Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing analytical methods for estimating water inflow to tunnels in the presence of discontinuity areas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are various methods for calculating the inflow of water into excavated tunnels in rock formations, including empirical, analytical, and numerical methods. Analytical equations are widely used due to their simplicity and reliance on assumptions. Results obtained using analytical equations are highly dependent on the tunnel geometry and environmental conditions. Hence, this study employed finite element numerical modeling to simulate the effects of various factors, including fault distance from the tunnel, permeability coefficient, fault width, tunnel radius, rock mass permeability, and groundwater level, on the water inflow into the tunnel. The analytical method was then used to estimate the water inflow, and the results were compared with the numerical modeling outputs. Subsequently, modified equations were developed to estimate the water inflow under different conditions, including cases where the fault intersects or does not intersect the tunnel. The obtained values were within an acceptable range, indicating the validity of the proposed models. Furthermore, the histograms of the residuals for both models showed a good fit. To validate the proposed models, the analytical method and the proposed equations were used to estimate the water inflow into the Amirkabir tunnel, respectively. The results showed that the values obtained using the new equations were closer to the actual values than those obtained using the analytical method. This study highlights the importance of considering various factors in estimating the water inflow into rock tunnels and provides new equations that can improve the accuracy of such estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Aalianvari A (2017) Combination of engineering geological data and numerical modeling results to classify the tunnel route based on the groundwater seepage. Geomech Eng 13:671–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryafar A, Doulati Ardejani F, Singh RN (2009) Numerical modeling of groundwater inflow from a confined aquifer into Sangan open pit mine, northeast Iran. Geomech Geoengin Int J 4:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang S-H, Jeon S-W, Kwon S-K (2012) Modeling the hydraulic characteristics of a fractured rock mass with correlated fracture length and aperture: application in the underground research tunnel at Kaeri. Nucl Eng Technol 44:639–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25:861–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bobet A (2010) Numerical methods in geomechanics. Arab J Sci Eng (Springer Sci. Bus. Media BV) 35

  • Butscher C (2012) Steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular tunnel. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 32:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesano D (1999) Prediction of groundwater flows into underground conctructions in hard rocks

  • Chen R, Tonon F (2012) Fracture cluster modeling for groundwater inflow prediction into rock tunnels using geostatistics, in: GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering. pp. 2372–2381

  • Coli N, Pranzini G, Alfi A, Boerio V (2008) Evaluation of rock-mass permeability tensor and prediction of tunnel inflows by means of geostructural surveys and finite element seepage analysis. Eng Geol 101:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Tani M (2003) Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 18:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadian H, Katibeh H (2017) New empirical model to evaluate groundwater flow into circular tunnel using multiple regression analysis. Int J Min Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadian H, Nikvar-Hassani A (2019a) Water flow into tunnels in discontinuous rock: a short critical review of the analytical solution of the art. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:3833–3849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1348-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadian H, Hassani AN, Katibeh H (2016) Groundwater inflow assessment to Karaj Water Conveyance tunnel, northern Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0995-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadian H, Katibeh H (2015) Effect of model dimension in numerical simulation on assessment of water inflow to tunnel in discontinues rock

  • Farhadian H, Nikvar-Hassani A (2019) Water flow into tunnels in discontinuous rock: a short critical review of the analytical solution of the art. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1348-9

  • Farhadian H, Aalianvari A, Katibeh H (2012) Optimization of analytical equations of groundwater seepage into tunnels: a case study of Amirkabir tunnel. J Geol Soc India 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-012-0122-z

  • Farhadian H, Katibeh H, Huggenberger P (2016a) Empirical model for estimating groundwater flow into tunnel in discontinuous rock masses. Environ Earth Sci 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5332-z

  • Farhadian H, Katibeh H, Huggenberger P, Butscher C (2016b) Optimum model extent for numerical simulation of tunnel inflow in fractured rock. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.014

  • Farhadian H, Salehzadeh MH, Nikvar-Hassani A (2021) Model dimension effect in DEM and FEM simulations for assessment of water inflow into a tunnel, in: ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. ARMA, p. ARMA-2021.

  • Fernandez G, Moon J (2010) Excavation-induced hydraulic conductivity reduction around a tunnel—Part 1: guideline for estimate of ground water inflow rate. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 25:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Ground water contamination. Groundwater. Ontario. Canada 383–456

  • Gattinoni P, Scesi L (2010) An empirical equation for tunnel inflow assessment: application to sedimentary rock masses. Hydrogeol J 18:1797–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE, Moye DG, Van Schalkwyk A, Javandel I (1964) Ground water inflows during tunnel driving. University of California, College of Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer RE (1995) Estimating rock tunnel water inflow, in: Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Society for mining, metallogy and exploration. INC, pp. 41–60.

  • Holmøy KH, Nilsen B (2014) Significance of geological parameters for predicting water inflow in hard rock tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indraratna B, Ranjith P (1998) Effects of boundary conditions and boundary block size on inflow to an underground excavation—sensitivity analysis. IMWA Proceedings, Johannesbg

  • Jing L (2003) A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:283–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing L, Hudson JA (2002) Numerical methods in rock mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsrud K (2001) Water control when tunneling under areas in the Olso region. NFF Publ 12:4–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Király L (1969) Anisotropie et hétérogénéité de la perméabilité dans les calcaires fissurés: avec 3 figures. Eclogae Geol Helv 62:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Király L (1978) La notion d’unité hydrogéologique dans le Jura (essai de définition)

  • Lei S (1999) An analytical solution for steady flow into a Ttonnel. Groundwater 37:23–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Lee C, Yu J (2000) Analysis of groundwater seepage of tunnels in fractured rock. J Chinese Inst Eng 23:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki MR (2018) Groundwater Seepage Rate (GSR); a new method for prediction of groundwater inflow into jointed rock tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 71:505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maleki Z, Farhadian H, Nikvar-Hassani A (2020) Geological hazards in tunnelling: the example of gelas water conveyance tunnel, Iran. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 54. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2019-114

  • Moeini H, Farhadian H, Nikvar-Hassani A (2018) Determination of the optimum sealing method for Azad pumped storage dam considering seepage analysis. Arab J Geosci 11:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon J, Fernandez G (2010) Effect of excavation-induced groundwater level drawdown on tunnel inflow in a jointed rock mass. Eng Geol 110:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon J, Jeong S (2011) Effect of highly pervious geological features on ground-water flow into a tunnel. Eng Geol 117:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikvar Hassani A, Katibeh H, Farhadian H (2015) Numerical analysis of steady-state groundwater inflow into Tabriz line 2 metro tunnel, northwestern Iran, with special consideration of model dimensions. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0802-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikvar Hassani A, Farhadian H, Katibeh H (2018) A comparative study on evaluation of steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular shallow tunnel. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.019

  • Oda M, Hatsuyama Y (1985) Permeability tensor for jointed rock masses. In: International Symposium on Fundamentals of Rock Joints. pp. 303–312

  • Pan Y-H, Qi J-R, Zhang J-F, Peng Y-X, Chen C, Ma H-N, Ye C (2022) A comparative study on steady-state water inflow into a circular underwater tunnel with an excavation damage zone. Water 14:3154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli Maleki M (2018) Groundwater Seepage Rate (GSR); a new method for prediction of groundwater inflow into jointed rock tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.006

  • Samardzioska T, Popov V (2005) Numerical comparison of the equivalent continuum, non-homogeneous and dual porosity models for flow and transport in fractured porous media. Adv Water Resour 28:235–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCE Company (2005) Site hydrogeology reports for KRJ project

  • Shahbazi A, Chesnaux R, Saeidi A (2021) A new combined analytical-numerical method for evaluating the inflow rate into a tunnel excavated in a fractured rock mass. Eng Geol 283:106003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DT (1969) Anisotropie permeability of fractured media. Water Resour Res 5:1273–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Huang Y, Shen H, Jiang Y, Zhou Z (2022) An analytical method for predicting the groundwater inflow to tunnels in a fractured aquifer. Hydrogeol J 30:1279–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su K, Zhou Y, Wu H, Shi C, Zhou L (2017) An analytical method for groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel. Groundwater 55. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12513

  • Zhou CB, Sharma RS, Chen YF, Rong G (2008) Flow–stress coupled permeability tensor for fractured rock masses. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1289–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu R, Xia Q, Zhang Q, Cao C, Zhang X, Mao B (2023) Dynamic parameter calibration of an analytical model to predict transient groundwater inflow into a tunnel. Water 15:2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoorabadi M, Saydam S, Timms W, Hebblewhite B (2012) Sensitivity analysis of effective parameters on the permeability of rock mass around a tunnel. In: ISRM International Symposium-Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium. ISRM, p. ISRM-ARMS7

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

    Hadi Farhadian & Farhad Bahmani Shahraki

Authors
  1. Hadi Farhadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farhad Bahmani Shahraki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors wrote the main manuscript text, prepared figures and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Farhadian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farhadian, H., Bahmani Shahraki, F. Enhancing analytical methods for estimating water inflow to tunnels in the presence of discontinuity areas. Environ Earth Sci 83, 339 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11651-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11651-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation