Skip to main content
Log in

Machine Learning-Enabled Determination of Diffuseness of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations from Magnetic Resonance Angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Translational Stroke Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diffuseness of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is a significant factor in surgical outcome evaluation and hemorrhagic risk prediction. However, there are still predicaments in identifying diffuseness, such as the judging variety resulting from different experience and difficulties in quantification. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model to automatically identify the diffuseness of bAVM niduses using three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) images. A total of 635 patients with bAVMs who underwent TOF-MRA imaging were enrolled. Three experienced neuroradiologists delineated the bAVM lesions and identified the diffuseness on TOF-MRA images, which were considered the ground-truth reference. The U-Net-based segmentation model was trained to segment lesion areas. Eight mainstream ML models were trained through the radiomic features of segmented lesions to identify diffuseness, based on which an integrated model was built and yielded the best performance. In the test set, the Dice score, F2 score, precision, and recall for the segmentation model were 0.80 [0.72–0.84], 0.80 [0.71–0.86], 0.84 [0.77–0.93], and 0.82 [0.69–0.89], respectively. For the diffuseness identification model, the ensemble-based model was applied with an area under the Receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87–0.99) in the training set. The AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for the diffuseness identification model were 0.95, 0.90, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.83, respectively, in the test set. The ML models showed good performance in automatically detecting bAVM lesions and identifying diffuseness. The method may help to judge the diffuseness of bAVMs objectively, quantificationally, and efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and Code Availability

The algorithm was published in “https://github.com/qizhaoaoe/AVM_diffuseness”. Deidentified data not published within this article will be made available to any qualified investigator upon request. To gain access, those requesting access to data will need to sign data access and use agreement. Data will be shared via a secure portal.

Abbreviations

bAVM:

Brain arteriovenous malformation

S-M grading:

Spetzler-Martin grading

ML:

Machine learning

TOF-MRA:

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography

ROC:

Receiver-operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the ROC curves

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

3D:

Three-dimensional

2D:

Two-dimensional

CNNs:

Convolutional neural networks

LR:

Logistic regression

SVM:

Support vector machine

KNN:

K-nearest neighbor classification

GBDT:

Gradient boosting decision tree

SRS:

Stereotactic radiosurgery

References

  1. Solomon RA, Connolly ES Jr. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1859–66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1607407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawton MT. The role of AVM microsurgery in the aftermath of a randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):617–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kandai S, Abdullah MS, Naing NN. Angioarchitecture of brain arteriovenous malformations and the risk of bleeding: an analysis of patients in northeastern Malaysia. Malay J Med Sci. 2010;17(1):44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tayebi Meybodi A, Lawton MT. Modern classification and outcome predictors of surgery in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg Sci. 2018;62(4):454–66. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04394-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE, Mikhak B, Young WL. A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):702–13; discussion 713. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.Neu.0000367555.16733.E1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiao Y, Lin F, Wu J, Li H, Wang L, Jin Z, Wang S, Cao Y. A supplementary grading scale combining lesion-to-eloquence distance for predicting surgical outcomes of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(2):530–40. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.10.Jns161415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin LS, Raffel C, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Giannotta SL, McComb JG. Diffuse arteriovenous malformations: a clinical, radiological, and pathological description. Neurosurgery. 1992;31(5):863–8; discussion 868–869.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Du R, Keyoung HM, Dowd CF, Young WL, Lawton MT. The effects of diffuseness and deep perforating artery supply on outcomes after microsurgical resection of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4):638–46; discussion 646–638. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.Neu.0000255401.46151.8a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braileanu M, Yang W, Caplan JM, Lin LM, Radvany MG, Tamargo RJ, Huang J. Interobserver agreement on arteriovenous malformation diffuseness using digital subtraction angiography. World Neurosurg. 2016;95:535-541.e533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mossa-Basha M, Chen J, Gandhi D. Imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2011.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim H, Abla AA, Nelson J, McCulloch CE, Bervini D, Morgan MK, Stapleton C, Walcott BP, Ogilvy CS, Spetzler RF, Lawton MT. Validation of the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system for brain arteriovenous malformations in a multicenter cohort of 1009 surgical patients. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(1):25–31; discussion 31–22; quiz 32–33. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang T, Lei Y, Tian S, Jiang X, Zhou J, Liu T, Dresser S, Curran WJ, Shu HK, Yang X. Learning-based automatic segmentation of arteriovenous malformations on contrast CT images in brain stereotactic radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2019;46(7):3133–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Behboodi B, Rivaz H. Ultrasound segmentation using U-Net: learning from simulated data and testing on real data. Proc 41st Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, (EMBC). 2019;6628–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2019.8857218.

  15. Makropoulos A, Counsell SJ, Rueckert D. A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage. 2018;170:231–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zaki M, Ghalwash A, Elkouny AA. CNN: a speaker recognition system using a cascaded neural network. Int J Neural Syst. 1996;7(2):203–12. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129065796000178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of ACM. 2012;1097–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386.

  18. Ronneberger O, Fisher P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. MICCAI 2015. 2015;234–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

  19. Lee B, Yamanakkanavar N, Choi JY. Automatic segmentation of brain MRI using a novel patch-wise U-net deep architecture. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8): e0236493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu J, Shen L, Albanie S, Sun G, Wu E. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020;2011–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372.

  21. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J, Recognition P. Deep residual learning for image recognition. CVPR. 2016;770–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.

  22. Wong KCL, Moradi M, Tang H, Syeda-Mahmood T. 3D segmentation with exponential logarithmic loss for highly unbalanced object sizes. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 612–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Solmaz I, Secer HI, Tehlı O, Temız C, Izcı Y, Gonul E. Diffuse cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20(4):536–9. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.2362-09.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oermann EK, Rubinsteyn A, Ding D, Mascitelli J, Starke RM, Bederson JB, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Sheehan JP, Hammerbacher J, Kondziolka D. Using a machine learning approach to predict outcomes after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21161. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi T, Jiang H, Zheng B. A stacked generalization U-shape network based on zoom strategy and its application in biomedical image segmentation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;197:105678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105678.

  27. Spears J, Terbrugge KG, Moosavian M, Montanera W, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC, Tymianski M. A discriminative prediction model of neurological outcome for patients undergoing surgery of brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1457–64. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Str.0000222937.30216.13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu S, Yan L, Yao Y, Wang S, Yang M, Wang B, Zhuo Y, Ai L, Miao X, Zhao J, Wang DJ. Noncontrast dynamic MRA in intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM), comparison with time of flight (TOF) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(6):869–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hadizadeh DR, Kukuk GM, Steck DT, Gieseke J, Urbach H, Tschampa HJ, Greschus S, Kovacs A, Mohlenbruch M, Bostroem A, Schild HH, Willinek WA. Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations by 4D-MRA for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in 56 patients: comparison with DSA and intraoperative findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1095–101. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the support of Professor Jian-Min Li from the Department of Computer Science and Technology at Tsinghua University in the study design and article revision.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81901175, principal investigator, Yuming Jiao), the “National Key Research and Development Program of China during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period” (Grant No. 2016YFC1301803, principal investigator, Prof. Yong Cao, and Grant No. 2016YFC1301801, principal investigator, Prof. Shuo Wang).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiao, Y., Zhang, JZ., Zhao, Q. et al. Machine Learning-Enabled Determination of Diffuseness of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations from Magnetic Resonance Angiography. Transl. Stroke Res. 13, 939–948 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00933-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00933-1

Keywords

Navigation