Abstract
Use of drug combinations that target different pathways involved in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa) has emerged as an alternative to overcome the resistance caused by drug monotherapies. The antiandrogen abiraterone acetate and the PI3K/Akt inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 (BEZ235) may be suitable options for the prevention of drug resistance and the inhibition of PCa progression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether abiraterone acetate and BEZ235 achieve superior therapeutic effects to either drug administered as monotherapy, in the early stages of PCa in an androgen-dependent system. Our study showed that each drug might impair tumor growth by reducing proliferation and increasing cell death when administered as monotherapy. However, tumor growth continued to progress with each drug monotherapy and some important side effects were related to BEZ. Conversely, when used in combination, the drugs impaired the inflammatory response, decreased hyperplastic lesions, and blocked tumor progression from premalignant to a malignant stage. Our data showed that the strategy to block the androgenic and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an effective therapeutic option and should be investigated including distinct PI3K pathway inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. The incidence of the disease has increased in part due to advances in diagnosis and the increase in life expectancy of the population [1]. It is expected that by 2030 there will be 1.7 million new cases and 499.000 new deaths due to the growth and aging of the global population [2, 3].
PCas require androgen for growth. Therefore, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the first-line treatment for PCa [4, 5]. However, it is not considered the ideal treatment for eradicating PCa. Despite the initial efficacy of ADT, most patients with advanced PCa develop castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC) [6]. Although more than 50% of patients with CRPC respond to secondary hormonal interventions, the response is moderate and therapeutic agents that are more effective are required [7]. Thus, in this setting, the combination of antiandrogens with therapies that target signaling pathways involved in tumor progression represents an effective therapy [5, 6, 8].
Abiraterone is a potent inhibitor of CYP17A1, an enzyme that blocks androgen biosynthesis in the testis, adrenal glands, and prostate [9, 10]. The use of abiraterone leads to reduced levels of androgens in serum, delayed tumor growth, and, most notably, intratumoral androgen levels that are undetectable and not observed with conventional ADT [11]. The drug has been used to treat CRPC after chemotherapy and, less frequently, for early-stage cancers [12].
Although primarily used for androgen receptor (AR)-independent PCa, the efficacy of abiraterone has been reported for AR-positive cancers [13]. The authors postulated that the attenuation of AR signaling is not the only rationale to explain the anticancer activity of abiraterone since it effectively reduced proliferation rates even for cancer cells lacking AR signaling. Because of these conflicting results, it is important to investigate the effects of this therapy in the initial stages of PCa, in an androgen-responsive setting. This could represent an effective alternative to delay or even prevent the development of drug resistance and androgen-independent growth in this clinical setting.
Because of the importance of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in tumor development and progression, numerous inhibitors have been designed for cancer treatment [14]. BEZ235 is a dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor, and its antitumor activity is expected to be higher than that of mTORC1 inhibitors due to the inhibition of phosphorylated Akt upregulation through mTORC2 [15]. This agent shows an inhibitory effect by binding to the adenosine triphosphate binding cleft of p110 and mTORC1/2. The drug binds to and blocks the catalytic sites of all isoforms of PI3K and mTOR [15, 16], and has been shown to inhibit the tumor growth of breast, prostate, and myeloma cell lines [15,16,17]. The p110α and p110β isoforms are expressed in most normal tissues and are involved in PCa [18, 19], and p110δ is possibly restricted to cells of the immune system [20, 21].
Several studies have evaluated the effect of BEZ235 alone and in association with other therapeutic agents on PCa growth [22]. Carver et al. [8] demonstrated that the combined inhibition of AR and PI3K/Akt signaling by enzalutamide (MDV3100) and BEZ235, respectively, increased antitumor activity in a hormone-sensitive LNCaP xenograft model. Recent clinical trials have pointed out some important side effects related to BEZ and the clinical development of the drug as a potential therapy for PCa has been discontinued during the conclusion of this work [23].
Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway by new molecules represents a promising approach to preventing tumor progression [8, 24, 25]. However, prolonged treatment could result in drug resistance, which leads to positive regulation of the androgen receptor pathway and reduces the anticancer effect [8, 26, 27]. Most clinical trials have targeted patients who have already developed androgen resistance [28]. However, some studies have suggested that the PI3K/Akt pathway is required for the development of CRPC. Thus, co-targeting the PI3K and AR pathways in the early stages of PCa development could delay androgen resistance [29, 30].
The crosstalk between the androgen receptor and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways allows for the development of novel strategies to inhibit cancer growth more effectively. The present study was performed to evaluate whether, in the early stages of PCa, abiraterone acetate, and BEZ235 administered in combination, achieve better therapeutic effects than when each agent is administered alone, in an androgen-dependent setting.
Materials and Methods
Animals
The experiments were performed using 12-week old male Fischer 344 rats, obtained from colonies maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Multidisciplinary Center for Biological Investigation (CEMIB-UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil). The animals were housed under controlled environmental conditions (temperature: 22 ± 2 °C; relative humidity: 55 ± 20%; 12/12-h light–dark cycle; and continuous air exhaust) and were provided free access to water and standard chow diet. The animals were handled in line with the ethical principles for animal research established by the Brazilian Council for Control of Animal Experimentation, and the experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals from the Institute of Biosciences–UNESP (Protocol no. 559-CEUA).
Chemical Induction of Carcinogenesis and Experimental Design
The tumor induction methodology used in the study was developed and provided by the Laboratory of Urogenital Carcinogenesis and Immunotherapy of the Institute of Chemistry/UNICAMP. All animals were subjected to carcinogenesis induction, which consisted of (1) pretreatment with testosterone cypionate (100 mg/kg)—administered via subcutaneous injection for three consecutive days, followed by; (2) intraprostatic administration of the carcinogen N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)—the animals were anesthetized with 2% xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg i.m.; König, São Paulo, Brazil) and 10% ketamine hydrochloride (60 mg/kg i.m., Fort Dodge, Iowa, USA). A suprapubic incision of 0.5 cm was made in the dorsolateral prostate for inoculation of MNU (15 mg/kg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in sodium citrate (1 M, pH 6.0) and co-administered with a thermosensitive copolymer (Pluronic 127) in the capsule of the dorsolateral prostate; (3) carcinogenesis promotion—1 week after MNU administration the animals received subcutaneous doses of testosterone cypionate (5 mg/kg—diluted in corn oil) twice a week for 220 days.
After tumor induction, the animals were randomly divided into four groups. The drugs were administered by gavage for ten consecutive days as follows. The control group received only the drug vehicles 1 (6% ethanol diluted in corn oil) and 2 (1:9/ 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP): polyethylene glycol 300 (PEG)) group A received abiraterone acetate (14 mg/kg, Cayman Chemical —in vehicle 1: 6% ethanol diluted in corn oil—[8, 16, 31] and vehicle 2); group B received BEZ235 (45 mg/kg, Cayman Chemical) and vehicle 1. BEZ235 was dissolved in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and then diluted with polyethylene glycol 300 (PEG300) to a final concentration of 10% v/v NMP and 90% v/v PEG300 (vehicle 2: 1:9/NMP: PEG) [15, 32, 33]; group AB received abiraterone acetate + BEZ235. The procedures are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Biometric Data
During the experiment, body weight was monitored. Following the treatments, blood samples were collected to measure testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. Testosterone levels were determined by double-antibody radioimmunoassay using the Coat-A-Count® (Diagnostics Products Corporation, Los Angeles, USA) and DHT levels (DHT—Diagnostics Biochem Canada Inc., Canada) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The intra-assay variation was 1.75%, and the results were expressed in ng/ml and pg/ml. All procedures were performed at the Neuroendocrinology Laboratory, School of Dentistry of the University of São Paulo, USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Following the treatment period, each animal was subjected to a complete autopsy, and the dorsolateral prostate (DL) was removed, weighed, and subjected to histopathologic and molecular analysis.
Processing of Samples
The dorsolateral prostate was fixed by immersion in Methacarn (methanol, chloroform, and acetic acid at a ratio of 7:2:1) for 3 h at 4 °C. After fixation, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol, clarified in xylene, and embedded in paraffin (Histosec™, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Serial step sections (4 μm) were made in an automatic rotary microtome (Leica) picking up a section and discarding the next 10, until the entire prostate lobe had been sectioned. For the molecular assays, prostate samples were homogenized in RIPA buffer plus protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, USA) in Tureaux type homogenizer (Ultra Stirrer—Ultra80) for 3 cycles of 10 s. The homogenates were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were collected. The protein quantification was performed using the Bradford method, absorbance measured in an ELISA reader (595 nm), and the samples were frozen for western blotting assay.
Morphologic Analysis
Histopathologic Classification and Determination of Lesion Multiplicity
Histologic sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) for histopathologic classification of prostate neoplasms as described previously [34,35,36]. The entire dorsolateral prostate from each animal was examined to quantify the multiplicity (number of prostatic lesions per analyzed field, n = 25 histologic areas/group) and incidence (number of affected animals, n = 5 animals/group) of each lesion. Double-blind quantifications were performed to determine the number of inflammatory disorders as well as benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions. An experienced veterinarian pathologist confirmed the analyses.
Determination of the Proliferative and Apoptotic Index
For detection of proliferating cells, the prepared sections were dewaxed, rehydrated through graded alcohols, and the antigen retrieved in Tris-EDTA buffer pH 9.0, at 97 °C for 20 min. The endogenous peroxidases were blocked by covering the slides with H2O2 (3% in methanol) for 15 min. To block the nonspecific protein-protein interactions, the sections were incubated with 3% non-fat milk plus 1% goat serum in PBS for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody anti-Ki67 (1:100, ab16667-Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) diluted in 1% BSA. The slides were subsequently incubated for 90 min at 37 °C with HRP-conjugated secondary goat-anti-rabbit antibody (1:200, ab-97,051-Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) in 1% BSA. Apoptosis was measured in the sections according to the instructions of In Situ Cell Death Detection kit, POD (Roche), which is based on the TUNEL assay. The revelation of both reactions was performed with diaminobenzidine solution (DAB, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and hematoxylin was used for counterstaining.
To determine the proliferative and apoptotic index, 30 random prostatic areas of each group were used and were examined using the ×40 objective lens. In each field, the percentage of positive epithelial cells was determined relative to total cells, and the results were analyzed for statistical significance.
Quantification of Mast Cells on Dorsolateral Prostate
Histologic sections were subjected to cytochemical methods to identify mast cells. The sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue (aqueous solution). A total of 45 random fields per group were used to determine the mean number of mast cells per 1 mm2 area. The values obtained were analyzed for statistical significance between groups.
Western Blot Analysis
Aliquots (70 μg of protein) were separated on SDS-PAGE. Following the electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The nonspecific binding of proteins was blocked by incubating the membrane in 3% BSA in TBST buffer for 90 min at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with the respective primary antibody in 1% BSA diluted in TBST overnight at 4 °C: p-AKT (T308) (#9275 s); p-AKT (S473) (#4060 s); Pan-AKT (#4691 s); FoxO1 (#2880); p-FoxO1 (#9461); PI3K (#5569 s); BAD (#9292); p-BAD (#9295); XIAP (#2042); p-mTOR (#2971 s); mTOR (#2972 s) (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. USA); phospho-AR (ab71948); Bcl-2 (ab7973); TNF-α (ab1793); IL-6 (ab6672); IL-10 (ab9969) (Abcam® Inc., USA); AR (sc-816); β-actin (sc-47,778) (Santa Cruz® Biotechnology, Inc., USA).
The membranes were then incubated with a specific secondary antibody conjugated with peroxidase, which was diluted 1:5000–30,000 in 1% BSA for 1 h (IgG goat-anti-rabbit, ab97051 or IgG goat-anti-mouse, ab97023, Abcam® Inc., USA). The immunoreactive components were revealed by GE Amersham ECL chemiluminescent substrate (GE Healthcare). Analyses were done in three different biological samples per group (three animals/group). To calculate the mean and SEM, the optic density of band was used as the unit of measure with software Image J (Version 1.33u—National Institutes of Health, USA), and normalized by endogenous control β-actin.
Statistical Analysis
The results were checked for differences between groups using Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad). The statistical difference among the parameters was considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. The tests were chosen in agreement with the sampling distribution of each parameter. Parametric data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer test. The nonparametric analysis was performed, by Mann-Whitney’s test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns test.
Results
Effect of Drugs on Body Weight and Hormone Levels
More than 7% loss in body weight was observed after administering BEZ235 (Fig. 2). At the beginning of the experiment, body weights were similar between groups. One week after carcinogenic induction, there was an expected non-significant decrease in body weight due to exposure to MNU. Weight loss is a side effect that could be relate to the BEZ administration. The drugs did not affect testis, adrenal, kidney, and dorsolateral prostate weight (data not shown). Serum levels of testosterone decreased only in the AB group, while DHT levels decreased in all treatment groups, especially the AB group (Fig. 3). These results show that abiraterone effectively decreased steroidogenesis.
Abiraterone Acetate and BEZ235 Inhibit the Growth of Prostate Lesions
We examined the occurrence of hyperplastic lesions (atypical hyperplasia and reactive hyperplasia), inflammatory disorders (intraluminal and periductal infiltrates), premalignant lesions (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia—PIN), and malignant lesions (microinvasive carcinoma and adenocarcinoma).
Our results showed a high incidence of histopathologic lesions on the dorsolateral prostate. Inflammatory disorders were frequent in this lobe, suggesting a greater propensity for the development of inflammation. Reactive hyperplasia was the most common lesion, and the reduction in a multiplicity of treated groups was similar (Fig. 4a). Inflammatory infiltrates were common in the luminal and stromal compartments. However, a reduction in the multiplicity of these lesions was observed when the drugs were administered either alone or in combination (Fig. 4b, c).
In general, the control group had the highest number and incidence of lesions, mainly premalignant and malignant lesions. The groups treated with each drug alone (A and B groups) had more atypical hyperplasia foci than did the control and the AB group (Fig. 4d), but premalignant and malignant lesions decreased (Fig. 4e, f). More importantly, abiraterone and BEZ235 together decreased the number of hyperplastic, premalignant, and malignant lesions. Thus, while in the control group there was a predominance of premalignant and malignant lesions, the drugs could block the growth and progression of the lesions.
Since proliferation and apoptosis control growth or tumor regression, the proliferative and apoptotic index were assessed. Proliferation decreased markedly following the treatments (Fig. 5). Apoptosis increased in the glandular epithelium following treatment with abiraterone with or without BEZ235 (Fig. 5). Interestingly, the drug combination promoted the highest apoptotic indexes, with a significant increase compared to that in group A.
Abiraterone Acetate and BEZ235 Attenuate Inflammatory Responses in the Dorsolateral Prostate
Our study showed frequent inflammatory infiltrates in prostate tissues. Thus, we measured the presence of mast cells and the expression of pro-inflammatory (TNF-α and IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) in the tissues. Mast cell count reduced in the treated groups (Fig. 6). Consistent with the histopathologic data, protein expression analyses showed reduced inflammatory response. TNF-α expression decreased in groups A and AB, while IL-6 expression decreased after treatments, mainly with BEZ235 (Fig. 8). Conversely, only the combination of abiraterone and BEZ235 reduced IL-10 expression (Fig. 8).
Effects of Abiraterone Acetate and BEZ235 on AKT and AR Signaling
Since abiraterone acetate and BEZ235 act on androgen and the PI3K/Akt pathways, respectively, the effects on androgen receptor and mTOR and PI3K-mediated signaling were assessed by measuring the expression level of the total and activated forms of their effectors downstream.
Each drug when used as monotherapy or in combination decreased PI3K expression and the activated forms of the androgen receptor (Fig. 7). Treatment with the drugs alone reduced expression of Akt, but after treating with BEZ235, the reduction was more significant (Fig. 7). In addition, BEZ235 decreased the activated forms of Akt. However, abiraterone could also decrease p-AKT (Ser473) expression. The reduction in activated proteins could be the result of a decrease in total Akt expression in the monotherapy groups. Although the expression level of Akt did not change in the AB group, the activated state (T308) decreased its expression, indicating that BEZ235 contributed to this inactivation. Similarly, treatment with BEZ235 alone or in combination with abiraterone resulted in reduced expression of pmTOR, but the expression level of mTOR did not change.
Our examination showed increased apoptotic index following the treatments. Thus, the analysis of the expression of proteins involved in this process, and stimulated by Akt, as shown by the expression of BAD, XIAP, Bcl-2, and FoxO1 (Fig. 8) may clarify the mechanisms for tumor reduction. BAD decreased in the B and AB groups, while pBad, XIAP, Bcl-2, and FoxO1 expression levels decreased in all treated groups. In addition, the expression level of FoxO1 decreased in the A and AB groups.
Discussion
Therapies involving the combination of drugs that act on different pathways to regulate PCa growth have been studied as alternatives to overcome the resistance that monotherapies can cause. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of abiraterone acetate and BEZ235, when used alone or in combination, on carcinogenesis in the dorsolateral lobe of rat prostates. When used alone, the drugs reduced proliferation and elevated cell death, impairing tumor growth. However, their effects significantly improved when used in combination in the initial stages of AR-dependent PCa.
Studies investigating the resistance to abiraterone have reported increased expression of the Cyp17a1 gene and androgen receptors as possible mechanisms [37]. Our data showed that during the treatment period, the drug resistance stage was not achieved since drug monotherapy impaired tumor growth. Androgen deprivation only results in tumor regression in androgen-dependent settings [38]. Since a reduction in tumor growth was shown following androgen inhibition by abiraterone, we can confirm that our model was androgen-dependent. Androgen-dependent tumors commonly express high levels of AR [39, 40]. Thus, the results suggest that the AR expression reduction, in the treated groups, contributed to a decrease in tumor growth. Interestingly, we observed the AR expression reduction after exposure to BEZ235. Our results are consistent with those of Wang et al. [14] where a decrease in AR expression and activity was reported in breast cancer tumors after treatment with BEZ235. The authors suggested that AR-dependent tumors are more responsive to treatment with BEZ235. However, the rationale for these observations is still poorly understood.
Furthermore, studies show that the forkhead transcription factor 1 FOXO1 inhibits androgen and androgen receptor-mediated gene expression and, consequently, suppresses cell proliferation [41]. FoxO transcription factors are involved in several physiological processes, regulated by Akt proteins [42], including cell proliferation and death as well as cell cycle regulation and cancer growth [43]. Akt inhibits FOXO1, which in turn abolishes FOXO1-mediated inhibition of AR, thereby driving carcinogenesis progression. Conversely, inactivation of Akt enables FOXO1 activities [44]. Our study showed an increase in the active form of FOXO1 after BEZ235 exposure, which is consistent with the inactivation of AR and, consequently, with anti-proliferative effects. These findings are consistent with the results of Wang et al. [14]. Although BEZ235 also interferes with the androgenic pathway, the mechanisms are still unknown.
The promotion of cell survival in neoplasms favors malignancy and represents the mainstay of tumor progression in PCa. The Akt pathway is mainly involved in the regulation of cell growth and survival in tumorigenesis and is particularly relevant in PCa [45]. To exert its biological effects, Akt must be activated, which is achieved via phosphorylation at PDK1 (Thr308) and mTOR (Ser473) [46]. Consequently, blocking these sites is likely to inhibit Akt activity [8]. Thus, BEZ235 seems to be a good candidate for PCa treatment, since it inhibits PI3K and mTOR simultaneously. The dual inhibition was found in the present study and is consistent with previous studies [16, 47]. Thus, we can suggest that the decrease in Akt, mTOR, and PI3K in the prostate of BEZ235-treated rats was one of the factors responsible for the decrease in cell proliferation observed in those groups.
Unfortunately, inhibition of the AKT pathway and consequent impact on tumor growth was accompanied by side effects, such as weight loss and diarrhea following the use of BEZ. Phase I studies of BEZ235 in metastatic castration-resistant PCa showed adverse effects such as mucositis, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, and weight loss [23, 48]. Due to questionable safety and tolerability profile of BEZ235, the clinical development of the drug as a potential therapy for PCa was discontinued during this study. However, the effectiveness of PI3K pathway blockade in the treatment of PCa can be confirmed by our results and should continue to be investigated.
Akt negatively regulates apoptotic pathways at the pre-mitochondrial level through phosphorylation and modulation of proteins such as BAD, XIAP, and FoxOs [49, 50]. XIAP is part of a family of anti-apoptotic proteins (IAPs), which act by blocking the activity of caspases (3, 7, and 9). XIAP is an Akt substrate, and the interaction results in the phosphorylation of XIAP and consequently blocks auto-ubiquitination, which inhibits apoptosis via caspases. Overexpression of XIAP is related to the growth and progression of tumors, while its reduction favors activation of the caspase cascade, increasing cell death [49, 51]. Phosphorylation of FOXO by Akt leads to its inhibition and, consequently, prevents intrinsic apoptotic pathway activation, thus promoting cell survival [40]. BAD is a pro-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 gene family and plays a role in the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis activation [52, 53]. When dephosphorylated, BAD promotes apoptosis and in the phosphorylated form, stimulates tumor proliferation and growth. Thus, a reduction of BAD expression would be expected in tumor cells. However, studies have shown elevated expression in PCa compared to that in normal epithelium [54]. In this setting, tumor cells would control the stimulation versus inhibition of apoptosis by modulating the phosphorylation of BAD. Thus, the phosphorylated form is predominant in tumors [55].
Our study suggests that increased apoptosis is associated with reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins XIAP, BAD, Bcl-2, and FOXO, which blocks tumor growth. Due to the inhibitory effect of BEZ235 on the Akt pathway, the inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins would only be expected in that group. Interestingly, we observed reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic molecules following abiraterone treatment. A previous study has also reported that abiraterone may modulate pro-apoptotic signals from p21, caspase-3, survivin, and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) [13]. Since abiraterone affects the androgenic pathway, the crosstalk between Akt, TGFβ, and androgen receptor pathways may result in the observed pro-apoptotic stimuli. Based on our results, we can suggest that abiraterone could attenuate anti-apoptotic signals, resulting in increased apoptosis, as confirmed by the histopathologic and protein expression data. Moreover, our study revealed that combining the drugs resulted in a more significant stimulatory effect of apoptosis, which represents a better therapeutic effect on tumor growth.
Employment of new drugs and therapeutic strategies may cause additional side effects. Our data showed weight loss around 7% in animals treated with BEZ235, while other studies have reported weight loss greater than 15% [56]. Studies have shown that the loss of body weight, after oral administration of BEZ235, occurs in a dose-dependent manner in several model systems [14, 57, 58]. Wang and colleagues [14] reported that BEZ235-treated mice consumed less feed compared to the control group. Similarly, another study showed that BEZ235 is associated with reduced food consumption and severely impairs glucose metabolism in rodents. The drug inhibits PI3K isoforms alpha (p110α) and beta (p110β), which are necessary for metabolic processes [59]. When BEZ235 was used in combination with abiraterone, its effect on body weight did not change.
BEZ235 was found to be poorly tolerated in men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant PCa in phase I studies [23, 48]. The authors reported that the most common adverse events were oral mucositis (66.7%), diarrhea (66.7%), nausea (50.0%), anorexia (50.0%), weight loss (50.0%), and musculoskeletal pain (50.0%) [23]. These side effects contributed to the unacceptable toxicity and resulted in discontinuation of the drug for PCa treatment purposes.
Tumor microenvironments are often surrounded by inflammatory cells such as macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and mast cells. The role of mast cells is controversial; while some studies suggest a preventive role regarding tumor growth [60,61,62,63], others suggest that mast cells favor the progression of PCa [64]. Nonomura et al. [65] performed a study with 104 patients and showed a positive correlation between the frequency of mast cells around the tumor and the Gleason score. Consistent with the literature, our data showed a reduction in mast cell counts when tumor growth decreased.
Inflammatory disorders are common histopathologic events associated with tumors [66, 67]. There is increasing evidence that the emergence of inflammation and PIN precedes the development of PCa, suggesting a significant role for inflammation in the early stages of carcinogenesis [67, 68]. Mechanisms potentially involved in this process include the production of cytokines and other factors by inflammatory cells that promote epithelial proliferation, stimulate angiogenesis, and malignancy [67, 69]. In this setting, some pro-inflammatory (TNF-α, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) play an important role in prostate carcinogenesis through signaling pathways such as JAK-STAT, PI3k-AKT, and MAPk-ERK [70,71,72]. Elevated levels of TNF-α correlate with increased proliferation, mortality, and malignancy [73], while high levels of IL-6 are associated with metastases and progression to the hormone refractory stage [74]. IL-10 plays a pleiotropic role, which may suppress or stimulate tumorigenesis, but most studies suggest an anti-inflammatory role [75]. In this context, the reduction in IL-10 expression only occurred with drug treatments, which would be expected to reduce inflammation. Consistent with previous reports, our study showed that inflammatory disorders were related to the development of prostatic lesions. Thus, we can hypothesize that after administering the drugs, the number of inflammatory infiltrates and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased, contributing to the inhibition of tumor growth.
In endocrine-related cancers in general, targeting both hormone receptor and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways has shown promise [14]. In the present study, we showed that both drugs effectively inhibited those pathways, which resulted in anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. However, tumor growth, although slow, persisted after administering the drugs as monotherapy. Atypical hyperplasia was very frequent in the groups treated with the drugs alone, which also showed premalignant and malignant lesions. When the drugs were administered in combination, hyperplastic lesions decreased and, more importantly, tumor progression from a premalignant to the malignant stage was inhibited. In a setting of androgenic inhibition by abiraterone, it is reasonable to assume that the lesions may grow due to AKT activation. In addition, BEZ235 therapy inhibits the AKT pathway by blocking one of the sources of alternative AR activation [76] as well as cell proliferation and survival [46]. However, in this group, the androgenic synthesis was not inhibited, allowing the lesions to grow, even though the expression of the androgen receptor was impaired. The data presented here suggest that the reduction of cell proliferation and survival and the stimulation of apoptosis were more effective when the drugs were combined.
The strategy to block the androgenic and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways represents a good alternative to treat PCa, mainly due to the biological effects reported in the present study. Thus, different drugs, that have a more favorable therapeutic index, should be investigated. Agents targeting specific PI3K isoforms are currently under investigation in early phase clinical trials [23], and may be better tolerated and achieve greater therapeutic efficacy [77]. It remains to be determined what combination of AR and PI3K/AKT inhibition will be both tolerable and clinically active [23].
In conclusion, despite the side effects, the biological response of simultaneous inhibition of the androgenic and PI3K pathways was favorable; the drugs negatively affected tumor growth, and drug combination achieves better therapeutic effect than drug monotherapy. Based on the present results, it is possible to hypothesize that combination therapy could be used also in cases where prostate tumors have not become resistant. However, further studies, based on distinct PI3K inhibitors, are necessary to determine a safe and clinically tolerable schedule and to evaluate whether long-term combination therapies could achieve the same beneficial effects reported in the present study for PCa.
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):134
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
Jain S, Saxena S, Kumar A (2014) Epidemiology of prostate cancer in India. Meta Gene 2:596–605
Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED, Miller G, McLeod DG, Loehrer PJ, Wilding G, Sears K, Culkin DJ, Thompson IM Jr, Bueschen AJ, Lowe BA (1998) Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 339(15):1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199810083391504
Ferraldeschi R, Sharifi N, Auchus RJ, Attard G (2013) Molecular pathways: inhibiting steroid biosynthesis in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19(13):3353–3359. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0931
Bracarda S, de CO, Greco C, Prayer-Galetti T, Valdagni R, Gatta G, de BF, Bartsch G (2005) Cancer of the prostate. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 56(3):379–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.010
Reid AH, Attard G, Barrie E, de Bono JS (2008) CYP17 inhibition as a hormonal strategy for prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol 5(11):610–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1237
Carver BS, Chapinski C, Wongvipat J, Hieronymus H, Chen Y, Chandarlapaty S, Arora VK, Le C, Koutcher J, Scher H, Scardino PT, Rosen N, Sawyers CL (2011) Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 17:575–586
Harris WP, Mostaghel EA, Nelson PS, Montgomery B (2009) Androgen deprivation therapy: progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion. Nat Clin Pract Urol 6(2):76–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1296
Ardiani A, Gameiro SR, Kwilas AR, Donahue RN, Hodge JW (2014) Androgen deprivation therapy sensitizes prostate cancer cells to T-cell killing through androgen receptor dependent modulation of the apoptotic pathway. Oncotarget 5(19):9335–9348. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2429
Wadia R, Petrylak DP (2014) New developments in the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer. Asian J Androl 16(4):555–560. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.127824
Goldberg T, Berrios-Colon E (2013) Abiraterone (Zytiga), a novel agent for the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer. P T 38(1):23–26
Grossebrummel H, Peter T, Mandelkow R, Weiss M, Muzzio D, Zimmermann U et al (2016) Cytochrome P450 17A1 inhibitor abiraterone attenuates cellular growth of prostate cancer cells independently from androgen receptor signaling by modulation of oncogenic and apoptotic pathways. Int J Oncol 48(2):793–800. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3274
Wang Y, Yu Q, He X, Romigh T, Altemus J, Eng C (2014) Activation of AR sensitizes breast carcinomas to NVP-BEZ235’s therapeutic effect mediated by PTEN and KLLN upregulation. Mol Cancer Ther 13(2):517–527. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0655
Serra V, Markman B, Scaltriti M et al (2008) NVP-BEZ235, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, prevents PI3K signaling and inhibits the growth of cancer cells with activating PI3K mutations. Cancer Res 68:8022
Maira SM, Stauffer F, Brueggen J, Furet P, Schnell C, Fritsch C, Brachmann S, Chène P, De Pover A, Schoemaker K, Fabbro D, Gabriel D et al (2008) Identifcation and characterization of NVP-BEZ234, a new orally available dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with potent in vivo antitumor activity. Mol Can Ther 7(7):1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0017
Baumann P, Mandl-Weber S, Oduncu F, Schmidmaier R (2009) The novel orally bioavailable inhibitor of phosphoinositol-3-kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin NVP-BEZ235, inhibits growth and proliferation in multiple myeloma. Exp Cell Res 315:485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.11.007
Jia S, Gao X, Lee SH, Maira SM, Wu X, Stack EC, Signoretti S, Loda M, Zhao JJ, Roberts TM (2013) Opposing effects of androgen deprivation and targeted therapy on prostate cancer prevention. Cancer Discov 3(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0262
Marques RB, Aghai A, de Ridder CM, Stuurman D, Hoeben S, Boer A, Ellston RP, Barry ST, Davies BR, Trapman J, van Weerden WM (2015) High efficacy of combination therapy using PI3K/AKT inhibitors with androgen deprivation in prostate cancer preclinical models. Eur Urol 67(6):1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.053
Sawyer C, Sturge J, Bennett DC, O’Hare MJ, Allen WE, Bain J et al (2003) Regulation of breast cancer cell chemotaxis by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110delta. Cancer Res 63(7):1667–1675
Hancox U, Cosulich S, Hanson L, Trigwell C, Lenaghan C, Ellston R, Dry H, Crafter C, Barlaam B, Fitzek M, Smith PD, Ogilvie D, D'Cruz C, Castriotta L, Wedge SR, Ward L, Powell S, Lawson M, Davies BR, Harrington EA, Foster E, Cumberbatch M, Green S, Barry ST (2015) Inhibition of PI3Kβ signaling with AZD8186 inhibits growth of PTEN-deficient breast and prostate tumors alone and in combination with docetaxel. Mol Cancer Ther 14(1):48–58. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0406
Yasumizu Y, Miyajima A, Kosaka T, Miyazaki Y, Kikuchi E, Oya M (2014) Dual phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 sensitizes docetaxel in castration resistant prostate cancer. J Urol 191(1):227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.101
Wei XX, Hsieh AC, Kim W, Friedlander T, Lin AM, Louttit M, Ryan CJ (2017) A phase I study of abiraterone acetate combined with BEZ235, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Oncologist 22(5):503–e43. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0432
Bemis DL, Capodice JL, Desai M, Buttyan R, Katz AE (2004) A concentrated aglycone isoflavone preparation (GCP) that demonstrates potent anti-prostate cancer activity in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 10(15):5282–5292. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0828
Rhodes N, Heerding DA, Duckett DR, Eberwein DJ, Knick VB, Lansing TJ, McConnell RT, Gilmer TM, Zhang SY, Robell K, Kahana JA, Geske RS, Kleymenova EV, Choudhry AE, Lai Z, Leber JD, Minthorn EA, Strum SL, Wood ER, Huang PS, Copeland RA, Kumar R (2008) Characterization of an Akt kinase inhibitor with potent pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity. Cancer Res 68(7):2366–2374. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5783
Kaarbo M, Mikkelsen OL, Malerod L, Qu S, Lobert VH, Akgul G et al (2010) PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is dominant over androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells. Cell Oncol 32(1-2):11–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/CLO-2009-0487
Squillace RM, Miller D, Wardwell SD, Wang F, Clackson T, Rivera VM (2012) Synergistic activity of the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus and the antiandrogen bicalutamide in prostate cancer models. Int J Oncol 41(2):425–432. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1487
Edlind MP, Hsieh AC (2014) PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling in prostate cancer progression and androgen deprivation therapy resistance. Asian J Androl 16(3):378–386. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122876
Mulholland DJ, Tran LM, Li Y, Cai H, Morim A, Wang S, Plaisier S, Garraway IP, Huang J, Graeber TG, Wu H (2011) Cell autonomous role of PTEN in regulating castration-resistant prostate cancer growth. Cancer Cell 19(6):792–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.05.006
Thomas C, Lamoureux F, Crafter C, Davies BR, Beraldi E, Fazli L, Kim S, Thaper D, Gleave ME, Zoubeidi A (2013) Synergistic targeting of PI3K/AKT-pathway and androgen-receptor axis significantly delays castration-resistant prostate cancer progression in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 12(11):2342–2355. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0032
Ma BB, Lui VW, Hui CW, Lau CP, Wong CH, Hui EP, Ng MH, Cheng SH, Tsao SW, Tsang CM, Cheung CS, Ho K, Chan AT (2014) Preclinical evaluation of the mTOR-PI3K inhibitor BEZ235 in nasopharyngeal cancer models. Cancer Lett 343(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.007
Marone R, Erhart D, Mertz AC, Bohnacker T, Schnell C, Cmiljanovic V, Stauffer F, Garcia-Echeverria C, Giese B, Maira SM, Wymann MP (2009) Targeting melanoma with dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Mol Cancer Res 7(4):601–613. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0366
Fuereder T, Wanek T, Pflegerl P, Jaeger-Lansky A, Hoeflmayer D, Strommer S, Kuntner C, Wrba F, Werzowa J, Hejna M, Müller M, Langer O, Wacheck V (2011) Gastric cancer growth control by BEZ235 in vivo does not correlate with PI3K/mTOR target inhibition but with [18F]FLT uptake. Clin Cancer Res 17:5322–5332
Bosland MC, Tuomari DL, Elwell MR, Shirai T, Ward JM, McConnel RF (1998) Proliferative lesions of the prostate and other accessory sex glands in male rats. Guides for Toxicologic Pathology, Washington, DC
Gonçalves BF, Campos SGP, Zanetoni C, Scarano WR, Falleiros Júnior LR, Amorin RL, Góes RM, Taboga SR (2013) A new proposed rodent model of chemically induced prostate carcinogenesis: distinct time-course prostate cancer progression in the dorsolateral and ventral lobes. Prostate 73(11):1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22669
Shappell SB, Thomas GV, Roberts RL, Herbert R, Ittmann MM, Rubin MA, Humphrey PA, Sundberg JP, Rozengurt N, Barrios R, Ward JM, Cardiff RD (2004) Prostate pathology of genetically engineered mice: definitions and classification. The consensus report from the Bar Harbor meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res 64(6):2270–2305. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-0946
Mostaghel EA, Marck BT, Plymate SR, Vessella RL, Balk S, Matsumoto AM, Nelson PS, Montgomery RB (2011) Resistance to CYP17A1 inhibition with abiraterone in castration-resistant prostate cancer: induction of steroidogenesis and androgen receptor splice variants. Clin Cancer Res 17(18):5913–5925. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0728
Huggins C, Hodges CV (1941) Studies on prostate cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res 1:293–297
Bentel JM, Pickering MA, Pollard M, Clements JA, Tilley WD (1999) Androgen receptor expression in primary prostate cancers of Lobund-Wistar rats and in tumor-derived cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 35(10):655–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-999-0106-5
Liao Z, Boileau TW, Erdaman JW Jr, Clinton SK (2005) Increased phospho-AKT is associated with loss of the androgen receptor during the progression of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced prostate carcinogenesis in rats. Prostate 64(2):186–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20224
Zhao Y, Tindall DJ, Huang H (2014) Modulation of androgen receptor by FOXA1 and FOXO1 factors in prostate cancer. Int J Biol Sci 10(6):614–619. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.8389
Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS, Anderson MJ, Arden KC, Blenis J, Greenberg ME (1999) Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96(6):857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80595-4
Tzivion G, Dobson M, Ramakrishnan G (2011) FoxO transcription factors; regulation by AKT and 14-3-3 proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813(11):1938–1945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.06.002
Fan W, Yanase T, Morinaga H, Okabe T, Nomura M, Daitoku H et al (2007) Insulin-like growth factor 1/insulin signaling activates androgen signaling through direct interactions of Foxo1 with androgen receptor. J Biol Chem 282(10):7329–7338. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M610447200
Schmitz M, Grignard G, Margue C, Dippel W, Capesius C, Mossong J, Nathan M, Giacchi S, Scheiden R, Kieffer N (2007) Complete loss of PTEN expression as a possible early prognostic marker for prostate cancer metastasis. Int J Cancer 120(6):1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22359
Vivanco I, Sawyers CL (2002) The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:489−501
Brachmann SM, Hofmann I, Schnell C, Fritsch C, Wee S, Lane H, Wang S, Garcia-Echeverria C, Maira SM (2009) Specific apoptosis induction by the dual PI3K/mTor inhibitor NVPBEZ235 in HER2 amplified and PIK3CA mutant breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(52):22299–22304. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905152106
Massard C, Chi KN, Castellano D, de Bono J, Gravis G, Dirix L, Machiels JP, Mita A, Gonzalez BM, Turri S, Maier J, Csonka D, Chakravartty A, Fizazi K (2017) Phase Ib dose-finding study of abiraterone acetate plus buparlisib (BKM120) or dactolisib (BEZ235) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 76:36–44
Dan HC, Sun M, Kaneko S, Feldman RI, Nicosia SV, Wang HG, Tsang BK, Cheng JQ (2004) Akt phosphorylation and stabilization of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP). J Biol Chem 279(7):5405–5412. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312044200
Zhang X, Tang N, Hadden TJ, Rishi AK (2011) Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813(11):1978–1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.010
Asselin E, Mills GB, Tsang BK (2001) XIAP regulates Akt activity and caspase-3-dependent cleavage during cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian epithelial cancer cells. Cancer Res 61(5):1862–1868
Yang E, Jockel J, Zha J, Korsmeyer S (1994) Bad, a new bcl-2 family member, heterodimerizes with bcl-2 and bcl-XL in vivo and promotes cell death. Blood 84(suppl 1):373
Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ (2004) Cell death: critical control points. Cell 116(2):205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00046-7
Royuela M, Arenas MI, Bethencourt FR, Sanchez-Chapado M, Fraile B et al (2001) Immunoexpressions of p21, Rb, mcl-1 and bad gene products in normal, hyperplastic and carcinomatous human prostates. Eur Cytokine Netw 12(4):654–663
Smith AJ, Karpova Y, D'Agostino R Jr, Willingham M, Kulik G (2009) Expression of the Bcl-2 protein BAD promotes prostate cancer growth. PLoS One 13:e6224
Netland IA, Førde HE, Sleire L, Leiss L, Rahman MA, Skeie BS, Gjerde CH, Enger PØ, Goplen D (2016) Dactolisib (NVP-BEZ235) toxicity in murine brain tumour models. BMC Cancer 16:657. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2712-4
Cao P, Maira SM, Garcia-Echeverria C, Hedley DW (2009) Activity of a novel, dual PI3-kinase/mTor inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 against primary human pancreatic cancers grown as orthotopic xenografts. Br J Cancer 100(8):1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604995
Diaz-Gonzalez R, Kuhlmann FM, Galan-Rodriguez C, Madeira da Silva L, Saldivia M, Karver CE et al (2011) The susceptibility of trypanosomatid pathogens to PI3/mTOR kinase inhibitors affords a new opportunity for drug repurposing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(8):e1297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001297
Smith GC, Ong WK, Rewcastle GW, Kendall JD, Han W, Shepherd PR (2012) Effects of acutely inhibiting PI3K isoforms and mTOR on regulation of glucose metabolism in vivo. Biochem J 442(1):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111913
Farram E, Nelson DS (1980) Mouse mast cells as anti-tumor effector cells. Cell Immunol 55(2):294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8749(80)90162-8
Henderson WR, Chi EY, Jong EC, Klebanoff SJ (1981) Mast cell-mediated tumor-cell cytotoxicity. Role of the peroxidase system. J Exp Med 153(3):520–533. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.153.3.520
Benyon RC, Imai T, Abe T, Befus D (1991) Mast cell heterogeneity: protein composition, biosynthesis and mRNA characterization. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 94(1–4):218–219. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235364
Taverna G, Giusti G, Seveso M et al (2013) Mast cells as a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Dis Markers 35(6):711–720
Nakai Y, Nelson WG, DeMarzo AM (2007) The dietary charred meat carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine acts as both a tumor initiator and promoter in the rat ventral prostate. Cancer Res 67(3):1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1336
Nonomura N, Takayama H, Nishimura K, Oka D, Nakai Y, Shiba M, Tsujimura A, Nakayama M, Aozasa K, Okuyama A (2007) Decreased number of mast cells infiltrating into needle biopsy specimens leads to a better prognosis of prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 97(7):952–956. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603962
Bernoulli J, Yatkin E, Laakso A, Anttinen M, Bosland M, Vega K, Kallajoki M, Santti R, Pylkkänen L (2008) Histopathological evidence for an association of inflammation with ductal pin-like lesions but not with ductal adenocarcinoma in the prostate of the noble rat. Prostate 68(7):728–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20719
De Marzo AM, Platz EA, Sutcliffe S, Xu J, Grönberg H, Drake CG, Nakai Y, Isaacs WB, Nelson WG (2007) Inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 7(4):56–69
Stock D, Groome PA, Siemens DR (2008) Inflammation and prostate cancer: a future target for prevention and therapy? Urol Clin N Am 35(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2007.09.006
Lucia MS, Torkko KC (2004) Inflammation as a target for prostate cancer chemoprevention: pathological and laboratory rationale. J Urol 171(2 Pt 2):S30–S34 discussion S35
Culig Z (2014) Proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in prostate carcinogenesis. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2(3):231–238
Taniguchi K, Karin M (2014) IL-6 and related cytokines as the critical lynchpins between inflammation and cancer. Semin Immunol 26(1):54–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.001
Torrealba N, Rodríguez-Berriguete G, Fraile B, Olmedilla G, Martínez-Onsurbe P, Guil-Cid M, Paniagua R, Royuela M (2017) Expression of several cytokines in prostate cancer: correlation with clinical variables of patients. Relationship with biochemical progression of the malignance. Cytokine 89:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.08.008
Michalaki V, Syrigos K, Charles P, Waxman J (2004) Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-a correlate with clinicopathological features and patient survival in patients with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 90(12):2312–2316. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601814
Culig Z, Puhr M (2012) Interleukin-6: a multifunctional targetable cytokine in human prostate cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 360(1-2):52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.033
Mannino MH, Zhu Z, Xiao H, Bai Q, Wakefield MR, Fang Y (2015) The paradoxical role of IL-10 in immunity and cancer. Cancer Lett 367(2):103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.009
Wen Y, Hu MC, Makino K, Spohn B, Bartholomeusz G, Yan DH, Hung MC (2000) HER-2/neu promotes androgen-independent survival growth of prostate cancer cells through the Akt pathway. Cancer Res 60(24):6841–6845
Thorpe LM, Yuzugullu H, Zhao JJ et al (2015) PI3K in cancer: divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Cancer 15:7–24
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the technical assistance of José Eduardo Bozano, Prof. Dra Janete Aparecida, Anselmo Franci, and Dr. Ruither de Oliveira Gomes Carolino.
Funding
This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation–FAPESP (Proc. N. 2013/22604-5; 2014/14202-7).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, B.F., de Campos, S.G.P., Fávaro, W.J. et al. Combinatorial Effect of Abiraterone Acetate and NVP-BEZ235 on Prostate Tumor Progression in Rats. HORM CANC 9, 175–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-018-0323-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-018-0323-z