Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Iowa Research Network

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has recently emerged as an effective and affordable colorectal cancer screening option, many family physician offices continue to use guaiac-based tests. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of FITs in the Iowa Research Network and to assess physicians' knowledge about FITs. A cover letter and questionnaire were faxed twice to the 291 physician members followed up by a mailing. One hundred and seven (37 %) questionnaires were returned. Participants' mean age was 55 years with 78 male responders. Fifty-two (49 %) of the physician's offices were in a nonmetro area. Fifty-one (49 %) reported using guaiac-based tests and 39 (39 %) reported using FITs. Many physicians were unsure of the answers for the FIT knowledge questions. FIT use is not widespread in Iowa Research Network physician offices, and not all physicians are aware of the type of fecal occult blood test being conducted in their office.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Irons GV Jr, Kirsner JB (1965) Routine chemical tests of the stool for occult blood: an evaluation. Am J Med Sci 249:247–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Songster CL, Barrows GH, Jarrett DD (1980) Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood—the fecal smear punch-disc test: a new non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer. Cancer 45(5 Suppl):1099–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2011–2013. (2011) Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures Web site. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-028323.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2013

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012) Screen for life: colorectal cancer, basic facts on screening, publication #99-6949. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/pdf/Basics_FS_Eng_color.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2012

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012) Colorectal cancer screening saves lives. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/Features/VitalSigns/CancerScreening/. Accessed 23 July 2012

  7. Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH et al (2010) Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 105(9):2017–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkenfeld S, Belfer RG, Chared M et al (2011) Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test. J Med Screen 18(3):135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilschut JA, Hol L, Dekker E (2011) Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 141(5):1648–1655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Allison JE, Sakoda LC, Levin TR et al (2007) Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(19):1462–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klabunde C, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan G, Vernon SW (2009) Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med 37(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nadel MR, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde CN, Smith RA, Coughlin SS, White MC (2010) Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 25(8):833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Department of Family Medicine of The University of Iowa is gratefully acknowledged. NIH RC4 CA153493.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 01290-F PFP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, 52242, IA, USA

    Jeanette M. Daly & Barcey T. Levy

  2. Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, 400 CPHB, 100 River Street, Iowa City, 52242, IA, USA

    Camden Bay & Barcey T. Levy

Authors
  1. Jeanette M. Daly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camden Bay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barcey T. Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette M. Daly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daly, J.M., Bay, C. & Levy, B.T. Use of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Iowa Research Network. J Canc Educ 28, 397–401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0439-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0439-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation