Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Blame Game Triangulation between Parents, Teachers and Children with Academic Problems

  • RESEARCH IN PROGRESS
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This cross-sectional survey on a sample of parent, teacher and child respondents (n = 195) elicited their perceptions on or about the ‘reasons/causes’ for academic problems in school students. A semi-structured ‘Demographic Data Sheet’ and another open ended exploratory ‘Causes of Academic Problems Interview Schedule’ (CAPIS) exclusively developed for this study was used. A classification of the ‘causes’ for academic problems into four categories by two independent observers revealed preponderance of ‘child-centered’ causes (N: 937), followed by ‘teacher-centered’ causes (N: 751), ‘parent-centered’ (N: 643) and ‘environment centered’ causes (N: 362). Analysis of trends show significant statistical differences in reported perceptions between the three respondents (p: < 0.04); with highest disparity between ‘teacher-centered’ causative perceptions (p: < 0.001). Concordance rates as measured by Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient is reflected by greater agreements on or about the reasons for academic problems between parent-teacher respondents (0.34) and least for child-teacher reports (−0.08). The results suggest an attitudinal triangulation on or about the reasons attributed for academic problems between parents, teachers and the children. This opens up the need for stepping up measures to de-triangulate or harmonize these varying inter personal perceptions for optimum benefit of such children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeurbach, E. R. (1989). Toward a social contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(2), 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K., Entwisle, D., & Dauber, S. (1994). On the success of failure: A reassessment on the effects of retention in the primary grades. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altermatt, E. R., Pomerantz, E. M., Ruble, D. N., Frey, K. S., & Greulich, F. K. (2002). Predicting changes in children’s self-perceptions of academic competence: A naturalistic examination of evaluative discourse among classmates. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 903–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2006). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G. (2000). Factors influencing first year students success in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aysan, F., Tanriogen, G., & Tanriogen, A. (1996). Perceived causes of academic failure among the students at the faculty of education at Buca: Technical research report. Izmir, Turkey: Dokuz Eylul University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borich, G. D., & Tombari, M. L. (1997). Education psychology: A contemporary approach (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweietzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosco, J. P., Perez, T., Guerra, V., Spar, D., & Levy-Jaffe, J. (2004). Screening for academic problems in school age children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25(5), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed., p. 254). Routledge: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. (1999). Linking parental involvement with student achievement: Do race and income matter. Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworking, P. H. (1989). School failure. Pediatric Review, 10(1), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easten, L. (2002). Lessons from Learners. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, D. S. (1971). Parental Aspiration and the Educational Achievement of Children. Journal of Education Research, 14(1), 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, J. M., & Conboy, J. E. (2006). Secondary Student perceptions of factors effecting failure in science in Portugal. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R., Story, P. A., Kelley, K. N., & McMillan, J. H. (2009). What causes failure and success? Students’ perceptions of their academic outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 12(2), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 435–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, M., & Springer, S. (2002). Secondary student perceptions of their class activities regarding meaningfulness, challenge, choice and appeal: An initial validation study. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(1), 192–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H., & Weary, G. (1985). Attribution: Basic issues and applications. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerig, P. K. (1995). Triangles in the family circle: Effects of family structure on marriage, parenting, and child adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(1), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steibrenner, K., & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Donoghue, T., & Punch, K. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting (p. 78). Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P. P., Hechter, F. J., Menec, V. H., & Weinberg, L. H. (1993). Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: An attribution retraining perspective. Research in Higher Education, 34(6), 687–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayneri, L., & Gerber, B. (2004). Development of a student perceptions inventory. Roeper Review, 26(2), 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetti, R. L. (1996). The effects of perceived daily social and academic failure experiences on school-age children’s subsequent interactions with parents. Child Development, 67(1), 1467–1482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, H. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of academic failure in children. Health Administrator, 17(1), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy, J., Kapur, M., & Kaliaperumal, V. G. (1998). Psychological disturbances among 5–8 year old children: A study from India. Social Psychiatry and Epidemiology, 33(1), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 235–244). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teale, W. H. (1986). Home background and young children’s literacy development. In W. H. Teale & E. Edwad (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 33–39). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, N., Hsia, S., & Townsend, J. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ excuses for academic difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 28(2), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, S. (2004). Children with developmental disabilities: A training guide for parents, Teachers and caregivers. New Delhi: Sage (India) Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, S. (2010). Academic problems in primary school children enrolled under SSA-Karnataka: Study manual for master trainers. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, S., & Purusotham, P. (2006). Historical analysis on course and clinical presentations of children with learning disabilities in India. Disabilities and Impairments, 21(2), 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., Wiest, D., & Cusick, L. (2002). Perceptions of autonomy support, parent involvement, competence and self worth as predictors of motivational orientation and academic achievement: An examination of sixth and ninth grade regular education students. Adolescence, 37(146), 225–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinivasan Venkatesan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkatesan, S. Blame Game Triangulation between Parents, Teachers and Children with Academic Problems. Psychol Stud 56, 206–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0082-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0082-1

Keywords

Navigation