Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Industrial Symbiosis and Territorial Development: The Cross-Fertilization of Proximity Dynamics and the Role of Information and Knowledge Flows

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial regions, specialized in heavy industry, currently face many challenges, due to their strong specialization (job losses, closure of plants, etc.) and are looking for new paths of diversification. Industrial ecology can be an engine of this diversification: the industrial symbiosis generated by its implementation is a source of positive externalities stemming from the articulation of geographical, organizational, and cognitive proximities. These externalities strengthen territorial attractiveness and favor the development of a related variety. Using a mixed methodology including the constitution and analysis of database and interviews, we study the case of Dunkirk, pioneer city in France for the implementation of industrial ecology. The empirical results show that the new companies are linked to local ones through eco-industrial synergies. These synergies can be, through the flows of information and knowledge, a source of the emergence of new markets and innovative technologies and thus induce territorial development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The choice of this period corresponds to the date of the survey that made it possible to identify the main synergies of Dunkirk’s industrial symbiosis (see Kasmi et al. 2017).

  2. Standard Industrial Classification

  3. The NFA code composed of 4 digits + 1 letter identifies the company’s main branch of activity. It is allocated by INSEE when the company is registered or declares its activity (INSEE 2015).

  4. Our analysis of related variety does not include industrial symbiosis sectors in which no new firms have been created.

References

  • Allenby, B. R. (1992). Industrial ecology: The materials scientist in an environmentally constrained world. MRS Bulletin, 17(3), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?. European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299–330.

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory. Empirics and Policy, Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Cheltenham: Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydalot, P. (1986). Les milieux innovateurs en Europe. Paris: GREMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnasco, A. (1977). Tre Italia. La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano. Il Mulino, Bologna.

  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. (2017). Smart specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 17, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In G. Руке Becattini & W. Sengerberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International institute for labour studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F. A., & Baas, L. W. (1997). Types of industrial ecology: The problem of coordination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1001–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an Evolutionary Economic Geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. Cooke et al. (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 187–210). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., Gianelle C. (2014). Regional Branching and Smart Specialization Policy, S3 policy brief series n°6/2014, S3 platform JRC-IPTS, Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

  • Boschma, R., Iammarino, S. (2007). Related variety and regional growth in Italy. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series. Paper No. 162, Utrecht University, pp. 1–25.

  • Boschma, R., & Lambooy, J. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2013). The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography, 89(1), 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., Ballandy, P.-A., & Koglerz, D.-F. (2014). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutillier, S., Uzunidis, D. (1998). Port et industries du Nord. Clichés Dunkerquois, L’Harmattan, collection Economie et Innovation, Paris.

  • Brullot, S., Maillefert Et, M., & Joubert, J. (2014). Stratégies D’acteurs Et Gouvernance Des Démarches D’écologie Industrielle Et Territoriale. Développement Durable Et Territoires, 5(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buclet, N. (2011). Écologie industrielle et territoriale, Stratégies locales pour un développement durable. Lille: Presses Universitaires du septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1991). Introduction : From the local « milieu » to innovation through cooperation networks. In R. Camagni (Ed.), Innovation networks, spatial perspectives (pp. 1–9). GREMI: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2009). Mode 3′ and ‘quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2017). Les systèmes d’innovation de la quadruple et de la quintuple hélice. Innovations, 54(3), 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerceau, J., Mat, N., Liming, L., Junqua, G., Laforest Et, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: international overview of case studies and cross-case analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–16.

  • Chertow, M. (2000). Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow M., (2004). Industrial Symbiosis. In CLEVELAND C J. (DIR.), Encyclopedia of Energy. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 407–415.

  • Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforrrm, 23(3), 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, O. (1999). L'ouvriérisation de l'emploi dunkerquois, les impasses d'une marche forcée vers l'industrie lourde dans Innovations. In Cahiers d'économie de l'innovation (Vol. 10). Paris: L'Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, O., Ziel, J., Mudard, N., (2000). Développement portuaire et milieu innovateur. Le cas de Dunkerque, Document de travail Lab.RII, ULCO, 31.

  • Diemer, A. (2012). La technologie au cœur du développement durable : mythe ou réalité ? Innovations, 37, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direccte. (2014). Trajectoire socio-économique de la zone d’emploi de Dunkerque. Les Synthèses de la Direccte n° 34, Nord - Pas-de-Calais.

  • Dumais, G., Ellison, G., Glaeser, E., (1997). Geographic Concentration as Dynamic Process. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, NBER Working Paper no. 6270.

  • Dunn, B. C., & Steinemann, A. (1998). Industrial ecology for sustainable communities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, 661–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellawanger, N., Boschma, R. (2013). Who acquires whom? The role of geographical proximity and industrial relatedness in Dutch domestic M&a between 2002 and 2008, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1319

  • Erhenfeld, J. (2004). Industrial ecology: A new field or only a metaphor? Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 825–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (1998). Vers une écologie industrielle, éditions Charles Léopold Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (2004). Vers une écologie industrielle : comment mettre en pratique le développement durable dans une société hyper-industrielle (2nd édition ed.). Paris: Editions Charles Léopold Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and Bmode 2^ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. Journal of Business, 73, 629–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. (1994). Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource related industry groups. Organization Science, 5, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. Annals of Regional Science, 35(1), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2009). Knowledge for growth. prospects for science, technology and innovation. Technical report, research commissioner Janez Potočnik’s expert group.

  • Foray, D. (2013). Smart specialization and the new industrial policy agenda, policy brief n°8, European commission, Innovation for Growth – i4g.

  • Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialization: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. New York: Routledge/Regional Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch, R. A., & Galloupolos, N. G. (1989). Des stratégies industrielles viables. Pour la science, 145, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaud, D., & Laperche, B. (2016). Économie circulaire et circuits courts écologie industrielle. ISTE éditions Ltd..

  • Gertler, N. (1995). Industrial ecosystems: Developing sustainable industrial structures. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Gibbs D., Deutz P., Proctor A., (2005). Industrial ecology and eco-industrial development: A potential paradigm for local and regional development? Regional Studies, vol.39 n°2, pp.171–183.

  • Hartog M., Boschma R., Sotarauta M., (2012). The impact of related variety on regional employment growth in Finland 1993–2006: High-tech versus medium/low-tech, Industry and Innovation, Volume 19, n° 6, pp. 459–476.

  • Heimeriks, G., & Balland, P. A. (2016). How smart is specialisation? An analysis of specialisation patterns in knowledge production. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 562–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. L., Hausmann R. (2007) The product space conditions and the development of nations, Science, 317, 482–487.

  • Insee. (2015). NAF RÉV. 2 et CPF RÉV. 2 : guide d’utilisation. INSEE, https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/2406147

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 3, 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasmi, F. (2018). Écologie industrielle, milieu éco-innovateur et diversification de l’économie territoriale : le cas du complexe industrialo-portuaire de Dunkerque, Thèse de doctorat en sciences économiques, Clersé/ULCO, Dunkerque.

  • Kasmi, F., Laperche, B., Merlin-Brogniart, C., & Burmeister, A. (2017). Écologie industrielle, milieu innovateur et gouvernance territoriale : Le cas de Dunkerque (Nord- France). Canadian Journal of Regional Science/ Revue Canadienne de Sciences Régionales, 40(2), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laperche, B, Perrin Boulonne, H (2017). La dynamique d’évolution du territoire Entrepreneurs et capital savoir territorial, in BOUTILLIER S. (dir.) Entrepreneuriat et innovation : Contextes et concept, Business and Innovation, Peter Lang, Bruxelles.

  • Laperche, B., & Uzunidis, D. (2011). Crise, innovation et renouveau des territoires : dépendance de sentier et trajectoires d'évolution. Innovations, 35(2), 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laperche, B., Lorek, M., Uzunidis, D., (2011). Crise et reconversion des milieux industrialo-portuaires : dépendance de sentier ou renouveau économique ? Les exemples de Dunkerque (France) et de Gdansk (Pologne). Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine, pp. 341–368.

  • Levy, R, Ferru, M. (2016). Ron Boschma - L'apport de la géographie à la compréhension des mécanismes d'innovation collective, éditions EMS Management & société.

  • Lopes, J., & Franco, M. (2019). Review about regional development networks: An ecosystem model proposal. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(1), 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E., Moran, S., Holmes, D. (1996). Fieldbook for the development of eco-industrial parks. Indigo Development, final report.

  • Mameli, F., Immarino, S., Boschma, R., (2012). Regional variety and employment growth in Italian labour market areas: Services versus manufacturing industries. CIMR Research Working Paper Series Working Paper 4, pp. 1–23.

  • Mirata, M., & Emtairah, T. (2005). Industrial symbiosis and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona symbiosis programme. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 993–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neffke, F., Henning, M. (2008). Revealed relatedness: Mapping industry space. Working paper series number 08.19. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. A. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87, 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance. Journal of Management & Governance, 4(1), 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oecd. (2013). Innovation-driven growth: The role of smart specialisation, OECD Publishing.

  • Pehrsson, A. (2019). Business relatedness in international diversification: Achievements, gaps, and propositions. European Business Review, 31(2), 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 549–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D. L. (2012). The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG), n° 1218. Utrecht University, Utrecht.

  • Schalchli, P. (Coord) (2011). Rapport COMETHE, Mémoire scientifique, Rapport pour l’ANR, 175 p, miméo.

  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., & Beuret, J. E. (2012). Proximités territoriales. In Construire la gouvernance des territoires, entre conventions, conflits et concertations. Paris: Economica-Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzunidis, D. (2007). Entreprises, Entrepreneurs et milieux innovateurs : quelles politiques territoriales de compétitivité ? Humanisme et Entreprises, 28, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzunidis, D. (2010). Innovation et proximité. Entreprises, entrepreneurs et milieux innovateurs. Revue des sciences de gestion, 241, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beers D., Corder G., Bossilkov A., Van Berkel R., (2007). Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry. The cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol 11, n°1, pp. 55–72.

  • Van Oort, F., De Geus, S., Dogaru, T. (2015). Related variety and regional economic growth in a cross-section of european urban regions. European Planning Studies, 1–18.

  • Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Lata, R. (2014). Embeddedness of European regions in European Unionfunded Research and Development (R&D) networks: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 3404(June), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S., & Nadvi, K. (2018). Industrial clusters and industrial ecology: Building ‘eco-collective efficiency’ in a south Korean cluster. Geogorum, 90, 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lorraine, ERPI Laboratory (EA n°3767), 8 rue Bastien Lepage, 54010, Nancy, France

    Fedoua Kasmi

Authors
  1. Fedoua Kasmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fedoua Kasmi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Eco-industrial synergies of the new companies
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasmi, F. Industrial Symbiosis and Territorial Development: The Cross-Fertilization of Proximity Dynamics and the Role of Information and Knowledge Flows. J Knowl Econ 12, 342–362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00631-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00631-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation