Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation about rainfall-induced shallow landslides in CYL and TWR watersheds, Taiwan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslides identified from aerial photos and satellite images between 1988 and 2009 in Chenyulan (CYL) and Tsengwen Reservoir (TWR) watersheds in Taiwan were investigated. These watersheds have similar area, but different percentage of landslide area due to their own watershed characteristics and extreme triggers (earthquakes and typhoons). The Chi–Chi earthquake in 1999 increased about 3 % of landslide area in CYL, had obvious influence on rainfall-induced landslides in subsequent 5 years, while the Typhoon Morakot in 2009 increased 2.53 % of landslide area in TWR. The incremental landslide area by rainfalls, especially brought by typhoons indicates that the rainfall-induced shallow landslide depends not only on the rainfall amount but also on intensity. Two quadratic equations of the percentage of incremental landslide areas in terms of the rainfall erosivity factor that is composed of rainfall amount and intensity were developed. The number and size of landslides caused Typhoon Morakot in CYL and TWR were different, but they followed a similar power-law frequency–area distribution. Extreme triggers play the most important roles in the evolution of landslides in these watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1987) Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Phys Rev Lett 59(4):381–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum RL, Godt JW (2010) Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA. Landslides 7:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geograf Annal 62A:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CY, Yu FC, Lin SC, Cheung KW (2007) Discussion of landslide self-organized criticality and the initiation of debris flow. Earth Surf Process Landforms 32:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JC, Huang WS, Jan CD, Yang YH (2012) Recent changes in the number of rainfall events related to debris-flow occurrence in the Chenyulan Stream Watershed, Taiwan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke BA, Burbank DW (2010) Bedrock fracturing, threshold hillslopes, and limits to the magnitude of bedrock landslides. Earth Planet Sci Lett 297:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BD, Znidarcic D (2004) Stability Analyses of Rainfall Induced Landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(4):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Negro PD, Frattini P (2003) Soil slips and debris flows on terraced slopes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier MJ, Glade T (2005) The nature of landslide hazard impact. In: Glade T et al (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, London, pp 43–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM (1991) A simple definition of a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 43:27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadson SJ, Hovius N, Chen H, Dade WB, Lin JC, Hsu ML, Lin CW, Horng MJ, Chen TC, Milliman J, Stark CP (2004) Earthquake-triggered increase in sediment delivery from an active mountain belt. Geology 32:733–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2001) Frequency-volume relation and prediction of rainfall-induced landslides. Eng Geol 59:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deering DW (1978) Rangeland reflectance characteristics measured by aircraft and spacecraft sensors. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, p 338

  • Dhakal AS, Sullivan K (2014) Shallow groundwater response to rainfall on a forested headwater catchment in northern coastal California: implications of topography, rainfall, and throughfall intensities on peak pressure head generation. Hydrol Process 28:446–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrans SR, Kirby JT (2004) Regionalization of extreme precipitation estimates for the Alabama rainfall atlas. J Hydrol 295:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyles RJ, Eyles GO (1982) Recognition of storm damage events. In: Proceedings of eleventh New Zealand geography conference, Wellington, vol 1981, pp 118–123

  • Foster GR, McCool DK, Renard KG, Moldenhauer WC (1981) Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. J Soil Water Conserv 26(6):355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Frattini P, Crosta GB (2013) The role of material properties and landscape morphology on landslide size distribution. Earth Planet Sci Lett 361:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii Y (1969) Frequency distribution of landslides caused by heavy rainfall. J Seismol Soc Jpn 22:244–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Reichenbach P (2002) Power-law correlations of landslide areas in central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 195:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Rossi M (2008a) Distribution of landslides in the Upper Tiber River basin, central Italy. Geomorphology 86:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008b) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Rossi M, Valigi D (2009) Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 279:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga H, Matsumoto Y, Matsutani J, Fujita M, Nishida K, Sakamoto Y (2005) Flow paths, rainfall properties, and antecedent soil moisture controlling lags to peak discharge in a granitic unchanneled catchment. Water Resour Res 41:W12410. doi:10.1029/2005WR004236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haung WS, Jan CD, Yang SY, Wang CS (2010) Analysis of the impacts of Typhoon Morakot on the watershed of Tseng-Wen Reservoir. J Eng Environ 24:63–72 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergarten S (2003) Landslides, sandpiles, and self-organized criticality. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovius N, Stark CP, Allen PA (1997) Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping. Geology 25(3):231–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovius N, Stark CP, Chu HT, Lin JC (2000) Supply and removal sediment in a landslide dominated mountain belt: central range, Taiwan. J Geol 108:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufschimidt G, Crozier MJ (2008) Evolution of natural risk: analysing changing landslide hazard in Wellington, Aotearoa/New Zealand. Nat Hazards 45:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Colombia. Can Geotech J 36:224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imaizumi F, Sidle RC (2007) Linkage of sediment supply and transport processes in Miyagawa Dam catchment, Japan. J Geophys Res 112:F03012. doi:10.1029/2006JF000495

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman DL, Jenkins SA (1999) Climate change and the episodicity of sediment flux of small California Rivers. J Geol 107:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan CD, Chen CL (2005) Debris flow caused by Typhoon Herb in Taiwan. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 539–563

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (1994) The importance of earthquake-induced landslides to long-term slope erosion and slope-failure hazards in seismically active regions. Geomorphology 10:265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S (2009) Characterization of soil moisture responses on a hillslope to sequential rainfall events during late autumn and spring. Water Resour Res 45:W09425. doi:10.1029/2008WR007239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Petrow T, Mueller M, Merz B (2005) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures-lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 25:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavé J, Burbank D (2004) Denudation processes and rates in the transverse ranges, southern California: erosional response of a transitional landscape to external and anthropogenic forcing. J Geophys Res 109:F01006. doi:10.1029/2003JF000023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2004) Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the universal soil loss equation and geographic information system: a case study at Boun, Korea. Environ Geol 45:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin GW, Chen H (2012) The relationship of rainfall energy with landslides and sediment delivery. Eng Geol 125:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CW, Liu SH, Lee SY, Liu CC (2006) Impacts of the Chi–Chi earthquake on subsequent rainfall-induced landslides in central Taiwan. Eng Geol 86:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JJ (2004) Posteruption suspended sediment transport at Mount St. Helens: decadal-scale relationships with landscape adjustment and river discharges. J Geophys Res 109:F01002, doi:10.1029/2002JF000010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud BD, Turcotte DL (1999) Self-organized criticality applied to natural hazards. Nat Hazards 20:93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meusburger K, Steel A, Panagos P, Montanarella L, Alewell C (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall erosivity factor for Switzerland. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri A, Shah F, Annandale GW, Dinar A (2003) Reservoir conservation, the RESCON approach, vol I. World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J, Buchorithner MF (2012) Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess 184:715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renerd KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate R-factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Skilodimou HD, Loupasakis C, Bathrellos GD (2013) Application of the revised universal soil loss equation model on landslide prevention. An example from N. Euboea (Evia) Island Greece. Environ Earth Sci 70:3255–3266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby MJ (1985) Earth’s changing surface. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivrikaya O, Kilic AM, Yalcin MG, Aykamis AS, Sonmez M (2008) The 2001 Adana landslide and its destructive effects, Turkey. Environ Geol 54:1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatard L, Grasso JR, Helmstetter A, Garambois S (2010) Characterization and comparison of landslide triggering in different tectonic and climatic settings. J Geophys Res 115:F04040. doi:10.1029/2009JF001624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Agency (2011) The project of the conservation in Tseng-Wen, Nanhua, and Wusanto reservoirs and the stable water supply in southern Taiwan ROC, Taiwan

  • Wischmeir WH, Smith DD (1965) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains—guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. Agriculture Handbook No. 282, USDA, Washington

  • Wischmeir WH and Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537, USDA, Washington

  • Yang SY, Jan CD, Haung WS, Tseng KH (2010) Application of hourly rainfall data to estimate the rainfall erosion index. J Chin Soil Water Conserv 41(3):189–199 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin S, Xie Y, Nearing MA, Wang C (2007) Estimation of rainfall erosivity using 5- to 60-minute fixed-interval rainfall data from China. Catena 70:306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under the Grant No. MOST 103-2625-M-006-008 and MOST 104-2221-E-006-053-MY3. Anonymous reviewers, and the Associate Editor provided constructive comments that improved the quality and clarity of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ssu-Yao Yang.

Appendix 1: Rainfall erosivity factor

Appendix 1: Rainfall erosivity factor

Traditional rainfall erosivity factor R is evaluated using long period of rainfall data with 15-min or smaller resolution (Wischmeir and Smith 1965, 1978). However, in many cases, the hourly rainfall data are more available and convenient, compared with rainfall data with 15-min or smaller resolution. The hourly rainfall data are used to evaluate the rainfall erosivity factor as well as other rainfall parameters in this study. The rainfall erosivity factor evaluated by using hourly rainfall data is denoted as R hr for distinguishing R that is evaluated from the rainfall data with 15-min or smaller resolution. Therefore, for a rainfall event, R hr is the product of rainfall kinetic energy and maximum hourly rainfall intensity:

$$R_{hr} = E \times I_{hr}$$
(9)

where E is the kinetic energy of a rainfall event (MJ/ha) and I hr is the maximum hourly rainfall intensity (mm/h). In practice, the kinetic energy is usually expressed in a discrete form as:

$$E = \sum\limits_{j}^{n} {e_{j} P_{j} }$$
(10)

where n is the number of segments in an event-based hyetograph of rainfall, e j is the rainfall energy per unit rainfall for the jth segment, and P j is the rainfall amount for the jth segment. The rainfall energy per unit rainfall e j depends on the size and terminal velocity of the raindrops, both of which are related to rainfall intensity. Foster et al. (1981) proposed a function for rainfall intensity as:

$$e_{j} = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0.119 + 0.0873\log I_{j} & {\text{ if }}I_{j} \le 76{\text{ mm/h}} \hfill \\ 0.283 & {\text{ if }}I_{j} > 76{\text{ mm/h }} \hfill \\ \end{array} \right.$$
(11)

where I j is the rainfall intensity (mm/h) calculated using the following formula:

$$I_{j} = \frac{{P_{j} }}{{\Delta t_{j} }}$$
(12)

where Δt j is the time interval of a segment of the rainfall event hyetograph (mm). Δt j  = 1 h for hourly rainfall data in this study. The total rainfall erosivity factor R hr for a given period having M rainfall events is evaluated by the linear summation approach, i.e.,

$$R_{hr} = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{M} {(R_{hr} )_{j} }$$
(13)

According to Yang et al. (2010), the annual rainfall erosivity factor R hr evaluated from hourly rainfall data is about 2/3 of the annual rainfall erosivity factor R evaluated from rainfall data of 10 min resolution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jan, CD., Yang, SY., Su, YW. et al. Investigation about rainfall-induced shallow landslides in CYL and TWR watersheds, Taiwan. Environ Earth Sci 75, 898 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5215-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5215-8

Keywords

Navigation