Skip to main content
Log in

Disentangling the Relationship between Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity in Healthy Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cluster Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

Frailty and intrinsic capacity (IC) are distinct but interrelated constructs. Uncertainty remains regarding how they are related and interact to influence health outcomes. We aim to understand the relationship between frailty and IC by identifying subgroups based on frailty criteria and IC domains and studying one-year outcomes.

Methods

We studied 200 independent community-dwelling older adults (mean age 67.9±7.9 years, Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score 99±2.6). Frailty was defined by modified Fried criteria. Scores (range: 0–2) were assigned to individual IC domains (cognition, psychological, locomotion, and vitality) to yield a total IC score of 8. To identify subgroups, two-step cluster analysis was performed with age, frailty and IC domains. Cluster associations with one-year outcomes (frailty, muscle strength (grip strength, repeated chair stand test), physical performance (gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery), function (MBI) and quality-of-life (EuroQol (EQ)-5D)) were examined using multiple linear regression adjusted for age, gender and education.

Results

Three distinct clusters were identified — Cluster 1: High IC/Robust (N=74, 37%); Cluster 2: Intermediate IC/Prefrail (N=73, 36.5%); and Cluster 3: Low IC/Prefrail-Frail (53, 26.5%). Comparing between clusters, IC domains, cognition, depressive symptoms, nutrition, strength and physical performance were least impaired in Cluster 1, intermediate in Cluster 2 and most impaired in Cluster 3. At one year, the proportion transitioning to frailty or remaining frail was highest in Cluster 3 compared to Cluster 2 and Cluster 1 (39% vs 6.9% vs 2.8%, P<0.001). Compared to Cluster 1, Cluster 3 experienced greatest declines in grip strength (β=−4.1, P<.001), MBI (β=−1.24, P=0.045) and EQ-5D utility scores (β=−0.053, P=0.005), with Cluster 2 intermediate between Cluster 1 and Cluster 3.

Conclusions

Amongst independent community-dwelling older adults, IC is complementary to frailty measures through better risk-profiling of one-year outcomes amongst prefrail individuals into intermediate and high-risk groups. The intermediate group merits follow-up to ascertain longer-term prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020–2030. https://www.who.int/ageing/decade-of-healthy-ageing. Accessed June 13, 2021.

  2. Beard JR, Jotheeswaran AT, Cesari M, Araujo de Carvalho I. The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e026119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771–787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belloni G, Cesari M. Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity: Two Distinct but Related Constructs. Front Med. 2019;6:133. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chew J, Tay L, Lim JP, et al. Serum Myostatin and IGF-1 as Gender-Specific Biomarkers of Frailty and Low Muscle Mass in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(10):979–986. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1255-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300–307.e2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12(2):166–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/12.2.166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahadevan S, Lim PP, Tan NJ, Chan SP. Diagnostic performance of two mental status tests in the older chinese: influence of education and age on cutoff values. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(3):234–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(200003)15:3<234::aid-gps99>3.0.co;2-g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, et al. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutr Burbank Los Angel Cty Calif. 1999;15(2):116–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giudici KV, de Souto Barreto P, Beard J, et al. Effect of long-term omega-3 supplementation and a lifestyle multidomain intervention on intrinsic capacity among community-dwelling older adults: Secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MAPT study). Maturitas. 2020;141:39–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdin E, Subramaniam M, Vaingankar JA, Luo N, Chong SA. Measuring health-related quality of life among adults in Singapore: population norms for the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2013;22(10):2983–2991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0405-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benassi M, Garofalo S, Ambrosini F, et al. Using Two-Step Cluster Analysis and Latent Class Cluster Analysis to Classify the Cognitive Heterogeneity of Cross-Diagnostic Psychiatric Inpatients. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu T, Fang D, Chen J, Wang Y, Jeris C. A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In: KDD’ 01.; 2001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/502512.502549

  19. Rousseeuw P. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. 1987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7

  20. Finch CF, Stephan K, Shee AW, et al. Identifying clusters of falls-related hospital admissions to inform population targets for prioritising falls prevention programmes. Inj Prev. 2015;21(4):254–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, García-Chanes RE, González-Bautista E, Rosas-Carrasco O. Validation of Two Intrinsic Capacity Scales and Its Relationship with Frailty and Other Outcomes in Mexican Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(1):33–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1555-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prince MJ, Acosta D, Guerra M, et al. Intrinsic capacity as a framework for Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE); insights from the 10/66 Dementia Research Group cohort studies in Latin America, India and China. medRxiv. September 2019:19006403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/19006403

  23. George PP, Lun P, Ong SP, Lim WS. A Rapid Review of the Measurement of Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(6):774–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1622-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, García-Chanes RE, Pérez-Zepeda MU. Allostatic Load as a Biological Substrate to Intrinsic Capacity: A Secondary Analysis of CRELES. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):788–795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1251-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1487–1492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Woo J. Combating frailty and sarcopenia in aging populations: Switching to a more positive paradigm. Aging Med Milton NSW. 2019;2(1):7–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/agm2.12052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all participants who contributed to this study. This study was supported by the Lee Foundation Grant 2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Chew.

Ethics declarations

All participants provided written informed consent prior to taking part in the research study.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chew, J., Lim, J.P., Yew, S. et al. Disentangling the Relationship between Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity in Healthy Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cluster Analysis. J Nutr Health Aging 25, 1112–1118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1679-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1679-2

Key words

Navigation