Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Synthesis and Sensor Properties of a Phenol Derivative Molecule: Potentiometric Determination of Silver(I) Ions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Electrocatalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herein, we developed a novel potentiometric sensor that exhibits high selectivity towards Ag+ ions, using a newly synthesized phenol derivative (4) molecule as an electroactive material (ionophore). The sensor was prepared by coating the surface of a conductive solid contact by a membrane containing bis(2-ethylhexyl)sebacate (BEHS) as plasticizer, poly (vinly chloride) (PVC) as a polymeric matrix, electroactive material (4), and potassium tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate (KTpClPB) as an additive. The developed sensor exhibited a wide linear concentration range of 1.0 × 10–6–1.0 × 10−1 mol L−1 and a lower detection limit of 5.87 × 10−7 mol L−1. The sensor exhibited quite good selectivity over other cationic species, and its potential response remained unaffected of pH in the range of 3.0–7.0. In addition, the developed sensor had a short response time of 8 s, good repeatability, and stability. Finally, the proposed sensor was used in the direct determination of Ag+ in different water samples, and as an indicator electrode for the end point determination in the potentiometric titration of Ag+ ions against sodium chloride.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Xu, C. Pérez-Ràfols, M. Cuartero, G.A. Crespo, Electrochim. Acta 374, 137929 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Isildak, N. Deligönül, O. Özbek, Turk. J. Chem. 43, 1149–1158 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Karimi, S.Z. Mohammadi, A. Mohadesi, A. Hatefi-Mehrjardi, M. Mazloum-Ardakani, L.S. Korani, A.A. Kabir, Sci. Iran 18, 790–796 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H.M. Abu-Shawish, S.M. Saadeh, H.M. Dalloul, B. Najri, H. Al Athamna, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 182, 374–381 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Zhang, Y. Chai, R. Yuan, J. Guo, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 32, 1179–1183 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.N. Bianchin, E. Martendal, E. Carase, J. Anal. Methods. Chem. 2011, 1–7 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Valverde, M. Costas, F. Pena, I. Lavilla, C. Bendicho, Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 20, 217–226 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R.K. Saha, Orient. J. Chem. 32, 499–507 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Hu, G. Yang, Y. Zhao, J. Yin, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 375, 831–835 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. B.H. Zhang, L. Qi, F.Y. Wu, Microchim. Acta 170, 147–153 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.E.B. Mohamed, E.Y. Frag, M.H. El Brawy, Microchem. J. 164, 106065 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ö. Isildak, O. Özbek, M.B. Gürdere, J. Anal. Test. 4, 273–280 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Özbek, Ö. Isildak, C. Berkel, J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 98, 1–9 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.P. Akanji, O.A. Arotiba, D. Nkosi, Electrocatalysis 10, 643–652 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Tamji, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Electrocatalysis 10, 466–476 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Kuzu Çelik, A.F. Üzdürmez, A. Erkal, E. Kılıç, A.O. Solak, Z. Üstündağ, Electrocatalysis 7, 207–214 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Özbek, Ö. Isildak, M.B. Gürdere, A. Cetin, Org. Commun. 14, 228–239 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ö. Isildak, O. Özbek, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 51, 218–231 (2021)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Topcu, Talanta 161, 623–631 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ö. Isildak, O. Özbek, K.M. Yigit, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 101, 2035–2045 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O. Özbek, C. Berkel, Ö. Isildak, I. Isildak, Clin. Chim. Acta 524, 154–163 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Topcu, Investigation of usage of recently synthesized Schiff bases as active components in chemical sensors. MSc Thesis, Ondokuzmayis University, Samsun, Turkey (2009)

  23. E. Findik, M. Ceylan, M. Elmastaş, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 46, 4618–4624 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ö. Isildak, O. Özbek, K.M. Yigit, Bulg. Chem. Commun. 52, 448–452 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Özbek, Ö. Isildak, ChemistrySelect 7, e202103988 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O. Özbek, Ö. Isildak, I. Isildak, Biochem. Eng. J. 176, 108181 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ö. Isildak, O. Özbek, J. Chem. Sci. 132, 29 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Umezawa, P. Bühlmann, K. Umezawa, K. Tohda, A.S. Amemiya, Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 1851–2082 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R.P. Buck, E. Lindner, Pure Appl. Chem. 66, 2527–2536 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D.M. Sejmanović, B.B. Petković, M.V. Budimir, S.P. Sovilj, V.M. Jovanović, Electroanal. 23, 1849–1855 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. I. Isildak, M. Yolcu, O. Isildak, N. Demirel, G. Topal, H. Hosgoren, Microchim. Acta 144, 177181 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Demirel, A. Doğan, G. Akkuş, M. Yılmaz, E. Kılıç, Electroanal. 18, 1019–1027 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. R.K. Mahajan, M. Kumar, V. Sharma, I. Kaur, Analyst 126, 505–507 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Masrournia, H. Zamani, H. Mohammedzadeh, S.M. Seyedi, M.R. Ganjali, H.A. Eshghi, J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 54, 63–67 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Mazloum, M.S. Niassary, S.H. Mirhoseini Chahooki, M.K. Amini, Electroanal. 14, 376–381 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. R.K. Mahajan, I. Kaur, V. Sharma, M. Kumar, Sensors 2, 417–423 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Research Assistant Caglar Berkel for his contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Technology, Application and Research Center, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Oguz Özbek

  2. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Alper Çetin

  3. Departmet of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Science, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey

    Esra Koç & Ömer Isildak

Authors
  1. Oguz Özbek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alper Çetin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esra Koç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ömer Isildak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oguz Özbek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özbek, O., Çetin, A., Koç, E. et al. Synthesis and Sensor Properties of a Phenol Derivative Molecule: Potentiometric Determination of Silver(I) Ions. Electrocatalysis 13, 486–493 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-022-00738-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-022-00738-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation