Skip to main content
Log in

Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2010

Abstract

The state of knowledge and resources available to issue alerts of precipitation-induced landslides vary across the USA. Federal and state agencies currently issue warnings of the potential for shallow, rapidly moving landslides and debris flows in a few areas along the Pacific coast and for areas affected by Atlantic hurricanes. However, these agencies generally lack resources needed to provide continuous support or to expand services to other areas. Precipitation thresholds that form the basis of landslide warning systems now exist for a few areas of the USA, but the threshold rainfall amounts and durations vary over three orders of magnitude nationwide and over an order of magnitude across small geographic areas such as a county. Antecedent moisture conditions also have a significant effect, particularly in areas that have distinct wet and dry seasons. Early warnings of shallow landslides that include specific information about affected areas, probability of landslide occurrence, and expected timing are technically feasible as illustrated by a case study from the Seattle, WA area. The four-level warning scheme (Null, Outlook, Watch, Warning) defined for Seattle is based on observed or predicted exceedance of a cumulative precipitation threshold and a rainfall intensity–duration threshold combined with real-time monitoring of soil moisture. Based on analysis of historical data, threshold performance varies according to precipitation characteristics, and threshold exceedance corresponds to a given probability of landslide occurrence. Experience in Seattle during December 2004 and January 2005 illustrates some of the challenges of providing landslide early warning on the USA West Coast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum RL (2007) Landslide warning capabilities in the United States—2006. Proceedings of the 1st North America Landslide Conference, Vail, Colorado, June 3–8, 2007, pp 1–13, Association of Engineering Geologists Special Publication 23, CD-ROM

  • Baum RL, Chleborad AF, Schuster RL (1998) Landslides triggered by the winter 1996–97 storms in the Puget Lowland, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-239

  • Baum RL, Coe JA, Godt JW, Harp EL, Reid ME, Savage WZ, Schulz WH, Brien DL, Chleborad AF, McKenna JP, Michael JA (2005a) Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA. Landslides 2(4):266–279. doi:10.1007/s10346-005-0023-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum RL, Godt JW, Harp EL, McKenna JW, McMullen SR (2005b) Early warning of landslides for rail traffic between Seattle and Everett, Washington, USA. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (eds) Landslide risk management. Proceedings of the International Conference on Landslide Risk Management, Vancouver, Canada, May 30–June 3, 2005. Balkema, New York, pp 731–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum RL, Godt JW, Savage WZ (2008) TRIGRS—a Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability analysis, version 2.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2008-1159, pp 75

  • Brabb EE, Colgan JP, Best TC (2000) Map showing inventory and regional susceptibility for Holocene debris flows, and related fast-moving landslides in the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map 2329

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr Ann 62A:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RH (1975) Soil slopes, debris flows, and rainstorms in the Santa Monica Mountains and vicinity, southern California. U.S. Geol Surv Prof Pap 851

  • Cannon SH (1988) Regional rainfall-threshold conditions for abundant debris-flow activity. In: Ellen SD, Wieczorek GF (eds) Landslides, floods, and marine effects of the storm of January 3–5, 1982, in the San Francisco Bay region, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434. USGS, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Ellen SD (1985) Rainfall conditions for abundant debris avalanches, San Francisco Bay region, California. Calif Geol 38(12):267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE (2005) Wildfire-related debris flow from a hazards perspective. In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Holland-Sears A, Thurston BM, Gleason JA (2003) Debris flow response of basins burned by the 2002 Coal Seam and Missionary Ridge Fires, Colorado. In: Boyer DD, Santi PM, Rogers WP (eds) Engineering geology in Colorado—contributions, trends, and case histories (AEG Special Publication 14 on CD-ROM). Association of Engineering Geologists, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Michael JA (2007) Methods for the emergency assessment of debris-flow hazards from basins burned by the fires of 2007, southern California. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007–1384, pp 10

  • Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Wilson RC, Bowers JC, Laber JL (2008) Storm rainfall conditions for floods and debris flows from recently burned areas in southwestern Colorado and southern California. Geomorphology 96:250–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RKS, Pang PLR, Pun WK (2003) Recent developments in the landslip warning system in Hong Kong. In: Proceedings of the 14th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference. Balkema, Lisse, The Netherlands

  • Chleborad AF (1998) Use of air temperature data to anticipate the onset of snowmelt-season landslides. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-0124

  • Chleborad AF (2000) A method for anticipating the occurrence of precipitation-induced landslides in Seattle, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-469

  • Chleborad AF (2003) Preliminary evaluation of a precipitation threshold for anticipating the occurrence of landslides in the Seattle, Washington, area. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-463

  • Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JW (2006) Rainfall thresholds for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, area—exceedance and probability. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1064

  • Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JW (2008) A prototype system for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, Area. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area: Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 103–120. doi:10.1130/2008.4020(06)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe JA, Kinner DA, Godt JW (2008) Initiation conditions for debris flows generated by runoff at Chalk Cliffs, central Colorado. Geomorphology 96:270–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovelli RA, Coe JA (2009) Probabilistic estimation of numbers and costs of future landslides in the San Francisco Bay region. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards. doi:10.1080/17499510802713123

  • DOGAMI (2005) Oregon’s debris-flow warning system and how it works. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. http://www.oregongeology.com/sub/Landslide/debrisflow.htm. Accessed 8 Apr 2009

  • Fleming RW, Taylor FA (1980) Estimating the costs of landslide damage in the United States: U.S. Geol Surv Circ 832

  • Gerstel WJ, Brunengo MJ, Lingley WS, Logan RL, Shipman H, Walsh TJ (1997) Puget Sound bluffs: the where, why, and when of landslides following the holiday 1996/97 storms. Wash Geol 25:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraud RE (2005) Recent fire-related debris flows in northern Utah—causes, impacts, risk reduction, and lessons learned. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 37(7):36

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, McKenna JP (2008) Numerical modeling of rainfall thresholds for shallow landsliding in the Seattle, Washington, area. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area: Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 121–135. doi:10.1130/2008.4020(07)

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, Baum RL, Chleborad AF (2006) Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA. Earth Surf Processes Landf 31:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, Schulz WH, Baum RL, Savage WZ (2008) Modeling rainfall conditions for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area: Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 137–152. doi:10.1130/2008.4020(08)

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW, Baum RL, Lu N (2009) Landsliding in partially saturated materials. Geophys Res Lett 36:L02403 5pp. doi:10.1029/2008GL035996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harp EL, Michael JA, Laprade WT (2008) Shallow landslide hazard map of Seattle, Washington. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Engineering geology and landslides of the Seattle, Washington, area: Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 67–82. doi:10.1130/2008.4020(04)

    Google Scholar 

  • Highland LM (2006) Estimating landslide losses—preliminary results of a seven-state pilot project. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1032

  • Highland LM, Baum RL, Cannon SH, Cockrell NJ, Dean AM, Lyttle P (2009) “Did you see it?” A website to collect reports of landslide occurrence in the United States from the public and practitioners. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 41(7):254

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister RJ, Miller DJ, Mills KA, Hinkle JC, Beier AE (2002) GIS overview map of potential rapidly moving landslide hazards in western Oregon, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Interpretive Map Series IMS-22

  • Jibson RW (1989) Debris flows in southern Puerto Rico. In: Schultz AP, Jibson RW (eds) Landslide processes of the eastern United States and Puerto Rico. Geological Society of America Special Paper 236. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 29–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW (2005) Landslide hazards at La Conchita, California. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2005-1067

  • Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM III, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238(13):921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laprade WT, Kirkland TE, Nashem WD, Robertson CA (2000) Seattle landslide study. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Internal Report W-7992–01. http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/landslide/study/. Accessed 8 Apr 2009

  • Larsen MC, Simon A (1993) A rainfall intensity–duration threshold relation for landslides in a humid-tropical environment, Puerto Rico. Geogr Ann 75A(1 2):13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los Angeles Times [Chong J, Renaud J, Ailsworth E] (2004) Flash floods wash away lives, dreams. Los Angeles Times, Jan 3, 2004, B-1

  • McCarter MK, Kaliser BN (1985) Prototype instrumentation and monitoring programs for measuring surface deformation associated with landslide processes. In: Bowles DS (ed) Delineation of landslide, flash flood, and debris flow hazards in Utah. Proceedings of a specialty conference. General Series, Utah Water Research Laboratory G85-3. Utah State University, Logan, pp 30–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Menounos B (1994) Alpine debris flows within the Indian Peak Wilderness, Colorado’s Front Range; AGU 1994 fall meeting. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 75(44, Suppl):273

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills KA (2002) Oregon’s debris flow warning system. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 34(5):25

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Schmidt KM, Greenberg HM, Dietrich WE (2000) Forest clearing and regional landsliding. Geology 28(4):311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA-USGS Debris-Flow Task Force (2005) NOAA-USGS Debris-Flow Warning System—final report. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1283

  • Radbruch-Hall DH, Colton RB, Davies WE, Lucchitta I, Skipp BA, Varnes DJ (1982) Landslide overview map of the conterminous United States U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1183

  • Reid ME, Baum RL, LaHusen RG, Ellis WL (2008) Capturing landslide dynamics and hydrologic triggers using near-real-time monitoring. In: Chen Z, Zhang J, Li Z, Wu F, Ho K (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes from the past to the future. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Landslides and Engineered Slopes, 30 June–4 July 2008, Xi’an, China, v. 1. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo P, Cannon SH, Laber J, Jorgensen DP, Werner K (2009) NOAA/USGS demonstration flash-flood and debris-flow early-warning system for recently burned areas in Southern California, USA. 7th International Conference on Geomorphology. Australia, July 2009

  • Rossi M, Peruccacci S, Guzzetti F (2006) A review of rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides. Geophys Res Abstr 8:02323

    Google Scholar 

  • Salciarini D, Godt JW, Savage WZ, Baum RL, Conversini P (2008) Modeling landslide recurrence in Seattle, Washington, USA. Eng Geol 102(3–4):227–237. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz WH (2007) Landslide hazards revealed by LIDAR imagery, Seattle, Washington. Eng Geol 89(1–2):67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster RL (1996) Socioeconomic significance of landslides. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Special Report 247. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, p 675

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs DW (1974) Landslides in Seattle. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 52

  • USGS (2005) A NOAA–USGS demonstration flash-flood and debris-flow early-warning system. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2005-3104

  • Wieczorek GF (1987) Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on debris flows on the central Santa Cruz mountains, California. In: Costa JE, Wieczorek GF (eds) Debris flows/avalanches—processes, recognition, and mitigation. Rev Eng Geol 7. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Sarmiento J (1983) Significance of storm intensity–duration for triggering debris flows near La Honda, California [abs]. Geol Soc Am Abstr Progr 15(5):289

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Sarmiento J (1988) Rainfall, piezometric levels, and debris flows near La Honda, California, in storms between 1975 and 1983. In: Ellen SD, Wieczorek GF (eds) Landslides, floods, and marine effects of the storm of January 3–5, 1982, in San Francisco Bay region, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434. USGS, Washington, DC, pp 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Glade T (2005) Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Ellen SD, Lips EW, Cannon SH, Short DN (1983) Potential for debris flow and debris flood along the Wasatch Front between Salt Lake City and Willard, Utah, and measures for their mitigation. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 83-635:25

  • Wieczorek GF, Lips EW, Ellen SD (1989) Debris flows and hyperconcentrated floods along the Wasatch Front, Utah, 1983 and 1984. Assoc Eng Geol Bull 26(2):191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Morgan BA, Campbell RH (2000) Debris-flow hazards in the Blue Ridge of central Virginia. Environ Eng Geosci 6(1):3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley TJ (2000) Relationship between rainfall and debris flows in western Oregon. Oregon Geol 62(2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC (1997) Operation of a landslide warning system during the California storm sequence of January and February 1993. In: Larson RA, Slosson JE (eds) Reviews in engineering geology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC (2000) Climatic variations in rainfall thresholds for debris-flow activity. In: Claps P, Siccardi F (eds) Mediterranean storms. Proceedings of the EGS Plinius Conference on Mediterranean Storms, Maratea, Italy. Bios, Cosenza, pp 415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC (2004) The rise and fall of a debris-flow warning system for the San Francisco Bay Region, California. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, New York, pp 493–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC, Wieczorek GF (1995) Rainfall thresholds for initiation of debris flows at La Honda, California. Environ Eng Geosci 1(1):11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RC, Jayko AS (1997) Preliminary maps showing rainfall thresholds for debris-flow activity, San Francisco Bay region, California. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-745F

  • Wilson RC, Torikai JD, Ellen SD (1992) Development of rainfall warning thresholds for debris flows in the Honolulu District. U. S. Geological Survey, Report OF 92-0521

  • Wilson RC, Mark RK, Barbato G (1993) Operation of a real-time warning system for debris flows in the San Francisco Bay area, California. In: Shen HW, Su ST, Wen F (eds) Hydraulic Engineering’93: Proceedings of the 1993 Conference, vol 2. Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco, pp 1908–1913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten RM, Gillon KA, Witt AC, Latham RS, Douglas TJ, Bauer JD, Fuemmeler SJ, Lee LG (2008) Geologic, geomorphic and meteorological aspects of debris flows triggered by hurricanes Frances and Ivan during September 2004 in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of Macon County, North Carolina (southeastern USA). Landslides 5(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dennis Staley and Ray Wilson of the US Geological Survey and two anonymous reviewers provided constructive reviews of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rex L. Baum.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0204-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baum, R.L., Godt, J.W. Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA. Landslides 7, 259–272 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0

Keywords

Navigation