Advertisement

Variety-of-evidence reasoning about the distant past

A case study in paleoclimate reconstruction
  • Martin A. VezérEmail author
Original Paper in Philosophy of Science

Abstract

The epistemology of studies addressing questions about historical and prehistorical phenomena is a subject of increasing discussion among philosophers of science. A related field of inquiry that has yet to be connected to this topic is the epistemology of climate science. Branching these areas of research, I show how variety-of-evidence reasoning accounts for scientific inferences about the past by detailing a case study in paleoclimate reconstruction. This analysis aims to clarify the logic of historical inquiry in general and, by focusing on a case study about climate change, it offers an epistemic account of a particular discipline that is of environmental and social importance.

Keywords

Variety of evidence Epistemology Historical science Paleoclimate Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Wayne Myrvold, Gillian Barker, Eric Desjardins, Radoslav Dimitrov, Lisa Lloyd, Gordon McBean, Stathis Psillos, Jamie Voogt and the anonymous reviewers for helpful discussion and feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. This research was supported by the Department of Philosophy and the Rotman Institute of Philosophy at the University of Western Ontario.

References

  1. Ahmed, M., Anchukaitis, K., Buckley, B., Braida, M., Borgaonkar, H., Asrat, A., Cook, E., Büntgen, U., Chase, B.M., Christie, D.A., & et al. (2013). Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia: Supplementary information. Nature Geoscience, 6(5).Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, L., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., Michel, H., & Alvarez, L. W. (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science, 208 (4448), 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Biello, D. (2012). Hit them with the hockey stick. Scientific American, 306(3), 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, R.S. (2011). Global warming and political intimidation: How politicians cracked down on scientists as the earth heated up: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  6. Briffa, K.R. (2000). Annual climate variability in the holocene: interpreting the message of ancient trees. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19(1–5), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleland, C.E. (2001). Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology, 29(11), 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleland, C.E. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleland, C.E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Congressional Record (2003). Volume 149 Issue 113.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S.A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2).Google Scholar
  12. Currie, A., & Turner, D. (2016). Introduction: Scientific knowledge of the deep past. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doran, P.T., & Zimmerman, M.K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90(3), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleming, J.R. (1998). Historical Perspectives on Climate Change: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Folland, C., Karl, T., Christy, J., Clarke, R., Gruza, G., Jouzel, J., Mann, M., Oerlemans, J., Salinger, M.J., & Wang, S.W. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Forber, P., & Griffith, E. (2011). Historical reconstruction: Gaining epistemic access to the deep past: Philosophy & Theory in Biology.Google Scholar
  17. GISTEMP Team. (2016). GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP). NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Gould, S. (1992). The panda’s thumb: More reflections in natural history: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Gould, S.J. (1989). Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, S.J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, S.J. (2003). The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister’s Pox: Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
  22. Hartmann, D., Tank, A.K., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L., Bronnimann, S., Charabi, Y., Dentener, F., Dlugokencky, E., Easterling, D., Kaplan, A., Soden, B., Thorne, P., Wild, M., & Zhai, P. (2013). Observations: Atmosphere and surface. In Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge Univ Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hempel, C.G. (1942). The function of general laws in history. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hempel, C.G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC. (2014). Climate change synthesis report, (p. 132). NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. IPCC AR4 Appendix (2007). Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC fourth assessment report on addressing uncertainties. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jansen, E., Overpeck, J., Briffa, K., Duplessy, J.-C., Joos, F., Masson-Delmotte, V., Olago, D., Otto-Bliesner, B., Peltier, W., Rahmstorf, S., Ramesh, R., Raynaud, D.S.O.V.R., Rind, D., & Zhang, D. (2007). Paleoclimate. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Vol. 4: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffares, B. (2008). Testing times: regularities in the historical sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39(4), 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, P.D., Briffa, K.R., Barnett, T.P., & Tett, S.F.B. (1998). High-resolution palaeoclimatic records for the last millennium: interpretation, integration and comparison with general circulation model control-run temperatures. The Holocene, 8(4), 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leclercq, P.W., & Oerlemans, J. (2012). Global and hemispheric temperature reconstruction from glacier length fluctuations. Climate Dynamics, 38 (5-6), 1065–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lloyd, E. (2009). I–varieties of support and confirmation of climate models. In Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, (Vol. 83 pp. 213–232).Google Scholar
  33. Lloyd, E. (2010). Confirmation and robustness of climate models. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 971–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lloyd, E.A. (2015). Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 49, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann, M.E., Bradley, R.S., & Hughes, M.K. (1998). Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nature, 392(6678), 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mann, M.E., Bradley, R.S., & Hughes, M.K. (1999). Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(6), 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Masson-Delmotte, V., Schulz, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Beer, J., Ganopolski, A., Gonzlez Rouco, J., Jansen, E., Lambeck, K., Luterbacher, J., Naish, T., Osborn, T., Otto-Bliesner, B., Quinn, T., Ramesh, R., Rojas, M., Shao, X., & Timmermann, A. (2013). Information from paleoclimate archives. In The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mastrandrea, M.D., Field, C.B., Stocker, T.F., Edenhofer, O., Ebi, K.L., Frame, D.J., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Mach, K.J., Matschoss, P.R., & et al. (2010). Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).Google Scholar
  39. Mayo, D.G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mayo, D.G. (2000). Experimental practice and an error statistical account of evidence. Philosophy of Science, 193–207.Google Scholar
  41. Mayo, D.G. (2005). Evidence as passing severe tests: highly probable versus highly probed hypotheses: NA.Google Scholar
  42. Morice, C.P., Kennedy, J.J., Rayner, N.A., & Jones, P.D. (2012). Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4 data set. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D8).Google Scholar
  43. North, G.R., Biondi, F., Bloomfield, P., Christy, J., Cuffey, K., Dickinson, R., Druffel, E., Nychka, D., Otto-Bliesner, B., Roberts, N., & et al. (2006). Surface temperature reconstructions for the last 2,000 years: NRC Statement to Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives.Google Scholar
  44. Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306 (5702), 1686–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parker, W. (2008a). Computer simulation through an error-statistical lens. Synthese, 163(3), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parker, W. (2008b). Franklin, Holmes, and the epistemology of computer simulation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22(2), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker, W. (2010a). Comparative process tracing and climate change fingerprints. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parker, W. (2010b). Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pollack, H.N., & Smerdon, J.E. (2004). Borehole climate reconstructions: Spatial structure and hemispheric averages. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D11), 11106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider, S., & Moss, R. (1999). Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR. recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting, In R, Pachauri, T Taniguchi, K, Tanaka (Eds.), Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (pp. 33–51). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
  51. Tans, P., & Keeling, R. (2016). Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide: Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network.Google Scholar
  52. Tuana, N. (2012). Climate change and human rights. In Handbook of Human Climate: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Tucker, A. (2011). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Turner, D. (2000). The functions of fossils: inference and explanation in functional morphology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(1), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turner, D. (2004). The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 35(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner, D. (2005). Local underdetermination in historical science. Philosophy of Science, 72(1), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner, D. (2007). Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism debate: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Turner, D. (2009). How much can we know about the causes of evolutionary trends? Biology and Philosophy, 24(3), 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner, D. (2011). Gould’s replay revisited. Biology & Philosophy, 26(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner, D.D. (2016). A second look at the colors of the dinosaurs. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 55, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. UNFCCC. (1995). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Berlin: Conference of the Parities. First Session.Google Scholar
  62. UNFCCC. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Pairs Agreement. Paris: Conference of the Parties, Twenty-First Session.Google Scholar
  63. Vezér, M.A. (2016). Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: an epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weart, S.R. (2011). Discovery of Global Warming (rev. and Expanded Ed.): Diane Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth and Environmental Systems InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations