Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landslide susceptibility mapping along Rishikesh–Badrinath national highway (Uttarakhand) by applying multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslides occur when masses of rock, soil, or debris move down slopes due to various factors, such as heavy rainfall, earthquakes, or human activities, and they are among the most destructive hazards in the hilly regions posing serious threats to life and property. Identifying landslide prone areas is an essential step in minimizing losses and preparing mitigation plans. Therefore, in the present study, the landslide susceptibility mapping was conducted along Rishikesh–Badrinath national highway, using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). Prior to performing landslide susceptibility mapping, a landslide inventory was prepared using high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery along with Google Earth image. In all total 156 landslides adjacent to the highway were identified and mapped in 2022. Afterwards, relative weights were assigned to a host of nine controlling and triggering factors using AHP. Subsequently, each factor was reclassified and converted to thematic layer and finally overlaid in the GIS environment for the generation of landslide susceptibility map. Furthermore, the generated landslide susceptibility map was validated with the landslide inventory of the region. Consequently, the validation revealed an AUC value of 0.81. Later, the created landslide susceptibility map was classified in five sub-classes of very low, low, moderate, high, and very high landslide susceptible zone. About 27% of the area was found to be highly landslide susceptible. This section is characterized with high slope and rainfall. The current study offers a comprehensive identification of landslide susceptible zones along Rishikesh–Badrinath national highway. The landslide susceptible zone map of this area may help in the preparedness and development of various mitigation plans for making disaster governance better. Additionally, landslide susceptibility map could be used as a guideline for the formulation of disaster management plan to avoid loss and reduce risk to landslide by the concerned authority. Moreover, this information can be used to raise awareness among the local people about the risk associated with the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are held by the corresponding author and can be made available upon request.

References

  • Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary, review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58(1):21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32(4):269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R, Kumar R, Lakshmanan K, Parida S, Neethu S (2015) Landslide hazard zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic approach, a case study of Lachung Valley, Sikkim. Geoenviron Disasters 2(6):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhaga S, Ramesh V (2014) Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping in Ghat Road Section of Kolli Hills, India. J Mt Sci 11(5):1308–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2618-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreo B, Vías J, Durán JJ, Jiménez P, López-Geta JA, Carrasco F (2008) Methodology for ground water recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeology 16(5):911–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aniya M (1985) Ann Assoc Am Geogr 1985(75):102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Shah HR, Hameed N (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas. Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 9(4):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera S, Upadhyay VK, Guru B, Oommen T (2021) Landslide inventory and susceptibility models considering the landslide typology using deep learning: Himalayas, India. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04731-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreno ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S, Kienberger S, Keiler M, Alexander D, Zeil P, Welle T (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F (1992) Uncertainty in assessing landslide hazard and risk. ITC J 2:172–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2815–2831. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalkias C, Ferentinou M, Polykretis C (2014) GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping on the Peloponnese, Peninsula, Greece. Geosciences 4(3):176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla A, Chawla S, Pasupuleti S, Rao ACS, Sarkar K, Dwivedi R (2018) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Darjeeling Himalayas, India. Hindawi Adv Civ Engg 2018:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantin M, Bednarik M, Jurchescu MC (2011) Vlaicu M (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the Sibiciu Basin (Romania). Environ Earth Sci 63:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0724-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Quart 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieu TB, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2015) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikshit A, Sarkar R, Pradhan B, Segoni S, Alamri AM (2020) Rainfall induced landslide studies in Indian Himalayan region: a critical review. Appl Sci 10:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou J, Dieu TB, Yunus AP, Jia K, Song X, Revhaug I, Xia H, Zhu Z (2015) Optimization of causative factors for landslide susceptibility evaluation using remote sensing and GIS Data in parts of Niigata, Japan. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey)”. Eng Geol 75(3–4):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Whitt G, Miner A, Flentje PN (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Aust Geomech J 42(1):13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman EH (1993) Facts and fiction about the analytic hierarchy process. Math Comput Modell 17(4–5):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90172-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gariano SL, Guzzetti F (2016) Landslides in a changing climate. Earth Sci Rev 162:227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma F, Raghuvanshi TK, Ayenew T, Hailemariam T (2015) Landslide hazard zonation in Ada Berga district, Central Ethiopia—a GIS based statistical approach. J Geomat 9(i):25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez B, Jones PJ (2010) Research methods in geography—a critical introduction. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Jankowski P, Gessler PE (2006) A heuristic approach for mapping landslide hazard by integrating fuzzy logic with analytic hierarchy process. Control Cybern 35:121–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multiscale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M (2006) Landslide hazard assessment in the Collazzone area, Umbria, Central Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamza T, Raghuvanshi TK (2017) GIS based landslide hazard evaluation and zonation—a case from Jeldu District, Central Ethiopia. J King Saud Univ Sci 29(2):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque U, da Silva PF, Devoli G, Pilz J, Zhao B, Khaloua A, Wilopo W, Andersen P, Lu P, Lee J, Yamamoto T, Keellings D, Wu JW, Glass GE (2019) The human cost of global warming: Deadly landslides and their triggers (1995–2014). Sci Total Environ 682:673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Dieu TB (2015) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. CATENA 133:266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, JN (1995) Landslide hazard assessment. keynote paper. In: Bell DH (ed) Landslides, Proceeding of 6th International Symposium on Landslides, Christchurch, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1805–1841

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: synthesis report, contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, p 151

  • Jensen JR (2005) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlon S, Chandel VBS, Brar KK (2014) Landslides in Himalayan Mountains: A Study of Himachal Pradesh, India. In J IT Eng Appl Sci Res (IJIEASR) 3(9):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Sharma S (2014) Rainfall thresholds for prediction of shallow landslides around Chamoli-Joshimath region, Garhwal Himalayas, India. Landslides 11:629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85:347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur H, Sarkar R, Gupta S, Parkash S, Thapa R, Meena SR (2022) The vulnerability of human population to landslide disaster: a case study of sikkim Himalayas. Springer, pp 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7314-6_14

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Q, Wang Y, Liu T, Zhu Y, Sui Q (2017) The vulnerability of people to landslides: a case study on the relationship between the casualties and volume of landslides in China. Int J Env Res Pub He 14(2):212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick J, Singh RK, AlAwadh MA, Islam S, Khan RA, Qureshi MN (2018) GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decision-making techniques in the Abha Watershed, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 77:276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7451-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha TR, Roy P, Jain N (2021) Geospatial landslide inventory of India— an insight into occurrence and exposure on a national scale. Landslides 18:2125–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2009) Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping and its validation in part of Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, India, using binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve method. Landslides 6:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt M, Fink M, Tunschel H (2015) Landslide susceptibility analysis in central Vietnam based on an incomplete landslide inventory: comparison of a new method to calculate weighting factors by means of bivariate statistics. Geomorphology 234:80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahayo L, Kalisa E, Maniragaba A, Xavier F, Nshimiyimana (2019) Comparison of analytical hierarchy process and certain factor models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Rwanda. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(7):885–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00575-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Proceedings of the Vienna conference on HydroGIS 96: application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS Pub. No. 235, pp 559–566.

  • Pande A, Joshi RC, Jalal DS (2002) Selected landslide types in the Central Himalaya: their relation to geological structure and anthropogenic activities. Environmentalist 22:269–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardeshi SD, Autade SE, Pardeshi SS (2013) Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques. Springer plus 2:523. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN (2010) On the impact of climate change and population growth on the occurrence of fatal landslides in South, East and SE Asia. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 43(4):487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poonam RN, Kumar P, Ray C, Bisht P, Bagri DS, Wasson RJ, Sundriyal Y (2017) Identification of landslide-prone zones in the geomorphically and climatically sensitive Mandakini valley, (central Himalaya), for disaster governance using the weights of evidence method. Geomorphology 284:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Fatemi Aghda SM (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards 69:749–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0728-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25:747–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(12):4164–4177. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2050328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi TK, Ibrahim J, Ayalew D (2014) Slope stability susceptibility evaluation parameter (SSEP) rating scheme—an approach for landslide hazard zonation. J Earth Sci 99:595–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao BU, Verma R (2017) Micro-zonation of landslide hazards between Aizawl City and Lengpui Airport Mizoram, India. Using Geo-Inform Int J Basic Appl Sci IJBAS-IJENS 17(5):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority, setting resource allocation. McGraw Hill International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Mehrotra GS (1995) Landslide hazard zonation: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Mt Res Dev 15(4):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Sharma S (2015) Landslide hazard assessment in the upper Alaknanda valley of Indian Himalayas. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 6(4):308–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.847501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster R (1996) Socioeconomic significance of landslides. Landslides: investigation and mitigation: special report, vol 247. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, pp 12–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shano L, Raghuvanshi TK, Meten M (2020) Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques—a review. Geoenviron Disasters 7(8):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VK (2020) Landslides in India: issues and perspective. J Geol Soc India 95:110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1393-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi P (2019) Hazards, disasters, and risks. Disaster Risk Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6689-5_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Pal S, Kanungo DP (2020) An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility–vulnerability– risk assessment of building infrastructures in hilly regions of India. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00804-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svalova VB, Zaalishvili VB, Ganapathy GP, Nikolaev AV, Melkov DA (2019) Landslide risk in mountain areas. Geol South of Russ (in Russ) 10(2):110–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrini CT, Visintainer P (1998) Proposal of a method to define areas of landslide hazard and application to an area of the Dolomites, Italy. Eng Geol 50:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2018) Report on Economic Losses, Poverty & Disasters (1998–2017). Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice, natural hazards, 3. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma R (2019) Case study of College Veng Road section landslide Aizawl, Mizoram, India. Senhri J Multidiscipl Stud 4(2):01–06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li W (2017) A GIS-based comparative evaluation of analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Phys Geographys 38:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CJ, Lee SS, Fisher RA, Dickerman LH (1999) A comparison of statistical methods for prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Appl Stoch Models Data Anal 15:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Wu Y, Yang Y, Chen F, Zhang N, Ke Y, Li W (2017) A comparative study on the landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and statistical index models. Arab J Geoscience 10:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Huang X (2018) Trend and spatiotemporal distribution of fatal landslides triggered by non-seismic effects in China. Landslides 15:1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1007-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS), Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India for providing financial support to the project. In addition to this, we are also thankful to European space agency for making satellite data open to public. The authors are also grateful to Geological Survey of India (GSI) for giving accessibility to various geological and lithological data. We are thankful to NASA for providing rainfall data. Further, the authors extend our appreciation to the Department of Geography, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi for providing conducive environment for the research.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS), Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India (Sanction No. NGP/LS/Masood/TPN-34315/2019 (G)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MR: developed the framework of the study and completed the major part of the research. MAS: gave the geological account of the study area and all the research was done under his guidance. MSS: has contributed in writing the manuscript. LS and MT also helped in improving the manuscript writing. The contribution of HRN and AS was more in the result analysis. In addition to this, all other co-authors have contributed in the rating of various landslide controlling factors for the preparation of comparison-pair-wise matrix.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Ramiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramiz, M., Siddiqui, M.A., Salman, M.S. et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping along Rishikesh–Badrinath national highway (Uttarakhand) by applying multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Environ Earth Sci 82, 591 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11268-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11268-5

Keywords

Navigation