond in hydroxyl groups (Azouaou et al. 2010). The O–H stretching vibrations occured within a broad range of frequencies indicate the presence of phenols and alcohols, which confirms the presence of cellulose and lignin in the MLP samples. Cellulose and lignin molecules contain–OH groups, but the phenolic structure is a measure of lignin. The bands observed at 2918 cm−1 were assigned to asymmetric C–H bands present in alkyl groups. The peak at 1707 cm−1 was characteristics of carbonyl group stretching of carboxylic acid (Pagnanelli et al. 2010). The peak at 1623 cm−1 was attributed to bending vibration of molecular water (Baig et al. 2010). Band at 1383 cm−1 was attributed to COO symmetric stretching vibration group (Azouaou et al. 2010). The peaks appeared in the region 1320–1210 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching vibration of C–O in carboxylic acid. Thus, the FTIR analysis indicated that the MLP contained functional groups such as OH and COOH that could be potential adsorption sites for interaction with the cationic MB dye.

Fig. 1
figure 1

FTIR spectra of mango leaf powder (MLP)

SEM images of MLP before and after adsorption are shown in Fig. 2a, b, respectively. The availability of pores and internal surface is clearly displayed in the SEM image of the MLP before adsorption (Fig. 2a), and the coverage of the surface and the pores by the adsorbed methylene blue is shown in Fig. 2b. Basically, the porous structure that appeared in Fig. 2a became blurred because of adsorption of MB as is shown in Fig. 2b.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of a raw mango leaf powder and b mango leaf powder after adsorption of MB

The BET surface area, total pore volume of the pores less than 184 nm diameter and average pore diameter of the MLP were found to be 4.02 m2/g, 0.007 cm3/g and 6.5 nm, respectively.

The surface charge Q of the adsorbent as a function of pH was calculated from the experimental titration data according to the following equation (Kiefer et al. 1997):

$$ Q = \frac{1}{w}(C_{\text{A}} - C_{\text{B}} - [{\text{H}}^{ + } ] - [{\text{OH}}^{ - } ]) $$
(3)

where, w is the dry weight of adsorbent in aqueous system (g/L); C A is the concentration of added acid in aqueous system (mol/L); C B is the concentration of added base in aqueous system (mol/L); [H+] is the concentration of H+ (mol/L); [OH] is the concentration of OH (mol/L). The pH value at the point of zero charge was then determined by plotting Q versus pH. Figure 3 shows the surface charge of the adsorbent as a function of pH. The point of zero charge (pHPZC) of the mango leaf powder was estimated to be 5.6 ± 0.2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Surface charge of MLP adsorbent as a function of pH

Adsorption studies

Effect of pH on adsorption

The pH of the dye solution plays an important role in the whole adsorption process and particularly on the adsorption capacity, influencing not only the surface charge of the adsorbent, the degree of ionization of the material present in the solution and the dissociation of functional groups on the active sites of the adsorbent, but also the solution dye chemistry. MB is a cationic dye and it has a pK value of 3.8 (Kim et al. 2013). It exists in aqueous solution as positively charged ions at pH greater than 3.8. As a charged species, the degree of its adsorption onto the adsorbent surface is primarily influenced by the surface charge on the adsorbent, which in turn is influenced by the solution pH. It is commonly known fact that the anions are favorably adsorbed by the adsorbent at lower pH values due to the presence of H+ ions. At high pH values, cations are adsorbed due to the negatively charged surface sites adsorbents. Figure 4 shows the effect of pH on the adsorption of methylene blue onto MLP. It was observed that the adsorption capacity was influenced by initial solution pH. The adsorption capacity of MLP was increased from 10.0 to 40.0 mg/g as the pH of the dye solution was increased from 2.5 to 10. This can be explained on the basis of a decrease in competition between positively charged H+, H3O+ and MB for surface sites and also by the decrease in positive surface charge on the adsorbent, which results in a lower electrostatic repulsion between the surface and MB. The effect of pH can also be explained in terms of the zero point of charge (pHPZC) of the adsorbent. The pHPZC of MLP was experimentally found to be 5.6 ± 0.2. The surface charge of the adsorbent is positive at pH > pHPZC, while it is negative at pH < pHPZC. Thus, below pH 5.6, MLP was positively charged and did not favor adsorption of positively charged MB due to electrostatic repulsion. The optimum pH for MB biosorption onto MLP was found to be in the range of 7–10 (Fig. 4), which was higher than the pHPZC value of 5.6. Thus, the MLP act as a negative surface and attracts the cationic MB resulting higher adsorption capacity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of pH on the equilibrium adsorption capacity of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 50 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Effects of adsorbent dose

The value of equilibrium adsorption capacity (q e) and the percentage removal of dye as a function of adsorbent dose are presented in Fig. 5. It was observed that the percentage removal of dye was increased from 82 to 99% with an increase in adsorbent dose from 0.1 to 0.8 g. The increase in the percentage of dye removal with adsorbent dosages could be attributed to increase in the adsorbent surface areas, augmenting the number of adsorption sites available for adsorption. On the other hand, the adsorption capacity was decreased from 164 to 25 mg/g when the adsorbent dose was increased from 0.1 to 0.8 g. The decrease in adsorption capacity q e (mg/g) with increasing adsorbent dose was due to the split in the flux or the concentration gradient between solute concentration in the solution and the solute concentration in the surface of the adsorbent. Thus, with increasing adsorbent dose, the amount of dye adsorbed onto unit weight of adsorbent was reduced causing a decrease in equilibrium adsorption capacity. Similar adsorption behavior has been reported in case of adsorption of MB on tea waste (Uddin et al. 2009a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of adsorbent dose on the adsorption of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 100 mg/L, V = 200 mL)

Effect of contact time and concentration of dye

To determine proper MB adsorption and equilibrium time, initial concentrations of MB solutions were changed and time intervals were assessed until no adsorption of adsorbate onto MLP took place. The adsorption capacity of MLP for the adsorption of MB versus contact time for various initial concentrations is presented in Fig. 6. The results showed that equilibrium time required for the adsorption of MB on MLP was almost 120 min (2 h). However, for subsequent experiments, the samples were left for 4 h to ensure equilibrium. These results also indicated that 85 ± 5% of the total amount of dye uptake was found to occur in the first rapid phase (30 min) and thereafter the sorption rate was found to decrease. The higher sorption rate at the initial period (first 30 min) might be due to an increased number of vacant sites on the adsorbent available at the initial stage resulting increased concentration gradients between adsorbate in solution and adsorbate on adsorbent surface. This increased in concentration gradients tended to increase in dye sorption at the initial stages. As time proceeded, the concentration gradient was reduced due to the accumulation of MB in the vacant sites leading to a decrease in the adsorption rate at the later stages from 30 to 240 min (Vadivelan and Kumar 2005). Figure 6 also showed that the equilibrium adsorption capacity increased with increase in initial MB concentration. The equilibrium adsorption capacity was increased from 79 to 172 mg/g with increasing MB concentration from 100 to 250 mg/L. This was due to increase in the driving force of the concentration gradient at higher initial dye concentration. When the initial concentrations were increased, the mass transfer driving force became larger resulting in higher adsorption capacity (Tan et al. 2008).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of contact time and initial concentrations on the adsorption of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 100, 150, 200, 250 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Adsorption isotherms

The relationship between the amount of dye adsorbed at constant temperature and its concentration in the equilibrium solution is called the adsorption isotherm. The equilibrium adsorption isotherm is important in the design of adsorption systems. In general, the adsorption isotherms describe how adsorbates interact with adsorbents and are useful for estimating the total amount of adsorbent needed to adsorb a required amount of adsorbate from solution (Jain and Shrivastava 2008). Among different available isotherm equations two important isotherms were selected for this study: the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The applicability of the isotherm equation was compared by judging the correlation coefficients, r 2.

The Langmuir adsorption isotherm is based on the assumption that all the adsorption sites on the adsorbent surface are energetically equivalent. When the adsorbate occupies a site further adsorption cannot take place at that site and there is no interaction between molecules adsorbed on neighboring sites. The maximum adsorption corresponds to a saturated monolayer of solute molecules on the adsorbent surface. The linear form of Langmuir isotherm can be represented by the following equation (Langmuir 1918):

$$ \frac{1}{{q_{\text{e}} }} = \frac{1}{{q_{0} }} + \frac{1}{{q_{0} K_{\text{L}} }} \cdot \frac{1}{{C_{\text{e}} }} $$
(4)

where q 0 is the monolayer adsorption capacity (mg/g) and K L is Langmuir constants (L/mg).

The values of K L and q 0 were calculated from the slope and intercept of the linear plots of 1/q e vs. 1/C e (Fig. 7) and are given in Table 2. The linearity of plots revealed that the adsorption followed Langmuir isotherm model. The maximum adsorption capacity of MLP for MB was found to be 156 mg/g. For better understanding the adsorption capacity of MLP obtained in this work was compared with other results reported in the literature (Table 3). From Table 3, it was observed that the adsorption capacity of MLP for methylene blue was found to be relatively higher than that of other low cost materials. Therefore, MLP can be used as an effective low cost adsorbent for the treatment of dye bearing wastewaters.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Langmuir isotherm for adsorption of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Table 2 Langmuir and Freundlich constants for the adsorption of methylene blue onto MLP
Table 3 Comparison of the maximum monolayer adsorption capacity of MB onto various adsorbents

The essential characteristics of the Langmuir isotherm can be expressed in terms of dimensionless constant called separation factor or equilibrium parameter, R L , and is given by Eq (5) (Grini 2008):

$$ R_{\text{L}} = \frac{1}{{1 + K_{\text{L}} C_{0} }} $$
(5)

where C 0 is the initial concentration of MB. The value of R L indicates the type of the isotherm to be either unfavorable (R L > 1), linear (R L = 1), favorable (0 < R L < 1) or irreversible (R L = 0). The calculated R L values at different initial MB concentrations (100–350 mg/L) in the present study were found to be in the range of 0.027–0.007, indicating that MLP was favorable for the adsorption of MB under experimental conditions studied.

Unlike Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm assumes heterogeneous surface energies, in which the energy term in Langmuir equation varies as a function of the surface coverage. The well-known linearized form of Freundlich isotherm can be expressed as (Freundlich 1906):

$$ \ln q_{\text{e}} = \ln K_{\text{F}} + \frac{1}{n}\ln C_{\text{e}} $$
(6)

where K F and n are Freundlich constants with n giving an indication of how favorable the adsorption process. K F can be defined as the adsorption or distribution coefficient and represents the quantity of dye adsorbed onto MLP for unit equilibrium concentration. The slope of 1/n ranging between 0 and 1 is a measure of adsorption intensity or surface heterogeneity, becoming more heterogeneous as its value gets closer to zero. A value for 1/n below 1 indicates a normal Langmuir isotherm while 1/n above one is an indicative of cooperative adsorption (Fytianos et al. 2000). The plot of \( \ln q_{\text{e}} \) versus \( \ln C_{\text{e}} \) gave a straight line with slope 1/n (Fig. 8), which showed that the adsorption of MB also followed the Freundlich isotherm. Freundlich constants K F and n were calculated and also listed in Table 2.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Freundlich isotherm for adsorption of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Table 2 shows the values of the parameters of the two isotherms and the related correlation coefficients. As seen from Table 2, the Langmuir model yielded a somewhat better fit (r 2 = 0.998) than the Freundlich model (r 2 = 0.957). As also illustrated in Table 2, the value of 1/n is 0.32, which indicated favorable adsorption.

Adsorption kinetics

The prediction of batch adsorption kinetics is necessary for the design of industrial adsorption columns. Kinetic models are used to examine the rate of the adsorption process and potential rate-controlling step. In the present work, the kinetic data obtained from batch studies were analyzed using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models.

The first order equation of Lagergren is generally expressed as follows (Lagergren 1898):

$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}q}}{{{\text{d}}t}} = k_{1} (q_{\text{e}} - q_{\text{t}} ) $$
(7)

where k 1 is the rate constant of pseudo-first-order sorption (min−1). The integrated form of Eq. (7) becomes

$$ \ln (q_{\text{e}} - q_{\text{t}} ) = \ln q_{\text{e}} - k_{1} t $$
(8)

A plot of \( \ln (q_{\text{e}} - q_{\text{t}} ) \) against t should give a linear relationship with the slop of k 1 and intercept of ln q e. The plot of linearized form of the pseudo first-order equation is shown in Fig. 9. The pseudo first-order rate constant k 1, the predicted values, \( q_{\text{e,cal}} \) calculated from the model and the correlation coefficients, \( r_{1}^{2} \), are presented in Table 4. The table shows that the correlation coefficients for pseudo-first-order were low (<0.96) and the predicted values of \( q_{\text{e,cal}} \) were not reasonably close to experimental \( q_{{{\text{e}},\exp }} \) values, suggesting the insufficiency of pseudo-first-order model to fit the kinetic data.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The pseudo-first-order kinetic plot for adsorption of MB onto MLP (C 0 = 100, 150, 200, 250 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Table 4 Comparison of the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order adsorption rate constants and calculated and experimental q e values obtained at different initial MB concentrations

The pseudo-second-order kinetic rate equation is expressed as follows (Ho and Mckay (1999):

$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}q}}{{{\text{d}}t}} = k_{2} (q_{\text{e}} - q_{\text{t}} )^{2} $$
(9)

where k 2 is the rate constant of pseudo-second-order sorption (g mg−1min−1).The integrated form of Eq. (9) becomes

$$ \frac{t}{{q_{\text{t}} }} = \frac{1}{{k_{2} q_{\text{e}}^{2} }} + \frac{1}{{q_{\text{e}} }}t $$
(10)

If the second order kinetic equation is applicable, the plot of t/q against t of Eq. (10) should give a linear relationship. The q e and k 2 can be determined from the slope and intercept of the plot, respectively.

Figure 10 shows the linearized form of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The pseudo-second-order rate constant k 2, calculated and experimental q e values and correlation coefficients are also presented in Table 4. As can be seen from Table 4, the correlation coefficients (\( r_{2}^{2} \)) obtained from pseudo second-order model were found to be higher than 0.998 for all concentrations, which were larger than those of the pseudo first-order model. The results revealed that the pseudo second-order model was the best one in describing the kinetics of MB adsorbed onto mango leaf powder. On the other hand, the calculated values, \( q_{\text{e,cal}} \) obtained from the pseudo-second-order model perfectly agreed with the experimental values, \( q_{\text{e,exp}} \) at all initial concentrations. Hence, it could be concluded that the pseudo-second-order model better represented the adsorption kinetics.

Fig. 10
figure 10

The pseudo-second-order kinetic plot for adsorption of MB onto MLP at different initial dye concentrations (C 0 = 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Proposed adsorption mechanism

For an effective removal of dyes from textile wastewaters, it is essential to understand the mechanism of dye adsorption onto the adsorbents. The adsorption mechanism of MB can be explained by considering the electrostatic interaction between negatively charged surface of MLP and positively charge MB dye. This electrostatic interaction can be explained with the help of surface functional groups of MLP adsorbent and the pH dependency of the adsorption of MB onto MLP. Fourier transmission infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis confirmed the presence of hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups on the surface of MLP. The ionization of these groups which depends on solution pH results in electrical charge on the surface of the MLP adsorbent. The hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups present on the surface of MLP can gain or lose a proton, resulting in a surface charge that varies with changing pH.

At low pH, MLP surface sites are protonated and surface gets positively charged as shown in Eqs. (11) and (12).

$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{OH}} + {\text{H}}^{ + } \to {\text{MLP}} - {\text{OH}}_{2}^{ + } $$
(11)
$$ \text{MLP} -{\text{COOH}} + {\text{H}}^{ + } \to {\text{MLP}} - {\text{COOH}}_{2}^{ + } $$
(12)

On the other hand, at high pH, the surface of MLP may get negatively charged due to the reaction of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups with OH (deprotonation reaction) as shown in Eqs. (13) and (14).

$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{OH}} + {\text{OH}}^{ -} \to \text{MLP} - {\text{O}}^ - + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} $$
(13)
$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{COOH }} + {\text{OH}}^{ - } \to \text{MLP} - {\text{COO}}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} $$
(14)

Thus at high pH, the adsorption process was highly favored through the electrostatic forces of attraction as proposed by Eqs. (15) and (16).

$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{O}}^{ - } + {\text{ MB}}^{ + } \to {\text{ MLP}} - {\text{O}}^{ - \ldots } {\text{MB}} $$
(15)
$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{COO}}^{ - } + {\text{MB}}^{ + } \to {\text{MLP}} - {\text{COO}}^{ - \ldots } {\text{MB}} $$
(16)

The adsorption of MB by electrostatic attraction was further confirmed by desorption study. Initially the adsorption was observed by increasing the pH from 2.3 to 10 (Fig. 11). The desorption was then carried out by decreasing the solution pH. Equilibrium concentration of MB in solution at pH 10 was 1.25 mg/L. The concentration in solution increased from 1.5 to 35.0 mg/L with the decrease in pH from 10 to 2.5 (Fig. 11). At lower pH, the protons replace the cationic MB dye molecules and the protonated surface of the adsorbent became positively charged. Due to this positive charged surface, the repulsion force between the adsorbent surface and dye molecule increased resulting decreased in adsorption as proposed in Eqs. (17) and (18). The increase in MB concentration in solution with decrease in pH indicates that the most of dye uptake was carried out by electrostatic force of attraction.

$$ \text{MLP} -{\text{O}}^{ - \ldots } {\text{MB}} + 2 {\text{H}}^{ + } \to {\text{MLP}} - {\text{OH}}_{2}^{ + } + {\text{MB}}^{ + } $$
(17)
$$ \text{MLP} - {\text{COO}}^{ - \ldots } {\text{MB}} + 2 {\text{H}}^{ + } \to {\text{MLP}} - {\text{COOH}}_{2}^{ + } + {\text{MB}}^{ + } $$
(18)
Fig. 11
figure 11

Adsorption-desorption curve of the methylene blue onto mango leaf adsorbent (C 0 = 50 mg/L, W = 0.25 g, V = 200 mL)

Conclusion

The ability of MLP to remove MB from aqueous solution was investigated under different experimental conditions in batch mode. Experimental results showed that MLP was effective for the removal of MB from aqueous solutions. The amount of dye adsorbed was found to vary with initial solution pH, initial dye concentrations, contact time, and adsorbent dose. The amount of dye uptake (mg/g) was found to increase with increasing initial solution concentration and found to decrease with increasing adsorbent dosage. Equilibrium data fitted very well in the Langmuir isotherm equation, confirming the monolayer adsorption of methylene blue onto MLP with a monolayer adsorption capacity of 156 mg/g which was higher compared to many low-cost adsorbents cited in the literature. The kinetics of the adsorption process was found to follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Since MLP used in this work is freely, abundantly and locally available, it can be expected as an economically viable and promising adsorbent for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions.