Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

EFL Teachers’ Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy: A Study of its Impact on Students’ Emotional States, Cognitive Learning, and Burnout

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective teacher–student interaction is an essential element of an ideal classroom which promotes the opportunity for expanded learning and stimulates the connections between students and teacher. The focus of the present study is on an instructional communication element that is teacher immediacy. It is defined as the mutual sensory and psychological stimulation between teacher and students. It can be verbal or nonverbal. Verbal immediacy is characterized as stylistic differences in expression from which like–dislike is inferred and includes using humor or personal examples, getting feedback, or even calling students by name. Nonverbal immediacy encompasses behaviors such as appropriate eye contact, the use of gestures, movement about the classroom, smiling, and vocal variety. In particular, the present study sought to explore the impact of English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ perceived verbal/nonverbal immediacy on students’ self-actualization, stress-control, and self-esteem. Moreover, it examined the role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ cognitive learning and emotional exhaustion, which is a burnout subscale. To this end, 206 EFL students participated from selected universities of Mashhad, a city in northeast of Iran. The respondents were asked to complete five inventories about themselves and the previous EFL teacher they had had classes with. The results of structural equation modeling demonstrated that teacher immediacy behavior had a positive significant impact on all student-related variables: stress tolerance (β = .65, t = 7.59), self-actualization (β = .69, t = 8.02), self-esteem (β = .63, t = 7.71), burnout (β = .31, t = 4.05), and cognitive learning (β = .45, t = 6.08). The highest impact was exerted on self-actualization and self-esteem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional intelligence inventory (EQ-I): Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, S. G. (2015). The effects of teacher immediacy and student burnout on empowerment and resistance among Turkish pre-service teachers. Learning and Individual Differences, 40(2), 170–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calero, H. H. (2005). The power of nonverbal communication: How you act is more important than what you say. Aberdeen: Silver Lake Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44(4), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comadena, M. E., Hunt, S. K., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24(3), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A. N., & Schrodt, P. (2012). Students’ perceived understanding mediates the effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on learner empowerment. Communication Education, 61(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). De -motivators and their association with burnout and language achievement in an Iranian EFL context. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 7(3), 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanizadeh, A., & Moafian, F. (2010). The role of EFL teachers’ emotional intelligence in their success. ELT Journal, 64(4), 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanizadeh, A., & Royaei, N. (2015). Emotional facet of language teaching: Emotion regulation and emotional labor strategies as predictors of teacher burnout. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 10(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2015.1113847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivtzan, I., Gardner, H. E., Bernard, I., Sekhon, M., & Hart, R. (2013). Wellbeing through self-fulfilment: Examining developmental aspects of self-actualization. The Humanistic Psychologist, 41(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahedizadeh, S., Ghanizadeh, A., & Ghonsooly, B. (2016). The role of EFL learners’ demotivation, perceptions of classroom activities, and mastery goal in predicting their language achievement and burnout. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0021-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E. (1995). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58(1), 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. J. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., & Mottet, T. P. (2011). The effect of instructor nonverbal immediacy behaviors and feedback sensitivity on Hispanic students’ affective learning outcomes in ninth-grade writing conferences. Communication Education, 60(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P. (2013). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62(1), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., McKenna-Buchanan, T. P., Quinlan, M. M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The dark side of emotion in the classroom: Emotional processes as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student negative emotions. Communication Education, 63(3), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45(3), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages (Vol. 8). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (2009). Nonverbal communication (3rd ed.). Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messman, S., & Jones-Corley, J. (2001). Effects of communication environment, immediacy, and communication apprehension on cognitive and affective learning. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. (2002). Relationships between teacher nonverbal immediacy, student emotional response, and perceived student learning. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T. (2007). Rapport building in language instruction: A microanalysis of the multiple resources in teacher talk. Language and Education, 21(4), 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M. Y. (2016). Integrating rapport-building into language instruction: A study of Korean foreign language classes. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., Lee, S. A., Yun, D., & Kim, W. (2009). The impact of instructor decision authority and verbal and nonverbal immediacy on Korean student satisfaction in the US and South Korea. Communication Education, 58(2), 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39(3), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P. (2002) Teacher nonverbal immediacy: Use and outcomes. In J. L. Chesebro, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 65–82). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & Mccroskey, J. C. (1986). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 574–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45(4), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami, Z., Abedi, M. R., Schaufeli, W. B., Ahmadi, S. A., & Sadeghi, A. H. (2014). The psychometric characteristics of Maslach burnout inventory student survey: A study students of Isfahan University. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 16(9), 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santilli, V., Miller, A. N., & Katt, J. (2011). A comparison of the relationship between instructor nonverbal immediacy and teacher credibility in Brazilian and US classrooms. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Amaury, N., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titsworth, B. S. (2001). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational lecture cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language classroom: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velez, J. J., & Cano, J. (2012). Instructor verbal and nonverbal immediacy and the relationship with student self-efficacy and task value motivation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Oetzel, J. G., Gao, X., Wilcox, R. G., & Takai, J. (2007). A further test of immediacy-learning models: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

    Sadegh Gholamrezaee & Afsaneh Ghanizadeh

Authors
  1. Sadegh Gholamrezaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Afsaneh Ghanizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afsaneh Ghanizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gholamrezaee, S., Ghanizadeh, A. EFL Teachers’ Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy: A Study of its Impact on Students’ Emotional States, Cognitive Learning, and Burnout. Psychol Stud 63, 398–409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0467-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0467-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation