Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the cross-sectional and prospective associations between behavior and cognitive problems and malnutrition in long-term care facilities (LTCF).
Design
Cross-sectional and prospective routine care cohort study.
Setting
6874 Residents in Dutch LTCFs (period 2005–2020).
Participants
Data were obtained from the InterRAI-LTCF instrument. Cross-sectional analyses on prevalence of malnutrition at admission included 3722 residents. Prospective analyses studied incident malnutrition during stay (total follow-up time 7104 years) and included data of 1826 residents with first measurement on admission (‘newly-admitted’) and n=3152 with first measurement on average ∼1 year after admission (‘existing’).
Measurements
InterRAI scales for communication problems (CS), aggressive behavior (ABS), social engagement (RISE), depressive symptoms (DRS), cognitive performance (CPS) and the total number of behavior and cognitive problems were investigated as independent variables and malnutrition (ESPEN 2015 definition) as dependent variable in regression analyses. Results were stratified for gender and group ‘newly-admitted’ vs. ‘existing’.
Results
On admission, 9.5% of residents was malnourished. In men, low social engagement was associated with prevalence of malnutrition. In women, all behavior and cognitive problems except depression were associated with malnutrition in the unadjusted analyses, but this attenuated in the full model taking all problems into account. The incidence of malnutrition during stay amounted to 8.9%. No significant associations of behavior and cognitive problems with malnutrition incidence were seen in ‘newly-admitted’ male residents while in ‘existing’ male residents all determinants were significantly associated. In ‘newly-admitted’ female residents CS, ABS and CPS, and in ‘existing’ female residents CS, RISE, ABS and CPS were significantly associated with incident malnutrition. All associations slightly attenuated after adjustment. Malnutrition incidence increased with increasing number of combined behavior and cognitive problems.
Conclusion
Residents with behavior and cognitive problems are at an increased risk of being malnourished at admission, or becoming malnourished during stay in a LTCF, especially residents with multiple behavior and cognitive problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
The European population of 65 years and older is expected to increase from 19% nowadays, towards 28.5% in 2050 (1). Many European countries encourage ‘ageing-in-place’, whereby most older adults remain living in their own home and community with or without (informal) care (2). Ageing-in-place enables older adults to remain as autonomic, independent and (socially) active as possible (3, 4). Based on this policy, older adults only move to residential care facilities when their level of dependency is high and home-care is no longer sufficient (5).
Older adults with severe behavior and cognitive problems become affected in their (instrumental) activities of daily living (ADL) (6, 7), and this puts a high burden on formal and informal care at home (8). When people with advanced behavior and cognitive problems become fully care-dependent, they are more likely to become institutionalized (8–10).
While still living at home, the ability to perform grocery shopping and prepare meals is one of the first functions that is lost in older adults with cognitive decline, herewith increasing the risk of impaired food intake (6). Previous cross-sectional studies have shown a clear association between cognitive impairment and the presence of malnutrition, both in the community and during stay in a long term care facility (LTCF) (11–15). However, studies describing incident malnutrition during stay in a LTCF in residents suffering from behavior and cognitive problems are lacking.
We hypothesize that residents with behavior and cognitive problems are at increased risk to be already malnourished at admission to a LTCF, or to become malnourished during stay. Therefore, the aim is of this study is to describe the cross-sectional and long-term associations between behavior and cognitive problems at admission, malnutrition prevalence at admission and incident malnutrition during stay in a LTCF in a large population.
Methods
Data source
Data were obtained from InterRAI; a non-profit international multidisciplinary collaboration that aims to improve quality of life of older adults through systematic, accurate and standardized data collection of residents’ physical and psychosocial functioning (16). A specific assessment form was developed for each healthcare setting (17). The RAI Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCF) assessment form is a minimum data set (MDS) which includes nineteen sections, including residents’ nutritional, cognitive and psychosocial status. The assessment form is administered by trained nurses in interaction with the residents, their family members and other health professionals (17). Several studies have shown high validity and reliability of the assessment form (18–20).
Two groups were derived from residents admitted to a LTCF: the ‘newly admitted’ and the ‘existing’ residents. The newly admitted group had their first assessment taken place within one month after admission to a LTCF (‘admission assessment’); thereafter residents were monitored typically with quarterly or semi-annual follow-up assessments.
When a LTCF started using InterRAI, no ‘admission assessment’ was performed for the residents who were already living in that facility (‘existing’ residents). A ‘delayed first assessment’ was then noted as first measurement.
Dutch InterRAI subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) living in LTCF between 2005 and 2020 were included in this study. In total, 4190 residents with an ‘admission assessment’ were available, median time to first assessment was 16 days [IQR: 7–30] after admission. These residents represent ‘newly-admitted’ residents.
In contrast, the ‘existing’ residents are defined by having had their first measure after their initial admission. In total 5592 residents with a ‘delayed first assessment’ were available and this assessment took place with a median time of 345 [IQR: 117–914] days in male and 546 [IQR: 165–1363] days in female residents after their initial admission. Thus, the defining difference between the groups is the time elapsed between their admission and their first assessment, which was shorter in the newly admitted group and longer in the ‘existing’ residents’ group.
Inclusion criteria cross-sectional analyses
For the cross-sectional analyses, only data of ‘admission assessments’ were used (n=4190). Residents were included if data regarding malnutrition status were available. Exclusion criterion was presence of end-stage disease, i.e. terminally ill residents with a life expectancy <6 months as indicated by the treating physician, to exclude residents with incurable malnutrition. After exclusion, 3722 residents were available for analyses.
Inclusion criteria prospective analyses
For the prospective analyses, first assessment data of ‘newly-admitted’ residents as well as first assessment data of ‘existing’ residents and all subsequent follow-up measurements were used. Residents were included when they were not malnourished at their first available measurement and had one or more follow-up measurements where nutrition status was measured. Exclusion criterion was presence of end-stage disease at first or last measurement. After exclusion, 4978 residents were available for analyses.
Figure 1 provides an overview of the in- and exclusion process.
Measurements
We used the following InterRAI scales for behavior and cognitive problems as independent variables: Communication Scale (SC), Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), Depression Rating Scale (DRS), Revised Index of Social Engagement (RISE), Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS) and total number of behavioral-cognitive problems. Malnutrition based on the ESPEN 2015 criteria was used as dependent variable.
Communication Scale (CS)
The CS is a standardized questionnaire that assesses the communication performance of subjects living in a LTCF. It consists of two communication items (understanding others, making oneself self-understood). The scale provides a score ranging from 0 (good communication performance) till 8 (poorest communication performance) (21). No validated cut-off values are available for CS but previous research showed that a cut-off value of ≥3 will identify the 10% most severe cases with communication problems (22). The CS was dichotomized into good communication performance (CS ≤2) or moderate to severe impairment (CS ≥3).
Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS)
The CPS is a standardized and validated questionnaire containing five items (decision making, memory, disordered thinking, change in mental status, change in decision making) to assess cognitive performance of subjects living in a LTCF (23, 24). It provides a total score ranging from 0 (cognitive performance intact) till 6 (very severe cognitive impairment) (24). The CPS has been validated against the MMSE, whereby a CPS score of 2 equals a MMSE score of 19 (24). Therefore, the CPS scale was dichotomized into ≤2 and ≥3.
Depression Rating Scale (DRS)
The DRS is a standardized and validated screening questionnaire to screen for depressive symptoms in subjects living in a LTCF (25, 26). It includes seven depressive mood and behavioral indicators (negative statements, anger, unrealistic fears, health complaints, anxious complaints, sad expressions, crying). All indicators have possible scores of 0 (indicator not present during the past 30 days), 1 (indicator present 1 till 5 times a week) or 2 (indicator present 6 or 7 days a week), resulting in a total maximum score of 14. A total score ≥ 3 indicates a resident is at risk for depression (26). Therefore, this item was dichotomized in low (≤2) or high depression risk (≥3).
Revised Index of Social Engagement (RISE)
The RISE is a standardized and validated measure of social engagement of subjects living in a LTCF (27). It includes six dichotomous indicators of social engagement (initiating social interaction, accepting social interaction, activity participation, accepting invitations and facility involvement). The scale provides a score ranging from 0 (poor social engagement) till 6 (high social engagement) (27). Based on the original validation paper of RISE, a cut-off of ≤2 reflects a division between low- and high functioning people (28). Therefore, the RISE was dichotomized into low social engagement (RISE score ≤2) and high social engagement (RISE score ≥3). The high social engagement group (RISE score ≥3) was chosen as reference group in our analysis.
Aggressive behavior scale (ABS)
The ABS is a validated four-item scale based on the following items: verbal abuse, physical abuse, socially inappropriate behavior and resisting care (29). These items are coded as: not present (0), present in last three days (1), happened once or twice in three days (2) or daily (3). Based on the four items, scores range from 0–12, and higher scores indicate aggressive behavior. The ABS was dichotomized into no aggressive behavior (ABS=0) or aggressive behavior present (ABS ≥1) (29).
Total number of behavior and cognitive problems
Based on the dichotomized scores of the scales mentioned above, a sum score of CS, CPS, DRS, RISE, ABS was created, which indicated on how many of the behavioral-cognitive scales problems were identified (range 0–5).
Malnutrition
The primary end point of this study was malnutrition based on the ESPEN 2015 criteria; Body Mass Index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2, or weight loss (5% during last month or 10% in six months), in combination with a reduced age-specific BMI (< 20 kg/m2 < 70 years or < 22 kg/m2 ≥ 70 years) (30).
Covariables
Data on age, gender, living status before admission (together vs. alone) and number of underlying diseases were obtained from the RAI-LTCF Assessment Form.
Ethical considerations
InterRAI assessments are performed for clinical purposes as part of routine care. Data is de-identified and thereafter transferred to the InterRAI database at the Amsterdam University Medical Centres — Location VUmc. Residents are informed (by their practice nurse, through newsletters, posters and website) in general terms that their data can be used for research purposes. Residents can object against use of their data and an opt-out procedure is available therefore. The Ethical committee of VUmc approved the use of data for research in this way.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Descriptive statistics were stratified by nutritional status and gender. Normality was checked by QQ-plots and stem-and-leaf plots. Means with standard deviations were used to describe continuous variables and numbers and percentages for categorical data. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the associations between CPS, CS, DRS, RISE, ABS and total number of behavior and cognitive problems (independent variables), and malnutrition (dependent variable). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazard regression analyses were performed with malnutrition as event and CPS, CS, DRS, RISE, ABS, and total number of behavior and cognitive problems as independent variables. Time to event was defined as days between first available assessment and the first follow-up assessment where malnutrition occurred. If someone was categorized as malnourished, all further follow-up measurements were removed. Residents who stayed well-nourished during their total follow-up period were censored and event time ended at their latest available measurement. Kaplan-Meier curves provided a graphical evaluation of the proportional hazard assumption. As these assumptions were met, Cox Proportional Hazard regression analyses were performed.
Stratification for gender was based on the significance of interaction terms (behavior-cognitive problem * gender). In the cross-sectional analyses this interaction term was significant (p<0.10) (31) for RISE, CPS and total number of behavior-cognitive problems. In the prospective analyses, interaction terms for DRS and total number of behavior-cognitive problems were statistically significant.
Thereafter, we tested whether there was effect modification by type of first assessment in the prospective analyses (behavior-cognitive problem * type of first assessment). Significant interaction terms (p<0.10) (31) were seen for male gender (CS, DRS, ABS, CPS and total number of behavior-cognitive problems). Based on this number of significant interaction terms and the large differences in effect sizes between men/women and newly-admitted/existing residents, we decided to present four different strata (for illustration, see appendix 1 for additional Kaplan-Meier curves on CS).
As previous studies showed that malnutrition is related to very old age (≤ 90 years vs. ≥ 91 years) (32), number of comorbidities (≤1 vs. ≥2) (33, 34) and living status before admission (alone vs. together) (35), all regression analyses were adjusted for these variables (model 1). As most behavioral-cognitive problems are associated with each other, a full model was created which included in addition all five determinants (CS, DRS, RISE, ABS and CPS) (full model).
Results
Cross-sectional analysis
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 3722 included residents at LTCF admission. Most residents were women (67.6%), lived alone before admission (64.3%), were aged <90 years (81.9%) and their BMI was within the normal range (mean 24.7 kg/m2, SD 4.6). Prevalence rates of behavioral-cognitive problems ranged from 22.4% for aggressive behavior (ABS) to 27.8% for depression risk (DRS).
In total, 88 male residents (7.3%) and 266 (10.6%) female residents were malnourished at admission. In women, prevalence rates of malnutrition ranged from 12.5–13.5% for each of the behavior and cognitive problems. In male residents, malnutrition was lowest (6.5%) in residents with cognitive problems and highest (10.4%) in residents with low social engagement (table 2).
Bivariate analyses showed that CS, DRS, RISE and CPS were significantly associated with an increased odds of being malnourished in female residents. Adjustments for age, number of comorbidities and living status before admission had only minor influence (see appendix 2). In the full model associations attenuated, but a trend for higher prevalence of malnutrition in residents with behavior and cognitive problems remained. In men, only RISE was significantly associated with malnutrition. In women, a clear trend (p-value <0.001) was seen between having multiple behavioral-cognitive problems and prevalence of malnutrition. In male residents, this trend was not seen but power was low in this group.
Prospective analysis
As depicted in table 3, data of 4978 residents were available for the prospective analysis, 1826 with an ‘admission assessment’ (‘newly-admitted’ residents) and 3152 with a ‘delayed first assessment’ as reference assessment (‘existing’ residents). Most residents were women (71.3%), aged <90 years (78.5%), had ≥2 diseases (61.6%), and a mean BMI of 25.7 kg/m2. Nearly 1 out of 3 residents had depressive symptoms based on DRS (31.0%), other behavioral-cognitive problems ranged between 25.5–28.0%.
Total follow-up of all participants was 7104 residents’ years with a median individual follow up of 357 days. During this period, 17217 follow-up measurements were performed (including last assessment). Incident malnutrition occurred in 106 (7.4%) male residents and 337 (9.5%) female residents. Incident malnutrition per follow-up year was lowest in ‘existing’ male residents (0.052 per follow-up year) and highest in ‘newly-admitted’ female residents (0.071 per follow-up year).
As shown in table 4, none of the behavior and cognitive problems was significantly associated with incident malnutrition in ‘newly-admitted’ male residents (n=599). In contrast, in ‘existing’ male residents (n=831), all behavioral-cognitive problems were associated with incident malnutrition in the bivariate analyses. Like in the cross-sectional analysis, adjustments for age, number of comorbidities and living status before admission had little influence (appendix 2). In the full model a clear trend was seen for an increased risk of becoming malnourished for all behavior and cognitive problems, although only for DRS this was statistically significant (HR:1.72 [95%CI: 1.00–2.96]).
In women, small differences were seen between ‘newly-admitted’ (n=1227) and ‘existing’ residents (n=2321) (Table 4). In the bivariate analysis, all behavioral-cognitive problems (except DRS in both groups and RISE in ‘newly-admitted’ female residents) were significantly associated with incident malnutrition. In the full model, only communication problems remained independently associated with becoming malnourished in ‘newly-admitted’ female residents (CS HR:2.32 [95%CI: 1.40–3.86]). No clear trend was seen for the other behavior and cognitive problems.
Having more behavior and cognitive problems was related to a higher risk of becoming malnourished. In ‘newly-admitted’ male residents this was not observed, but in ‘existing’ male residents as well in both female groups this was observed (p-value test for trend <0.001). Especially in ‘existing’ male residents high HRs were observed, with HR’s ranging from 6.03–9.88 for 4–5 behavior and cognitive problems. In female residents, we found an increased risk of malnutrition in residents with 1–3 behavioral-cognitive problems (HR’s ranging from 1.05–1.66), and this was even stronger for residents with 4–5 problems (HR’s ranging from 2.71–3.55) (Table 4).
Discussion
Our results show that approximately 9.5% of all LTCF residents with behavior and cognitive problems are malnourished at admission and another 8.8% become malnourished during stay. The more behavior and cognitive problems, the higher the risk of developing malnutrition.
Our data indicate that behavior and cognitive problems are related with incident malnutrition in both men and women. For male residents in the cross-sectional and in the prospective analyses of ‘newly-admitted’ residents, no clear relation with malnutrition was seen for most behavior-cognitive problems. However, among ‘existing’ residents, a clear relation between behavior-cognitive problems and malnutrition was observed, indicating that the manifestation is later in men. In female residents, such a difference between ‘newly-admitted’ and ‘existing’ residents was not seen and their risk was more stable over time.
As was seen in the cross-sectional analyses, male residents are entering LTCFs in a better nutritional state compared to women. We hypothesize that this could be explained by the home situation before admission; women traditionally prepare meals, and take care of their husbands with behavioral-cognitive problems. The other way around is usually more problematic, as older men generally lack cooking skills (36). Male residents were more frequently living with a partner or children and might therefore have been better taken care of before admission to LTCF, and this may explain the lower malnutrition rates at admission. This effect seemed to decrease over time and malnutrition developed in male ‘existing’ residents as well. We thus suggest to take preventative measures in the first year after admission to LTCF.
Our statistical models showed attenuating associations when all behavior and cognitive problems were included. The attenuation of all effect-sizes within a model can only be explained by the presence of multiple behavioral-cognitive problems within one person. Indeed, most residents with behavior and cognitive problems had more than one problem, which reflects reality; the more problems, the higher the risk to be become malnourished. This may explain the observed loss of significance after including all problems in the model. Interventions to prevent malnutrition should therefore especially focus on residents with multiple behavior and cognitive problems.
The prevalence of malnutrition at admission in our sample was 9.5% which was lower compared to a recent meta-analysis (34) where 17.5% was malnourished. However, in the meta-analysis most studies assessed malnutrition during stay, which also includes long-stay residents. In addition, different definitions of malnutrition were used: the review was based on screening tool outcomes, while we used the ESPEN 2015 definition, which strongly relies on BMI. As BMI is relatively high in older adults, the ESPEN 2015 definition is thought to underestimate the prevalence of malnutrition (37). For incidence rates, the underestimation might be even stronger. During stay, residents with overweight/obesity are not likely to lose weight to the extent that they fall below the cut-off points from the ESPEN 2015 definition. Therefore, we suggest to implement the recently published GLIM criteria (38) in the InterRAI minimum dataset form in the future as these criteria rely less on BMI (37).
We decided not to adjust our analyses for BMI at first measurement. Within the ESPEN definition, a high BMI is protective for developing malnutrition in the future as one can only be categorized as malnourished by having a low age-specific BMI combined with recent weight loss, or by having a very low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2). In accordance with this definition, weight loss alone will not trigger these cut-off values in older adults with a high BMI. By adjusting for BMI at baseline, a potential real protective effect of BMI would have been removed, and lead to over-adjustment.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in a residential-care setting on the prospective associations between behavioral-cognitive problems and malnutrition. Two previous prospective studies in the community and sheltered-house setting reported significant associations between poor cognition and malnutrition (39, 40). In contrast, one study showed no such association but in this study a relatively high cut-off value for cognitive problems was used (MMSE<24) (41). Previous research on the association between depression and malnutrition showed contrasting results as a significant association was seen in Schilp et al. (41), but not in Mamhidir et al. (40). Neither study adjusted for other behavioral-cognitive problems, while we have shown that the combination of problems increases the risk.
For most behavior and cognitive problems, a stronger relation with malnutrition was seen in the prospective analysis compared to the cross-sectional analysis. This probably is because behavioral-cognitive problems are progressive over time (42–44), and this is thought to directly affect the risk of malnutrition i.e. the worse the condition of the resident, the higher the malnutrition risk. At admission, most residents still have mild or moderate cognitive problems (45) and consequences regarding malnutrition can easily be addressed by regular care (46). However, during stay, residents are known to further lose cognitive functions and to become more care dependent (47). Severe cognitive decline or dementia can even result in swallowing and chewing problems, and refusal to eat and drink (48). These problems require extensive individualized care. For daily care, we suggest to routinely check whether standard nutritional care is still sufficient in the light of someone’s cognitive decline or if more individualized care is needed.
Strengths and weaknesses
Strong points of our study were the large number of residents and large total follow-up years. The mean follow-up period per person of approximately one year may be relatively short for a prospective study on malnutrition, but is in accordance with the average length of stay in a LTCF. We excluded residents with end-stage disease, i.e. terminally ill residents with a life expectancy <6 months, at their first or last measurement to exclude residents with incurable malnutrition. In general, treatment of malnutrition in nursing homes, either curative or palliative, should be guided by the stage of life of residents and their personal wishes to be treated (49).
A weakness of our data may be the relative long interval between measurements. Unobserved changes in nutritional status may have taken place between two measurements. On the other hand, nutritional status of most persons is relatively stable. Furthermore, we used dichotomized outcomes for all behavior-cognitive problems as this better reflects the clinical situation. Note that for ABS four categories are described in the validation paper (0, 1–2, 3–5, ≥6) but we did not have enough power in the 3–5 and ≥6 category, hence we decided to dichotomize it in ABS problems present no/yes (ABS=0 vs. ABS ≥1) (29). Lastly, we used cognitive status at first available measurement as independent variable. Residents without behavior and cognitive problems at first assessment could have developed these problems during their stay. This could have led to an underestimation of the effect sizes.
Conclusion
Residents in LTCF with behavior and cognitive problems are at an increased risk of being malnourished at admission and to become malnourished during stay, and more specifically during long-term stay. Male residents with behavior and cognitive problems are in better nutritional condition at admission and seem to develop malnutrition in a later stage compared to female residents. This emphasizes the need of early identification and treatment of malnutrition in residents with behavioral-cognitive problems.
Availability of data and materials: The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to restrictions of the data owner (InterRAI) but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- LTCF:
-
Long-term care facility
- MDS:
-
minimum data set
- BMI:
-
body mass index
- CPS:
-
cognitive performance scale
- CS:
-
communication scale
- RISE:
-
revised index of social engagement
- DRS:
-
depressive rating scale
- ABS:
-
aggressive behavior scale
References
Eurostat. Ageing Europe. Looking at the Lives of Older People in the EU.; 2019.
WHO. The World Report on Ageing and Health.; 2015.
Iecovich E. Aging in place: From theory to practice. Anthropol Notebooks. 2014;20(1):21–33.
Roy N, Dubé R, Després C, Freitas A, Légaré F. Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PLoS One. 2018;13(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189266
Alders P, Schut FT. The 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands: Getting the financial incentives right? Health Policy (New York). 2019;123(3):312–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.010
Njegovan V, Man-Son-Hing M, Mitchell SL, Molnar FJ. The hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline in older persons. Journals Gerontol — Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(10):M638–643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.10.M638
Johnson S, Bacsu J, Abeykoon H, McIntosh T, Jeffery B, Novik N. No Place Like Home: A Systematic Review of Home Care for Older Adults in Canada. Can J Aging. 2018;37(4):400–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980818000375
Buhr GT, Kuchibhatla M, Clipp EC. Caregivers’ reasons for nursing home placement: Clues for improving discussions with families prior to the transition. Gerontologist. 2006;46(1):52–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.1.52
Gaugler J., Duval S, Anderson K., Kane RL. Predicting nursing home admission in the US: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7(1):13.
Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König HH, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2009;39(1):31–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp202
Fávaro-Moreira NC, Krausch-Hofmann S, Matthys C, et al. Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Based on Longitudinal Data. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(3):507–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.011254
O’Keeffe M, Kelly M, O’Herlihy E, et al. Potentially modifiable determinants of malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.007
Verbrugghe M, Beeckman D, Van Hecke A, et al. Malnutrition and associated factors in nursing home residents: A cross-sectional, multi-centre study. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(3):438–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.008
Stange I, Poeschl K, Stehle P, Sieber CC, Volkert D. Screening for malnutrition in nursing home residents: Comparison of different risk markers and their association to functional impairment. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2013;17(4):357–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0021-z
Tamura K. B, Bell L. C, Masaki H. K, Amella J. E. Factors Associated With Weight Loss, Low BMI, and Malnutrition Among Nursing Home Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(9):649–655.
InterRAI. Organization The interRAI Organization: Who We Are Mission and Vision. https://www.interrai.org/organization/. Published 2021. Accessed May 10, 2021.
Gray LC, Berg K, Fries BE, et al. Sharing clinical information across care settings: The birth of an integrated assessment system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(71):6963–6971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-71
Boorsma M, Frijters DHM, Knol DL, Ribbe ME, Nijpels G, Van Hout HPJ. Effects of multidisciplinary integrated care on quality of care in residential care facilities for elderly people: A cluster randomized trial. CMAJ. 2011;183(11):E724–E732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101498
Hirdes JP, Ljunggren G, Morris JN, et al. Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: A 12-country study of an integrated health information system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(27):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-277
Kim H, Jung Y Il, Sung M, Lee JY, Yoon JY, Yoon JL. Reliability of the interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF) and interRAI Home Care (HC). Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(2):220–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12330
Frederiksen K, Tariot P, De Jonghe E. Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) scores compared with scores from five rating scales. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44(3):305–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00920.x
Guthrie DM, Davidson JGS, Williams N, et al. Combined impairments in vision, hearing and cognition are associated with greater levels of functional and communication difficulties than cognitive impairment alone: Analysis of interRAI data for home care and long-term care recipients in Ontario. PLoS One. 2018;13(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192971
Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, Koch GG, Mitchell CM, Phillips CD. Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: Agreement with the mini-mental state examination. Journals Gerontol — Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(2):128–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50A.2.M128
Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, et al. MDS cognitive performance scale. Journals Gerontol. 1994;49(4):174–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.4.M174
Anderson RL, Buckwalter KC, Buchanan RJ, Maas ML, Imhof SL. Validity and reliability of the Minimun Data Set Depression Rating Scale (MDSDRS) for older adults in nursing homes. Age Ageing. 2003;32(4):435–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/32.4.435
Burrows AB, Morris JN, Simon SE, Hirdes JP, Phillips C. Development of a Minimum Data Set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age Ageing. 2000;29(2):165–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/29.2.165
Gerritsen DL, Steverink N, Frijters DHM, Hirdes JP, Ooms ME, Ribbe MW. A revised index for social engagement for long-term care. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008;34(4):40–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20080401-04
Resnick HE, Fries BE, Verbrugge LM. Windows to their world: The effect of sensory impairments on social engagement and activity time in nursing home residents. Journals Gerontol — Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997;52(3):S135–S144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.3.S135
Perlman CM, Hirdes JP. The aggressive behavior scale: A new scale to measure aggression based on the minimum data set. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(2):2298–2303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02048.x
Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R, et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition — An ESPEN Consensus Statement. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):335–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.001
Twisk J. Inleiding in De Toegepaste Biostatistiek. Loghum: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2017.
Gaskill D, Black LJ, Isenring EA, Hassall S, Sanders F, Bauer JD. Malnutrition prevalence and nutrition issues in residential aged care facilities. Australas J Ageing. 2008;27(4):189–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00324.x
Borkent J, Schuurman L, Beelen J, et al. What do screening tools measure? lessons learned from SCREEN II and SNAQ65+. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020.
Leij-Halfwerk S, Verwijs MH, van Houdt S, et al. Prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition risk in European older adults in community, residential and hospital settings, according to 22 malnutrition screening tools validated for use in adults >65 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.05.006
Streicher M, van Zwienen-Pot J, Bardon L, et al. Determinants of Incident Malnutrition in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A MaNuEL Multicohort Meta-Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(12):2335–2343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15553
Vesnaver E, Keller HH. Social influences and eating behavior in later life: A review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;30(1):2–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01639366.2011.545038
Clark AB, Reijnierse EM, Lim WK, Maier AB. Prevalence of malnutrition comparing the GLIM criteria, ESPEN definition and MST malnutrition risk in geriatric rehabilitation patients: RESORT. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(11):3504–3511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.015
Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition — A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002
Shatenstein B, Kergoat MJ, Nadon S. Weight change, nutritional risk and its determinants among cognitively intact and demented elderly Canadians. Can J Public Heal. 2001;92(2):143–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03404949
Mamhidir AG, Ljunggren G, Kihlgren M, Kihlgren A, Wimo A. Underweight, weight loss and related risk factors among older adults in sheltered housing — A Swedish follow-up study. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2006;10(4):255
Schilp J, Wijnhoven HAH, Deeg DJH, Visser M. Early determinants for the development of undernutrition in an older general population: Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Br J Nutr. 2011;106(5):708–717. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511000717
Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand M, Meillon C, Rullier L, et al. Cognitive decline after entering a nursing home: A 22-year follow-up study of institutionalized and noninstitutionalized elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(7):504–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.006
Zahodne LB, Ornstein K, Cosentino S, Devanand DP, Stern Y. Longitudinal relationships between alzheimer disease progression and psychosis, depressed mood, and agitation/aggression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23(2):130–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2013.03.014
Hackett RA, Steptoe A, Cadar D, Fancourt D. Social engagement before and after dementia diagnosis in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e220195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220195
Ulbricht CM, Rothschild AJ, Hunnicutt JN, Lapane KL. Depression and cognitive impairment among newly admitted nursing home residents in the USA. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(11):1172–1181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4723
Volkert D, Chourdakis M, Faxen-Irving G, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(6):1052–1073. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004
Helvik AS, Engedal K, Benth JŠ, Selbæk G. A 52 month follow-up of functional decline in nursing home residents — Degree of dementia contributes. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-45
Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, et al. The Clinical Course of Advanced Dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1529–1538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0902234
Druml C, Ballmer PE, Druml W, et al. ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(3):545–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006
Acknowledgement
None.
Funding
Funding: This project was funded by the Taskforce for Applied Research, part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), financed by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, project number RAAK.PUB06.O1O. The sponsor had no role in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis and preparation of paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contribution: All authors have read and approved the submission of this manuscript. Study concept and design: All authors. Acquisition of data: HvH. Analysis and interpretation of data: JB, HvH, EF, MdvdS. Drafting of the manuscript: All authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate: Assessments were performed for clinical purposes as part of routine care. After de-identification, data were transferred to the interRAI database at the Amsterdam University Medical Centres — Location VU University. An opt-out procedure was applied in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation. Older people were informed in general terms that their data could be used for research purposes by their practice nurses and through their practices’ newsletters, websites and posters in waiting rooms, and they had the possibility to object. The Ethical committee of VU approved the use of data for research in this way.
Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Competing interest: All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw179/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12603-022-1827-3/MediaObjects/12603_2022_1827_MOESM1_ESM.jpg)
12603_2022_1827_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Appendix 1, Odds/Hazard ratio’s for CPS, CS, DRS, RISE, ABS and total number of behavioral-cognitive problems in relation to malnutrition, stratified by gender
Rights and permissions
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Borkent, J.W., van Hout, H.P.J., Feskens, E.J.M. et al. Behavioral and Cognitive Problems as Determinants of Malnutrition in Long-Term Care Facilities, a Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study. J Nutr Health Aging 26, 749–759 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1827-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1827-3