Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Changing Political Positions on Charitable Donations: A Case Study of a Political Scandal in South Korea

  • Article
  • Published:
The Review of Socionetwork Strategies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines whether political ideology switching by moderates mediates their charitable donations. Using the impeachment of Park Geun-hye, the former conservative president of South Korea, as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that the charitable donations of those who changed their political ideology from moderate to progressive after the corruption scandal increased by 16.8–17.9%. A battery of robustness tests supports the basic results. These findings imply that political scandals can affect moderates’ charitable behavior through the channel of political ideology switching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets are available from the Korea Institute of Public Finance, https://www.kipf.re.kr/panel/.

Notes

  1. This is based on raw data (2001–2019) from the Center for Philanthropy, the Beautiful Foundation.

  2. According to the press, Ms. Choi even managed the president’s schedules.

  3. The Candlelight Movement was a sustained series of protests that took place from November 2016 to March 2017. The protests were organized by a coalition of over 1,500 civic organizations motivated by the President Park scandal. The protests were largely peaceful and characterized by their use of social media [20].

  4. As shown in Fig. 1, a larger proportion of moderates changed their position to progressivism after the political scandal, but others maintained their ideology.

  5. Several factors may constitute the underlying mechanisms. According to Farmer et al. (2020), progressives who subscribe to a social justice viewpoint tend to help many people.

References

  1. Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maier, J. (2011). The impact of political scandals on political support: An experimental test of two theories. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. von Sikorski, C., Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2020). How political scandals affect the electorate. Tracing the eroding and spillover effects of scandals with a panel study. Political Psychology, 41(3), 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Keith, B. E., Magleby, D. B., Nelson, C. J., Orr, E. A., & Westlye, M. C. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics: How American disdain for parties leads to political inaction. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Webster, S. W., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017). The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the US electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forbes, K. F., & Zampelli, E. M. (2013). The impacts of religion, political ideology, and social capital on religious and secular giving: Evidence from the 2006 Social Capital Community Survey. Applied Economics, 45(17), 2481–2490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yen, S. T., & Zampelli, E. M. (2014). What drives charitable donations of time and money? The roles of political ideology, religiosity, and involvement. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50, 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P. A., Van Doesum, N. J., & Pollet, T. V. (2019). What are the most powerful predictors of charitable giving to victims of Typhoon Haiyan: Prosocial traits, socio-demographic variables, or eye cues? Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks, A. C. (2004). Faith, secularism, and charity. Faith & Economics, 43(Spring), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks, A. C. (2007). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism–America’s charity divide–Who Gives, who doesn’t, and why it matters. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2017). Partisan differences in nonpartisan activity: The case of charitable giving. Political Behavior, 39(4), 839–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farmer, A., Kidwell, B., & Hardesty, D. M. (2020). Helping a few a lot or many a little: Political ideology and charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 614–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, Y. (2021). Politics, religion, and tax incentives for charitable giving in South Korea. The Korean Economic Review, 37(1), 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, Y. (2023). Effects of tax benefits on the price elasticity of charitable contributions in South Korea. Pacific Economic Review, 28(2), 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kato, H., Goto, T., & Kim, Y. (2023). Tax-Price Elasticities of Charitable Giving and Selection of Declaration: Panel Study of South Korea, (No. 23–05).

  18. Jung, H. (2022). Examining the relationship between political spending and legislative activities. Bulletin of Economic Research, 74(2), 539–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, Y. S. (2018). Social media and rigid beliefs: Evidence from impeachment of the president. Available at SSRN 3252932.

  20. Kim, N. (2017). Candlelight and the yellow ribbon: Catalyzing re-democratization in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus, 15(14), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Number JP22K01528.

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(C), 22K01528, Youngrok Kim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngrok Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict or competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Jung, H. The Impact of Changing Political Positions on Charitable Donations: A Case Study of a Political Scandal in South Korea. Rev Socionetwork Strat 17, 145–154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-023-00141-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-023-00141-3

Keywords

Navigation